Advertisement

Journal of Children's Orthopaedics

, Volume 10, Issue 6, pp 469–470 | Cite as

Long bone deformity correction and bone lengthening procedures

  • Pierre Lascombes
  • Hakan Omeroglu
Open Access
Editorial

Last year’s 34th Annual Meeting of the European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (EPOS) was held in Marseille, France, on 15–18 April. A comprehensive pre-meeting course held on 15 April was dedicated to many complex aspects of long-bone deformity correction and bone-lengthening procedures. The present issue of the Journal of Children’s Orthopaedics collates manuscripts of the presentations made at that advanced course, and thus provides a summary of the latest strategies for and descriptions of most of the more difficult approaches to long-bone correction and lengthening. References to some additional recent works in this field have also been added to the reference lists originally provided with the manuscripts.

Guided growth is one of the most common surgeries used to treat such conditions. The first part of this issue reports on the mechanism and reversibility of growth modulation in deformity corrections, as well as the role of growth modulation in limb lengthening. During the course, Elhanan Bar-On described guided femoral rotational growth in an animal model [1]. New perspectives and applications will surely be developed in the future [2, 3, 4, 5].

The second part of this issue is dedicated to long-bone lengthening procedures and updated techniques. Among external fixators, the classic Ilizarov fixator is increasingly being replaced by hexapod fixators, as these allow easier 3-D correction through the use of modern computer software. The application of additional flexible intramedullary nails leads to an average decrease in the healing index of 20%. Complications are also less likely with external fixation, as the fixator is removed earlier. The development of motorized and magnetic intramedullary lengthening nails is also contributing to improvements in lengthening reliability and quality. Two other subjects of debate are the indications for a bridging joint, soft-tissue release, and physiotherapy, and the problem of an unstable knee in congenital lower-limb deficiency.

With regards to surgical technique, the third part of this issue concerns the master techniques for tibial and fibular hemimelias, as well as for humerus and forearm lengthening, including in cases with multiple exostoses [6]. Both of the manuscripts on tibial and fibular hemimelias should be considered state-of-the-art papers, and they provide definitive guidance for any surgeon who needs to treat these congenital abnormalities.

The final part of this issue covers the controversial topic of bilateral lengthening. Approaches to achondroplasia differ from those used in cosmetic indications. During the pre-meeting course, Dror Paley presented his experiences of cosmetic lengthening with magnetic nails [7], and Francesco Guerrischi described his with external fixators. Another important topic is the prevention of pin-tract infections during treatment. The growth remaining after the lengthening procedure must be perfectly understood in order to ensure that maximum natural growth is achieved, even in cases with multiple lengthening during childhood. Finally, amputation and rotationplasty may still be indicated for severe limb deficiencies [8].

We send our warmest thanks to our hosts in Marseille, Gérard Bollini, and Jean-Luc Jouve, who were largely responsible for the course’s success, as well as to all the authors who agreed to provide the updated and concise manuscripts which document their work and are included in this exceptional issue of JCO.

References

  1. 1.
    Arami A, Bar-On E, Herman A, Velkes S, Heller S (2013) Guided femoral rotational growth in an animal model. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 95:2022–2027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fillingham YA, Kroin E, Frank RM, Erickson B, Hellman M, Kogan M (2014) Post-operative delay in return of function following guided growth tension plating and use of corrective physical therapy. J Child Orthop 8(3):365–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ashby E, Eastwood D (2015) Characterization of knee alignment in children with mucopolysaccharidosis types I and II and outcome of treatment with guided growth. J Child Orthop 9(3):227–233CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van Oosterbos M, van der Zwan AL, van der Woude HJ, Ham SJ (2016) Correction of ankle valgus by hemiepiphysiodesis using the tension band principle in patients with multiple hereditary exostosis. J Chil Orthop 10(3):267–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Monier BC, Aronsson DD, Sun M (2015) Percutaneous epiphysiodesis using transphyseal screws for limb-length discrepencies: high variability among growth predictor models. J Chil Orthop 9(5):403–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D’Ambrosi R, Barbato A, Caldarini C, Biancardi E, Facchini RM (2016) Gradual ulnar lengthening in children with multiple exostoses and radial head dislocation: results at skeletal maturity. J Child Orthop 10(2):127–133CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paley D, Debiparshad K, Balci H, Windisch W, Lichtblau C (2015) Stature lengthening using the PRECICE intramedullary lengthening nail. Tech Orthop 30:167–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ghassemi Jahani SA, Danielson B, Karlsson J, Danielsson AJ (2014) Long-term follow-up of thalidomide embryopathy: malformations and development of osteoarthritis in the lower extremities and evaluation of upper extremity function. J Child Orthop 8(5):423–433CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Paediatric OrthopaedicsHôpitaux Universitaires de GenèveGeneva 14Switzerland
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of MedicineTOBB Economy and Technology UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations