Advertisement

Sophia

, Volume 52, Issue 3, pp 447–462 | Cite as

Equanimity and Intimacy: A Buddhist-Feminist Approach to the Elimination of Bias

  • Emily McRae
Article

Abstract

In this article I criticize some traditional impartiality practices in Western philosophical ethics and argue in favor of Marilyn Friedman’s dialogical practice of eliminating bias. But, I argue, the dialogical approach depends on a more fundamental practice of equanimity. Drawing on the works of Tibetan Buddhist thinkers Patrul Rinpoche and Khenpo Ngawang Pelzang, I develop a Buddhist-feminist concept of equanimity and argue that, despite some differences with the Western impartiality practices, equanimity is an impartiality practice that is not only psychologically feasible but also central to loving relationships. I conclude by suggesting ways that feminist dialogical practices for eliminating bias and meditative practices are mutually supportive.

Keywords

Equanimity Intimacy Emotions Ethics Buddhism Feminism 

References

  1. Baron, M. (1991). “Impartiality and Friendship,” Ethics, Vol. 101, No. 4.Google Scholar
  2. Benhabib, S. (1987). The generalized and the concrete other: The Kohlberg-Gilligan controversy and moral theory. In E. Kittay & D. Meyers (Eds.), Women and moral theory. Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  3. Burrow, S. (2005). The Political Structure of Emotion: From Dismissal to Dialogue. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 20, 4:27–43.Google Scholar
  4. Cottingham, J. (1983). “Ethics and Impartiality,” Philosophical Studies, Vol. 43. p. 83-99.Google Scholar
  5. Curtin, D., & Powers, J. (1994). Mothering: Moral cultivation and feminist ethics. Philosophy East and West, 44(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dalmiya, V. (2001). Particularizing the moral self: A feminist buddhist exchange. Sophia: International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Metaphysical Theology and Ethics, 40(1), 61–72.Google Scholar
  7. Friedman, M. (1993). What are friends for? Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Goodman, C. (2009). The consequences of compassion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the Evolution of Society. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hare, R. M. (1981). Moral thinking. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heim, M. (2008). “Buddhism and the Emotions” in Oxford Handbook of Religion and Emotion. NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  12. Kamilasila. (2001). Stages of meditation (The Dalai Lama, commentator). Ithaca: Snow Lion Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Li, C. (1994). The Confucian concept of Jen and the feminist ethics of care: A comparative study. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 9(1), 70–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li, C. (2002). Revisiting Confucian Jen ethics and feminist care ethics: A reply to Daniel Star and Lijun Yuan. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 130-140.Google Scholar
  15. Li, C. (2008). Does Confucian ethics integrate care ethics and justice ethics? The case of Mencius. Asian Philosophy, 18(1), 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McFall, L. (1989). Integrity. Ethics, 98, 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pang-White, A. (2009). Reconstructing modern ethics: Confucian care ethics. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 36(2), 210–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pelzang, K. N. (2004). A guide to the words of my perfect teacher. Padmakara Group, trans. Boston: Shambala.Google Scholar
  19. Reilly, N. (2007). Cosmopolitan Feminism and Human Rights. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 22, 4:180–198.Google Scholar
  20. Patrul Rinpoche (1994). The words of my perfect teacher. Padmakara Group, trans. San Francisco: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Mingyur Rinpoche (2009). Joyful wisdom. New York: Three Rivers Press.Google Scholar
  22. Schutte, O. (1998) Cultural Alterity: Cross-cultural Communication and Feminist Theory in North-South. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 13, 2 (Monsoon 1998): 53–72.Google Scholar
  23. Smith, A. (1948). A theory of moral sentiments. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  24. Tao, J. P.-W. (2000). Two perspectives of care: Confucian Ren and feminist care. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 27(2), 215–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tsongkhapa. (2000). Lam rim chen mo (The stages of the path). The Lam Rim Chenmo Translation Committee, trans. Ithaca: Snow Lion Publications.Google Scholar
  26. Young, I. (1986). Impartiality and the civic public. Praxis International, 5, 381–401.Google Scholar
  27. Young, I. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations