Advertisement

Genetic variation in herbivore resistance within a strawberry crop wild relative (Fragaria vesca L.)

  • Daniela WeberEmail author
  • Paul A. Egan
  • Anne Muola
  • Johan A. Stenberg
Open Access
Original Paper

Abstract

To decrease the dependency on chemical pesticides, the resistance of cultivated strawberry to pests needs to be increased. While genetic resources within domesticated varieties are limited, wild genotypes are predicted to show high heritable variation in useful resistance traits. We collected 86 wild accessions of Fragaria vesca L. from central Sweden and screened this germplasm for antibiosis (pest survival and performance) and antixenosis (pest preference) traits active against the strawberry leaf beetle (Galerucella tenella L.). First, extensive common garden experiments were used to study antibiosis traits in the sampled plant genotypes. Heritable genetic variation among plant genotypes was found for several antibiosis traits. Second, controlled cafeteria experiments were used to test for plant genetic variation in antixenosis traits. The leaf beetles avoided egg laying on plant genotypes possessing high antibiosis. This indicates a high degree of concordance between antibiosis and antixenosis and that the beetles’ egg-laying behavior optimizes the fitness of their offspring. The existence of high genetic variation in key resistance traits suggests that wild woodland strawberry contains untapped resources that are sought to reduce pesticide dependence in cultivated strawberry. Given that only a very small portion of the species’ distribution area was sampled, even higher variation may be expected at the continental scale. As a whole, the genetic resources identified in this study serve to strengthen the position of woodland strawberry as a key crop wild relative.

Keywords

Herbivory Oviposition preference Galerucella tenella Woodland strawberry Crop wild relative Resistance breeding 

Introduction

Higher intrinsic resistance in crop plants against pests is a promising option to gain independence from heavy pesticide use during cultivation (Broekgaarden et al. 2011; Smith and Clement 2012). Especially in cultivated strawberry, the demand for alternative pest control approaches is growing, since the fruits are among the food with the highest pesticide residues (Fernandes et al. 2011; Godfray et al. 2014; Parikka and Tuovinen 2014). Genetic resources for resistance against pests are limited within current strawberry cultivars and breeding programs (Liston et al. 2014; Chen et al. 2015). A good source to enhance traits for pest resistance is the naturally existing variation among the crop wild relatives (CWR) of cultivated strawberries (Egan et al. 2018). Known as ‘rewilding’ or ‘inverse breeding,’ beneficial traits such as plant resistance to herbivores can be restored in future varieties by including CWR germplasm in breeding programs (Broekgaarden et al. 2011; Andersen et al. 2015; Palmgren et al. 2015; Dempewolf et al. 2017). For example, a resistance trait to control the cabbage root fly Delia radicum L. (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) was identified in wild white mustard (Sinapis alba L.) and successfully integrated in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) and rutabaga (B. napus. var. napobrassica) (Ekuere et al. 2005; Malchev et al. 2010).

In recent times, woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca) has been recognized as a model species and potential source of diversity for Fragaria breeding programs, including those for the garden strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) (Longhi et al. 2014; Urrutia et al. 2015; Egan et al. 2018). Owing to the large geographic distribution of the wild F. vesca (Hilmarsson et al. 2017) and its natural adaptation to a range of habitats, the resulting genetic diversity of F. vesca is a promising source of desirable traits for abiotic and biotic stresses (Amil-Ruiz et al. 2011; Liston et al. 2014). The sequenced genome of F. vesca shares a very high degree of synteny with the hybrid F. × ananassa (Tennessen et al. 2014) and has already permitted greater insight into the molecular mechanisms underpinning flowering (Mouhu et al. 2013; Hollender et al. 2014) and fruiting (Kang et al. 2013). In addition, F. vesca itself represents a valuable niche crop with a growing market due to the intense taste of its fruits (Ulrich et al. 2007; Doumett et al. 2011). However, knowledge about resistance against herbivores in F. vesca is still scarce (Muola et al. 2017), and thus, further exploration of resistance in wild germplasm is needed to fully utilize the available gene pool.

We used wild F. vesca originating from Sweden to investigate genetic variation in resistance to a chewing herbivore, the strawberry leaf beetle Galerucella tenella (L.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) (Fig. 1). Galerucella tenella is a pest insect in open strawberry plantations in Russia and Northern Europe, which is commonly controlled by spraying with insecticides (Parikka and Tuovinen 2014; Stenberg 2014). Larvae and adult beetles feed on strawberry leaves as well as on the flowers, which reduces pollination success, and larvae can furthermore damage fruits (Olofsson and Pettersson 1992; Parikka and Tuovinen 2014; Muola et al. 2017).
Fig. 1

On the left, copulating strawberry leaf beetles, G. tenella. On the right, eggs of G. tenella on strawberry leaf.

Photo credits: Alejandro Ruete

In order to facilitate a robust basis for sustainable pest management, we here took both the antibiosis and antixenosis components of plant resistance into account (Stenberg and Muola 2017). Antibiosis has an adverse effect on insect herbivore performance, whereas antixenosis targets herbivore behavior and renders the plant unattractive for feeding and/or oviposition (Painter 1951). To cover both aspects, we monitored oviposition preference as a proxy of antixenosis, as well as three proxies of antibiosis (egg hatching success, larval growth rate, and larval survival) for G. tenella in wild genotypes of F. vesca. In addition, we calculated the broad-sense heritability of antibiosis (larval growth rate) in the screened F. vesca genotypes in order to investigate the phenotypic stability of this trait, with the potential view towards ‘rewilding’ strawberries. We hypothesized that: (1) wild F. vesca sampled within the native range of G. tenella in Sweden is likely to show high variation in the studied resistance parameters, and (2) that resistance should show significant broad-sense heritability, which would indicate its stability as a trait (i.e., that trait variation shows a significant genetic component) and hence breeding potential. Findings from this screening are likely to be important for the utilization of available genetic resources for restoring herbivore resistance in cultivated strawberry (Andersen et al. 2015; Palmgren et al. 2015).

Methods

Study species

The woodland strawberry F. vesca is a low-growing, herbaceous perennial plant. It occurs throughout most of the Holarctic including parts of Scandinavia and grows naturally in various half sunny and sunny habitats such as mountain slopes, roadsides, open forests, forest clearings, and edges of forests and farmland (Roiloa and Retuerto 2007; Maliníková et al. 2013; Schulze et al. 2012). The trifoliate leaves are evergreen, and it is an ever-bearing plant producing flowers and fruits throughout the entire growing season starting in May until late September (Maliníková et al. 2013). Flowering peaks in early June and pollination of the white hermaphrodite flowers is carried out by insects, although selfing also commonly occurs alongside cross-pollination (Muola et al. 2017). In addition to the production of animal-dispersed fruits, F. vesca is also capable of clonal reproduction and produces a high amount of runners that grow into self-sustaining plants in a short time (Schulze et al. 2012).

The oligophagous G. tenella L. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae; Fig. 1) feeds on different species of the Rosaceae family, including Fragaria spp. (Stenberg et al. 2006; Hambäck et al. 2013). Wild meadowsweet (Filipendula ulmaria L.) serves as the main host, from which G. tenella commonly spills over to neighboring Rosaceae plants such as F. vesca. Galerucella tenella has become a noticeable pest especially in organic strawberry cultivations. Outbreaks with severe damage have been reported from strawberry cultivations in the Nordic countries (Stenberg and Axelsson 2008; Stenberg 2012, 2014), the Baltic States (Kaufmane and Libek 2000), and Russia (Bulukhto and Tsipirig 2004).

The adult G. tenella beetles hibernate in the topsoil and emerge during April–May. Mating as well as oviposition takes place directly on the host plant after emerging and the larvae hatch after few weeks from early June on depending on the temperatures in spring (Stenberg et al. 2006). Both adults and larvae feed on the leaves and flowers (Muola et al. 2017). Larvae might also tunnel into ripe berries and gnaw the fruit surface causing brown scaring [own observation, Parikka and Tuovinen 2014). After 2–4 weeks of feeding the larvae leave the host plant to pupate in the upper soil layer from early July on until mid-August in cold (Stenberg et al. 2006).

Collection and experimental organization of wild germplasm

We adopted a quantitative genetic framework to study the genetic variation and heritability of resistance against G. tenella using 86 wild F. vesca genotypes. Following the protocol described by Muola et al. (2017), we collected wild plant genotypes from 86 randomly selected and geographically distinct locations (Fig. 2; see Online resource 1 for coordinates) across Uppsala County, Sweden, in spring 2012. Uppsala County encompasses 8207 km2 and the distances between the sampling locations varied between 7 and 40 km. One genotype was collected from each site in order to maximize the geographic resolution of the sampled area. A recent microsatellite marker analysis where seven of these collected clones were included showed that they are true (separate) genotypes (Hilmarsson et al. 2017).
Fig. 2

Map of the collection sites of 86 F. vesca genotypes used in this study

We cloned the sampled plant genotypes for several vegetative generations at the SLU Ultuna campus and planted 40 runners per plant genotype in blocks (one runner per plant genotype per block) in sandy soil in an open agricultural field (59.741°N, 17.684°E), 15 km south of Uppsala in Autumn 2013. The distance between the plants was 50 cm and the entire common garden was covered with fabric mulch (Weibulls Horto) to reduce weed densities. The common garden was manually weeded when needed, but we did not apply any irrigation or fertilizer. The plants were growing in the common garden for 2 years before we used them in this study. The plant genotypes were specifically collected for the purpose of this study and corresponding plant material can be obtained from Stenberg on reasonable request.

Screening of antibiosis

We measured antibiosis using several different proxies, namely larval survival, larval development time (days from hatching to pupation), pupal weigh (mg), and larval growth rate (mg/day, calculated from the two previous proxies). As growth rate takes both development time and weight into account, we think it provides the most complete proxy of antibiosis. Low larval growth rate corresponds to high antibiosis and vice versa. As a final proxy for antibiosis, we recorded the egg hatching success, which was done in line with the oviposition (antixenosis) screening and is therefore described under the antixenosis paragraph below.

For the screening of larval growth rate and survival, we used detached leaves of the 86 plant genotypes that were collected from the common garden described above. To obtain neonate larvae for the experiment, we collected adult Galerucella tenella from four distinct natural meadowsweet populations in the vicinity of Uppsala (59.809°N, 17.667°E; 59.788°N, 17.664°E; 59.806°N, 17.652°E; 59.806°N, 17.665°E) during early May 2015. The adult beetles were collected from locations with no co-occurring F. vesca population to exclude a previous feeding experience with strawberry plants. This was done to avoid mistaking putative local adaptation of the herbivore with the genetic variation in plant resistance. The collected beetles were randomly mixed and placed in meshed cages containing a mix of F. vesca plants chosen randomly among the 86 genotypes. The cages were kept in a greenhouse (15 °C, LD 16:8-h photoperiod, 80% RH) and the beetles were allowed to mate and oviposit freely on the offered plants. In order to rear the larvae, plants with eggs were retrieved and placed in a separate cage and monitored for hatching larvae.

We placed the neonate larvae (< 24 h) individually in a 30-ml plastic containers and assigned them randomly to feed on one of the 86 plant genotypes. Ten larvae were assigned to each plant genotype, resulting in 860 rearing containers. We provided the larvae with one detached, undamaged, middle-aged leaf from the assigned plant genotype. The leaf was replaced every third day and the rearing containers were cleaned in course with the leaf exchange. The rearing containers were kept in a climate chamber until the larvae reached the adult stage (15 °C, LD 16:8-h photoperiod, 80% RH). We checked the larvae daily and weighed each larva on the day it reached the pupal stage. Furthermore, we recorded the survival and determined their sex after they reached the adult stage.

Screening of antixenosis

We used oviposition preference as a proxy of antixenosis and addressed host plant suitability in the context of maternal choice. The oviposition preference of G. tenella females was studied in a two-choice experiment. Based on the earlier larval growth rate screening (antibiosis, see description above), we selected eight plant genotypes with low larval growth rate (high antibiosis) and eight with high larval growth rate (low antibiosis) to test if ovipositing beetles discriminate between them. Runners from each of the 16 selected plant genotypes were collected from the common garden and propagated further to produce genetically identical replicates. The runners were potted in 0.2-L pots with Hasselforss™ (Hasselfors, Örebro, Sweden) planting soil and placed in a greenhouse (15 °C, 16:8 h) for 5 weeks during April 2016. The plants were then moved outside in early May 2016 1 week prior to the experiment to allow them to adjust to the outside conditions. We used ten approximately equal-sized replicates from each plant genotype to exclude plant size as selection criteria for the female beetle, resulting in 80 replicates of both high and low antibiosis plants. The two types (high/low antibiosis) of plant genotypes were randomly paired and placed in meshed cages (40 × 40 × 40 cm) located at a sunny, sheltered place at the experimental garden of the SLU Alnarp campus. Within each cage, the two paired plants were spaced 30 cm apart. This was done to avoid leaf contact between the plants so that the female beetle had to choose one or the other. We collected the female G. tenella for the experiment from the same places as the beetles used in the performance experiment with two additional locations (59.782°N, 17.753°E; 59.833°N, 17.914°E) during early May 2016 and selected mating couples with a gravid female to ensure subsequent egg laying. After collection, the female beetles were placed centrally on the bottom of the cage and allowed to oviposit freely on the offered plant pair for 48 h. For each plant, the number and the position (leaf blades or leaf petioles) of the laid eggs were noted. The position of the egg determines the microclimate for the egg development as well as the exposure of eggs and neonate larvae to predation or conspecific competition. Furthermore, the egg position facilitates or hampers the migration of the neonate larvae to young, developing leaves for feeding and hiding from predators.

After all eggs were counted, the plants were placed back into their cages to monitor the survival of the eggs as an additional aspect of antibiosis. Insect eggs can induce plant defences that harm the eggs (Hilker and Fatouros 2015). We measured the egg hatching success by allowing the eggs to hatch naturally and counting the first round of neonate larvae (< 24 h) for each plant individual. Plants and G. tenella females were used only once in each oviposition choice trial.

Statistical analyses

All the following data analyses were conducted with R, version 3.3.1 (R Core Team 2016).

We used the inverse of herbivore performance measured as larval growth rate as one of three proxies for antibiosis in F. vesca against G. tenella. We analyzed the genetic variation in growth rate with a linear mixed model with larval growth rate as a response variable. Larval growth rate was calculated by dividing pupal weight (mg) by larval developmental time (days). The analyses of genetic variation in these two traits separately are presented in Online resource 2. We included plant genotype as a random factor and the sex of the beetles as a covariate to account for the potential sexual dimorphism in larval growth rate (or in pupal weight and development time). As per previous quantitative genetic analyses in F. vesca (Egan et al. 2018), this model structure—in which genotype is fitted as a random effect—permitted environmental (within-genotype) variation to be partitioned from genetic (between-genotype) variation (Hill 2010) in order to predict a ‘total genetic value’ for each genotype (Piepho et al. 2008). These values were used to visualize genetic variation in plots, or as an input to additional analyses, as detailed below. The interaction term between plant genotype and the covariate was insignificant and therefore removed from the final model. We assessed normality by visual examination and conducted a Levene’s test to check for equality of variances of the residuals.

As a second proxy of antibiosis, we used one-way ANOVA to test whether larval growth rate (working with genotype genetic values as predicted in the previous model) is associated with larval survival rate, i.e., the percentage of larvae surviving per plant genotype. Due to the high rate of larval survival, we used the larval growth rate as response variable and grouped the survival rate into three categories of 100%, 90%, and < 90% survival. This categorical factor was then used as an explanatory variable to avoid zero inflation in the model. We validated the model for normality and equality of variances as described above and compared the survival levels in a post hoc comparison based on a Tukey’s pairwise analysis.

As a third proxy for antibiosis, we examined the effect of plant genotype on the survival of the eggs that were laid in the antixenosis screening. As response variable, we calculated the number of eggs successfully hatched as a proportion of the total amount of eggs per plant. We fitted the proportional response of egg hatching success in a generalized linear mixed model (logit link function) with a binomial error structure and used antibiosis (i.e., larval growth rate) level (susceptible vs. resistant) as a fixed factor and individual plant genotype nested within the antibiosis level as a random factor. We performed a likelihood ratio test to assess the significance of the random effect of genotype. We validated the model with the Anderson–Darling test and visual examination of the residuals.

To examine the antixenosis of F. vesca genotypes, we tested whether antibiosis affected the oviposition choice of G. tenella females. Since the female beetles laid different absolute numbers of eggs on different plants, as well as on different tissues (i.e., the leaf blade and leaf petiole), we calculated the number of eggs laid on each tissue of a plant as a proportion of the total amount of eggs laid in the cage (following the setup in cages containing one resistant and one susceptible plant genotype). We used egg proportion per plant tissue (i.e., eggs laid on the leaf blade/all eggs laid in the cage and eggs laid on the leaf petiole/all eggs laid in the cage) as a proportional response variable in a binomial generalized mixed model (R-package “lme4”), in which plant antibiosis level (susceptible vs. resistant), plant tissue type, and their interaction were fitted as a fixed factor. Both plant individual nested within genotype, and genotype nested within the plant antibiosis level (susceptible vs. resistant) were included as random effects, in order to account for the non-independence of egg-laying locations within the same plant individual and the genotypic effect in the resistance level, respectively. Due to the significant interaction term between plant antibiosis level and plant tissue type, we obtained estimated marginal means and computed contrasts with the ‘emmeans’ package for R. As only four of the six possible combinations were of interest (e.g., resistant leaf blade vs. resistant leaf petiole; resistant leaf blade vs. susceptible leaf blade), we used the ‘holm’ method to adjust for four pairwise comparisons. To test whether the random effect of genotype had a significant effect, we ran a likelihood ratio test to compare the full model to a null model in which this random effect was removed. We validated the model through the Anderson–Darling test for normality and visual examination of the residuals.

To examine broad-sense heritability (or clonal repeatability) in antibiosis (larval growth rate) among the tested plant genotypes, broad-sense heritability (H2) estimates were calculated from a linear mixed effects model. The tests for broad-sense heritability in larval development time and pupal weight separately are presented in Online resource 2. The model was fitted using the rptR package (Holger et al. 2016) in R (function ‘rpt’) and used the same model structure as specified for the resistance model above (i.e., ‘growth rate’ predicted by the random effect of ‘genotype,’ controlling for the fixed effect of ‘sex’). The standard error of H2 was estimated based on 1000 parametric bootstraps, and the significance of H2 was tested via a likelihood ratio test.

Results

Antibiosis

We found genetic variation in antibiosis levels against G. tenella in F. vesca as indicated by statistically significant variation in the growth rate of G. tenella larvae reared on 86 different plant genotypes (χ2 = 78.6, d.f. = 1, p < 0.001, Fig. 3). Furthermore, there was a heritable component to this variation, as broad-sense heritability in antibiosis (measured as larval growth rate) differed significantly from zero (H2 = 0.22 ± 0.04 SE). Similarly, both larval development time and pupal weight showed significant genetic variation between the tested plant genotypes and there was a heritable component in the observed variation (Online resource 2). The average larval growth rate varied from 0.204 ± 0.03 mg/day on the most susceptible plant genotype to 0.129 ± 0.016 mg/day on the most resistant plant genotype. Female pupae were significantly heavier than male pupae (LMM: t-value = − 13. 5, d.f. = 733, p < 0.001, Online resource 2) and, accordingly, females also had a significantly higher larval growth rate than males (F = 139.52, d.f. = 1, 717, p < 0.001).
Fig. 3

Genetic variation in plant resistance (antibiosis) against G. tenella in 86 wild-collected F. vesca genotypes. Antibiosis was measured as inverse of herbivore performance. Larval growth rate (calculated as pupal weight divided by the larval development time from hatching until pupation) was used as a measure of herbivore performance. In the figure, the mean larval growth rate on each plant genotype is compared to the overall mean (standardized on zero) of all 86 plant genotypes used. Negative values, i.e., larval growth rate lower than the overall mean indicate more resistant plant genotypes, while positive values indicate more susceptible plant genotypes. The red and blue bars denote the plant genotypes selected for experiments testing oviposition preference and egg survival. Predicted mean (total genetic value) + SE

The overall survival rate of G. tenella from egg hatching until pupation was high (93.2%). However, larval growth rate and survival were associated: a higher than average larval growth rate was observed for those plant genotypes where all beetles survived, in contrast to below average growth rates observed in cases where one or more larvae died (F = 9.63, d.f. =  2, p < 0.001; Fig. 4), indicating that antibiosis also affects survival through its effects on growth rate. Interestingly, egg hatching success was not affected by plant antibiosis level (Z = 1.38; d.f. = 160, p = 0.169; Fig. 5a), in which a predicted average of 47.4% of eggs successfully hatched on a resistant genotype, and 56.5% on a susceptible genotype. However, hatching success was affected by plant genotype (χ2 = 6.31, d.f. = 1, p < 0.012).
Fig. 4

Association between larval growth rate and survival of G. tenella larvae. The inverse of larval growth rate (calculated as pupal weight divided by the larval development time from hatching until pupation) was used as a proxy of plant resistance (antibiosis). Larval survival was divided into three classes according to the number of larvae that survived when assigned to feed on the certain plant genotype. Statistical significance levels have been obtained by pairwise Tukey’s post hoc tests. Estimated marginal means + SE. **0.05 < p < 0.001; ***p < 0.001

Fig. 5

Effect of plant resistance (antibiosis) on a egg hatching success (antibiosis) and b the interactive effects of leaf tissue (leaf blade vs. leaf petiole) and plant antibiosis level on oviposition preference (antixenosis) of G. tenella. Plant resistance (antibiosis) was measured as inverse of herbivore performance, i.e., larval growth rate calculated as pupal weight divided by the larval development time from hatching until pupation. Pairwise a priori contrast comparisons were conducted to compare differences between resistant leaf blade versus resistant leaf petiole, susceptible leaf blade versus susceptible leaf petiole, resistant leaf blade versus susceptible leaf blade, and resistant leaf petiole versus susceptible leaf petiole. Estimated marginal means + SE. **0.05 < p < 0.001; ***p < 0.001

Antixenosis

We used oviposition preference as a measure of antixenosis. We found that the location of eggs—whether located on the leaf blade or leaf petiole—was affected by antibiosis, as shown by a significant interaction between plant antibiosis level (resistant or susceptible) and leaf tissue type (leaf blade or leaf petiole; Z = 2.15, d.f. = 160, p = 0.032, Fig. 5b). Female beetles oviposit on average of 1.9 times more eggs on leaf blades and 5.3 times more on leaf petioles of susceptible plants compared to resistant plants. Overall, female beetles were 3.2 times more likely to lay eggs on plant genotypes classified as susceptible (averaged across different tissue types), compared to resistant plants (Z = 2.774, d.f.  = 320, p = 0.006; Fig. 5b). In addition to plant antibiosis level, oviposition preference was affected by plant genotype (χ2 = 1.77, d.f. =1, p = 0.036).

Discussion

Theory suggests that relatively high genetic variation can be found even in small geographic areas (Thompson 2013; Egan et al. 2018). Concordantly, we found significant genetic variation in the measured resistance traits against the Northern European pest insect G. tenella in our screening of wild woodland strawberry, F. vesca. In our study, we observed a large gradient in resistance, ranging from susceptible to highly resistant, suggesting that an untapped genetic resource is available in wild germplasm from Nordic populations of this plant species. However, the sampled area represents only a small fraction of this species’ Eurasian and North American distribution, suggesting that even higher variation could be harnessed if germplasm from the whole distribution was screened.

In order to obtain robust resistance in plants against pest insects, plant traits underlying strong antibiosis as well as antixenosis should be identified and optimized simultaneously (Stenberg and Muola 2017). We scored antibiosis using three different proxies: egg hatching success, larval growth rate, and larval survival. The herbivore growth rate varied markedly and significantly between the plant genotypes. Furthermore, it correlated positively with the larval survival; i.e., plant genotypes that supported higher herbivore growth rate also contributed to higher herbivore survival. Although the mortality was generally low, on certain genotypes the herbivore growth rate was significantly reduced which can further act as a sub-lethal plant defence by prolonging the window of vulnerability of G. tenella to natural enemy attack (Clancy and Price 1987; Williams 1991). In addition, both larval development time and pupal weight, i.e., the intrinsic components of larval growth rate, also show individually significant genetic variation (Online resource 2). The plant traits and mechanisms underlying these antibiosis processes are yet to be identified, but our findings suggest that true resistance traits (e.g., chemical or physical defences), rather than low nutritional content, underlie antibiosis in woodland strawberry (Haukioja et al. 1991). Egg hatching success was unaffected by plant antibiosis level.

Our study of antixenosis—measured as oviposition preference—showed that this aspect of plant resistance also varied between plant genotypes. The female beetles showed a clear preference for genotypes with high host plant quality (low antibiosis), and thus by extension, an ability to make optimal choices for their offspring (cf. the mother knows best hypothesis) (Jaenike 1978; Valladares and Lawton 1991). In wild strawberry populations with genetic variation in antixenosis, the herbivores would thus inflict natural selection on the plant, because herbivory is known to affect plant fitness (Muola and Stenberg 2018). However, the importance of antixenosis in cultivated monocultures, where beetles have no choice, is less obvious. In a previous study, G. tenella was shown to abandon another host plant (meadowsweet) when plant resistance increased and instead utilized a secondary host plant (arctic raspberry) which normally is less preferred (Stenberg et al. 2008). Similar herbivore emigration from resistant strawberry fields to nearby alternative host plants would reduce herbivore damage on strawberry, but this needs to be confirmed by further studies. The fact that antibiosis and antixenosis correlate with each other is also beneficial from a future breeding perspective, as this opens up the possibility to simultaneously optimize both aspects of resistance in the same plant, providing robust protection against the target herbivore (Stenberg and Muola 2017).

Reverse breeding or rewilding is one promising way to provide modern crops with new or improved traits—such as resistance—which may have been lost or degraded during domestication. Given the continuous need to develop resistant strawberry cultivars, rewilding would allow cultivation of strawberry with reduced input of chemical pesticides. In the case of antibiosis against G. tenella, we found different levels of broad-sense heritability (or clonal repeatability; the stability or ‘repeatability’ of this trait among clonal replicates of the same genotype) depending on which proxy that was used. Larval development time showed the highest level of heritability, while larval growth rate showed moderate levels, and pupal weight low heritability (Online resource 2). Which of the three proxies that is biologically most relevant is up to debate, and all of them have previously been used and recommended for other plant species (Stenberg and Muola 2017).

The genetic diversity of wild Fragaria species has previously provided novel genetic resources that were integrated into new cultivars (Liston et al. 2014). Among the wild Fragaria species, the woodland strawberry F. vesca is of special interest since its genome is sequenced (Shulaev et al. 2011) and displays a high level of collinearity with the cultivated garden strawberry in comparative mapping studies (Rousseau-Gueutin et al. 2008). New molecular methods such as CRISPR/Cas (Fonfara et al. 2016) and advances in plant breeding may soon offer solutions to overcome the multigene nature of many resistance mechanisms and the differences in ploidy between wild and cultivated strawberry and thus smooth the way for introgression of desired traits from wild relatives into modern crop varieties (Borges et al. 2018; Martinez et al. 2018).

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study contributes to a growing body of literature showing that crop wild relatives in general, and woodland strawberry in particular, contain genetic resources that could contribute to resistance breeding in modern crops. In particular, we demonstrated considerable genotypic variation in each measured proxy of antibiosis (egg hatching success, larval growth rate, and larval survival) and antixenosis (oviposition preference) as components of plant resistance against the pest insect G. tenella. In terms of their combined potential for pest suppression, antibiosis and antixenosis either held no specific relation to each other, or else showed good compatibility—e.g., where genotypes which possessed high antixenosis levels against G. tenella larvae furthermore tended to be avoided by female adults as oviposition host plants. These results together highlight the large potential value of wild germplasm for resistance breeding. If breeding challenges can be overcome, we expect that “wild” resistance traits will play important role in future rewilded strawberry cultivars and contribute to a more sustainable crop production with reduced dependency on pesticides.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Open access funding provided by Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. We thank Joubin Haji Mirza Ali, Linn Holmstedt, Sara Janbrink, Wera Kleve, Joel Lönnqvist, Milda Norkute, Erika Qvarfordt, and Brenda Vidal Estévez for technical assistance and Jan-Erik Englund and Adam Flöhr for valuable statistical discussions. The authors are funded by The Swedish Research Council Formas (Grant Nos. 217 - 2014-541 and 216 - 00223) and Maj and Tor Nessling Foundation (Grant No. 201800048).

Author contributions

All authors conceived, organized, and planned the research; JAS collected the wild accessions and established the common garden; DW undertook the experimental work and collected the data; DW, PAE, and AM analyzed the data; and DW led the writing of the manuscript. All authors contributed critically to the drafts and gave final approval for publication.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11829_2019_9724_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (39 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 38 kb)
11829_2019_9724_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (46 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 45 kb)

References

  1. Amil-Ruiz F, Blanco-Portales R, Muñoz-Blanco J, Caballero JL (2011) The strawberry plant defense mechanism: a molecular review. Plant Cell Physiol 52:1873–1903PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen MM, Landes X, Xiang W, Anyshchenko A, Falhof J, Østerberg JT, Olsen LI, Edenbrandt AK, Vedel SE, Thorsen BJ, Sandøe P, Gamborg C, Kappel K, Palmgren MG (2015) Feasibility of new breeding techniques for organic farming. Trends Plant Sci 20:426–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borges F, Parent J-S, van Ex F, Wolff P, Martínez G, Köhler C, Martienssen RA (2018) Transposon-derived small RNAs triggered by miR845 mediate genome dosage response in Arabidopsis. Nat Genet 50:186–192PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Broekgaarden C, Snoeren TAL, Dicke M, Vosman B (2011) Exploiting natural variation to identify insect-resistance genes. Plant Biotechnol J 9:819–825PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bulukhto NP, Tsipirig OV (2004) Strawberry leaf beetle. Zashchita i Karantin Rastenii 8:42–43Google Scholar
  6. Chen YH, Gols R, Benrey B (2015) Crop domestication and naturally selected species interactions. Annu Rev Entomol 60:35–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clancy KM, Price PW (1987) Rapid herbivore growth enhances enemy attack—sublethal plant defenses remain a paradox. Ecology 68:733–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dempewolf H, Baute G, Anderson J, Kilian B, Smith C, Guarino L (2017) Past and future use of wild relatives in crop breeding. Crop Sci 57:1070–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doumett S, Fibbi D, Cincinelli A, Giordani E, Nin S, Del Bubba M (2011) Comparison of nutritional and nutraceutical properties in cultivated fruits of Fragaria vesca L. produced in Italy. Food Res Int 44:1209–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Egan PA, Muola A, Stenberg JA (2018) Capturing genetic variation in crop wild relatives: an evolutionary approach. Evol Appl 11:1293–1304PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ekuere UU, Dosdall LM, Hills M, Keddie AB, Kott L, Good A (2005) Identification, mapping, and economic evaluation of QTLs encoding root maggot resistance in Brassica. Crop Sci 45:371–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fernandes VC, Domingues VF, Mateus N, Delerue-Matos C (2011) Organochlorine pesticide residues in strawberries from integrated pest management and organic farming. J Agric Food Chem 59:7582–7591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fonfara I, Richter H, Bratovič M, Le Rhun A, Charpentier E (2016) The CRISPR-associated DNA-cleaving enzyme Cpf1 also processes precursor CRISPR RNA. Nature 532:517–521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Godfray HCJ, Blacquière T, Field LM, Hails RS, Petrokofsky G, Potts SG, Raine NE, Vanbergen AJ, McLean AR (2014) A restatement of the natural science evidence base concerning neonicotinoid insecticides and insect pollinators. Proc R Soc B 281:20140558PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hambäck PA, Weingartner E, Ericson L, Fors L, Cassel-Lundhagen A, Stenberg JA, Bergsten J (2013) Bayesian species delimitation reveals generalist and specialist parasitic wasps on Galerucella beetles (Chrysomelidae): sorting by herbivore or plant host? BMC Evol Biol 13:92PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haukioja E, Ruohomäki K, Suomela J, Vuorisalo T (1991) Nutritional quality as a defense against herbivores. For Ecol Manag 39:237–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hilker M, Fatouros NE (2015) Plant responses to insect egg deposition. Annu Rev Entomol 60:493–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hill WG (2010) Understanding and using quantitative genetic variation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365:73–85PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hilmarsson HS, Hytönen T, Isobe S, Göransson M, Toivainen T, Hallsson JH (2017) Population genetic analysis of a global collection of Fragaria vesca using microsatellite markers. PLoS ONE 12:e0183384PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holger S, Stoffel M, Nakagawa S (2016) rptR: repeatability estimation for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data. R package version 0.9.0. 2016. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rptR. Accessed 14 Aug 2018
  21. Hollender CA, Kang C, Darwish O, Geretz A, Matthews BF, Slovin J, Alkharouf N, Liu Z (2014) Floral transcriptomes in woodland strawberry uncover developing receptacle and anther gene networks. Plant Physiol 165:1062–1075PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jaenike J (1978) On optimal oviposition behavior in phytophagous insects. Theor Popul Biol 14:350–356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kang C, Darwish O, Geretz A, Shahan R, Alkharouf N, Liu Z (2013) Genome-scale transcriptomic insights into early-stage fruit development in woodland strawberry Fragaria vesca. Plant Cell 25:1960–1978PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaufmane E, Libek A (2000) The occurrence of arthropods in strawberry plantation depending on the method of cultivation. In: Proceedings of the international conference fruit production and fruit breeding Tartu, pp 204–208Google Scholar
  25. Liston A, Cronn R, Ashman T-L (2014) Fragaria: a genus with deep historical roots and ripe for evolutionary and ecological insights. Am J Bot 101:1686–1699PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Longhi S, Giongo L, Buti M, Surbanovski N, Viola R, Velasco R, Ward JA, Sargent DJ (2014) Molecular genetics and genomics of the Rosoideae: state of the art and future perspectives. Hortic Res 1:1PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Malchev I, Fletcher R, Kott L (2010) Breeding of rutabaga (Brassica napus var. napobrassica L. Reichenb.) based on biomarker selection for root maggot resistance (Delia radicum L.). Euphytica 175:191–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maliníková E, Kukla J, Kuklová M, Balážová M (2013) Altitudinal variation of plant traits: morphological characteristics in Fragaria vesca L. (Rosaceae). Ann For Res 56:79–89Google Scholar
  29. Martinez G, Wolff P, Wang Z, Moreno-Romero J, Santos-González J, Conze LL, DeFraia C, Slotkin RK, Köhler C (2018) Paternal easiRNAs regulate parental genome dosage in Arabidopsis. Nat Genet 50:193–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mouhu K, Kurokura T, Koskela EA, Albert VA, Elomaa P, Hytönen T (2013) The Fragaria vesca homolog of SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS1 represses flowering and promotes vegetative growth. Plant Cell 25:3296–3310PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Muola A, Stenberg JA (2018) Folivory has long-term effects on sexual but not on asexual reproduction in woodland strawberry. Ecol Evol 8:12250–12259PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Muola A, Weber D, Malm LE, Egan PA, Glinwood R, Parachnowitsch AL, Stenberg JA (2017) Direct and pollinator-mediated effects of herbivory on strawberry and the potential for improved resistance. Front Plant Sci 8:823PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Olofsson E, Pettersson ML (1992) Leaf beetles in the genus Galerucella (Col., Chrysomelidae) on strawberry. Växtskyddsnotiser 56:42–45Google Scholar
  34. Painter RH (1951) Insect resistance in crop plants. The University Press of Kansas, LawrenceCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Palmgren MG, Edenbrandt AK, Vedel SE, Andersen MM, Landes X, Østerberg JT, Falhof J, Olsen LI, Christensen SB, Sandøe P, Gamborg C, Kappel K, Thorsen BJ, Pagh P (2015) Are we ready for back-to-nature crop breeding? Trends Plant Sci 20:155–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Parikka P, Tuovinen T (2014) Plant protection challenges in strawberry production in northern Europe. Acta Hortic 1049:173–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Piepho HP, Moehring J, Melchinger AE, Buechse A (2008) BLUP for phenotypic selection in plant breeding and variety testing. Euphytica 161:209–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  39. Roiloa SR, Retuerto R (2007) Responses of the clonal Fragaria vesca to microtopographic heterogeneity under different water and light conditions. Environ Exp Bot 61:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rousseau-Gueutin M, Lerceteau-Köhler E, Barrot L, Sargent DJ, Monfort A, Simpson D et al (2008) Comparative genetic mapping between octoploid and diploid Fragaria species reveals a high level of colinearity between their genomes and the essentially disomic behavior of the cultivated octoploid strawberry. Genetics 179:2045–2060PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schulze J, Rufener R, Erhardt A, Stoll P (2012) The relative importance of sexual and clonal reproduction for population growth in the perennial herb Fragaria vesca. Popul Ecol 54:369–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shulaev V, Sargent DJ, Crowhurst RN, Mockler TC, Folkerts O, Delcher AL et al (2011) The genome of woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca). Nature Genet 43:109–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smith CM, Clement SL (2012) Molecular bases of plant resistance to arthropods. Annu Rev Entomol 57:309–328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stenberg JA (2012) Effects of local vegetation and plantation age for the parasitoid Asecodes mento—a biocontrol agent in organic strawberry fields. Insect Sci 19:604–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stenberg JA (2014) Density-dependent herbivory and biocontrol of the strawberry leaf beetle, Galerucella tenella. Acta Hortic 1049:647–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stenberg JA, Axelsson EP (2008) Host race formation in the meadowsweet and strawberry feeding leaf beetle Galerucella tenella. Basic Appl Ecol 9:260–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stenberg JA, Muola A (2017) How should plant resistance to herbivores be measured? Front Plant Sci 8:663PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stenberg JA, Witzell J, Ericson L (2006) Tall herb herbivory resistance reflects historic exposure to leaf beetles in a boreal archipelago age-gradient. Oecologia 148:414–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stenberg JA, Hambäck PA, Ericson L (2008) Herbivore-induced “rent rise” in the host plant may drive a diet breadth enlargement in the tenant. Ecology 89:126–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tennessen JA, Govindarajulu R, Ashman T-L, Liston A (2014) Evolutionary origins and dynamics of octoploid strawberry subgenomes revealed by dense targeted capture linkage maps. Genome Biol Evol 6:3295–3313PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thompson JN (2013) Relentless evolution. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ulrich D, Komes D, Olbricht K, Hoberg E (2007) Diversity of aroma patterns in wild and cultivated Fragaria accessions. Genet Resour Crop Evol 54:1185–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Urrutia M, Schwab W, Hoffmann T, Monfort A (2015) Genetic dissection of the (poly)phenol profile of diploid strawberry (Fragaria vesca) fruits using a NIL collection. Plant Sci 242:151–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Valladares G, Lawton JH (1991) Host-plant selection in the holly leaf-miner: does mother know best? J Anim Ecol 60:227–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Williams IS (1991) Slow-growth, high-mortality—a general hypothesis, or is it? Ecol Entomol 24:490–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant Protection BiologySwedish University of Agricultural SciencesAlnarpSweden
  2. 2.Biodiversity UnitUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations