JOM

, Volume 56, Issue 8, pp 14–17

Energy implications of the changing world of aluminum metal supply

  • Subodh K. Das
  • W. Jerry LongIII
  • H. Wayne Hayden
  • John A. S. Green
  • Warren H. HuntJr.
Overview Aluminum Recycling

Abstract

Driven primarily by energy considerations, there has been a major change in the geographical distribution of primary aluminum production over the past few decades, even as the energy efficiency of the process has been improved. Meanwhile, in the United States, production of aluminum from secondary sources increased nearly ten-fold. This paper discusses past and projected future trends, emphasizing the changes in energy savings potential as the industry comes to rely more on remelting and less on primary production.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P. Glader. “Alcoa to Build $1 Billion Smelter on Trinidad.” Wall Street Journal (May 24, 2004).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aluminum Statistical Review for 2002 (Washington, D.C.: The Aluminum Association, Inc., 2003).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W.T. Choate and J.A.S. Green, “U.S. Energy Requirements for Aluminum Production: Historical Perspective, Theoretical Limits, and New Opportunities” (full report), www.oit.doe.gov/aluminum/pdfs/al_theoretical.pdf. Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aluminum Industry Vision: Sustainable Solutions for a Dynamic World (Washington, D.C.: The Aluminum Association, Inc., 2001).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aluminum Industry Technology Roadmap (Washington D.C.: The Aluminum Association Inc., 2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    “Electrical Power Used in Primary Aluminium Production,” International Aluminum Institute, www.world-aluminium.org.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Haupin, “History of Electrochemical Energy Consumption by Hall-Heroult Cells, Hall-Heroult Centennial: First Century of Aluminum Process Technology 1886–1986 (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 1986) pp. 106–113.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.R. Burkin, Production of Aluminum and Alumina (Critical Reports on Applied Chemistry, Vol. 20), (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 1987).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W.T. Choate and J.A.S. Green, “U.S. Energy Requirements for Aluminum Production: Historical Perspective. Theoretical Limits, and New Opportunities,” Energy Efficient Manufacturing Processes, ed. I.E. Anderson, T. Grobstein Maréchaux, and C. Cockrill (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 2003), pp. 99–113.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R.P. Pawlek, “Primary Smelters of the World,” Light Metals Age (April 2004), p. 6.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Gesing, “Assuring the Continued Recycability of Light Metals in End-of-Life Vehicles: A Global Perspective,” in this issue.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© TMS 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Subodh K. Das
    • 1
  • W. Jerry LongIII
    • 1
  • H. Wayne Hayden
    • 2
  • John A. S. Green
    • 3
  • Warren H. HuntJr.
    • 4
  1. 1.Lexington
  2. 2.MMPACTOak Ridge
  3. 3.Ellicott City
  4. 4.TMSWarrendale

Personalised recommendations