Advertisement

JOM

, Volume 70, Issue 4, pp 553–560 | Cite as

Advances in Gammalloy Materials–Processes–Application Technology: Successes, Dilemmas, and Future

  • Young-Won KimEmail author
  • Sang-Lan Kim
Technical Communication

Abstract

For the last several years, gamma titanium aluminide (γ-TiAl)-based alloys, called “gammalloys,” in specific alloy-microstructure forms began to be implemented in civil aero-engines as cast or wrought low-pressure turbine (LPT) blades and in select ground vehicle engines as cast turbocharger rotors and wrought exhaust valves. Their operation temperatures are approximately up to 750°C for LPT blades and around 1000°C for turbocharger rotors. This article critically assesses current engineering gammalloys and their limitations and introduces eight strengthening pathways that can be adopted immediately for the development of advanced, higher temperature gammalloys. Intelligent integration of the pathways into the emerging application-specific research and development processes is emphasized as the key to the advancement of the gammalloy technology to the next higher engineering performance levels.

Introduction

The finally realized implementations of current engineering gammalloy materials (cast 4822, cast 45XD and wrought TNM) as aero-engine low-pressure turbine blades (LPTB) for intermediate service temperatures (up to 750°C) began to establish the foundations of their respective materials–processes–manufacturing technologies.16 The first commercial flights of gammalloy LPTBs took place in March, 2012 when Japan Airlines received purchased Boeing 787 Dreamliners powered by GEnx-1B engines equipped with alloy 4822 LPTBs on the last two LPT stages. That was 2 years after the first flight of B787 with GEnx engines, approximately 8 years after their successful implementation in GEnx engines, 17 years after the first certification for CFM CF6 engines [Guy Norris, Power House, Flight International, 13 June 2006], approximately 24 years after the development of alloy 4822 at GE and nearly 40 years after the first gammalloy exploration program initiated at AF Materials Laboratory and conducted by P&W.7,8

Cast gammalloys (Ti-46/47Al-3/6Nb base) began to be used for automotive engine turbocharger wheels first at 850°C (1999) and then at gradually increased gas temperatures up to 1000°C (2011):9,10 This enhancement has been possible because of less stringent requirements in property balances, however with slow adoptions due to the reliability and cost issues. The first commercial application of gammalloy exhaust valves eventually took place with a near-alpha extruded and head-forged form of alloy 02B (Ti-44Al-6Nb-0.3W-0.1B)11 in 2013 for race vehicle (F-1 and Moto GP) engines12 where the operating temperatures are over 800°C.

Despite the exciting developments, their ongoing application expansion activities13,14 and new applications4,6 have shown that their respective temperature capabilities for aero-engine applications have remained unchanged ever since. The future of gammalloy technology will depend on whether or not or how we can develop or design gammalloy materials–processes–microstructure combinations yielding greater service temperature (750–900°C) capability for specific aero-engine applications and greater producibility–reliability for ground vehicle engine component applications.

This article first summarizes the exploration history of gamma TiAl alloys and reclassifies them by renaming them gammalloys, redefines their microstructures, assesses current engineering gammalloys and their limitations in service temperature, describes specific pathways to achieving greater temperature capabilities and then introduces the emerging “application-specific research and development (AsRD)” processes, with a recent realized example, for the development of higher temperature gammalloys.

Gammalloys—Classification and Microstructure Evolution

The first major gammalloy development programs performed at PW investigated many alloy compositions, including Ti-45Al-5Nb, and in the end (1981) recommended Ti-48Al-based alloys, such as Ti-48Al-2W, Ti-48Al-2Nb-1W and Ti-48Al-1V-0.1C.7,8 Based on the Ti-48Al-based compositions that undergo peritectic solidification, many conventional gammalloy (CG) compositions were explored and evaluated for over a decade starting in the late in 1980s. These alloys can be grouped in area CG of a quasi-ternary isothermal (900°C) phase field section (Ti-Al-Nbeq) containing γ, α2 and B2 (Fig. 1). The phase field was constructed by converting the electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) data of the equilibrium compositions of constituent phases to Nbeq using the beta-forming equivalency (BFE) determined for the first time for gammalloys utilizing available ternary phase diagrams.15 The BFE relation, Nb = Cr/3 = Mn/2 = V/2 = Mo/6 = W/8, was estimated based on Ti-44Al-X-based gammalloy compositions15 and has been proven valid for a wide range of compositions.
Fig. 1

A quasi-ternary isothermal (900°C) phase field section (Ti-Al-Nbeq), consisting of γ, α2 and β/B2 phases, shows two regions divided by an arrowed gray line that contain conventional gammalloy (CG) compositions and beta solidified gammalloy (BSG) compositions, respectively. CG alloys are characterized by peritectic solidification, and the BSG region includes special types of areas (A, B, C) that yield γ-rich (> 85%) alloys, called beta-gamma gammalloys (BG) (Gamteck DKI Base, Y-W. Kim, 15.0310)

The phase field section in Fig. 1 redefines gammalloys as conventional gammalloys (CG) and beta solidified gammalloys (BSG) located across the arrowed dividing line near the gamma phase field. CG compositions exist within the range Ti-(48-45)Al-(0-8)Nb-(0-4)(Cr, Mn)-(0-1)(Mo, W)-(0-1)B-(0-0.8)(C, Si) and BSG compositions within Ti-(42-45)Al-(0-10)Nb-(0-4)(Cr, Mn)-(0-2)(Mo, W)-(0-0.2)B-(0-0.6)(C, Si).

The typical CG alloys include: 4822 (Ti-48Al-2Nb-2Cr),1 XD alloys (Ti-45Al-2Nb-2Mn-0.8v/oTiB2),3 K5 (Ti-46.2Al-3Nb-2Cr-xB-yC/Si)16 and TNB (Ti-45Al-5/8Nb-0.2B-0.2C).17 These gammalloys generate numerous microstructures that sensitively depend on alloy composition, solidification path, processing route, post-processing heat treatment cycle and aging/stabilization condition. The microstructures were first identified and classified into near-gamma, duplex, nearly lamellar (NL) and fully lamellar (FL),18 and XD lamellar (XDL) is a complex form of FL. The first four are produced in cast as well as wrought forms,15,18 while XDL is in cast forms,3 and their microstructure–property relationships are too complex to quantify. However, the relationships could be described for well-controlled duplex and FL materials.19

BSG alloys are Ti-(42–44)Al based and contain significantly low (generally below 75%) amounts of gamma phase compared to those (> 85%) in CG alloys, as indicated by alloy 1 (Ti-42A-5Mn)20 and alloy 2 (TNM: Ti-43Al-4Nb-1Mo-0.1B),5,6 which are approximately located in Fig. 1. Unlike CG alloys, a small boron addition, (0.04–0.2) at.% B, helps the BSG compositions solidify to fine-grained (< 50 µm) lamellar structures, however with significant amounts of grain boundary gamma and/or β/B25,2023 and varying randomness depending on the cooling rate.24 Because of these and the apparent inability of producing coarser-grained isotropic FL microstructures and fair formability, efforts had been made to control characteristic wrought-processed nearly lamellar structures. This led to the development of TNM-WNL, a BSG alloy wrought material with a specific NL (WNL) structure, which has managed to make the last stage LPT application in geared turbofan engines.6

BSG alloys have not demonstrated the formation of fine-grained (40–150 µm), fully lamellar (FGFL) microstructures that are γ rich (> 85%) in any material forms. This dilemma was resolved by a special form of BSG alloys, called beta gammalloys (BG), that exist very close to the gamma phase field in three types, A, B and C, as mapped in Fig. 1.15 Type B and A BG alloys lie within the γ-rich and β-lean phase distributions, (85–92)γ-(0–2.5)β/B2-(15–7)α2 (vol.%). A type B BG alloy, 09C (Ti-43.8Al-4Nb-2Cr-xB-yC), has demonstrated FGFL (30–100 µm) microstructures in a wrought-processed material form that yields remarkable RT tensile properties (YS and ductility) and high-temperature strength retention.15 Importantly, this alloy demonstrates similar characters in a cast/annealed material form.23

High-Nb BSG alloys based on Ti-(44/45)Al have attracted significant attention, and typical examples include Ti-45Al-8.5Nb-0.2W-0.2B-0.0Y25 and Ti-44/45Al-6/4Nb-2Mo-Y/B alloys.26 These alloys contain more Al and Nb + Mo than TNM alloy, indicating greater environmental resistance and improved property balance, and enhanced operation temperatures if they exhibit the BG type phase distributions. Property measurements on a wide range of processing–microstructure combinations showed these potentials and the possibility of producing FGFL material (FGFL).26,27 This was manifested by a type A BG alloy 02B (Ti-44Al-6Nb-0.3W-0.1B) for successful high-temperature racing valve applications.11,12

Table I lists and summarizes gammalloys, their types and composition ranges, phase and microstructure distributions, and related details, as discussed above.
Table I

Gammalloys, types and related details (Gamteck DKI Base, Y-W. Kim, 17.0716)

Alloy type

Conventional gammalloys (CG)

Beta solidified gammalloys (BSG)

Typical composition range

Ti-(48–45)Al-(2–10)Nb-(0–4)(Cr, Mn)-(0–1)(Mo, W)-(0–1)B-(0–0.8)(C, Si)

Ti-(42–45)Al-(0–10)Nb-(0–5)(Cr, Mn)-(0–1) (Mo, W)-(0–0.2)B-(0–0.5)(C, Si)

Solidification type

Peritectic (or alpha) solidification

Beta solidification

Phase distribution (%) (< 1000°C)

γ (95–85) + α2 (5–15) + B2 (< 0.5)

BSG: γ (< 75) + α2 (0–26) + β/B2 (0–25) BG (A, B): γ (92–84) + α2 (6–16) + β/B2 (0–2.5)

Example alloys

Current CG: Ti-4822, 45XD-High-order γ-rich CG (HCG): K5, K3

Ti-42Al-5Mn; current BSG: TNM

High Nb BSG: Ti-(42–45)Al-(6–9)Nb-(0, 0.3)W-(0, 2)Mo-(0, 0.1)B

BG alloys: 02B (type A) and 9C (type B)

As-cast microstructure type

Ti-4822: large-grained nearly FL

45XD: XD lamellar (XDL)

HCG: large-grained FL

Fast cooling: elongated fine lamellar grains with GB B2 particles

Slow cooling: equiaxed fine lamellar grains

Assessing Current Engineering Gammalloys

Table II compares the current engineering gammalloys, Ti-4822, 45XD and TNM, and their processing-material details designed for their respective LPTB applications, and their pertinent engineering microstructures are shown in Fig. 2. The poor (or low) general plasticity is a continued concern that has often discouraged continued research or component development activities. This, however, has not deterred (rightly so) the application-specific component development activities at major aero-engine OEMs, as the current alloy materials in controlled microstructure forms demonstrate good resistance to fracture and fatigue as well as reasonable threshold intensities (ΔKth). Despite the low ductility (2–0.6%), therefore, their LPT blades have already been put in service extensively in advanced aero-turbine engines for more than 5 years.
Table II

Current engineering gammalloys and application material details (Gamteck DKI Base, Y-W. Kim, 17.0712)

Alloy

Ti-482228

45XD3,4,29

TNM6

Alloy class

Conv. or peritectic-solidified

XDL

Beta solidified

Composition

Ti-47.2Al-2Nb-2Cr (targeted)

Ti-48Al-2Nb-2Mn-1B (N)

Ti-43Al-4Nb-1Mo-0.1B (N)

Processing

Cast- HT1-HIP-HT2

Cast- HIP- HT

Cast-forge-HT

Microstructure

Casting duplex/NL

XDL (low anisotropy)

Wrought NL

Phase distribution (v/o)23

γ (88–95) + α2 (Bal) + B2(< 0.5)

83γ  + 16α2 + 1TiB2

68γ + 26α2 + 6B2

Ductility (%)

~ 2

1.5

~ 0.6

Property description

Low strength with high HT retention, but most balanced

Strong at RT but low HT strength retention

Very strong at RT but very low HT strength retention

LPTB application (year)

GEnX (2012) & LEAP

RR engines (~ 2018)

GTF engines (2016)

Approximate limit of operation T (°C)

< 700

< 700

< 750

Ti-4822: The phase distribution range of Ti-4822 (spec) was estimated based on the value (95.5γ + 4α2 + 0.5B2) measured on the Ti4822 (actual) casting duplex.23 45XD: The phase distribution was estimated based on the composition and the BSE imaging in Fig. 2b.23 TNM: The phase distribution was estimated23 based on the experimental value,6 72γ + 23α2 + 5B2, measured on a composition of Ti-43.9Al-4Nb-1Mo-0.1B.

Fig. 2

Current engineering gammalloys showing their application-specific microstructures: (a) Ti-4822 with casting duplex/NL; (b) 45XD with cast + heat treated XDL;29 (c) TNM with wrought + heat treated NL6

The limiting factors for their low service temperatures (< 750°C) that can be drawn from Table II and Fig. 2 include: (1) none is FL with anisotropic lath structures; (2) casting Duplex/NL consists of degenerated lath structures (Ti-4822); (3) XDL with random lath bundles and boundaries and low anisotropy (45XD); (4) NL with low gamma volume (< 72%), grain boundary gamma and B2 particles and high α2 volume (TNM). Collectively, significant increases in RT strength levels (4822 to XD to TNM) would not raise the operation temperature levels visibly, as the increases in RT strength lower the high temperature strength retention more rapidly.

The method to raise the service temperature is to improve both the strength and its high temperature strength retention capability together, which is directly related to the above shortcomings. However, the (obvious) shortcomings have not been assessed or even noticed, largely because of our tendency to take the existing situation for granted. This lack of the integral physical-mechanistic understanding has often led us to vague R&D directions or targets, thereby guiding the materials community to delve into added investigation of the known data, knowledge and information (DKI) or unnecessary or redundant details. Most of the additionally generated research and development outcome over the last decade therefore has not helped resolve the shortcomings.

Pathways to Advanced Gammalloys

The above shortcomings of the current gammalloys can be alleviated or removed by realizing the pathways to achieving greater high-temperature (HT) capability that will increase both the RT strength level and/or HT strength retention. The needed steps and abilities required for this process include: (1) hands-on experience in fundamental as well as applied RD, (2) mechanistic as well as physical understanding of the existing DKI, (3) valuation and selection of DKI for specific targets, (4) processing experience and knowledge, (5) knowledge of industrial infrastructure, and (6) manufacturing and application information.

The most important requirement, DKI, has been documented over the last 30 years in a number of publications since 1989.19,3041 The critical areas include: (1) composition-processing-microstructure-property relations, involving phase distribution, microstructure evolution and control, inverse relations, solid solution and compositions of gamma phase, precipitation hardening, deformation-fracture, creep and fatigue; (2) processing details such as ingot-casting, investment casting, forging, extrusion, rolling, directional processing and heat treatment cycles; (3) alloying and phase distribution effects on oxidation, surface protection,41 joining, machining, wear and erosion.

Since alloy materials having higher temperature capability tend to lower the ductility, the best way to compensate for the degradation is minimizing it and/or toughening the newly strengthened matrix. This can be accomplished by generating a microstructure and material form based on fine lamellar grains consisting of the highest possible anisotropic laths with a desired γ-rich (> 85%) phase distribution, which will help retain the plasticity and enhance the resistance to crack initiation/growth and creep deformation. The fullest high temperature performance in balance will be reached when the alloy material is produced into uniform FGFL15 or refined FL (RFL)15,16 forms with the highest deformation anisotropy in the lamellar grains and optimized grain boundary morphologies. Further improved temperature capabilities can be most effectively achieved in lamellar structures when small additions of C or C + Si are segregated from decomposing α2 laths in the forms of stable incoherent precipitates (Ti2AlC, Ti5Si3) along the lath interfaces.33 The used-to-be coherent and easy slip planes are disturbed with incoherent precipitates, residual alpha-2, small amounts of B2 particles and some openings, effectively pinning and blocking dislocation movements.

Another or additional improvement in RT as well as high temperature performance can be made when the material is processed directionally into an aligned lamellar grain structure employing controlled alpha-field hot working, such as extrusion,12,15 forging15 or rolling. Recent advances in the directional solidification (DS) processes for small ingots have shown some possibilities for producing highly textured DS4244 or single-crystalline like PST45 material forms. Producing such forms with highly anisotropic creep-resistant laths is a daunting task even for simple shapes, not to mention complex shapes.

