In recent decades the concept of ‘governance’ as interdependent coordination of actors as well as the normative concept of ‘good governance’ have increasingly influenced international forest policy, to varying degrees. Using the three dimensions of multi-actor, multi-sector and multi-level governance to analyse key aspects of governance in the follow-up of global policy after the UNCED conference in 1992, this paper shows that ‘multi-actor governance’ has received considerable attention in international forest policy, mainly through promoting national forest programs. Global forest policy initiatives were less able to develop concepts to address and improve ‘multi-sector governance’ and ‘multi-level governance’, although these two dimensions of governance are particularly relevant for local levels. A number of major international forest policy initiatives, both public and private, have also focused on improving various dimensions of ‘good governance’. A review of the degree to which these international governmental initiatives have been transposed and applied at the local or regional level reveals a major gap between concepts and forest policy initiatives developed and promoted at international and national levels and their application at the regional and local levels. This calls for better concepts addressing in particular the ‘multi-level’ dimension of governance in order to improve connectivity between these levels. A range of governance change approaches can be applied, including adjusting modes of interaction, instruments and institutions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
The ‘local’ level is understood here to refer to the smallest administrative unit in a country. This usually is a village or municipality. The term ‘regional’ is used to denote sub-national regions.
Institutions are defined by North (1990) as consist[ing] of formal rules, informal constraints—norms of behaviour, conventions, and self-imposed codes of conduct—and their enforcement characteristics. Institutions are often defined as the ‘rules of the game’.
The focus of the article with regard to “international forest policy” is on global forest policy as well as on European forest policy.
Benz A (2004) Governance – Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, Germany
Colfer CJP, Capistrano D (2005) The politics of decentralization; forests, power and people. Earthscan Publications, London
Dubé YC, Schmithüsen F (2007) Cross-sectoral policy developments in forestry. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome
Enters T, Durst PB, Victor M (eds) (2000) Decentralization and devolution of forest management in Asia and the Pacific. RECOFTC Report No.18 and RAP Publication 2000/1. Bangkok
Fisher RJ, Durst P, Enters T, Victor M (2000) Overview of themes and issues in devolution and decentralization of forest management in Asia and the Pacific. In Enters T, Durst PB, Victor M (eds). Decentralization and devolution of forest management in Asia and the Pacific. RECOFTC Report No. 18 and RAP Publication 2000/1. Bangkok; pp vi–xi
Glück P, Rayner J, Cashore B (2005) Change in the governance of forest resources. In: Mery G, Alfaro R, Kanninen M, Lobovikov M (eds) Forests in the global balance: changing paradigms. IUFRO World Series, Helsinki, pp 51–74
Hajer MA, Wagenaar H (eds) (2003) Deliberative policy analysis: understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hall JE, Bonnell B (2004) Social and collaborative forestry: Canadian model forest experience. Canadian Forest Service, Ottawa
Heritier A (2002) New modes of governance in Europe: policy-making without legislating? In: Heritier A (ed) Common goods: reinventing European and international governance. Rowman and Littlefield, Oxford, pp 185–205
Hogl K, Nordbeck R, Kvarda E, Pregernig M (2008) New modes of governance for sustainable forestry in Europe; Synthesis report of the EU FP6 GOFOR project. University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna
Jänicke M, Joergensen H (2006) New approaches to environmental governance. In: Jänicke M, Jakob K (eds) Environmental governance in global perspective. New approaches to ecological and political modernisation. Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, pp 176–177
Kouplevatskaya-Yunusova I, Buttoud G (2006) Assessment of an iterative process: the double spiral of re-designing participation. For Policy Econ 8(5):529–541. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2005.07.010
LaPierre L (2002) Canada’s model forest program. For Chron 78(5):613–617
Larson A (2004) Democratic decentralisation in the forestry sector: lessons learned from Africa, Asia and Latin America, paper presented at the Interlaken Workshop, Switzerland, April
Mayntz R (2004) Governance Theory als fortentwickelte Steuerungstheorie?, MPIfG Working Paper 04/1, Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, Köln
Mayntz R, Scharpf F (eds) (1995) Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
MCPFE (Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe) (2007) Implementation of MCPFE commitments. National and Pan-European activities 2003–2007. Liaison Unit, Warsaw
North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Pierre J (2000) Introduction: understanding governance. In: Pierre J (ed) Debating governance: authority, steering, and democracy. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Rametsteiner E, Schmithüsen F, Tikkanen I (2007) Report on the MCPFE qualitative indicators for sustainable forest management: policies, institutions and instruments. In Köhl M, Rametsteiner E (eds) The State of Europe’s Forests 2007. The MCPFE report on sustainable forest management in Europe. Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, Liaison Unit, Warsaw, pp 105–139
Ribot J (2004) Waiting for democracy: the politics of choice in natural resource decentralization. World Resources Institute, Washington DC
Rosenau JN, Czempiel EO (eds) (1992) Governance without government: order and change in world politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Salamon L (ed) (2002) The tools of government. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Shackleton S, Campbell B, Wollenberg E, Edmunds D (2002) Devolution and community-based natural resource management: creating space for local people to participate and benefit? ODI natural resource perspectives 76. Overseas Development Institute, UK
UN (1993) Agenda 21: earth summit: the United Nations programme of action from Rio. United Nations Publications, United Nations, New York
UN (2004) Decentralization, federal systems in forestry and national forest programs: Report of a workshop co-organized by the Governments of Indonesia and Switzerland. Final report of the Interlaken workshop 27–30 April 2004, Interlaken
About this article
Cite this article
Rametsteiner, E. Governance Concepts and their Application in Forest Policy Initiatives from Global to Local Levels. Small-scale Forestry 8, 143–158 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-009-9078-2
- International forest policy
- Local forest governance
- Multi-level governance
- Good governance
- Policy evaluation