Advertisement

Sophia

pp 1–18 | Cite as

‘Grasping the Difficulty in its Depth’: Wittgenstein and Globally Engaged Philosophy

  • Thomas D. CarrollEmail author
Article
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

In recent years, philosophers have used expressions of Wittgenstein’s (e.g., ‘language-games,’ ‘form of life,’ and ‘family resemblance’) in attempts to conceive of the discipline of philosophy in a broad, open, and perhaps global way. These Wittgenstein-inspired approaches indicate an awareness of the importance of cultural and historical diversity for approaching philosophical questions. While some philosophers have taken inspiration from Wittgenstein in embracing contextualism in philosophical hermeneutics, Wittgenstein himself was more instrumental than contextual in his treatment of other philosophers; his focus in his writings was on his own philosophical problems. Does this mean that Wittgensteinian philosophy is a poor resource after all for comparative, cross-cultural, or globally engaged philosophy (i.e., if it is properly Wittgensteinian)? In this article, I examine the relevance of Wittgenstein to contextually sensitive philosophy through studies of his conceptions of history and culture, his interest in Spengler’s philosophy of history, and recent scholarship by Hans-Johann Glock and Hans Sluga on the place of contextualism in Wittgenstein’s analysis of philosophical problems. Ultimately, this article advances the view that there are strong resources in Wittgenstein’s philosophy for those seeking a more globally engaged approach to the field.

Keywords

Wittgenstein Metaphilosophy Cross-cultural philosophy Philosophy of history Hermeneutics 

Notes

References

  1. Appiah, K. A. (2006). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a world of strangers. New York: W. W. Norton & Co..Google Scholar
  2. Baker, G. (2004). In K. J. Morris (Ed.), Wittgenstein’s method: neglected aspects. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bloemendaal, P. F. (2006). Grammars of faith: A critical evaluation of D. Z. Phillips’s Philosophy of Religion. Leuven: Peeters Press.Google Scholar
  4. Burley, M. (2018). Thickening description: toward an expanded conception of philosophy of religion. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 83, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burnyeat, M. F. (1987). Wittgenstein and Augustine De Magistro. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 61, 1-24.Google Scholar
  6. Cahill, K. (2001). Wittgenstein and Spengler. In R. Haller & K. Puhl (Eds.), Papers of the 24th international Wittgenstein symposium 12–18 August 2001—Wittgenstein and the future of philosophy - A reassessment after 50 years. Kirchberg am Wechsel. http://wittgensteinrepository.org/agora-alws/issue/view/175. Accessed July 28, 2018.
  7. Cavell, S. (1966). The availability of Wittgenstein’s later philosophy. In G. Pitcher (Ed.), Wittgenstein: the philosophical investigations. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cavell, S. (1989). Declining decline. In this new yet unapproachable America: Lectures after Emerson and Wittgenstein. Albuquerque: Living Batch Press.Google Scholar
  9. Clack, B. R. (1999). An introduction to Wittgenstein’s philosophy of religion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Clayton, J. (2006). Religions, reasons, and gods: essays in cross-cultural philosophy of religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeAngelis, W. J. (2007). Ludwig Wittgenstein – A cultural point of view: philosophy in the darkness of this time. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  12. Defoort, C. (2001). Is there such a thing as Chinese philosophy? Arguments of an implicit debate. Philosophy East and West, 51(3), 393–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fraser, C. (2016). Language and logic in the Xunzi. In E. L. Hutton (Ed.), The Dao companion to the philosophy of Xunzi. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Glock, H.-J. (2006). Wittgenstein and history. In A. Pichler & S. Säätelä (Eds.), Wittgenstein: The philosopher and his works. Ontos: Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  15. Haller, R. (1988). “Was Wittgenstein influenced by Spengler” in questions on Wittgenstein. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 74–89.Google Scholar
  16. Harrison, V. S. (2006). The pragmatics of defining religion in a multi-cultural world. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 59, 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hutchison, P., & Read, R. (2008). Toward a perspicuous presentation of “perspicuous presentation”. Philosophical Investigations, 31(2), 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hutton, E. L. (trans.) (2014). Xunzi: the complete text. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kiezler, W. (2013). Wittgenstein reads Plato. In L. Perissinotto & B. R. Cámara (Eds.), Wittgenstein and Plato: connections, comparisons and contrasts. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Knepper, T. D. (2013). The ends of philosophy of religion: Terminus and telos. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Malcolm, N. (2001). Ludwig Wittgenstein: a memoir (Second ed.). Clarendon Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
  22. Martin, C. G. (2016). Wittgenstein on perspicuous presentations and grammatical self-knowledge. Nordic Wittgenstein Review. 5(1), 79-108.Google Scholar
  23. Nongbri, B. (2013). Before religion: a history of a modern concept. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nylan, M. (2016). Academic silos, or “what I wish philosophers knew about early history in China”. In S.-H. Tan (Ed.), The Bloomsbury research handbook of Chinese philosophy methodologies. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  25. Perissinotto, L. (2013). “The Socratic method!”: Wittgenstein and Plato. In L. Perissinotto & B. R. Cámara (Eds.), Wittgenstein and Plato: connections, comparisons and contrasts. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Peterman, J. F. (2015). Whose tradition? Which Dao? Confucius and Wittgenstein on moral learning and reflection. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  27. Richards, R. J. (1992). The meaning of evolution: the morphological construction and ideological reconstruction of Darwin’s theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Richter, D. (2018). Augustine and Wittgenstein on the will. In K. Paffenroth, A. R. Eodice, & J. Doody (Eds.), Augustine and Wittgenstein. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  29. Sato, M. (2003). The Confucian quest for order: The origin and formation of the political thought of Xun Zi. Leiden: Brill Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Schilbrack, K. (2014). Philosophy and the study of religions: A manifesto. Malden: Wiley Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Schönbaumsfeld, G. (2007). A confusion of the spheres: Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein on philosophy and religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sluga, H. (1998). What has history to do with me? Wittgenstein and analytic philosophy. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 41(1), 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sluga, H. (2013). Beyond the “new” Wittgenstein. In M. G. Weiss & H. Greif (Eds.), Ethics, society, politics: Proceedings of the 35th International Wittgenstein Symposium, Kirchberg Am Wechsel, Austria, 2012. Berlin: De Gruyter Ontos.Google Scholar
  34. Sluga, H. (2017). Time and history in Wittgenstein. In H. Sluga & D. G. Stern (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Wittgenstein (Second ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smart, N. (1973). The phenomenon of religion. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Spengler, O. (1926). The decline of the west: Form and actuality & perspectives of world history. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stern, D. G. (2002). Nestroy, Augustine, and the opening of the philosophical investigations. In R. Haller & K. Puhl (Eds.), Wittgenstein and the future of philosophy: A reassessment after 50 years. Proceedings of the 24th International Wittgenstein-Symposium, pp. 429–449. Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar
  38. Sun, A. (2013). Confucianism as a world religion: contested histories and contemporary realities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Van Brakel, J., & Ma, L. (2015). Extension of family resemblance concepts as a necessary condition of interpretation across traditions. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy, 14, 475–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Van Norden, B. (2017). Taking back philosophy: A multicultural manifesto. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Winch, P. (1958). The idea of a social science and its relation to philosophy (First ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Winch, P. (1964). Understanding a primitive society. American Philosophical Quarterly, 1, 307–324.Google Scholar
  43. Winch, P. (1990). The idea of a social science and its relation to philosophy (Second ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On certainty. London: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  45. Wittgenstein, L. (1993). In J. C. Klagge & A. Nordmann (Eds.), Philosophical occasions: 1912-1951. Indianapolis: Hacket Publishers.Google Scholar
  46. Wittgenstein, L. (1998a). The Blue and Brown books. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  47. Wittgenstein, L. (1998b). In G. H. von Wright (Ed.), Culture and value, revised edition. Oxford: Blackwell publishers.Google Scholar
  48. Wittgenstein, L. (1998c). In G. H. von Wright & G. E. M. Anscombe (Eds.), Notebooks: 1914-1916. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  49. Wittgenstein, L. (1998d). In R. Rhees (Ed.), Philosophical remarks. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  50. Wittgenstein, L. (1998e). In G. H. Von Wright, R. Rhees, & G. E. M. Anscombe (Eds.), Remarks on the foundations of mathematics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  51. Wittgenstein, L. (2001). Philosophical investigations. (Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe). London: Blackwell publishers.Google Scholar
  52. Yang, X. (2008). Some issues in Chinese philosophy of religion. Philosophy Compass, 3(3), 551–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Chinese University of Hong KongShenzhenChina

Personalised recommendations