Based on the above discussions, eight (8) specific pathways to achieving greater temperature capabilities are identified as listed below:
  • P1—Microstructure optimization (4822-NL formed upon cooling, 45-Refined XDL, TNM-NFL).

  • P2—Higher order (than 4822), gamma-rich conventional gammalloys (HCG) in NL forms.

  • P3—NFL microstructure generation in conventional gammalloys in cast or wrought material forms.18

  • P4—FGFL microstructure generation in BG alloys in cast as well as wrought material forms.15

  • P5—RFL microstructure generation in HCG alloy wrought processed material forms.15

  • P6—Incoherent particle strengthening of the HCG alloy cast as well as wrought FL (NFL, FGFL, RFL) material forms.33

  • P7—Directional processing—alpha forging,15 alpha extrusion11,12 and possibly alpha rolling.

  • P8—Directional solidification42, 43, 44, 45—possible realization requires long-term efforts.

Most of the pathways have proven to be valid experimentally or using DKI-based concepts,23 and each can be validated/realized with minimum validation experiments, except for P8, on a few pathway-specific-alloy-processing combinations. All alloys for P2 through P7 are required to have phase distributions within the γ-predominant (85–92)γ-(0–2.5)β/B2-(16–7)α2 (%), which are rich in γ and deficient in beta.

Two examples are a BG alloy 9C (Ti-43.7Al-4Nb-2Cr-0.2B-0.2C) for P415 and an HCG alloy K3 (Ti-45.5Al-2Cr-2.5Nb-0.3W-X) for P5.15 The 9C composition was used to yield FGFL material forms through wrought processing (alloy 9C) and also casting (alloy CN). Their average FL grain sizes in these alloy forms were approximately 55 µm and 60 µm, respectively. Alloy K3 was controlled to have two different wrought RFL grain sizes, K3FL1 (110 µm), K3FL2 (220 µm) and K3FL3 (700 µm). Figure 3 compares 9C (a) and K3FL2 (b) microstructures in BSE imaging conditions.
Fig. 3

Fully lamellar BSE microstructures of: (a) beta gammalloy (BG) 9CN wrought FG-FL (55 µm) and (b) conventional (peritectic) gammalloy (CG) K3 wrought-processed RFL (~ 220 µm)

Figure 4 shows tensile yield strengths (a) and specific YS values (b) as a function of temperature for three current gammalloy materials (4822-CDP/NP, 45XDL, TNM-WNL) and two advanced gammalloy materials (9C-FGFL, CN-FGFL, K3FL1 and K3FL2). For TNM, the data from a cast + heat treated material46 were used for convenience. For comparison, the yield strength variation of a high-Nb BSG gammalloy with modulated microstructures47 is also plotted along with Ni-base alloy 718. The YS levels of current gammalloys vary significantly, however, to reach similar low values around or below 200 MPa at 1000°C. For example, TNM shows a very low retention from 950 MPa at RT to a value below 200 MPa at 1000°C. Even this low retention46 is better than those of the stronger mod Hi-Nb alloy material47 and the forged + heat treated 718. Remarkable HT strength retentions are achieved in advanced gammalloys, especially an HCG alloy K3 in RFL forms (110 µm and 220 µm) that exhibit a high YS = 730 MPa at RT and 420 MPa at 1000°C, showing a 58% retention. This high HT strength retention is expected to yield accordingly enhanced creep resistance at high temperatures.
Fig. 4

Yield stress versus temperature (a) and specific YS versus temperature (b) of two advanced alloys (CG alloy K3 and BG alloy 9C) in their specific processing-FL microstructure combinations are compared with those of current engineering gammalloy materials, 4822-CDP,3,28 45XDL3 and cast TNM,46 and a modulated high-Nb alloy material,47 along with wrought superalloy 718 (Gamteck DKI Base, Y-W. Kim, 17.0910)

Advances in Gammalloy Technology and Application-Specific RD Process

Figure 5 graphically summarizes the previously discussed advances in the gammalloy materials–processes–application technology in terms of operation temperature capability. The lateral expansion of current aero-engine LPTB gammalloys is shown to be steady but remains in the same temperature range (< 750°C). A short-lived development effort for beta solidified alloys with two-phase (γ + β) distributions20,48 is added in the schematic. Automotive engine turbocharger wheels began to be used in diesel engines at 850°C and later on in gasoline engines at much higher temperatures up to 1000°C or higher. At these high temperatures, most gammalloy materials need to be properly coated.41
Fig. 5

Advances in service temperature capabilities of: (1) current gammalloys (4822, XD and TNM) realized for aero-engine LPT blades; (2) Ti-46/47Al-3/6Nb base alloys for automotive engine turbocharger wheels; (3) advanced gammalloys having potential for future aero-engine higher temperature rotational components. The initial BSG development effort leading to low temperature (< 650°C) two-phase alloys20,48 is depicted. An advanced alloy BG-2B (Ti-44Al-6Nb-0.3 W-X) has been used for race vehicle exhaust valves. LPTB (low-pressure turbine blades); CG (conventional gammalloys); CDP/NL (casting duplex/nearly lamellar); XDL (XD lamellar); BSG (beta-solidified gammalloys); WNL (wrought-processed NL); HCG (high-order γ-rich CG); BG (beta gammalloys); FGFL (fine-grained FL); IPS (incoherent-precipitates strengthened); R-valves (race vehicles wrought exhaust valves); TC-wheels (automotive turbocharger cast wheels); DKI (data, knowledge and information) (Gamteck DKI Base, Y-W. Kim, 17.1108)

Higher temperature (> 740°C) service capabilities for future or higher-performance aero-engine rotational applications require advanced gammalloys in specific processing-phase-microstructure combination forms that can be developed and produced through specific development pathways integrated with value-added DKI, as discussed already. The enhanced service temperatures are expected to range from 740°C to over 900°C depending on the selected pathway. The pathways can be selected and executed independently or in parallel, or two or three may be combined into an integrated form.

The application-specific research and development (AsRD) process that has been proposed and exercised11,12,15 is target-oriented and starts with the knowledge of applications requiring specific properties. The next step is to identify a relevant microstructure type and form that can generate such properties, which leads to the selection or prediction of the most suitable pathway consisting of the alloy and processing route. This top-to-bottom step needs detailed valuation of DKI and its integration into the process. Accelerated validation experiments and tests are to be followed to determine and optimize the alloy-processing-microstructure-property combination that can be used to produce the material suitable for the application.

Example The wrought gammalloy exhaust valves produced for select race vehicles by Dell West Engineering are the first gammalloy component developed employing the AsRD process.11,12 The required properties were high tensile and high-cycle-fatigue (HCF) strengths and their high retention and oxidation resistance at HT. Pathway P7, alpha-extrusion,15 was selected for producing textured FL microstructures suitable for the valve forms, and an innovative multi-rods extrusion method was formulated and employed for the cost effectiveness.12 The alloy that would potentially satisfy the specific property requirements through the specified extrusion-forging process was determined and selected to be an Hi-Nb BG alloy 2B (Ti-44Al-6Nb-0.3W-X) that had been developed earlier for improved processibility and HT uses.11 Accelerated validation experiments were conducted following the formulated alloy material-processing-heat treatment path that would generate desired microstructures and properties.12 The experiments included ingot size optimization, acceptable composition range determination, material and component evaluation, engine tests and scaling-up, while a component-specific isothermal head forging process was developed and refined in parallel. The whole process, including the establishment of a manufacturing vendor chain, took 2 years until the thus-produced valves were accepted and implemented in race vehicle (Formula 1 and Moto Grand Prix) engines.12

Table III lists important properties of current engineering gammalloys (CG and BSG) and advanced gammalloys, BG and advanced CG (ACG), and typical superalloys. Some values for advanced gammalloys were estimated based on a few data points. Nonetheless, they are useful as future references as advanced gammalloy development processes proceed.
Table III

Properties of current engineering gammalloys (CG and BSG) and advanced gammalloys (BG and ACG) for aero-engine applications versus superalloys (Gamteck DKI base, Y-W. Kim, 17.0907)

Property

CG alloys

BSG alloys

BG alloys

ACG alloys

Superalloysa

PD (%)

γ + α2

70γ + 25α2 + 5B2

γ + α2 + (0–2.5)B2

γ + α2 + (0–0.5)B2

γ + γ

Density (g/cm3)

3.9–4.1

4.0–4.2

4.0–4.3

3.9–4.2

7.9–8.9

RT YS (MPa)

300–550

700–900

650–850

400–800

800–1200

1000°C YS (MPa)

150–200

180–220

350–400

240–500

RT ductility (%)

1–2.5

0.5–1.5

1–2

0.5–2

3–25

RT K1c (MPa√m)

14–18

13–17

13–17

14–20

30–80

RT ∆Kth (MPa√m)

5–7

5–7

6–8

5–9

BDTT (°C)

~ 700

~ 750

750–800

760–830

L-Creep (°C)

650–750

700–750

750–850

750–930

650–800

L-Oxidation (°C)

750–800

700–800

750–850

800–900

800–1000

aProperty ranges in wrought superalloys, PD (phase distribution); CG (conventional, peritectic solidified gammalloys): 4822 and XD; BSG (beta solidified gammalloys): BG (beta gammalloys); TNM; ACG (BG and advanced CG gammalloys); YS (yield strength); TS (tensile strength); K1c (crack initiation toughness); ∆Kth (stress intensity for fatigue crack initiation); BDTT (brittle-ductile transition temperature); L-Creep (long-term creep resistance); L-Oxidation (long-term oxidation resistance).

Summary

Finally, we have three gammalloys implemented in aero-engine turbines. They are one (4822) among many conventional (peritectic) alloy compositions that have been explored over the last 3 decades, one XDL alloy (45XD) and one beta solidified alloy TNM. Their operation temperature limitation (750°C) has remained unchanged for nearly 3 decades to many years. This slow progress is largely due to our tendency to neglect the vast DKI pileup and instead chase the new ones, which are often vaguely targeted, redundant or subjective. As demonstrated in the specified pathways, exciting opportunities exist for moving the gammalloy materials-processes forward to achieving greater temperature capabilities. This opportunity can be realized through the application-specific R&D process, which is a powerful, accelerated methodology to select and utilize the application- or component-specific pathways to targeted advanced alloy materials and processes technology development.

References

  1. 1.
    C. Austin and T. Kelly, Structural Intermetallics, ed. R. Darolia, J.J. Lewandowski, C.T. Liu, and M.V. Nathal (Warrendale: TMS, 1993), pp. 143–150.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Haubert, GE aviation, “GE Aviation Summary-Gamma TiAl for GEnx LPT Blades, in Paper and Presentation for the Committee of Materials Needs and Research and Development Strategy for Future Military Aerospace Ststems (January 30, 2009)—www.nap.edu/openbook.phip Printed by NAC (National Academies Press, 2011), pp. 189–197.
  3. 3.
    B. London, D. Larsen, D.A. Wheeler, and P.R. Aimone, Structural Intermetallics, ed. R. Darolia, J.J. Lewandowski, C.T. Liu, and M.V. Nathal (Warrendale: TMS, 1993), pp. 151–157.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Withey, Rolls-Royce, Derby, UK, private communication, 2016.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Clemens, H.F. Chladil, W. Wallgram, G.A. Zickler, R. Gerling, K.-D. Liss, S. Kremmer, V. Guether, and W. Smarsly, Intermetallics 16, 827 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. Smarsly, J. Esslinger, and H. Clemens, MTU, Germany, research and development results presented at GTA-2014 (San Diego: TMS, 2014).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T.E. O’Connell, Report AFML-TR-79-4177, WPAFB, OH 45433, 12/1979.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M.J. Blackburn and M.P. Smith, Report AFWAL-TR-80-4175, WPAFB, OH 45433, 11/1980.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. Tetsui, Adv. Eng. Mater. 3, 307 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Y. Koyanagi and S. Ueta, Daido Steel, Japan, unpublished research and development results and commercialization process discussed at GTA-2013 (Toulouse, France, 2013).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Y-W. Kim, Gamteck, Ohio, unpublished research and development (Gamteck-proprietary alloy), 2002.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Sommer, Del West Engineering, CA, development and commercialization process presented at GTA-2015 (Nanjing, China, 2015).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Q. Claude, M. Marie, and L. Lauri, Safran, Paris, France, development and application status presented at GAT-2013 (Toulouse, France, 2013).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Sallot, Safran technology, Paris, France, private communication, 2016.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Y-W. Kim and S-L. Kim, Ongoing unpublished research presented at GAT-2012 (Beijing, China, June 5–9, 2012) and GAT-2015 (Nanjing, China, April 26–30, 2015).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Y-W. Kim and D. M. Dimiduk, U.S. Patent 5,558,729 (1996).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    F. Appel, J.D.H. Paul, M. Oehring, C. Buque, C. Klinkenberg, and T. Carneiro, Niobium for High Temperature Applications, ed. Y-W. Kim and T. Carneiro (Warrendale: TMS, 2004), pp. 139–152.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Y-W. Kim, Acta. Metall. Mater. 40, 1121 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Y-W. Kim, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 192, 519 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    T. Tetsui, K. Shindo, S. Kobayashi, and M. Takeyama, Scripta Mater. 47, 399 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    U. Hecht, V. Witusiewicz, A. Drevermann, and J. Zollinger, Intermetallics 16, 969 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Oehring, A. Stark, J.D.H. Paul, T. Lippmann, and F. Pyczak, Intermetallics 32, 12 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Y-W. Kim, Gamteck, Ohio, unpublished research presented at GAT-2017 (TMS-2017, San Diego, CA, 2017).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    U. Hecht and V.T. Witusiewicz, JOM 69, 2588 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    J. Xin, L. Zhang, G. Ge, and J.P. Lin, Mater. Des. 107, 406 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    H.Z. Niu, Y.Y. Chen, S.L. Xiao, and L.J. Xu, Intermetallics 31, 225 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    J.P. Lin, USTB, Beijing, unpublished data (2016).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    M.J. Weimer and T.J. Kelly, GE Aviation, Ohio, unpublished results presented at 3 rd int’l Workshop on Gamma TiAl Technologies (Bamberg, Germany, May 29–June 1, 2006).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    C. Yang, D. Hu, A. Huang, and M. Dixon, Intermetallics 45, 89 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Y-W. Kim, JOM 41, 24 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Y-W. Kim, JOM 46, 30 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Y-W. Kim, Intermetallics 6, 623 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Y-W. Kim and S.-L. Kim, Intermetallics 53, 92 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    R. Darolia, J.J. Lewandowski, C.T. Liu, and M.V. Nathal, eds., Structural Intermetallics (Warrendale: TMS, 1993).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Y-W. Kim, R. Wagner, and M. Yamaguchi, eds., Gamma Titanium Aluminides (PA: TMS, 1995).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    M.V. Nathal, R. Darolia, C.T. Liu, and M. Yamaguchi, eds., Structural Intermetallics (Pittsburgh: TMS, 1997).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Y-W. Kim, D.M. Dimiduk, and M.H. Loretto, eds., Gamma Titanium Aluminides (Pittsburgh: TMS, 1999).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    K.J. Hemker, D.M. Dimiduk, H. Clemens, and R. Darolia, eds., Structural Intermetallics (Pittsburgh: TMS, 2001).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Y-W. Kim, D. Morris, R. Yang, and C. Leyens, eds., Structural Aluminides for Elevated Temperatures (Pittsburgh: TMS, 2008).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    F. Appel, J. Paul, and M. Oehring, Gamma Titanium Aluminide Alloys: Science and Technology (Weinheim: Wiley, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    M. Schuetze, JOM 69, 2602 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    R. Chen, S. Dong, J. Guo, H. Ding, Y. Su, and H. Fu, Mater. Des. 89, 492 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    L. Lapin and Z. Gabalcova, Intermetallics 19, 797 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    X.F. Ding, J.P. Lin, L.Q. Zhang, Y.Q. Su, and G.L. Chen, Acta Mater. 60, 498 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    G. Chen, Y. Peng, G. Zheng, Z. Qi, M. Wang, H. Yu, C. Dong, and C.T. Liu, Nat. Mater. 15, 876 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    E. Schwaighofer, H. Clemens, S. Mayer, J. Lindemann, J. Klose, W. Smarsly, and V. Güther, Intermetallics 44, 128 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    F. Appel, J.D.H. Paul, and M. Oehring, Ref. 39, p. 127 (2008).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    T. Tetsui, K. Shindo, S. Kobayashi, and M. Takeyama, Intermetallics 11, 299 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gamteck LLCDaytonUSA

Personalised recommendations