, Volume 61, Issue 1, pp 54–58 | Cite as

Using data to account for lack of data: Linking material informatics with stochastic analysis

  • Baskar GanapathysubramanianEmail author
Materials Informatics Overview


Many material systems of fundamental as well as industrial importance are significantly affected by underlying fluctuations and variations in boundary conditions, initial conditions, material property, as well as variabilities in operating and surrounding conditions. There has been increasing interest in analyzing, quantifying, and controlling the effects of such uncertain inputs on complex systems. This has resulted in the development of techniques in stochastic analysis and predictive modeling. A general application of stochastic techniques to many significant problems in engineering has been limited due to the lack of realistic, viable models of the input variability. Ideas of material informatics can be used to utilize available data about the input to construct a data-driven, computationally viable model of the input variability. This promising coupling of material informatics and stochastic analysis is investigated and some results are showcased using a simple example of analyzing diffusion in heterogeneous random media. Limited microstructural data is utilized to construct a realistic model of the thermal conductivity variability in a system. This reduced-order model then serves as the input to the stochastic partial differential equation describing thermal diffusion through random heterogeneous media.


Stochastic Analysis Sparse Grid Stochastic Partial Differential Equation Input Uncertainty Material Informatics 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Major Aircraft Disasters, Scholar
  2. 2.
    Accelerated Insertion of Materials (AIM) Program (Arlington, VA: DARPA Defense Sciences Office), Scholar
  3. 3.
    Prognosis, Program (Arlington, VA: DARPA Defense Sciences Office), Scholar
  4. 4.
    National Security Assessment of the U.S. Forging Industry (Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce), Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Martin and D.L. Evans “Reducing Costs in Aircraft: The Metals Affordability Initiative Consortium,” JOM, 52(3) (200), pp. 24–28.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. Wiener, “The Homogeneous Chaos,” Amer. J. Math., 60 (1938), pp. 897–936.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R.H. Cameron and W.T. Martin, “The Orthogonal Development of Non-linear Functionals in Series of Fourier-Hermite Functionals,” Ann. Math., 48 (1947), pp. 385–392.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.G. Ghanem and P.D. Spanos, Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach (Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, 1991).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Ghanem, “Probabilistic Characterization of Transport in Heterogeneous Porous Media,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 158 (1998), pp. 199–220.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Xiu and G.E. Karniadakis, “Modeling Uncertainty in Steady State Diffusion Problems via Generalized Polynomial Chaos,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 191 (2002), pp. 4927–4948.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. Velamur Asokan and N. Zabaras, “Variational Multiscale Stabilized FEM Formulations for Transport Equations: Stochastic Advection-Diffusion and Incompressible Stochastic Navier-Stokes Equations,” J. Comp. Physics, 202 (2005), pp. 94–133.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M.K. Deb, I.K. Babuska, and J.T. Oden, “Solution of Stochastic Partial Differential Equations using the Galerkin Finite Element Techniques,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 190 (2001), pp. 6359–6372.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    I. Babuska, R. Tempone, and G.E. Zouraris, “Solving Elliptic Boundary Value Problems with Uncertain Coefficients by the Finite Element Method: The Stochastic Formulation,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 194 (2005), pp. 1251–1294.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Tempone, “Numerical Complexity Analysis of Weak Approximation of Stochastic Differential Equations” (Ph.D. thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden, 2002).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D.M. Tartakovsky and D. Xiu, “Stochastic Analysis of Transport in Tubes with Rough Walls,” J. Comput. Phys., 217 (2006), pp. 248–259.zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    B. Velamur Asokan and N. Zabaras, “Using Stochastic Analysis to Capture Unstable Equilibrium in Natural Convection,” J. Comp. Phys., 208 (2005), pp. 134–153.zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    I. Babuska, F. Nobile, and R. Tempone, A Stochastic Collocation Method for Elliptic Partial Differential Equations with Random Input Data, ICES Report 05-47 (Austin, TX: Institute for computational Engineering and Science, 2005).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    D. Xiu and J.S. Hesthaven, “High-order Collocation Methods for the Differential Equation with Random Inputs,” SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 27 (2005), pp. 1118–1139.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    B. Ganapathysubramanian and N. Zabaras, “Sparse Grid Collocation Schemes for Stochastic Natural Convection Problems,” J. Comp. Phys., 225 (2007), pp. 652–685.zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    C. Desceliers, R. Ghanem, and C. Soize, “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Stochastic Chaos Representations from Experimental Data,” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng., 66 (2006), pp. 978–1001.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    L. Guadagnini, A. Guadagnini, and D.M. Tartakovsky, “Probabilistic Reconstruction of Geologic Facies,” J. Hydrol., 294 (2004), pp. 57–67.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    B. Ganapathysubramanian and N. Zabaras, “Modelling Diffusion in Random Heterogeneous Media: Data-Driven Models, Stochastic Collocation and the Variational Multi-Scale Method,” J. Comput. Phys., 226 (2007), pp. 326–353.zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    B. Ganapathysubramanian and N. Zabaras, “A Non-linear Dimension Reduction Methodology for Generating Data-Driven Stochastic Input Models,” J. Comput. Phys., 227 (2008), pp. 6612–6637.zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    S. Umekawa, R. Kotfila, and O.D. Sherby, “Elastic Properties of a Tungsten-Silver Composite above and below the Melting Point of Silver,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 13 (1965), pp. 229–230.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© TMS 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations