Small-scale Forestry

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 101–117

An Economic Evaluation of a Small-Scale Timber Harvesting Operation in Western Maryland, USA

Article

Abstract

As forests of the eastern United States become fragmented into smaller ownership parcels, there is a growing need for timber harvesting contactors who can economically harvest timber and perform silvicultural operations on small tracts. Traditional large-scale harvesting operators are ill-suited for work on small parcels, due to their high fixed costs. By contrast, small-scale operators, characterized by few workers and low capital investment, offer an opportunity to serve this landowner segment. This paper presents financial and productivity results from a small-scale timber harvesting pilot study conducted on small forested parcels in western Maryland, USA. Acceptable financial performance is possible for these operations, provided that the operator pays close attention to the important factors determining productivity and profitability, including: (1) average tree volume, (2) net delivered price, (3) time utilization, and (4) distance to the site. Although profitable harvesting of saw log quality trees on parcels less than 10 ha is possible, harvesting of small or poor-quality trees remains economically unattractive.

Keywords

Private forest owners Forest fragmentation Small forest parcels 

References

  1. Cubbage F (1983a) Economics of forest tract size: theory and literature. USDA forest service, general technical report SO-41, 21 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. Cubbage F (1983b) Simulated effects of productivity rates, input costs, and stand volumes on harvesting costs. For Prod J 33:50–56Google Scholar
  3. Cubbage F, Greene W, Lyon J (1989) Tree size and species, stand volume, and tract size: effects on southern harvesting costs. S J App For 13:145–152Google Scholar
  4. DeCoster L (1998) The boom in forest owners—a bust for forestry? J For 96:25–28Google Scholar
  5. Greene W, Harris T, DeForest C, Wang J (1996) Harvesting cost implications of changes in the size of timber sales in Georgia. S J App For 21:193–198Google Scholar
  6. Hedderick D (2008) Small woodlot harvesting: a guide for landowners, land managers and forest products operators. Maryland Department of Natural Resources Forest Service. Cited 17 Nov 2010. Available via http://www.dnr.state.md.us/irc/docs/00013497.pdf
  7. Internal Revenue Service (2005) Rev Proc 2005-78. Cited 17 Nov 2010. Available via http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rp-05-75.pdf
  8. Kittredge D, Mauri M, McGuire E (1996) Decreasing woodlot size and the future of timber sales in Massachusetts: when is an operation too small? N J App For 13:96–101Google Scholar
  9. Li Y, Wang J, Miller G, McNeel J (2006) Production economics of harvesting small-diameter hardwood stands in central Appalachia. For Prod J 56:81–86Google Scholar
  10. Londo A, Grebner D (2004) Economies of scale and forest management in Mississippi. In: Connor K (ed) Proceedings of the 12th biennial southern silvicultural research conference, general technical report SRS-71, AshevilleGoogle Scholar
  11. Maryland Department of Natural Resources (2001) Maryland forest stewardship program strategic plan, 2002–2006, AnnapolisGoogle Scholar
  12. Milauskas S, Wang J (2006) West Virginia logger characteristics. For Prod J 56:19–24Google Scholar
  13. Row C (1978) Economies of tract size in timber growing. J For 76:576–579, 582Google Scholar
  14. Updegraff K, Blinn C (2000) Applications of small-scale forest harvesting equipment in the United States and Canada. University of Minnesota Staff paper series no 143, St PaulGoogle Scholar
  15. West Virginia Division of Forestry (2010) West Virginia statewide forest resource assessment. Cited 17 Nov 2010. Available via http://www.wvforestry.com/DOF100Assessment_Revised_091310_Part1.pdf
  16. Wilhoit J, Rummer B (1999) Application of small-scale systems: evaluation of alternatives. Paper presented at the ASAE/CSAE annual international meeting, Toronto, 18–21 July 1999Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Steve Harrison, John Herbohn 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Forestry and Natural ResourcesWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA
  2. 2.Maryland Department of Natural ResourcesForest ServiceCumberlandUSA

Personalised recommendations