Advertisement

Sophia

, Volume 57, Issue 3, pp 425–442 | Cite as

Reading Derrida with Daya Krishna: Postmodern Trends in Contemporary Indian Philosophy

  • Dor MillerEmail author
Article
  • 94 Downloads

Abstract

In his published lectures Civilizations: Nostalgia and Utopia (2012), Daya Krishna criticizes postmodern thought and especially the writings of Jacques Derrida. By outlining similarities between the two, I would claim that, indeed, it was Daya Krishna’s unexpected proximity to Derrida’s ‘deconstruction’ project that triggered his scathing critique of the latter. Moreover, Daya Krishna’s response to Derrida reveals an ongoing inner conflict in his own thinking. On the one hand, he provides us with a harsh critique of Derrida the ‘postmodern’; on the other hand, he concedes that the ‘modern’ notion of knowledge has been totally transformed, and the ‘deconstruction’ of its old formulations was the major catalyst that provoked and directed his own philosophical enterprise in the last years of his life, reformulating knowledges (in the plural). Reconstructing in this way, the dialogue which never happened might prove beneficial, not only for understanding the distinctive works of its participants, but also for carrying their writings and us one step further towards a productive, ‘relevant’ philosophical discourse in the twenty-first century.

Keywords

Daya Krishna Jacques Derrida Contemporary Indian philosophy Deconstruction Academia Dialogue 

References

  1. Badiou A., & Žižek S. (2009). Philosophy in the present. P. Engelmann (Ed.), P. Thomas & A. Toscano (Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  2. Daya Krishna (1955). The nature of philosophy. Calcutta: Prachi Prakashan.Google Scholar
  3. Daya Krishna (1997). Encounters between civilizations: the question of the centre and the periphery. New Quest, 125, 261–269.Google Scholar
  4. Daya Krishna (1999). Thinking creatively about the creative act. Panjab University Research Bulletin (ARTS), 30(1&2), 18–26.Google Scholar
  5. Daya Krishna (2003). Illusion, hallucination and the problem of truth. Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research, 20(4), 129–146.Google Scholar
  6. Daya Krishna (2004a). Madness, reason and truth. Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research, 21(1), 89–100.Google Scholar
  7. Daya Krishna (2004b). Reality, imagination and truth. Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research, 21(4), 115–128.Google Scholar
  8. Daya Krishna (2005a). Definition, deception and the enterprise of knowledge. Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research, 22(1), 75–89.Google Scholar
  9. Daya Krishna (2005b). Eros, nomos and logos. Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research, 22(2), 165–182.Google Scholar
  10. Daya Krishna (2006a). Law, logic and ethics: Issues at the heart of society and polity. Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research, 23(1), 147–168.Google Scholar
  11. Daya Krishna (2006b). Chance, probability, indeterminacy and knowledge. Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research, 23(3), 91–110.Google Scholar
  12. Daya Krishna (2006c). The cosmic, biological and cultural conditionings, and the seeking for freedom. Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research, 23(4), 133–160.Google Scholar
  13. Daya Krishna (2011). Thinking versus thought: strategies in conceptual creativity. In N. Bhushan, J. L. Garfield, & D. Raveh (Eds.), Contrary thinking, selected essays of Daya Krishna (pp. 27–39). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Daya Krishna (2012). Civilizations: nostalgia and utopia. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Derrida J. (1981). Dissemination. B. Johnson (trans.). London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  16. Derrida, J. (1983). The principle of reason: the university in the eyes of its pupils. C. Porter & E. P. Morris (trans.). Diacritics, 13(3), 2–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Derrida J. (2002). Acts of religion. G. Anidjar (Ed. & intro.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Derrida, J. (2004). Eyes of the university: right to philosophy 2. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Levinas, E. (1996). Enigma and phenomenon. In A. T. Peperzak, S. Critchley, & R. Bernasconi (Eds.), Emmanuel Levinas: basic philosophical writings (pp. 65–78). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Michelfelder, D. P. (1989). In D. P. Michelfelder & R. E. Palmer (Eds.), Dialogue & deconstruction: the Gadamer-Derrida encounter. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  21. Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Not for profit: why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Rorty, R. (1977). Derrida on language, being, and abnormal philosophy. Journal of Philosophy, 74(11), 673–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rorty R. (2008 [1978]). Philosophy as a kind of writing: an essay on Derrida. New Literary History, 39(1), 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyTel Aviv UniversityTel Aviv-YafoIsrael

Personalised recommendations