Interpretation of Microstructural Effects on Porosity Evolution Using a Combined Dilatational/Crystal Plasticity Computational Approach
- 252 Downloads
- 3 Citations
Abstract
A novel formulation based on fast Fourier transforms for the prediction of ductile damage of polycrystalline materials that combines crystal plasticity and dilatational plasticity is reviewed and applied to understand the microstructural origin of available experimental evidence of porosity evolution in incipiently spalled Cu polycrystals. The influence of the Taylor factor of the crystalline ligaments linking interacting voids and the microstructural origin of a nonmonotonic grain-size dependence on porosity evolution is investigated and rationalized by means of numerical simulations using the new model.
Keywords
Slip System Void Growth Taylor Factor Porosity Evolution Ductile DamageNotes
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by LANL’s Laboratory-Directed Research and Development-Directed Research (LDRD-DR, Project 20140114DR) and ASC Science-Based Validation and Verification Programs.
References
- 1.G.I. Taylor, J. Inst. Met. 62, 307 (1938).Google Scholar
- 2.R.A. Lebensohn and C.N. Tomé, Acta Metall. Mater. 41, 2611 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.R.J. Asaro and A. Needleman, Acta Metall. 33, 923 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.F. Roters, P. Eisenlohr, L. Hantcherli, D.D. Tjahjanto, T.R. Bieler, and D. Raabe, Acta Mater. 58, 1152 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.H. Moulinec, P. Suquet, and C.R. Acad, Sci. Paris II 318, 1417 (1994).MATHGoogle Scholar
- 6.H. Moulinec and P. Suquet, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 157, 69 (1998).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 7.R.A. Lebensohn, Acta Mater. 49, 2723 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.R.A. Lebensohn, R. Brenner, O. Castelnau, and A.D. Rollett, Acta Mater. 56, 3914 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.R.A. Lebensohn, M. Montagnat, P. Mansuy, P. Duval, J. Meysonnier, and A. Philip, Acta Mater. 57, 1405 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.J.R. Rice and D.M. Tracey, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 17, 201 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.A.L. Gurson, J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 99, 2 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.A. Gologanu, J.B. Leblond, and J. Devaux, J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 116, 290 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.A.A. Benzerga and J. Besson, J. Eur. J. Mech. A 20, 397 (2001).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 14.J.B. Stewart and O. Cazacu, Int. J. Solids Struct. 48, 357 (2011).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 15.R.A. Lebensohn, M.I. Idiart, P.P. Castañeda, and P.G. Vincent, Philos. Mag. 91, 3038 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.R.A. Lebensohn, J.P. Escobedo, E.K. Cerreta, D. Dennis-Koller, C.A. Bronkhorst, and J. Bingert, Acta Mater. 61, 6918 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.J.P. Escobedo, E.K. Cerreta, D. Dennis-Koller, B.M. Patterson, C. Bronkhorst, B. Hansen, D. Tonks, and R.A. Lebensohn, J. Appl. Phys. 110, 033513 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.J.C. Michel, H. Moulinec, and P. Suquet, Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 1, 79 (2000).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 19.N. Lahellec, J.C. Michel, H. Moulinec, and P. Suquet, in IUTAM Symposium on Computational Mechanics of Solids Materials, ed. by C. Miehe (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 2001), pp. 247–268.Google Scholar
- 20.V. Tvergaard, Int. J. Fract. 17, 389 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.U. Lienert, S.F. Li, C.M. Hefferan, J. Lind, R.M. Suter, J.V. Bernier, N.R. Barton, M.C. Brandes, M.J. Mills, M.P. Miller, B. Jakobsen, and W. Pantleon, JOM 63, 70 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar