Sophia

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 319–324 | Cite as

Why a Believer Could Believe that God Answers Prayers

Article

Abstract

In a previous issue of this journal Michael Veber argued that God could not answer certain prayers because doing so would be immoral. In this article I attempt to demonstrate that Veber’s argument is simply the logical problem of evil applied to a possible world. Because of this, his argument is susceptible to a Plantinga-style defense.

Keywords

Problem of evil God Efficacy of prayer Prayer 

References

  1. Cha, K., Wirth, D. P., & Rogerio, L. (2001). Does prayer influence the success of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer? Report of a masked, randomized, trial. Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 46, 781–787.Google Scholar
  2. Krucoff, M. W., Crater, S. W., Green, C. L., Maas, A. C., Seskevich, J. E., Lane, J. D., et al. (2001). Integrative noetic therapies as adjuncts to percutaneous intervention during unstable coronary syndromes: Monitoring and Actualization of Noetic Training (MANTRA) feasibility pilot. American Heart Journal, 142(5), 760-769.Google Scholar
  3. Mackie, J. L. (1955). Evil and Omnipotence. Mind, 64(254), 200–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Plantinga, A. (1974). The nature of necessity (p. 165). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Veber, M. (2007). Why even a believer should not believe that God answers prayers. Sophia, 46(2), 177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyTyndale University CollegeTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations