, Volume 55, Issue 2, pp 163–177 | Cite as

So What If Horses Would Draw Horse Gods?

  • Scott F. Aikin


Xenophanes famously noted that if horses could draw, they would draw their gods as horses. This connection between those who depict the gods and how the gods are depicted is posed as part of a critical theological program. What follows is an argumentative reconstruction of how these observations determine the extent and content of Xenophanes’ theological reforms. In light of the strength of the critical epistemic program, it is likely Xenophanes posed ambitious theological reforms.


Xenophanes Religion Theology Monotheism Polytheism 


  1. Aikin, S. (2012). Pregnant premise arguments. Informal Logic, 32, 2.Google Scholar
  2. Aikin, S. (2014). Xenophanes’ high rationalism: on fragment 1. Epoche, 19, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes, J. (1979). The presocratic philosophers. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bowra, C. M. (1938). Xenophanes, fragment 1. Classical Philology, 33, 353–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burnet, J. (1920). Early Greek philosophy (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Dawkins, R. (2006). The god delusion. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  7. Dewey, J. (1935). A common faith. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Durkeim, E. (1915). The elementary forms of religious life. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  9. Eisenstadt, M. (1974). Xenophanes’ proposed reform of Greek religion. Hermes, 102, 142–150.Google Scholar
  10. Granger, H. (2013). “Xenophanes’ positive theology and his criticism of Greek popular religion.”. Ancient Philosophy, 33, 235–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harris, S. (2006). Letter to a Christian nation. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  12. Hitchens, C. (2007). God is not great. Boston: Twelve Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Jaeger, Werner (1967). The theology of the early Greek philosophers. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kirk, G.S. and Raven, J.E. (1962). The presocratic philosophers. Cambridge UP.Google Scholar
  15. Lesher, J. (1992). Xenophanes of colophon. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lesher, J (2009). “Xenophanes of colophon.” In: G. Oppy and N. Trakasis, (eds), The history of western philosophy of religion, Vol. I. Acumen.Google Scholar
  17. Lesher, J. (2013). A systematic xenophanes? In J. McCoy (Ed.), Studies in philosophy and the history of philosophy (pp. 77–90). Washington D.C: Catholic University Press of America.Google Scholar
  18. McKirahan, R.D. (1994). Philosophy before Socrates. Hackett.Google Scholar
  19. Mikalson, J. D. (1983). Athenian popular religion. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  20. Mogyorodi, E. (2002). “Xenophanes as philosopher: Theology and theodicy.” In Qu’est-ce que la Philosophie Presocratique? Ed. A. Laks. Presses Univeritaires du Sptentrion. 253–286.Google Scholar
  21. Onfray, M. (2005). Atheist manifesto. New York: Arcade Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Ring, M. (1987). Beginning with the pre-Socratics. Palo-Alto: Mayfield Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Robinson, J. M. (1968). Greek philosophy. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  24. Robinson, T.M. (2008). Presocratic theology. In The Oxford handbook of presocratic philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press. 485–500.Google Scholar
  25. Scoon, R. (1928). Greek philosophy before Plato. Princeton UP.Google Scholar
  26. Zeller, E. (1980 [1883]). Outlines of the history of Greek philosophy. Trans. L.R. Palmer. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations