Advertisement

Sophia

pp 1–24 | Cite as

Wang Yangming’s Reductionist Account of Practical Necessity: General and Particular

  • Yat-hung LeungEmail author
Article

Abstract

In this article, I argue that we can have a plausible account of the experience of practical necessity, namely, the experience that some action is necessitated for someone, by referring to the philosophy of Wang Yangming (1472–1529), a Neo-Confucian philosopher in Ming Dynasty China. The experience of practical necessity, according to Wang, can be of two kinds: general (to be a human) and particular (to be a particular person), both having their bases on human nature and related to the fulfillment of the self. I argue that this account fares better than the non-reductionist account and other reductionist accounts, including Christine Korsgaard’s, which explains the experience in terms of the constitution of the self.

Keywords

Practical necessity Constitution of self Fulfillment of self Wang Yangming 

Notes

References

  1. Angle, S. C. (2009). Sagehood: the contemporary significance of Neo-Confucian philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Angle, S. C., & Tiwald, J. (2017). Neo-Confucianism: a philosophical introduction. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle (2000). Nicomachean ethics (trans: Roger Crisp). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bambauer, C. (2017). Christine Kosgaard and the normativity of practical identities. In K. Bauer, S. Varga, & C. Mieth (Eds.), Dimensions of practical necessities (pp. 61–85). Cham: Springer International Publishing AG.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauer, K. (2016). Practical necessity and personality. In A. Masala & J. Webber (Eds.), From personality to virtue: essays on the philosophy of character (pp. 81–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brady, M. (2002). Skepticism, normativity, and practical identity. Journal of Value Inquiry, 36(4), 403–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chan, W. (trans.) (1963). Instructions for practical living, and other Neo-Confucian writings by Wang Yangming. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chen, L 陈来. (2014). The ontology of benevolence 仁学本体论. Beijing 北京: Sanluan Shudian 三联书店.Google Scholar
  9. Cheng H. 程顥 & Cheng Y. 程頤. (2008). Collection of the two Chengs 二程集. Beijing北京: Zhonghua shuju中華書局.Google Scholar
  10. FitzPatrick, W. J. (2011). How not to be an ethical constructivist: a critique of Korsgaard’s neo-Kantian constitutivism. In Constructivism (pp. 41–62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gay, R. J. (1989). Bernard Williams on practical necessity. Mind, 98(392), 551–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gowans, C. (2002). Practical identities and autonomy: Korsgaard’s reformation of Kant’s moral philosophy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 64(3), 546–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoffman, M. L. (1981). Is altruism part of human nature? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang, Y. (2006). A Neo-Confucian conception of wisdom: Wang Yangming on the innate moral knowledge (Liangzhi). Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 33(3), 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huang, Y. (2016). ‘Empathy with devils’: what we can learn from Wang Yangming. In C. Mi, M. Slote, & E. Sosa (Eds.), Moral and intellectual virtues in Western and Chinese philosophy: the turn toward virtue (pp. 214–234). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Huang, Y. (2018). Moral luck and moral responsibility: Wang Yangming on the Confucian problem of evil. In M. Gu (Ed.), Why traditional Chinese philosophy still matters: the relevance of ancient wisdom for the global age (pp. 68–81). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ivanhoe, P. (2002). Ethics in the Confucian tradition: the thought of Mengzi and Wang Yangming. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  18. Korsgaard, C. (1996). The sources of normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Korsgaard, C. (2009). Self-constitution: agency, identity, and integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lau, D.C. (trans.) (2000). The Analects. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Lau, D.C. (trans.) (2003) Mencius. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Liu, J. (2018). Neo-Confucianism: metaphysics, mind, and morality. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Mackie, J. L. (1977). Ethics: inventing right and wrong. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  24. McDowell, J. (1978). Are moral requirements hypothetical imperatives? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 52, 13–29+31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McDowell, J. (1998). Values and secondary qualities. In J. McDowell (Ed.), Mind, value, and reality (pp. 131–150). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mou, Z. 牟宗三 (1968). The substance of heart-mind and the substance of nature (Vol.1) 心體與性體(第一冊). Taipei台北: Xuesheng shuju學生書局.Google Scholar
  27. Shun, K. (2013). Three kinds of Confucian thought: Zhu Xi, Wang Yangming, and Dai Zhen. In Zhong C. 鍾彩鈞 (ed.), Confucianism in East Asian perspectives: on its traditions 東亞視域中的儒學:傳統的詮釋 (pp. 61–98). Taipei 台北: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
  28. Slote, M. (2010). The mandate of empathy. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy, 9(3), 303–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Steinvorth, U. (2016). Pride and authenticity. Cham: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang, Y. 王陽明. (2014). Complete works of Wang Yangming王陽明全集. Shanghai上海: Shanghai guji chubanshe上海古籍出版社.Google Scholar
  31. Wang, Y. 王陽明. (2016). A supplement to complete works of Wang Yangming王陽明全集補編. Shanghai上海: Shanghai guji chubanshe上海古籍出版社.Google Scholar
  32. Williams, B. (1973). The Makropulos case. In Problems of the self: philosophical papers (pp. 82–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Williams, B. (1981). Practical necessity. In Moral luck: philosophical papers, 1973–1980 (pp. 124–131). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Williams, B. (1985/2006). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Zhang, Z. 張載. (1978). Collection of Zhang Zai 張載集. Beijing北京: Zhonghua shuju中華書局.Google Scholar
  36. Zheng, Z. 郑宗义. (2018). A new interpretation of Wang Yangming’s doctrine of the unity of knowing and acting. 再论王阳明的知行合一. Academic Monthly 学术月刊, 50 (8), 5–19.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophySun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations