Primary outcomes of the congenital vertical talus correction using the Dobbs method of serial casting and limited surgery
- 270 Downloads
The traditional treatment for congenital vertical talus, which involves serial casting and extensive soft-tissue releases, has been associated with severe stiffness and other complications in adolescents and adults. Our hypothesis is that favorable results will be obtained using the Dobbs method of serial manipulation, casting, and limited surgery for vertical talus correction, even in older children and syndromic cases. Therefore, the present study aimed at evaluating the Dobbs method in such cases.
Materials and methods
We treated 15 feet of 10 patients (aged from 1 month to 9 years) using manipulation and serial casting or the reverse Ponseti method followed by percutaneous Achilles tenotomy and limited open reduction of the talonavicular joint. All patients were evaluated both clinically and radiologically in a mean follow-up period of 2 years.
After 2 years, all patients had plantigrade and flexible feet with good radiographic correction. The mean talocalcaneal angle before (70.5° ± 10.5) and after (31° ± 5.2) treatment and the talar axis metatarsal base angle before (60° ± 11.4) and after (15° ± 6.7) treatment were significantly improved (P < 0.001).
Recent research has shown that manipulation and serial casting followed by limited surgery (Dobbs method) was successful in treating idiopathic congenital vertical talus. Our results also showed that this method resulted in an excellent outcome in both idiopathic and syndromic congenital vertical talus, even in older children.
KeywordsCongenital vertical talus Casting Conservative treatment
- 4.Ogata K, Schoenecker PL, Sheridan J (1979) Congenital vertical talus and its familial occurrence: an analysis of 36 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 139:128–132Google Scholar
- 6.Campos da Paz AC Jr, de Souza V, de Souza DC (1978) Congenital convex pes valgus. Orthop Clin North Am 9:207–218Google Scholar
- 7.Clark MW, D’Ambrosia RD, Ferguson AB (1977) Congenital vertical talus: treatment by open reduction and navicular excision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59:816–824Google Scholar
- 8.Coleman SS, Stelling FH 3rd, Jarrett J (1970) Pathomechanics and treatment of congenital vertical talus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 70:62–72Google Scholar
- 9.Colton CL (1973) The surgical management of congenital vertical talus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 55:566–574Google Scholar
- 10.Drennan JC (1996) Congenital vertical talus. Instr Course Lect 45:315–322Google Scholar
- 13.Mazzocca AD, Thomson JD, Deluca PA, Romness MJ (2001) Comparison of the posterior approach versus the dorsal approach in the treatment of congenital vertical talus. J Pediatr Orthop 21:212–217Google Scholar
- 14.Eraltug U (1966) Corrective plaster application in the treatment of vertical talus. An analysis of eleven cases. Int Surg 46:246–249Google Scholar
- 16.Dobbs MB, Purcell DB, Nunley R, Morcuende JA (2007) Early results of a new method of treatment for idiopathic congenital vertical talus. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(2):111–121Google Scholar
- 17.Aydın A, Atmaca H, Müezzinoğlu US (2012) Bilateral congenital vertical talus with severe lower extremity external rotational deformity: treated by reverse Ponseti technique. Foot. doi: org/10.1016/j.foot.2012.04.004
- 18.Walker AP, Ghali NN, Silk FF (1985) Congenital vertical talus. The results of staged operative reduction. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67(1):117–121Google Scholar
- 21.Zorer G, Bagatur AE, Dogan A (2002) Single stage surgical correction of congenital vertical talus by complete subtalar release and peritalar reduction by using the Cincinnati incision. J Pediatr Orthop B 11:60–67Google Scholar
- 25.Eberhardt O, Fernandez FF, Wirth T (2011) Treatment of vertical talus with the Dobbs method. Z Orthop Unfall 149(2):219–224Google Scholar
- 26.Laaveg SJ, Ponseti IV (1980) Long-term results of treatment of congenital club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62:23–31Google Scholar