Advertisement

The choice between flowers of closely related plant species by generalist pollinator: identification of relevant VOCs

  • Laima Blažytė-ČereškienėEmail author
  • Violeta Apšegaitė
  • Vincas Būda
Original Paper
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

False blister beetles of the genus Oedemera (Coleoptera: Oedemeridae) are known as generalist pollinators of many plant species, but their mutualistic interactions are still insufficiently explored. The aim of the study was to identify the floral compounds emitted by sympatric and simultaneously co-flowering strawberry species that could serve for Oedemera beetles as olfactory cues of suitable flowers. In the test locality, flowers of Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis were visited by Oedemera lurida and Oedemera virescens beetles. O. lurida preferred flowers of F. viridis to those of F. vesca, whereas O. virescens tended to prefer F. vesca to F. viridis. GC-EAD analysis revealed that O. lurida perceived three compounds of F. vesca and four compounds of F. viridis flowers. Among these, nonanal, 2-phenylacetaldehyde and an unidentified compound (UC1) were common to both strawberries, while the amount of one compound (1,4-dimethoxybenzene) required to elicit an EAG response was sufficient in F. viridis, but not in F. vesca. Our results suggest that O. lurida are capable of choosing between flowers of the two strawberries based on VOCs’ with 1,4-dimethoxybenzene as a relevant key component. O. virescens responded to eight compounds present in F. vesca flowers. The flowers contained three compounds EAG-active towards O. lurida and O. virescens (nonanal, 2-phenylacetaldehyde, UC1) and five compounds EAG-active towards O. virescens only (acetic acid, decanal, (E)-non-2-enal, linalool, and UC2). In F. vesca and F. viridis flower extracts as well as headspaces, the identified compounds differed qualitatively only. (E)-Non-2-enal and acetic acid were recorded for the first time in Fragaria. Local specialization of Oedemera beetles in flower visiting was proved and relevant VOCs were identified.

Keywords

Fragaria Oedemera Flower volatiles Specialization in pollination systems Volatile organic compounds Wild strawberries 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the expert entomologist Dr Romas Ferenca from the Tadas Ivanauskas Museum of Zoology, Lithuania for the identification of beetle species, as well as Mrs Laima Monkienė for the English text correction. Open Access to the research infrastructure of the Nature Research Centre under Lithuanian open access network initiative is acknowledged.

References

  1. Andersson S, Dobson HEM (2003) Antennal responses to floral scents in the butterfly Heliconius melpomene. J Chem Ecol 29:2319–2330.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026278531806 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson S, Nilsson LA, Groth I, Bergström G (2002) Floral scents in butterfly-pollinated plants: possible convergence in chemical composition. Bot J Linn Soc 140:129–153.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8339.2002.00068.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armengol GF (2015) Biotic and abiotic factors that determine the emission of volatile organic compounds by flowers. PhD thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. https://ddd.uab.cat/pub/tesis/2015/hdl_10803_288049/gfa1de1.pdf
  4. Ashman T-L, Bradburn M, Cole DH, Blaney BH, Raguso RA (2005) The scent of a male: the role of floral volatiles in pollination of a gender dimorphic plant. Ecology 86:2099–2105.  https://doi.org/10.1890/04-1161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atanassova J, Sivilov O (2014) Pollen analysis of the crop contents of adult Oedemeridae (Coleoptera) in Bulgaria. Eur J Entomol 111:588–593.  https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2014.068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernhardt P (2000) Convergent evolution and adaptive radiation of beetle-pollinated angiosperms. Plant Syst Evol 222:293–320.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blažytė-Čereškienė L, Būda V, Bagdonaitė E (2012) Three wild Lithuanian strawberry species and their pollinators. Plant Syst Evol 298:819–826.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-012-0593-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burger H, Dötterl S, Ayasse M, Haberlein CM, Schulz S (2012) An arthropod deterrent attracts specialised bees to their host plants. Oecologia 168:727–736.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-2136-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carloni S, Bologna M (2005) Niche differences in two Oedemera species in mediterranean and continental ecosystems of central Italy (Coleoptera: Oedemeridae). Entomol Gener 28:201–211.  https://doi.org/10.1127/entom.gen/28/2005/201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carvalho AT, Dötterl S, Schlindwein C (2014) An aromatic volatile attracts oligolectic bee pollinators in an interdependent bee-plant relationship. J Chem Ecol 40:1126–1134.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-014-0510-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cook SM, Bartlet E, Murray DA, Williams IH (2002) The role of pollen odour in the attraction of pollen beetles to oilseed rape flowers. Entomol Exp Appl 104:43–50.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1570-7458.2002.00989.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Council of Europe (1996) European Pharmacopoeia, 3rd edn. Council of Europe, Strasbourg CedexGoogle Scholar
  13. Dobson HEM (2006) Relationship between floral fragrance composition and type of pollinator. In: Dudareva N, Pichersky E (eds) Biology of floral scent. Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, pp 147–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dötterl S, Vereecken NJ (2010) The chemical ecology and evolution of bee-flower interactions: a review and perspectives. Can J Zool 88:668–697.  https://doi.org/10.1139/Z10-031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ervik F, Knudsen JT (2003) Water lilies and scarabs: faithful partners for 100 million years? Biol J Linn Soc 80:539–543.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00258.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farré-Armengol G, Filella I, Llusià J, Peñuelas J (2015) Pollination mode determines floral scent. Biochem Syst Ecol 61:44e53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2015.05.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guédot C, Landolt PJ, Smithhisler C (2008) Odorants of the flowers of Butterfly Bush, Buddleia davidii Franch., as possible attractants of pest species of moths. Fla Entomol 91:576–582.  https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040-91.4.576 Google Scholar
  18. Johnson SD, Ellis A, Dötterl B (2007) Specialization for pollination by beetles and wasps: the role of lollipop hairs and fragrance in Satyrium microrrhynchum (Orchidaceae). Am J Bot 94:47–55.  https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.94.1.47 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jürgens A, Dötterl S, Liede-Schumann S, Meve U (2010) Floral scent composition in early diverging taxa of Asclepiadoideae, and Secamonoideae (Apocynaceae). S Afr J Bot 76:749–761.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2010.08.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Klatt BK, Burmeister C, Westphal C, Tscharntke T, von Fragstein M (2013) Flower volatiles, crop varieties and bee responses. PLoS ONE 8(8):e72724.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072724 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Knudsen JT, Eriksson R, Gershenzon J, Stahl B (2006) Diversity and distribution of floral scent. Bot Rev 72:1–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kunin WE (1992) Density and reproductive success in wild populations of Diplotaxis erucoides (Brassicaceae). Oecologia 91:129–133.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Labokas J, Bagdonaitė E (2005) Phenotypic diversity of wild Fragaria vesca and F. viridis in Lithuania. Biologija 3:19–22Google Scholar
  24. Maia ACD, Dötterl S, Kaiser R, Silberbauer-Gottsberger I, Teichert H, Gibernau M, do Amaral Ferraz Navarro DM, Schlindwein C, Gottsberger G (2012) The key role of 4-methyl-5-vinylthiazole in the attraction of scarab beetle pollinators: a unique olfactory floral signal shared by Annonaceae and Araceae. J Chem Ecol 38:1072–1080.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-012-0173-z Google Scholar
  25. Majetic CJ, Raguso RA, Ashman TL (2009) Sources of floral scent variation. Can environment define floral scent phenotype? Plant Signal Behav 4:129–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martinková Z, Skuhrovec J, Barták M, Bezděk J, Bogusch P, Hadrava J, Hájek J, Janšta P, Jelínek J, Kubáň V, Štys P (2015) Role of host plant in determining the insect community associated with the flowers of dicotyledoneous herbaceous plants. Acta Soc Zool Bohem 79:95–104Google Scholar
  27. Milet-Pinheiro P, Ayasse M, Dobson HEM, Schlindwein C, Francke W, Dötterl S (2013) The chemical basis of host-plant recognition in a specialized bee pollinator. J Chem Ecol 39:1347–1360.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-013-0363-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Najda A, Dyduch M (2009) Contents and chemical composition of essential oils from wild strawberry (Fragaria vesca L.). J Herba Pol 55:153–162Google Scholar
  29. Plepys D, Ibarra F, Francke W, Lofstedt C (2002) Odour-mediated nectar foraging in the silver Y moth, Autographa gamma (Lepidoptera: noctuidae): Behavioural and electrophysiological responses to floral volatiles. Oikos 99:75–82.  https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.990108.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shimoda T, Nishihara M, Ozawa R, Takabayashi J, Arimura G (2012) The effect of genetically enriched (E)-b-ocimene and the role of floral scent in the attraction of the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis to spider mite-induced volatile blends of torenia. New Phytol 193:1009–1021.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.04018.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sivilov O, Atanassova J, Zlatkov B (2011) Food plant spectrum of Oedemeridae species (Insecta, Coleoptera) based on pollen analysis (A preliminary study). C R Acad Bulgare Sci 64:225–230Google Scholar
  32. Soler C, Hossaert-McKey M, Buatois B, Bessière JM, Schatz B, Proffit M (2011) Geographic variation in floral scent in a highly specialized pollination mutualism. Phytochemistry 72:74–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2010.10.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Steenhuisen SL, Jürgens A, Johnson SD (2013) Effects of volatile compounds emitted by Protea species (Proteaceae) on antennal electrophysiological responses and attraction of cetoniine beetles. J Chem Ecol 39:438–446.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-013-0259-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Svensson GP, Hickman MOJr, Bartram S, Boland W, Pellmyr O, Raguso RA (2005) Chemistry and geographic variation of floral scent in Yucca filamentosa (Agavaceae). Am J Bot 92:1624–1631.  https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.92.10.1624 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Theis N, Adler LS (2012) Advertising to the enemy: enhanced floral fragrance increases beetle attraction and reduces plant reproduction. Ecology 93:430–435.  https://doi.org/10.1890/11-0825.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vazquez XA (2002) European Fauna of Oedemeridae. Argania Editio, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  37. Ventura MU, Pereira T, Nunes DH, Arruda IC (2007) Attraction of Astylus variegatus (Germ.) (Coleoptera, Melyridae) by volatile floral attractants. Sci Agric 64:306–307.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162007000300016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vuts J, Imrei Z, Birkett MA, Pickett JA, Woodcock CM, Tóth M (2014) Semiochemistry of the Scarabaeoidea. J Chem Ecol 40:190–210.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-014-0377-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wibe A, Borg-Karlson AK, Cross J, Bichão H, Fountain M, Liblikas I, Sigsgaard L (2014) Combining 1,4-dimethoxybenzene, the major flower volatile of wild strawberry Fragaria vesca, with the aggregation pheromone of the strawberry blossom weevil Anthonomus rubi improves attraction. Crop Prot 64:122–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2014.06.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Willmer P (2011) Pollination and floral ecology. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laima Blažytė-Čereškienė
    • 1
    Email author
  • Violeta Apšegaitė
    • 1
  • Vincas Būda
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Chemical and Behavioural EcologyNature Research CentreVilniusLithuania

Personalised recommendations