Sophia

, Volume 52, Issue 1, pp 95–114 | Cite as

Divine Hiddenness and Discrimination: A Philosophical Dilemma

Article

Abstract

Since its first delivery in 1993, J.L. Schellenberg’s atheistic argument from divine hiddenness keeps generating lively debate in various quarters in the philosophy of religion. Over time, the author has responded to many criticisms of his argument, both in its original evidentialist version and in its subsequent conceptualist version. One central problem that has gone undetected in these exchanges to date, we argue, is how Schellenberg’s explicit-recognition criterion for revelation contains discriminatory tendencies against mentally handicapped persons. Viewed from this angle, our present critique imparts Schellenberg’s position with a philosophical dilemma: (1) endorsing divine discrimination to the effect that God does not love ‘cognitive-affective outsiders’ or (2) giving up on explicit recognition. Either way, the hiddenness argument does not succeed.

Keywords

Divine hiddenness Discrimination Dilemma J.L. Schellenberg Love Explicit recognition 

References

  1. Aijaz, I., & Weidler, M. (2007). Some critical reflections on the hiddenness argument. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 61, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alston, W. (1996). Belief, acceptance, and religious faith. In J. Jordan & D. Howard-Snyder (Eds.), Faith, freedom and rationality. Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  3. Buber, M. (2004). I and Thou. Trans. R. G. Smith. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  4. McCord Adams, M. (2006). Christ and horrors: The coherence of christology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Moser, P. (2004). Reply to Schellenberg. In M. L. Peterson & R. J. Van Arragon (Eds.), Contemporary debates in the philosophy of religion. Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Pascal, B. (1995). Pensées. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  7. Pojman, L. (1986). Faith without belief? Faith and Philosophy, 3(2), 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pojman, L. (2003). Faith, doubt and hope or does faith entail belief? In R. Gale & A. R. Pruss (Eds.), The existence of God. Ashgate.Google Scholar
  9. Poston, T., & Dougherty, T. (2007). Divine hiddenness and the nature of belief. Religious Studies, 43, 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schellenberg, J. L. (1993). Divine hiddenness and human reason. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Schellenberg, J. L. (2004a). Does divine hiddenness justify atheism? In M. L. Peterson & R. J. Van Arragon (Eds.), Contemporary debates in the philosophy of religion. Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Schellenberg, J. L. (2004b). The problem of hiddenness and the problem of evil. Conference paper presented at the University of Colorado at Boulder.Google Scholar
  13. Schellenberg, J. L. (2005a). The hiddenness argument revisited (I). Religious Studies, 41, 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schellenberg, J. L. (2005b). Prolegomena to a philosophy of religion. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Schellenberg, J. L. (2007). On not unnecessarily darkening the glass: A reply to Poston & Dougherty. Religious Studies, 43, 199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schellenberg, J. L. (2008). Reply to Aijaz and Weidler on Hiddenness. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 64, 135–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schelling, F. W. J. (1993) Philosophie der Offenbarung 1841/42. Edited and introduced by M. Frank. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  18. Swinburne, R. (1981). Faith and reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  19. Vanstone, W. H. (1977). Love’s endeavor, love’s expense. London: Darton, Longman and Todd.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and PhilosophyColumbus State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of Michigan-DearbornDearbornUSA

Personalised recommendations