Small-scale Forestry

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 301–313 | Cite as

Factors Influencing Farmers’ Decisions to Plant Trees on Their Farms in Uttar Pradesh, India

  • Jawaid Ashraf
  • Rajiv Pandey
  • Wil de Jong
  • Bhuvnesh Nagar
Research Paper

Abstract

Increasing tree planting on farms is beneficial to increase the supply of forest functions including provision or raw materials, sequestration of carbon and wildlife habitat. Tree planting decisions by farmers are governed by the knowledge base of farm households, and other factors if the farmers are rational decision-makers under their given resource endowments. A recent surge of tree planting in several states in northern India, though inadequate, coincided with efforts by national and state forest agencies to promote tree planting. This paper reports on the results of a survey into tree plantations of 176 randomly selected households distributed in 34 villages in Western Uttar Pradesh based on demographic data and other factors potentially associated with tree planting decisions. The data were used to develop a binary logistic regression model, to identify which factors influence tree planting decisions. The factors found to correlate positively and significantly with tree planting include size of landholding, overall annual income, area of irrigated land and prior experience with tree planting. It is hypothesized that the lack of significance of other factors including family size and education level was probably due to the relatively homogeneous sample. The result can be used to devise policies to promote tree planting among famers in Uttar Pradesh and possibly other states and other countries.

Keywords

Agroforestry Binary logistic regression Socio-ecological system Subsistence farming 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Indian Council of Forestry Education and Research (ICFRE) for their generous funding support.

References

  1. Adesina AA, Mbila D, Nkamleu GB, Endamana D (2001) Econometric analysis of the determinants of adoption of alley farming by the farmers in the forest zone of southern Cameroon. Agric Econ Syst Environ 80(3):255–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agresti A (1996) An introduction to categorical data analysis. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Alavalapati JRR, Luckert MK, Gill DS (1995) Adoption of agroforestry practices: a case study from Andhra Pradesh India. Agrofor Syst 32(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhojvaid PP, Singh MP, Ashraf J, Reddy SR (2013) Transition to sustainable forest management and rehabilitation in Asia-Pacific region India. Forest Research Institute, DehradunGoogle Scholar
  5. Boon TE, Meilby H, Thorsen BJ (2004) An empirically based typology of forest owners in Denmark—improving the communication between authorities and owners. Scand J For Res 19(Suppl 4):45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buyinza M, Wambede N (2008) Extension of agroforestry technology adoption: mixed intercropping of Crotalaria (Crotalaria grahamiana) and Maize (Zea mays L.) in Kabale district Uganda. Environ Res J 2(3):131–137Google Scholar
  7. Chandra JP (2001) Scope of poplar cultivation. Indian For 127(1):51–60Google Scholar
  8. Dhiman RC (2012) Transforming rural Uttar Pradesh through integrating tree culture on farm land : a case study of WIMCO’s poplar programme. LMA Conv J 8(1):85–98Google Scholar
  9. Dwivedi RP, Kareemulla K, Singh R, Rizvi RH, Chauhan J (2007) Socio-economic analysis of agroforestry systems in Western Uttar Pradesh. Indian Res J Ext Edu 7(2&3):18–22Google Scholar
  10. Emtage NF, Harrison SR, Herbohn JL (2006) Landholder typologies used in the development of natural resource management programs in Australia–a review. Aust J Environ Manage 13(2):79–94Google Scholar
  11. Emtage NF, Herbohn JL, Harrison SR (2007) Landholder profiling and typologies for natural resource management policy and program support: potential and constraints. Environ Manage 40(3):481–492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Faham Elham, Ahmad Rezvanfar, Taghi Shanekhi (2008) Analysis of factors influencing motivation of villagers’ participation in activities of social forestry (the case study of West Mazandaran). Am J Agric Biol Sci 3(2):451–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. FSI (2009) India state of forest report. Forest Survey of India, DehradunGoogle Scholar
  14. Ghadim AKA, Pannell DJ (1999) A conceptual framework of adoption of an agricultural innovation. Agric Econ 21(2):145–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoch L, Pokorny B, de Jong W (2009) Do smallholders in the Amazon grow trees? Int For Rev 11(3):1–12Google Scholar
  16. Jain SK, Singh P (2000) Economic analysis of industrial agroforestry: poplar (Populus deltoids) in Uttar Pradesh, India. Agrofor Sys 49(3):255–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Joshi AK, Pant P, Kumar P, Giriraj A, Joshi PK (2010) National forest policy in India: critique of targets and implementation. Small-scale For. doi: 10.1007/s11842-010-9133-z Google Scholar
  18. Lambert O, Ozioma AF (2011) Adoption of improved agroforestry technologies among contact farmers in Imo State, Nigeria. Asian J Agric Rural Dev 2(1):1–9Google Scholar
  19. Lönnstedt L (2012) Small scale forest owners’ responsibilities: results from a Swedish case study. Small-scale For 11(3):407–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. MoE&F (2012) The regulatory regime regarding felling and transit regulations for tree species grown on non forests/private lands. Report of The Committee, MOE&F, GOI, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  21. Morris CT, Adelman I (1988) Comparative patterns of economic development. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 1850–1914Google Scholar
  22. Negi YS (1993) The conditions for agroforestry developments on farms in the Western Himalayas in India. Unpublished Thesis University of California BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  23. Neupane Ramji P, Sharma KR, Thapa GB (2002) Adoption of agroforestry in the hills of Nepal: a logistic regression analysis. Agric Syst 72(3):177–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pande SK, Pandey D (2004) Impact of incentives on the development of forest plantation resources in India. In: Enters T, Durst PB (eds) What does it take? The role of incentives in forest plantation development in Asia and the Pacific. Asia-Pacific Forestry Commission, RAP Publication 2004/27, FAO, Bangkok, pp 81–102Google Scholar
  25. Place F, Ajayi OC, Torquebiau E, Detlefsen G, Gauthier M, Buttoud G (2012) Improved policies for facilitating the adoption of agroforestry. In: Kaonga M (ed) Agroforestry for biodiversity and ecosystem services: science and practice. InTech, Rijeka, pp 113–128Google Scholar
  26. Prasad K (2003) Prospect of agroforestry in India. Paper submitted in XII World Forestry Congress, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  27. Puri S, Nair PKR (2004) Agroforestry research for development in India: 25 years of experiences of a national program. Agrofor Syst 62(3):437–452Google Scholar
  28. Raina R, Hara SS, Hara V, Irland LC (2011) Twenty-first century forest plantations: development of agroforestry in Haryana. J Res Energy Dev 8(2):67–74Google Scholar
  29. SAS Institute Inc. (2008) SAS 9.1.3 intelligence platform: web application administration guide, 3rd edn. SAS Institute Inc., North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  30. Selter A, Hartebrodt C, Brandl H, Herbohn J (2008) A critical comparison of typologies of small-scale forestry in Baden-Wu¨rttemberg derived using single and multiple criteria. Small-scale For 8:25–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sharma SK, Chauhan Sudhir, Sharma SK, Kaur B, Arya ID (2009) Opportunities and major constraints in agroforestry systems of Western UP: a vital role of Star Paper Mills, Saharanpur (UP)–India. Agric Biol J North India 1(3):343–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sidibe M (2005) Farm-level adoption of soil and water conservation techniques in northern Burkina Faso. Agric Water Manage 71(3):211–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Siriri D, Raussen T, Poncelet P (2000) The development potential of agroforestry technologies in Southwestern Uganda. Agroforestry Trends 2000 AFRENA KampalaGoogle Scholar
  34. Sood KK, Najiar C, Singh KN, Handique P, Singh B, Rethy P (2008) Association between Socio-economic parameters and agroforestry uptake: evidences from Eastern Himalaya. Indian J For 3(4):559–564Google Scholar
  35. Suyanto S, Permana RP, Khususiyah N, Joshi N (2005) Land tenure, agroforestry adoption, and reduction of fire hazard in a forest zone: a case study from Lampung, Sumatra, Indonesia. Agrofor Syst 65:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thangata PH, Alavalapati JRR (2003) Agroforestry adoption in southern Malawi: the case of mixed intercropping of Gliricidia sepium and Maize. Agric Syst 78(1):57–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zomer RJ, Bossio DA, Trabucco A, Yuanjie L, Gupta DC, Singh VP (2007) Trees and water: smallholder agroforestry on irrigated lands in Northern India. IWMI Research Report 122 International Water Management Institute Colombo Sri LankaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Steve Harrison, John Herbohn 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jawaid Ashraf
    • 1
  • Rajiv Pandey
    • 2
  • Wil de Jong
    • 3
  • Bhuvnesh Nagar
    • 2
  1. 1.Forest Research InstituteDehradunIndia
  2. 2.HNB Garhwal UniversitySrinagarIndia
  3. 3.Kyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations