Advertisement

Small-scale Forestry

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 327–345 | Cite as

Market Participation of the Local People in Non-timber Forest Products (NTFPs) in Omo Forest Reserve, Nigeria

  • Oluwakemi Adeola ObayeluEmail author
  • Lucy Adeteju Farinola
  • Abimbola Oluwayemisi Adepoju
Research Paper
  • 169 Downloads

Abstract

Marketing systems for non-timber forest products (NTFPs) have evolved over centuries and are culturally rooted in the traditional practices of local people. Relative to timber marketing, marketing of NTFPs has received little attention. This study assessed the NTFPs market participation behavior of people living in Omo Forest Reserve, Ogun State, Nigeria. Primary data were collected from 192 respondents using a multistage sampling procedure and were analyzed using descriptive statistics and a Heckman model. The decision to participate in NTFPs marketing increases with being a female, larger households, greater number of males and females aged 15–64, higher dependency ratios, and being married. Conversely, it decreases with older collectors, higher educational attainment, engagement in farming activities, higher non-farm income, higher per capita land size and farther market distance. Level of market participation was found to be positively and significantly influenced by being married, income from NTFPs, membership of forest users’ association and forest conservation. It is negatively and significantly influenced by being a male, age, household size, education level, livelihood diversification, non-farm income, transportation cost, per capita land size and average market distance.

Keywords

Marketable surplus Decision to participate Level of market participation Heckman model Socio-economic characteristics 

