, 48:419 | Cite as

Towards a Religiously Adequate Alternative to OmniGod Theism

  • John BishopEmail author


Theistic religious believers should be concerned that the God they worship is not an idol. Conceptions of God thus need to be judged according to criteria of religious adequacy that are implicit in the ‘God-role’—that is, the way the concept of God properly functions in the conceptual economy and form of life of theistic believers. I argue that the conception of God as ‘omniGod’—an immaterial personal creator with the omni-properties—may reasonably be judged inadequate, at any rate from the perspective of a relationship ethics based on the Christian revelation that God is Love. I go on to suggest that a conception of God as the power of love within the natural universe might prove more adequate, with God’s role as creator understood in terms of final rather than efficient causation.


Concepts of God Idolatry Theism Developmental theism Love Relationship ethics The problem of evil 


  1. Adams, M. M. (1999). Horrendous evils and the goodness of God. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, M. M. (2001). Afterword. In S. T. Davis (Ed.), Encountering evil: Live options in theodicy. Louisville KY: Westminster John Knox Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bishop, J. (2002). Faith as doxastic venture. Religious Studies, 38, 471–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bishop, J. (2007a). Believing by faith: An essay in the epistemology and ethics of religious belief. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bishop, J. (2007b). How a modest fideism may constrain concepts of God: A Christian alternative to classical theism. Philosophia, 35, 387–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chisholm, R. (1990). The defeat of good and evil. In M. M. Adams & R. M. Adams (Eds.), The problem of evil. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dostoevsky, F. (1958). The Brothers Karamazov. Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  8. Forrest, P. (2007). Developmental theism: From pure will to unbounded love. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Kaufman, G. (1972). God the problem. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Moser, P. (2008). The elusive God: Reorienting religious epistemology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Nagel, T. (1997). The last word. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Plantinga, A. (2000). Warranted Christian belief. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Sartre, J.-P. (1964). The words. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
  14. Tillich, P. (2001). Dynamics of faith. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  15. Watson, J. R. (2003). An annotated anthology of hymns. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyThe University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations