Small-scale Forestry

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 323–335

Sumatra’s Rubber Agroforests: Advent, Rise and Fall of a Sustainable Cropping System

Research Paper

Abstract

Until the end of the nineteenth century primary forests covered nearly all the island of Sumatra. The first valorisation of this natural resource was hunting and gathering activities, followed by and later associated with swidden cultivation of upland rice. The industrial revolution in Europe and North America in the 1950s created increasing demand for rubber. Answering this new market opportunity, farmers introduced rubber seedlings in their swiddens amidst the upland rice. By doing so, they invented a new cropping system, i.e. rubber agroforests. Thanks to the continuously increasing demand for rubber by the developing industry, rubber agroforests spread over Sumatra’s eastern peneplains until the 1990s. Forest conversion to rubber agroforests conserves a high level of forest biodiversity and the agroforests act as a buffer zone around national parks. But with growing demographic pressure, market integration and household monetary needs, agroforests are increasingly endangered. New cropping systems have appeared and challenge agroforests’ dominance in the landscape. Since the mid-twentieth century, rubber monospecific plantations have been competing for land, with an undoubtedly higher profitability than agroforests. More recently, oil palm plantations have spread over the island, quickly becoming the new challenger to rubber agroforestry. Nevertheless, the international community shows more and more interest in forest and biodiversity conservation. Forest cover in Jambi province has nearly disappeared over the past 30 years. The only way to save the remnants of forests and agroforests seems to be the creation of market incentives through conservation programs such as reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation.

Keywords

Natural rubber Oil palm Landscape dynamics Market incentives Deforestation 

References

  1. Angelsen A (ed) (2008) Moving ahead with REDD; issues, options and implications. CIFOR, Bogor, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashley R, Russel D, Shallow B (2006) The policy terrain in protected area landscapes: challenges for agroforestry in integrated landscape conservation. Biodivers Conserv 15(2):663–689. doi:10.1007/s10531-005-2100-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2000) Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptative management. Ecol Appl 10(5):1251–1262. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1251:ROTEKA]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beukema H, Danielsen F, Vincent G, Hardiwinoto S, Andel J (2007) Plant and bird diversity in rubber agroforests in the lowlands of Sumatra, Indonesia. Agrofor Syst 70(3):217–242. doi:10.1007/s10457-007-9037-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Casson A (2000) The hesitant boom: Indonesia’s oil palm sub-sector in an era of economic crisis and political change. In: CIFOR (ed) Occasional paper 29, CIFOR, Bogor, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  6. Chambon B (2001) De l’innovation technique dans les sociétés paysannes: la diffusion de la monoculture clonale d’hévéa à Kalimantan Ouest (Indonésie). Doctoral diss., Université Montpellier I, Montpellier, FranceGoogle Scholar
  7. Colfer CJP, Resosudarmo IAP (eds) (2002) Which way forward? People, forests, and policymaking in Indonesia. Resources for the future. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, and Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (Singapore), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. Cunningham A, Belcher B, Campbell B (eds) (2005) Carving out a future: forests, livelihoods and the international woodcarving trade. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. De Foresta H (2008) Forêts et foresteries dans les regions tropicales. In: Hallé F, Lieutaghi P (eds) Aux origins des plantes, vol 2. Editions Fayard, Paris, pp 138–155Google Scholar
  10. De Koninck R (2005) L’Asie du Sud-Est, 2nd edn. Armand Colin, ParisGoogle Scholar
  11. Dove MR (1994) Transition from native forest rubbers to Hevea brasiliensis (Euphorbiaceae) among tribal smallholders in Borneo. Econ Bot 48(4):382–396Google Scholar
  12. Ekadinata A, Vincent G (2004) Assessing landcover dynamics in Bungo district, Jambi, using multitemporal satellite imagery. SAU Working Document, vol 12, pp 1–29Google Scholar
  13. FAO (2008) FAOSTAT online statistical service. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://faostat.fao.org/. Accessed December 2008
  14. Gadgil M, Olsson P, Berkes F, Folke C (2003) Exploring the role of local ecological knowledge for ecosystem management: three case studies. In: Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Gouyon A (1995) Paysannerie et hévéaculture dans les plaines orientales de Sumatra: quel avenir pour un système agroforestier. Doctoral diss., Institut National d’Agronomie Paris-Grignon, ParisGoogle Scholar
  16. Gouyon A, De Foresta H, Levang P (1993) Does jungle rubber deserve its name? An analysis of rubber agroforestry systems in southeast Sumatra. Agrofor Syst 22(3):181–206. doi:10.1007/BF00705233 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huxley PA (1999) Tropical agroforestry. Blackwell Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Joshi L et al (2002) Jungle rubber: a traditional agroforestry system under pressure. ICRAF, BogorGoogle Scholar
  19. Le Fèvre G (1927) L’épopée du caoutchouc. Stock, ParisGoogle Scholar
  20. Levang P (1991) Les agroforêts indonésiennes, contribution de l’agro-économiste. In: IRD (ed) Communication à l’atelier agroforesterie. IRD, MontpellierGoogle Scholar
  21. Levang P (1997) La terre d’en face: la transmigration en Indonésie. Editions de l’ORSTOM, MontpellierGoogle Scholar
  22. Levang P, Gouyon A (1993) De la retouche à la rupture: l’introduction de l’hévéa dans les systèmes de riziculture sur brûlis à Sumatra. Séminaire sur “Innovations et sociétés”. IRD, MontpellierGoogle Scholar
  23. Levang P, Sitorus S (2006) Rubber smallholders versus acacia growers: socio-economic survey of the Rambang Dangku sub-district (South Sumatra). IRD-CIFOR, BogorGoogle Scholar
  24. Levang P, Michon G, de Foresta H (1997) Agriculture forestière ou agroforesterie? Bois Forets Tropiques 251(1):29–41Google Scholar
  25. Michon G (2005) Domesticating forests: how farmers manage forest resources. IRD, CIFOR, ICRAF, Bogor, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  26. Michon G, Bompard J-M (1987) Agroforesteries indonésiennes: contributions paysannes à la conservation des forêts naturelles et de leurs ressources. Rev Ecol (Terre Vie) 42(1):3–37Google Scholar
  27. Michon G, De Foresta H (1997) Agroforests: pre-domestication of forest trees or true domestication of forest ecosystems? Neth J Agric Sci 45(4):451–462Google Scholar
  28. Michon G, Mary F, Bompard J-M (1986) Multistoried agroforestry garden system in west Sumatra, Indonesia. Agrofor Syst 4:315–338. doi:10.1007/BF00048106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Michon G, De Foresta H, Levang P (1995) Stratégies agroforestières paysannes et développement durable: les agroforêts à damar de Sumatra. Natures Sci Soc 3(3):207–221Google Scholar
  30. Nurrochmat DR (2005) The impacts of regional autonomy on political dynamics, socio-economics and forest degradation: case of Jambi, Indonesia. Doctoral thesis, Goettingen University, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  31. Penot E (2001) Stratégies paysannes et évolution des savoirs: l’hévéaculture agroforestière indonésienne. Doctoral diss., Université Montpellier I, Montpellier, FranceGoogle Scholar
  32. Rasnovi S (2006) Ekologi regenerasi tumbuhan berkayu pada system agroforest karet. Doctoral thesis, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  33. Ruf F, Lançon F (eds) (2004) From slash and burn to replanting: green revolutions in the Indonesian uplands. The World Bank, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Ruiz-Perez M et al (2004) Markets drive the specialization strategies of forest peoples. Ecol Soc 9(2):1–23Google Scholar
  35. Sandker M, Suwarno A, Campbell BM (2007) Will forests remain in the face of oil palm expansion? Simulating change in Malinau, Indonesia. Ecol Soc 13(1):1–18Google Scholar
  36. Thiollay J-M (1995) The role of traditional agroforests in the conservation of rain forest bird diversity in Sumatra. Conserv Biol 9(2):335–353. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.9020335.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tomich TP, Thomas DE, Van Noordwijk M (2004) Environmental services and land use change: bridging the gap between policy and research in Southeast Asia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 104(1):229–244Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Steve Harrison, John Herbohn 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IRD-CIFORBogorIndonesia

Personalised recommendations