References

  1. Adhikari B (2004) Household characteristics and forest dependency: evidence from common property forest management in Nepal. Ecol Econ 48(2):245–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahenkan A, Boon E (2008) Enhancing food security, poverty reduction and sustainable forest management in Ghana through non-timber forest products farming: case study of Sefwi Wiawso District. GRIN Publishing at www.grin.com/de/preview/.html
  3. Ahenkan A, Boon E (2011) Non-timber forest products (NTFPs): clearing the confusion in semantics. J Human Ecol 33(1):1–9Google Scholar
  4. Aiyeloja AA, Ajewole OI (2006) Non-timber forest products’ marketing in Nigeria: a case study of Osun State. Educ Res Rev 1(2):52–58Google Scholar
  5. Alene AD, Manyong VM, Omanya G, Mignouna HD, Bokanga M, Odhiambo G (2008) Smallholder market participation under transaction costs: maize supply and fertilizer demand in Kenya. Food Policy 33(4):318–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Angelsen A, Jagger P, Babigumira R, Belcher B, Hogarth N, Bauch S, Borner J, Smith-Hall C, Wunder S (2014) Environmental income and rural livelihoods: a global-comparative analysis. World Dev 64:S12–S28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arabomen O, Ajewole OI (2012) Effects of commercial processing of selected non wood forest products on livelihood of rural dwellers and resource sustainability in Savanna eco-region of Oyo State. Unpublished Thesis of Department of Forest Resources Management, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, NigeriaGoogle Scholar
  8. Arnold JEM (2002) Clarifying the links between forests and poverty reduction. Int For Rev 4(3):231–233Google Scholar
  9. Asfaw A, Amare M, Davis B, Lipper L, Simutowe F (2010) Small holder market participation and rural poverty: evidence from Tanzania and Ethiopia. Working paperGoogle Scholar
  10. Boughton D, Mather D, Barrett C, Benfica R, Abdula D, Cunguara B (2007) Market participation by rural households in a low-income country: an asset-based approach applied to Mozambique. Faith Econ. SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1846745
  11. Cavendish W (2000) Empirical irregularities in the poverty-environment relationship of rural households: evidence from Zimbabwe. World Dev 28:1979–2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chilundika N (2011) Market participation of bean smallholder farmers in Zambia: a gender based approach. In: A research report presented to the department of agricultural economics and extension education of the University of Zambia in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Agricultural SciencesGoogle Scholar
  13. Cunningham LT, Brown BW, Anderson KB, Tostao E (2008) Gender differences in marketing styles. Agric Econ 38(1):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dyer GA, Boucher S, Taylor JE (2006) Subsistence response to market shocks. Am J Agric Econ 88(2):279–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Egbetokun OA, Omonona BT (2012) Determinants of farmers’ participation in food market in Ogun State. Glob J Sci Front Res Agric Vet Sci 12(9):24–30. journalofagriculture.org/index.php/GJSFR/article/view/40/40Google Scholar
  16. Ehui S, Benin S, Zelekawork P (2003) Policy options for improving market participation and sales of smallholder livestock producers: a case study of Ethiopia. In: Paper submitted to the 2nd EAF international conference on contemporary development issues in Ethiopia Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 11–13 July, 2003Google Scholar
  17. Fonta WM, Ichoku HE, Ayuk E (2009) The distributional impacts of forest income on household welfare in rural Nigeria. J Econ Sustain Dev. ISSN 2222-1700 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2855 (Online). www.iiste.org
  18. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2006) Can non-wood forest products help contribute to achieving the millennium development goals?. FAO, Rome, pp 2–14Google Scholar
  19. Food and Agricultural Organization (2011) Non-timber forest products use and management. technology scenarios in the Asia-Pacific forestry sector. Forestry Department. http://www.fao.org/docrep/w7715e07.htm
  20. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2016) Global forest resources assessment 2015: How are the world’s forests changing? In: Second edition food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, Rome, 2016. Retrieved on 4th Aug 2016. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4793e.pdf
  21. Gani BS, Adeoti AI (2011) Analysis of market participation and rural poverty among farmers in northern part of Taraba State, Nigeria. J Econ 2(1):23–36Google Scholar
  22. Gebremedhin B, Jaleta M (2010) Commercialization of smallholders: Does market orientation translate into market participation? improving productivity and market success (IPMS) of Ethiopian farmers project Working Paper 22. Nairobi, Kenya, ILRIGoogle Scholar
  23. Godoy R, Contreras M (2001) “A comparative study of education and tropical deforestation among lowland Bolivian Amerindians” Forest values, environmental externality, and school subsidies. Econ Dev Cult Change 49:555–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Godoy R, O’Neill K, Groff S, Kostishack P, Cubas A, Demmer J, McSweeney K, Overman J, Wilkie D, Brokaw N, Martinez M (1997) Household determinants of deforestation by Amerindians in Honduras. World Dev 25(6):977–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goetz SJ (1992) A selectivity model of household food marketing behaviour in sub-Saharan Africa. Am J Agric Econ 74(2):444–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Govereh J, Jayne TS, Nyoro J (1999) Smallholder commercialization, interlinked markets and food crop productivity: cross country evidence in eastern and southern Africa. http://www.aec.msu.edu/fs2/ag_transformation/atwgovereh.PDF
