Advertisement

JOM

, Volume 50, Issue 9, pp 58–64 | Cite as

The key role of impurities in ancient damascus steel blades

  • J. D. Verhoeven
  • A. H. Pendray
  • W. E. Dauksch
Archaeotechnology Feature

Abstract

The art of producing the famous 16–18th century Damascus steel blades found in many museums was lost long ago. Recently, however, research has established strong evidence supporting the theory that the distinct surface patterns on these blades result from a carbide-banding phenomenon produced by the microsegregation of minor amounts of carbide-forming elements present in the wootz ingots from which the blades were forged. Further, it is likely that wootz Damascus blades with damascene patterns may have been produced only from wootz ingots supplied from those regions of India having appropriate impurity-containing ore deposits.

Keywords

Cementite Pearlite Surface Pattern Steel Matrix Steel Ingot 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. Sache, Damascus Steel, Myth, History, Technology Applications (Düsseldorf, Germany: Stahleisen, 1994).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. Bronson, “The Making and Selling of Wootz,” Archeomaterials, 1 (1986), pp. 13–51.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. Rostoker and B. Bronson, “Pre-Industrial Iron, Its Technology and Ethnology,” Archeomaterial Monograph No. 1 (Philadelphia, PA: Archaeomaterials, 1990), p. 127.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L.S. Figiel, On Damascus Steel (Atlantas, FL: Atlantas Arts Press, 1991).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C.S. Smith, A History of Metallography, Chapters 3 and 4 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C.S. Smith, “Damascus Steel,” Science, 216 (1983), pp. 242–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Wadsworth and O.D. Sherby, “Damascus Steel-Making,” Science, 216 (1983), pp. 328–330.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.D. Verhoeven and D.T. Peterson, “What is Damascus Steel?” Mat. Char., 29 (1992), pp. 355–341.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Breant, “Description of a Process for Making Damasked Steel,” Annals of Philosophy, 8 (1824), pp. 267–271.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Anossoff and O. Bulatakh, Gornyj Journal (2) (1841), pp. 157–318.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    N.T. Belaiew, “Uber Damast,” Metallurgie, 8 (1911), pp. 449–456; “Damast, seine Struktur und Eigenschaften,” Metallurgie, 8 (1911), pp. 699–704; “Damascene Steel,” J. Iron and Steel Inst., 97 (1918), pp. 417–439.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Wadsworth and O.D. Sherby, “On the Bulat-Damascus Steel Revisited,” Prog. Mat. Sci., 25 (1980), pp. 35–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. Zschokke, “Du Damasse et des Lames de Damas,” Rev. Met., 21 (1924), pp. 635–669.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.D. Verhoeven and A.H. Pendray, “The Mystery of the Damascus Sword,” Muse, 2 (2) (April 1998), pp. 35–43.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J.D. Verhoeven and A.H. Pendray, “Experiments to Reproduce the Pattern of Damascus Steel Blades,” Mat. Char., 29 (1992), pp. 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J.D. Verhoeven, A.H. Pendray, and P.M. Berge, “Studies of Damascus Steel Blades: Part II–Destruction and Reformation of the Pattern,” Mat. Char., 30 (1993), pp. 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J.D. Verhoeven, A.H. Pendray, and E.D. Gibson, “Wootz Damascus Steel Blades,” Mat. Char., 37 (1996), pp. 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J.D. Verhoeven et al., “Microsegregation and Banding in Hypereutectoid Steel: Damascus Steel,” ISS Trans., 25 (in press).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    E.M. Taleff et al., “Pearlite in Ultrahigh Carbon Steels: Heat Treatments and Mechanical Properties,” Met. Mat. Trans. A, 27A (1996), pp. 111–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    J.D. Verhoeven and E.D. Gibson, “The Divorced Eutectoid Transformation (DET) in Steel,” Met. Mat. Trans., 29A (1998), pp. 1181–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    D.T. Peterson, H.H. Baker, and J.D. Verhoeven, “Damascus Steel, Characterization of One Damascus Steel Sword,” Mat. Char., 24 (1990), pp. 355–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Massalski, “Preparation de lacier Damasse en Perse,” Ann. Du Journal des Mines de Russie (1841), pp. 297–308.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    H.T.P. J. duc de Luynes, Memoire sur la Fabrication de lacier Foundu et Damassee (Paris: 1844).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    C. Panseri, “Damascus Steel in Legend and Reality,” Gladius, IV (1965), pp. 5–66.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    R.A. Grange, “Effect of Microstructural Banding in Steel,” Met. Trans., 2 (1971), pp. 417–426.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    L.E. Samuals, Optical Microscopy of Carbon Steels (Metals Park, OH: ASM, 1980), pp. 154–161.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    S.W. Thompson and P.R. Howell, “Factors Influencing Ferrite/Pearlite Banding and Origin of Large Pearlite Nodules in a Hypoeutectoid Plate Steel,” Mat. Sci. Tech., 8 (1992), pp. 777–784.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    R. Grossterlinden et al., “Formation of Pearlite Banded Structures in Ferrite-Pearlite Steels,” Steel Research, 63 (1992), pp. 331–336.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    P.T. Craddock, “Cast Iron, Fined Iron, Crucible Steel: Liquid Iron in the Ancient World,” Prehistory of Mining and Extractive Metallurgy, ed. P.T. Craddock and J. Lang (London: British Museum, in press).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    H. Maryon, “Pattern Welding and Damascening of Sword Blades Part 2,” J. of Intern. Inst. for Conservation of Hist. and Art. Works, 5 (1960), pp. 52–60.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© TMS 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. D. Verhoeven
    • 1
  • A. H. Pendray
    • 1
  • W. E. Dauksch
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringIowa State UniversityAmes

Personalised recommendations