, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 113–133 | Cite as

Time/History, Self-disclosure and Anticipation: Pannenberg, Heidegger and the Question of Metaphysics



This essay examines Wolfhart Pannenberg’s defense of metaphysics’ foundational importance for philosophy and theology. Among all the modern philosophers whose claims Pannenberg challenges, Martin Heidegger’s discourse against Western metaphysics receives the major portion of criticism. The first thing one concludes from this criticism is an affirmation of a wide intellectual gap that separates Pannenberg’s thought from Heidegger’s, as if each stands at the very opposite corner of the other’s school of thought. The questions this essay tackles are: is this seemingly irreconcilable difference between Pannenberg and Heidegger fully justifiable? What if there is a reading of Panneberg’s and Heidegger’s view of metaphysics that can reveal deeper similarities between the two thinkers than the first reading of Pannenberg’s criticism of Heidegger allows us to see? It then answers these questions by showing that both thinkers actually share a common emphasis on the concepts of ‘time/history’, ‘self-disclosure’ and ‘anticipation’, and their reliance on these notions reveals that Heidegger’s and Pannenberg’s approaches to the phenomenon of understanding and to metaphysical ontology are not fully contradictory but rather hold noticeable hermeneutical similarities.


Pannenberg Heidegger Metaphysics History Self-disclosure Anticipation The idea of God 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lecturer in Systematic and Intercultural TheologyEL Missionseminar, Hermannsburg/Göttingen UniversityHermannsburgGermany

Personalised recommendations