pp 1–18 | Cite as

Indifference and the World: Schelling’s Pantheism of Bliss

  • Kirill ChepurinEmail author


Although largely neglected in Schelling scholarship, the concept of bliss (Seligkeit) assumes central importance throughout Schelling’s oeuvre. Focusing on his 1810–11 texts, the Stuttgart Seminars and the beginning of the Ages of the World, this paper traces the logic of bliss, in its connection with other key concepts such as indifference, the world or the system, at a crucial point in Schelling’s thinking. Bliss is shown, at once, to mark the zero point of the developmental narrative that Schelling constructs here (from God before creation, via the natural, historical, and spiritual world, to the fully actualized, ‘true pantheism’) and to interrupt it at every step. As a result, bliss emerges here in its real utopian force but also its all-too-real ambivalence, indifference, and even violence, despite Schelling’s best efforts to theorize it as ‘love’; and Schelling himself emerges, in these texts, as one of modernity’s foremost thinkers not just of nature or freedom, but also of bliss in its modern afterlives. At stake in Schelling’s conception of bliss, I argue, is the very relationship between history and eternity, the not-yet and the already-here, the present, and the eschatological—as well as between Spinozian immanence and the Christian temporality of salvation, so important for modernity (with what is often called its process of ‘secularization’)—not to mention the complex entanglement of indifference, violence, and love or the ideas of totality, nonproductivity, and nonrelation that Schellingian bliss involves.


Bliss Pantheism Indifference German idealism Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling Spinozism 



This paper was first presented at a Schelling conference held at the University of the West of England in May 2017. I am grateful to the participants of that event for their incisive questions and remarks. I would also like to thank Joseph Albernaz, James Martel, Simona Schneider, Gilad Sharvit, and the anonymous referees for Sophia for their valuable comments and suggestions.


  1. Adorno, T. (2005). Minima Moralia: Reflections on a Damaged Life. Trans. E. F. N. Jephcott. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Alanen, L. (2012). Spinoza on passions and self-knowledge: The case of pride. In M. Pickavé & L. Shapiro (Eds.), Emotion and Cognitive Life in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 234–254). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barber, D. C. (2016). World-making and grammatical impasse. Qui Parle, 25(1–2), 179–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dubilet, A. (2018). The self-emptying subject: Kenosis and immanence, medieval to modern. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Gottlieb, A. (2016). The dream of enlightenment: The rise of modern philosophy. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
  6. Negri, A. (1991). The Savage Anomaly: The Power of Spinoza’s Metaphysics and Politics. Trans. Michael Hardt. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  7. Rousseau, J.-J. (1992). The Reveries of the Solitary Walker. Trans. Charles E. Butterworth. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  8. Schelling, F. W. J. (1856). Philosophische Einleitung in die Philosophie der Mythologie oder Darstellung der reinrationalen Philosophie. In K. F. A. Schelling (Ed.), Sämmtliche Werke: Abt. 2, Bd (1st ed.). Stuttgart: Cotta.Google Scholar
  9. Schelling, F. W. J. (1857). Ideen zu einer Philosophie der Natur. In K. F. A. Schelling (Ed.), Sämmtliche Werke: Abt. 1, Bd (2nd ed., pp. 1–344). Stuttgart: Cotta.Google Scholar
  10. Schelling, F. W. J. (1859). Fernere Darstellungen aus dem System der Philosophie. In K. F. A. Schelling (Ed.), Sämmtliche Werke: Abt. 1, Bd (4th ed., pp. 333–510). Stuttgart: Cotta.Google Scholar
  11. Schelling, F. W. J. (1860). System der gesammten Philosophie und der Naturphilosophie insbesondere [= “Würzburg System”]. In K. F. A. Schelling (Ed.), Sämmtliche Werke: Abt. 1, Bd (6th ed., pp. 131–576). Stuttgart: Cotta.Google Scholar
  12. Schelling, F. W. J. (1946). In M. Schröter (Ed.), Die Weltalter: Fragmente. In den Urfassungen von 1811 und 1813. München: Biederstein and Leibniz.Google Scholar
  13. Schelling, F. W. J. (1972). In H. Fuhrmans (Ed.), Grundlegung der positiven Philosophie. Münchner Vorlesung WS 1832/33 und SS 1833. Turin: Bottega d’Erasmo.Google Scholar
  14. Schelling, F. W. J. (1980). Vom Ich als Princip der Philosophie. In H. Buchner & J. Jantzen (Eds.), Historisch-kritische Ausgabe, Reihe I: Werke, Bd. 2 (pp. 1–176). Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
  15. Schelling, F. W. J. (1982). Philosophische Briefe über Dogmatismus und Kriticismus. In H. Buchner, W. G. Jacobs, & A. Pieper (Eds.), Historisch-kritische Ausgabe, Reihe I: Werke, Bd. 3 (pp. 1–112). Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
  16. Schelling, F. W. J. (2002). Clara, or, On Nature’s Connection to the Spirit World. Trans. Fiona Steinkamp. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  17. Schelling, F. W. J. (2008). In A. Denker & H. Zaborowski (Eds.), Philosophie und Religion. Freiburg-München: Karl Alber.Google Scholar
  18. Schelling, F. W. J. (2011). In T. Buchheim (Ed.), Philosophische Untersuchungen über das Wesen der menschlichen Freiheit und die damit zusammenhängenden Gegenstände (2nd improved ed.). Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schelling, F. W. J. (2017). Stuttgarter Privatvorlesungen (1810). In V. Müller-Lüneschloss (Ed.), Historisch-kritische Ausgabe, Reihe II: Nachlass, Bd. 8. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
  20. Strauss, L. (1997). Spinoza’s Critique of Religion. Trans. E. M. Sinclair. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Whistler, D. (2013). Schelling’s theory of symbolic language: Forming the system of identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Whistler, D. (2019). Identity philosophy. In K. Bruff & S. McGrath (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook to Schelling. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PhilosophyNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussian Federation
  2. 2.Theologische FakultätHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations