, Volume 59, Issue 10, pp 34–36 | Cite as

A Bright Future for copper electrowinning

Overview Aqueous Processing


Over the past 40 years, the copper mining industry has undergone a dramatic shift toward hydrometallurgical extraction of copper at the mine site. This has increased the importance of recovering high-purity copper by electrowinning. High-purity cathode production was achieved by implementing numerous technologies including superior lead-alloy anodes, improved cathode handling and/or stainless steel blanks, better electrolyte control, and advanced tankhouse automation. In the future, it is projected that tankhouses will produce high-quality copper at lower costs using technologies that could include dimensionally stable anodes, alternative anode reactions, innovative cell designs, novel electrolyte circulation systems, and more. This paper reviews existing commercial copper electrowinning technologies and discusses advances that need to be made to implement future technologies.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    M.L. Free, Chemical Processing and Utilization of Metals in Aqueous Media, 2nd Edition (Ann Arbor, MI: XanEdu Original Works, 2004).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.L. Free, “Fundamentals of Electrometallurgy in Aqueous Media,” JOM, 59(5) (2007), pp. 28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Kordosky and M. Virnig, “Equilibrium Modifiers in Copper Solvent Extraction Reagents-Friend or Foe,” Hydrometallurgy 2003, Vol. 1, ed. C.A. Young et al. (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 2003), pp. 905–916.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    International Copper Study Group (Lisbon, Portugal), Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Mella, R. Villarroel, and A. Lillo, Copper Electrowinning in the Absence of Acid Mist: Six Years of Industrial Application (Madrid, Spain: Ingenieria Industrial Same Ltda., 2004), pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Metal Bulletin Monthly-Copper Supplement (March 1998).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Jenkins et al., “Electrolytic Copper-Leach, Solvent Extraction and Electrowinning World Operating Data,” Copper 99-Cobre 99-Fourth International Conference, Volume 4, Hydrometallurgy of Copper, ed. S.K. Young et al. (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 1999), pp. 493–566.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Robinson et al., “Electrolytic Copper Electrowinning-2007 World Tankhouse Operating Data,” Copper-Cobre 2007, ed. G.E. Houlachi, J.D. Edwards, and T.G. Robinson (Montreal, Canada: CIM, 2007), pp. 375–424.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Moats, K. Hardee, and C. Brown, Jr., “Copper Electrowinning in Cobalt-Free Electrolyte using Mesh on Lead Anodes,” Proceedings of the Copper-Cobre 2003 International Conference, Volume V, ed. J.E. Dutrizac and C. Clement (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 2003), pp. 543–553.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Moats, K. Hardee, and C. Brown, Jr., “Mesh-on-Lead Anodes for Copper Electrowinning,” JOM, 55(7) (2003), pp. 46–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    K. Hardee and M. Moats, “Application of Titanium Mesh-on-Lead Technology to Metal Electrowinning Systems,” Electrochemistry in Mineral and Metal Processing V, ed. R. Woods and F.M. Doyle (Pennington, NJ: The Electrochemical Society, 2000), pp. 294–302.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Moats, C. Brown, and K. Hardee, “Nanocrystalline Coatings for Composite Copper Electrowinning Anodes,” Functional Fillers and Nanoscale Minerals II, ed. Jon Kellar (Littleton, CO: SME, 2006), pp. 267–273.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S.P. Sandoval et al., U.S. patent application 2005/025228 (3 February 2005).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.O. Marsden et al., U.S. patent application US2005/025086 (23 February 2006).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A.C. Stevens et al., U.S. patent application US2005/025158 (23 February 2006).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R.M. Nadkarni et al., U.S. patent 5,695,629 (9 December 1997).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    D.J. Robinson et al., U.S. patent application US2007/0102302 (10 May 2007).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    V. Jiricny, A. Roy, and J.W. Evans, “Copper Electrowinning using Spouted-Bed Electrodes: Part I. Experiments with Oxygen Evolution or Matte Oxidation at the Anode,” Met. & Mat. Trans. B, 33B (2002), pp. 669–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Minerals Engineering International (Falmouth, U. K.), Scholar
  20. 20.
    M.L. Free, “Electrochemical Coupling of Metal Extraction and Electrowinning,” Electrometallurgy 2001, ed. J.A. Gonzales and J. Dutrizac (Montreal, Canada: CIM, 2001), pp. 235–260.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    R.G. MacDonald and D.M. Muir, “Pressure Oxidation Leaching of Chalcopyrite. Part I. Comparison of High and Low Temperature Reaction Kinetics and Products,” Hydrometallurgy, 86(3–4) (2007), pp. 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© TMS 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.the Metallurgical Engineering Department at the University of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations