A radiologic classification of talocalcaneal coalitions based on 3D reconstruction
- First Online:
- 716 Downloads
Talocalcaneal coalitions can be difficult to detect on plain radiographs, despite obvious clinical findings. The purpose of this study is two-fold: (1) to delineate the benefits of thin-cut computed tomography (CT) and 3D reconstructions and (2) to develop a classification scheme for talocalcaneal coalitions that will provide valuable information for surgical planning.
From 2005 to 2009, 54 feet (35 patients) with a talocalcaneal coalition were evaluated with thin-cut (1 mm) CT, using multi-planar 2D and 3D reconstructions. The talocalcaneal coalitions were classified into five types based on the cartilaginous or bony nature, location, and facet joint orientation.
Bilateral coalitions were found in 22/35 patients. Types I and II were fibrocartilaginous coalitions, which was the most common type, comprising 40.7 and 16.7% of the coalitions, respectively. Of the patients, 14.8% had a shingled Type III coalition, while 11.1% of the feet examined had a complete bony coalition (Type IV). Small peripheral posterior bony coalitions (Type V), which are heretofore not described, were found in 16.7% of feet.
CT scans can provide valuable information regarding the bony or cartilaginous nature of coalitions, as well as the facet orientation, which is helpful in diagnosis and treatment. In this study, the 2D and 3D reconstructions revealed previously unreported peripheral posterior bony coalitions (Type V), as well as coalitions that are in the same plane as the standard CT cuts or Harris view radiographs (Type I). The CT scan also improved the crucial pre-operative planning of the resection in the more complex vertical and combined horizontal and vertical fibrocartilaginous coalitions (Type I and II). Additionally, the complete bony coalitions (Type IV) can be sized accurately, which is helpful in decision-making on the resectability of the coalition.
KeywordsTalocalcaneal coalition 3D computed tomography
The first anatomic description of talocalcaneal coalitions was by Zuckerkandl  in 1877. In 1921, Slomann  linked tarsal coalitions to flat feet, but it was Harris and Beath  who are credited with specifically identifying talocalcaneal coalitions as a significant cause of peroneal spastic flat foot. Radiographic signs were first reported by Conway and Cowell , who described three radiographic signs of talocalcaneal coalition and also designated tomography as critical for finding ‘hidden’ anterior coalitions. It was not until 1994 that Lateur et al.  described and named the well-known ‘C’ sign on a lateral X-ray, which can be indicative of a talocalcaneal coalition.
In the 1980s and 1990s, several authors reported on the use and importance of computed tomography (CT) for diagnosing and ruling out talocalcaneal coalitions, as well as mapping their size and location in relation to the subtalar joint facets [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. More recently, three-dimensional (3D), multi-planar reformatted CT images have allowed for improved evaluation of the bony anatomy of the foot [12, 13]. To our knowledge, there have not been any studies reporting on the benefits of 3D CT scans to enhance the delineation of talocalcaneal coalitions and assist with surgical planning. Additionally, while the coalitions have been separated into different types (osseous, cartilaginous, fibrous), there has not, to date, been a classification scheme demonstrating the location, nature, and position of the coalition.
The purpose of this study is to identify the precise location and position of talocalcaneal coalitions and allow the identification of the easily missed posterior coalitions. We will develop a classification for these coalitions that includes the shape of the middle facet joint, as well as the location and nature of the coalition.
Materials and methods
After approval from the Institutional Review Board, a retrospective review was performed to identify all patients who had a suspected talocalcaneal coalition based on physical examination and radiographic findings, and confirmed by CT scan, between September 2005 and April 2009. A total of 35 patients (54 feet) were identified. 3D CT reconstructions were analyzed on all 54 feet. Conventional radiographic imaging was performed on all feet prior to proceeding with the CT scan.
A General Electric (GE) Lightspeed Volumetric CT scanner (General Electric, Milwaukee, WI, USA) was used to perform all examinations. As defined by the Tarsal Coalition Protocol at our institution, all patients were positioned supine on the examination table with both feet flat against a positioning box. The patients were scanned feet first, from the bottom of their feet proximally through their ankle joint. All examinations were performed without intravenous contrast. The raw axial 2D CT data was uploaded to a GE Advantage workstation and volume-rendering software was used to reconstruct the sagittal and coronal planes using a standard algorithm. 3D reconstructions were then generated after selecting the appropriate density threshold for bone.
Three specific radiographic signs of talocalcaneal coalitions have been identified; talar beaking indicating decreased subtalar motion, broadening of the lateral process of the talus, and narrowing of the posterior talocalcaneal facet . Additionally, Lateur et al.  described the ‘C’ sign on a lateral radiograph of the ankle. The C-shape, which is formed by the medial outline of the talar dome and the posteroinferior outline of the sustentaculum tali, is indicative of a talocalcaneal coalition. While these signs can often be seen on the plain radiographs, they do not necessarily confirm the coalition, nor do they give precise information regarding the location and orientation of the coalition. Herzenberg et al.  and Pineda et al.  clearly illustrated the benefits of CT scans to identify and rule out coalitions, determining CT scan to be the method of choice for diagnosis. These were 2D CT scans, however, and the details of the coalition were not as completely defined as can be done with a 3D CT scan. Wilde et al.  described the technique of mapping the size of a talocalcaneal coalition, but, again, the details of the orientation and precise location of the coalition were not clear.
This study demonstrates the extensive benefits of 3D CT scans to define the size, location, and orientation of talocalcaneal coalitions. By classifying talocalcaneal coalitions into five types, they can be more accurately described and, thus, be more accurately and easily resected. A CT classification scheme was proposed by Kumar et al. ; however, this scheme merely broke the coalitions down into osseous, cartilaginous, and fibrous, and did not provide significant clinical benefits for the excision of the coalition. Our classification system, by providing details that will assist in the surgical excision, can be clinically applied and utilized.
Type I: linear coalitions
Type II: linear coalitions with posterior hook
Type III: shingled coalitions
Type IV: complete osseous coalitions
The complete osseous coalitions, Type IV, are certainly the most difficult to resect, and debate still exists as to whether these should be resected at all. Scranton  arbitrarily determined that a coalition size of >50% of the width of the subtalar joint should not be resected, and others have indicated that a poor outcome is associated with the resection of talocalcaneal coalitions that were >50% of the size of the posterior facet. The size of the complete osseous coalitions is often quite large and, thus, a careful decision must be made as to whether or not to resect it [11, 16]. If a resection is to be undertaken, the 3D CT scan can provide additional help in determining the correct level of resection and illustrates improved bony landmarks.
Type V: posterior coalitions
This study was limited by its retrospective nature. Additionally, a greater number of patients would strengthen the results. A clinical study, relating the surgical outcomes to this classification scheme, would also provide further insight and valuable information to validate this study. In conclusion, 3D CT scans illustrate the details of talocalcaneal coalitions, including the precise location, shape, and nature of the coalition, and provide significant information that is helpful for the resection of these coalitions.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
- 1.Zuckerkandl E (1877) Ueber einen Fall von Synostose Zwischen talus und calcaneus. Allg Wein Med Zeitung 22:293–294Google Scholar
- 2.Slomann HC (1921) On coalition calcaneonavicularis. J Orthop Surg 3:586–588Google Scholar
- 3.Harris RI, Beath T (1948) Etiology of peroneal spastic flat foot. J Bone Joint Surg Br 30(4):624–634Google Scholar
- 6.Comfort TK, Johnson LO (1998) Resection for symptomatic talocalcaneal coalition. J Pediatr Orthop 18(3):283–288Google Scholar
- 9.Pineda C, Resnick D, Greenway G (1986) Diagnosis of tarsal coalition with computed tomography. Clin Orthop Relat Res 208:282–288Google Scholar
- 11.Wilde PH, Torode IP, Dickens DR, Cole WG (1994) Resection for symptomatic talocalcaneal coalition. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76(5):797–801Google Scholar
- 14.Kumar SJ, Guille JT, Lee MS, Couto JC (1992) Osseous and non-osseous coalition of the middle facet of the talocalcaneal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74(4):529–535Google Scholar
- 15.Scranton PE Jr (1987) Treatment of symptomatic talocalcaneal coalition. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69(4):533–539Google Scholar
- 16.Luhmann SJ, Schoenecker PL (1998) Symptomatic talocalcaneal coalition resection: indications and results. J Pediatr Orthop 18(6):748–754Google Scholar