  27. Greene WH (2003) Econometric analysis. Macmillan Publishing Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Gunatilake HM (1998) The role of rural development in protecting tropica rainforest: evidence from Sri Lanka. J Environ Manag 53(3):273–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Holloway GJ, Nicholson C, Delgado C, Staal S, Ehui S (2000) Agro industrialization through institutional innovation: transaction costs, cooperatives and milk-market development in the East African Highlands. J Agric Econo 23:279–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Key N, Sadoulet E, de Janvry A (2000) Transactions costs and agricultural household supply response. Am J Agric Econ 82(2):245–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lapar LA, Holloway G, Ehui C (2003) Policy options promoting market participation among smallholder livestock producers: a case study from the Philippines. Food Policy 28(6):87–211Google Scholar
  33. Makhura MN, Kirsten J, Delgado C (2001) Transaction costs and smallholder participation in maize markets in the northern province of South Africa. In: Paper presented at the Southern Africa Regional Maize conference, February 11–15Google Scholar
  34. Marshall E, Rushton J, Schreckenberg K (2005) Practical tools for researching successful NTFPs commercialization: a methods manual. http://quin.unep-wcmc.org/forest/ntfp/cd/2_Methods_manual/a_Methods_manual_Eng.pdf
  35. Mulenga BP, Richardson RB, Tembo G (2012) Non-timber forest products and rural poverty alleviation in Zambia. Indaba Agricultural Policy Research Institute (IAPRI) Lusaka, Zambia, Working Paper No. 62. http://www.aec.msu.edu/fs2/zambia/index.htm
  36. Mutie S, Mburu J, Ackello-Ogutu C, Guthiga P (2006) Local communities’ dependence on NTFPs in Kakamega Forest: analysis of economic value, and determinants of participation and extraction levels. In: Conference on international agricultural research for development, Tropentag. University of BonnGoogle Scholar
  37. Oduro AD, Osei-Akoto I (2007) Market Participation and Rural Poverty in Ghana in the Era of Globalization. UNU-WIDER Research Paper, No. 2007/70, World Institute for Development Economics ResearchGoogle Scholar
  38. Ogunsesan D, Oyedepo J, Oates J, Adeofun CO, Ikemeh R, Bergl R (2011) GIS-supported survey of low-land rain forests in south-western Nigeria. In: Proceedings of the environmental management conference, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria, 2011. journal.unaab.edu.ng/index.php/COLERM/article/download/248/231. Downloaded 14/7/2014Google Scholar
  39. Omiti JM, Otieno DJ, Nyanamba TO, McCullough E (2009) Factors influencing the intensity of market participation by smallholder farmers: a case study of rural and peri-urban areas of Kenya. Afjare 3(1):57–82Google Scholar
  40. Onuche P (2011) Non-timber forest products (NTFPs). A pathway for rural poverty reduction in Nigeria. Int J Econ Dev Res Invest 2(2):28–37Google Scholar
  41. Pattanayak SK, Sills EO, Kramer RA (2004) Seeing the forest for the fuel. Environ Dev Econ 9(2):155–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rajib B (2009) Exploring the contribution of NTFPs to rural livelihoods: the case of Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve, India. In: A dissertation submitted to the school of development studies of the University of East Anglia in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of ArtsGoogle Scholar
  43. Sadashivappa P, Suryaprakash S, Vijaya Krishna V (2006) Participation behavior of indigenous people in non-timber forest products extraction and marketing in the dry deciduous forests of South India. In: Conference on international agricultural Research for development, Tropentag University of Bonn, October 11–13Google Scholar
  44. Shackleton C, Shackleton S (2004) The importance of non-timber forest products in rural livelihood security and as safety nets: a review of evidence from South Africa. S Afr J Sci 100:658–664Google Scholar
  45. Shylajan CS, Mythili G (2007) Community dependence on non-timber forest products: a household analysis and its implication for forest conservation. India. Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai WP-2007-005Google Scholar
  46. Strasberg PJ (1999) Effects of agricultural commercialization on food crop input use and productivity in Kenya. MSU International Development, Working Paper No. 71Google Scholar
  47. Takasaki Y, Barham BL, Coomes OT (2004) Risk coping strategies in tropical forests: floods, illnesses, and resource extraction. Environ Dev Econ 9(2):2003–2224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Terry CHS, Harrison ST, Ndoye O (2004) Forest products, livelihoods and conservation: case studies on non-timber forest products. www.cifor.org. Accessed on February 21st, 2013
  49. Tewari DD (2012) Promoting non-timber forest products (NTFPs) to alleviate poverty and hunger in rural South Africa: a reflection on management and policy challenges. Afr J Bus Manag 6(47):11635–11647. http://www.academicjournals.org/AJBM. doi:  10.5897/AJBM12.583s
  50. Vance C, Geoghegan J (2004) Modelling the determinants of semi-subsistence and commercial land uses in an agricultural frontier of Southern Mexico: a switching regression approach. Int Reg Sci Rev 27(3):326–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wiersum KF, Shackleton CM (2003) The role of natural resources in maintaining and enhancing livelihood diversification in South Eastern Africa. In: Paper presented at the Seminar ‘Land and livelihood in Eastern and Southern Africa’, Cape Town, South Africa, pp 27-31Google Scholar
  52. Zamasiya B, Mango N, Nyikahadzoi K, Siziba S (2014) Determinants of soybean market participation by smallholder farmers in Zimbabwe. J Dev Agric Econ 6(2):49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Steve Harrison, John Herbohn 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oluwakemi Adeola Obayelu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lucy Adeteju Farinola
    • 2
  • Abimbola Oluwayemisi Adepoju
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural EconomicsUniversity of IbadanIbadanNigeria
  2. 2.Forest Research Institute of NigeriaIbadanNigeria

Personalised recommendations