, 48:351 | Cite as

The Anthropic Argument Against the Existence of God

  • Mark WalkerEmail author


If God is morally perfect then He must perform the morally best actions, but creating humans is not the morally best action. If this line of reasoning can be maintained then the mere fact that humans exist contradicts the claim that God exists. This is the ‘anthropic argument’. The anthropic argument, is related to, but distinct from, the traditional argument from evil. The anthropic argument forces us to consider the ‘creation question’: why did God not create other gods rather than humans? That is, if God is omniscient, omnipotent, and morally perfect then why didn’t He create a world populated exclusively by beings that are perfect in the same way that He is—ontological equivalents— rather than choosing to create humans with finite natures and all the suffering that this entails?


Problem of evil God Free will Plantinga 


  1. Adams, R. (1972). Must God create the best? Philosophical Review, 81, 317–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alston, A. (1989). Some suggestions for divine command theorists’, reprinted in divine nature and human language: Essays in philosophical theology. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Augustine. (1950). The city of God, translated by Marcus Dods. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
  4. Basinger, D. (1980). Must God Create the Best Possible World? A Response. International Philosophical Quarterly, 20.Google Scholar
  5. Blumenthal, D. R. (1993). Facing the abusing God: A theology of protest. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar
  6. Daniels, C. B. (1996). God vs. less than the very best. Sophia, 35, 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davies, B. (1993). An introduction to the philosophy of religion (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. DeRose, K. (1991). Plantinga, presumption, possibility, and the problem of evil. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 21, 497–512.Google Scholar
  9. Grover, S. (1988). Why only the best is good enough. Analysis, 48, 224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hasker, W. (2004). Providence, evil and the openness of God. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Hick, J. (1977). Evil and the God of love (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  12. Hick, J. (1981). ‘An Irenaean theodicy’, in Encountering Evil (pp. 39–52). Atlanta: John Knox Press.Google Scholar
  13. Howard-Synder, D., & Howard-Synder, F. (1994). How an unsurpassable being can create a surpassable world. Faith and Philosophy, 11, 260–267.Google Scholar
  14. Howard-Snyder, D., & O’Leary-Hawthorne, J. (1998). Transworld sanctity and plantinga’s free will defense. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 44(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heyd, D. (1992). Genethics: moral issues in the creation of people. University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kant, I. (1964). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals, translated by H. J. Paton. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  17. Kraay, K. (2005). William L. Rowe’s a priori argument for atheism. Faith and Philosophy, 211–234.Google Scholar
  18. Kraay, K. ‘Theism, possible worlds and the multiverse’, forthcoming in Philosophical Studies.Google Scholar
  19. Leibniz, G. W. (1952). Theodicy, translated by E. M. Huggard. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Leslie, J. (1989). Universes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Lewis, C. (1940). The problem of pain. London: Geoffrey Bles.Google Scholar
  22. Mackie, J. L. (1955). Evil and omnipotence. Mind, 64, 200–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McClosky, H. J. (1960). God and evil. Philosophical Quarterly, 10, 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Myers, C. M. (1987). Free will and the problem of evil. Religious Studies, 23, 289–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. O’Connor, T. (2008). Theism and ultimate explanation: the necessary shape of contingency. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Otte, R. (2009). Transworld depravity and unobtainable worlds. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 78, 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Patterson, R. W. K. (1979). Evil, omniscience and omnipotence. Religious Studies, 15, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Plantinga, A. (1974). God, freedom and evil. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  30. Plantinga, A. (1989). The nature of necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Plantinga, A. (2009). Transworld depravity, transworld sanctity, & uncooperative essences. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 88, 178–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Resnick, L. (1973). God and the best possible world. American Philosophical Quarterly, 10, 313–317.Google Scholar
  33. Rowe, W. (1993). The problem of divine perfection and freedom. In I. E. Stump (Ed.), Reasoned faith (pp. 223–233). New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Rowe, W. (1998). In defense of ‘the free will defense’. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 44, 115–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rowe, W. (2004). Can God be free. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Rubenstein, R. L. (1992). After Auschwitz: history, theology, and contemporary Judaism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Scharader, D. (1988). Evil and the best possible worlds. Sophia, 27, 24–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Soelle, D. (1975). Suffering. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
  39. Stump, E. (1985). The problem of evil. Faith and Philosophy, 2, 392–418.Google Scholar
  40. Swinburne, R. (1977). The coherence of theism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  41. Swinburne, R. (1989). Could there be more than one God. Faith and Philosophy, 5, 225–241.Google Scholar
  42. Swinburne, R. (1998). Providence and the problem of evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tuggy, D. (2003). The unfinished business of trinity theorizing. Religious Studies, 39, 165–183.Google Scholar
  44. Weinstock, J. A. (1975). Must God create the best world? Sophia, 14, 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wielenberg, E. J. (2004). A morally unsurpassable God must create the very best. Religious Studies, 40, 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Richard L. Hedden Chair of Advanced Philosophical Studies, Department of PhilosophyNew Mexico State UniversityLas CrucesUSA

Personalised recommendations