Skip to main content
Log in

Testing the ‘plant domestication-reduced defense’ hypothesis in blueberries: the role of herbivore identity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arthropod-Plant Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Domestication is predicted to reduce resistance of agricultural crops against insect herbivores; however, its impact on herbivores with different feeding modes and evolutionary histories needs investigation. To this end, we conducted greenhouse experiments to explore the effects of domestication of blueberries (Vaccinium corymbosum), a crop native to North America, on the performance of two chewing herbivores [the native Sparganothis fruitworm (Sparganothis sulfureana (Clemens)) and non-native gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.)], and one piercing-sucking herbivore [the blueberry aphid (Illinoia azaleae (Mason))]. Lymantria dispar performed better (i.e., larvae gained more mass, damaged more leaves, and had greater survival) on cultivated V. corymbosum than on its wild counterpart. In contrast, domestication had no impact on the native S. sulfureana larval mass, consumption, and survivorship. Domestication increased survivorship, but not offspring production, of the aphid I. azaleae. To examine changes in plant chemistry due to domestication, we measured phenolic and nutrient (macro- and micro-elements) content in wild and cultivated V. corymbosum leaves. Although there were no differences in total phenolic content, two compounds were absent, while two were at lower and one at higher concentration in domesticated than in wild plants. Wild V. corymbosum leaves had higher amounts of phosphorus, sulfur, and sodium than cultivated leaves; the opposite was found for aluminum. While our findings provide support for the ‘plant domestication-reduced defense’ hypothesis, the effects of domestication were dependent on feeding modes and adaptations of the herbivores such that the non-native chewing species was more positively affected than the chewing and the piercing-sucking natives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AphID (2018) Illinoia azaleae. http://aphid.aphidnet.org/Illinoia_azaleae.php. Accessed 16 Jan 2018

  • Astello-Garcia MG, Cervantes I, Nair V et al (2015) Chemical composition and phenolic compounds profile of cladodes from Opuntia spp. cultivars with different domestication gradient. J Food Compos Anal 43:119–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Averill AL, Sylvia MM (1998) Cranberry insects of the northeast. University of Massachusetts Cranberry Experiment Sta, Wareham

    Google Scholar 

  • Beninger CW, Abou-Zaid MM (1997) Flavonol glycosides from four pine species that inhibit early instar gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) development. Biochem Syst Ecol 25:505–512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benrey B, Denno RF (1997) The slow-growth-high-mortality hypothesis: a test using the cabbage butterfly. Ecology 78:987–999

    Google Scholar 

  • Benrey B, Callejas A, Rios L, Oyama K, Denno RF (1998) The effects of domestication of Brassica and Phaseolus on the interaction between phytophagous insects and parasitoids. Biol Control 11:130–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunea A, Rugină DO, Pintea AM, Sconta Z, Bunea CI, Socaciu C (2011) Comparative polyphenolic content and antioxidant activities of some wild and cultivated blueberries from Romania. Not Bot Horti Agrobo 39:70–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chacón-Fuentes M, Parra L, Rodriguez-Saona C, Seguel I, Ceballos R, Quiroz A (2015) Domestication in murtilla (Ugni molinae) reduced defensive flavonol levels but increased resistance against a native herbivorous insect. Environ Entomol 44:627–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YH, Gols R, Benrey B (2015a) Crop domestication and its impact on naturally selected trophic interactions. Annu Rev Entomol 60:35–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YH, Gols R, Stratton CA, Brevik KA, Benrey B (2015b) Complex tritrophic interactions in response to crop domestication: predictions from the wild. Entomol Exp Appl 157:40–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coley PD, Bryant JP, Chapin FS (1985) Resource availability and plant anti-herbivore defence. Sci 230:895–899

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coville FV (1937) Improving the wild blueberry. Yearbook of Agriculture, United States United States Government Printing Office, Washington DC, pp 559–574

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lange ES, Balmer D, Mauch-Mani B, Turlings TCJ (2014) Insect and pathogen attack and resistance in maize and its wild ancestors, the teosintes. New Phytol 204:329–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doane CC, McManus ML (1981) The gypsy moth: research toward integrated pest management. U.S.D.A. Forest Service Technical Bulletin 1584, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck P, Childers NF (1966) The blueberry industry. In: Eck P, Childers NF (eds) Blueberry culture. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, pp 3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans LT (1993) Crop evolution, adaptation and yield. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard MDP, Glauser G, Robert CAM, Turlings TCJ (2018) Fine-tuning the ‘plant-domestication-reduced defense’ hypothesis: specialist vs generalist herbivores. New Phytol 217:355–366

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • García-Palacios P, Milla R, Delgado-Baquerizo M et al (2013) Side-effects of plant domestication: ecosystem impacts of changes in litter quality. New Phytol 198:504–513

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gepts P (2010) Crop domestication as a long-term selection experiment. In: Janick J (ed) Plant breeding reviews. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, pp 1–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Giese RL, Schneider ML (1979) Cartographic comparison of Eurasian gypsy moth distribution (Lymantria dispar L.; Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Entomol News 90:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovanelli G, Buratti S (2009) Comparison of polyphenolic composition and antioxidant activity of wild Italian blueberries and some cultivated varieties. Food Chem 112:903–908

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gols R, Bukovinszky T, van Dam NM, Dicke M, Bullock JM, Harvey JA (2008) Performance of generalist and specialist herbivores and their endoparasitoids differs on cultivated and wild Brassica populations. J Chem Ecol 34:132–143

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock J (2001) Blueberry characteristics range among the varieties. The Fruit Growers News, May Issue, pp 36–37

  • Herms DA, Mattson WJ (1992) The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Q Rev Biol 67:283–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horneck DA, Miller RO (1998) Determination of total nitrogen in plant tissue. In: Kalra YP (ed) Handbook and reference methods for plant analysis. CRC Press, New York, pp 75–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang C-Y, Schulte EE (1985) Digestion of plant tissue for analysis by ICP emission spectroscopy. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 16:943–958

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy GG, Barbour JD (1992) Resistance variation in natural and managed systems. In: Fritz RS, Simms EL (eds) Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens: ecology, evolution, and genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 13–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindroth RL, Weisbrod AV (1991) Genetic variation in response of the gypsy moth to aspen phenolic glycosides. Biochem Syst Ecol 19:97–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • López-Uribe MM, Cane JH, Minckley RL, Danforth BN (2016) Crop domestication facilitated rapid geographical expansion of a specialist pollinator, the squash bee Peponapis pruinosa. Proc R Soc B 283:20160443. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.0443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Macfadyen S, Bohan DA (2010) Crop domestication and the disruption of species interactions. Basic Appl Ecol 11:116–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnoler A (1970) Susceptibility of gypsy moth larvae to Lymantria spp. nuclear-and cytoplasmic-polyhedrosis viruses. Entomophaga 15:407–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marucci PE (1953) The Sparganothis fruitworm in New Jersey. Am Cranberry Growers’ Ass Proc 83:6–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell FG, Jenninggs PE (1980) Breeding plants resistant to insects. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick J (1998) The vegetation of the New Jersey pine barrens. In: Forman RTT (ed) Pine barrens: ecosystem and landscape. Rutgers University Press, New Brunsiwck, pp 229–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikulic-Petkovsek M, Slatnar A, Stampar F, Veberic R (2012) HPLC-MSn identification and quantification of flavonol glycosides in 28 wild and cultivated berry species. Food Chem 135:2138–2146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mithöfer A, Boland W (2012) Plant defense against herbivores: chemical aspects. Annu Rev Plant Biol 63:431–450

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moreira, X, Zas R, Solla A, Sampedro L (2015) Differentiation of persistent anatomical defensive structures is costly and determined by nutrient availability and genetic growth-defence constraints. Tree Physiol 35:112–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peng S, Cassman KG, Virmani SS, Sheehy J, Khush GS (1999) Yield potential trends of tropical rice since the release of IR8 and the challenge of increasing rice yield potential. Crop Sci 39:1552–1559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polashock JJ, Caruso FL, Averill AL, Schilder AC (2017) Compendium of blueberry, cranberry, and lingonberry diseases and pests, 2nd edn. APS Press, St. Paul

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ranger CM, Johnson-Cicalese J, Polavarapu S, Vorsa N (2006) Evaluation of Vaccinium spp. for Illinoia pepperi (Hemiptera: Aphididae) performance and phenolic content. J Econ Entomol 99:1474–1482

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ranger CM, Singh AP, Johnson-Cicalese J, Polavarapu S, Vorsa N (2007) Intraspecific variation in aphid resistance and constitutive phenolics exhibited by the wild blueberry Vaccinium darrowi. J Chem Ecol 33:711–729

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades RD (1979) Evolution of plant chemical defense against herbivores. In: Rosenthal GA, Janzen DA, Applebaum SW (eds) Herbivores: their interaction with secondary plant metabolites. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera M, Rodriguez-Saona CR, Jennings DE, Koppenhoffer AM (2015) Assessing the impact of cultivation and plant domestication of highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum) on soil properties and associated plant-parasitic nematode communities. Soil Biol Biochem 88:25–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Saona C, Vorsa N, Singh AP et al (2011) Tracing the history of plant traits under domestication in cranberries: potential consequences on anti-herbivore defences. J Exp Bot 62:2633–2644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal JP, Dirzo R (1997) Effects of life history, domestication and agronomic selection on plant defence against insects: evidence from maizes and wild relatives. Evol Ecol 11:337–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salminen JP, Karonen M (2011) Chemical ecology of tannins and other phenolics: we need a change in approach. Funct Ecol 25:325–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellappan S, Akoh C, Krewer G (2002) Phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity of Georgia-grown blueberries and blackberries. J Agric Food Chem 50:2432–2438

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turcotte M, Turley NE, Johnson MTJ (2014) The impact of domestication on resistance to two generalist herbivores across 29 independent domestication events. New Phytol 204:671–681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang SY, Chen CT, Wang CY (2009) Composition of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity in the leaves of blueberry cultivars. Food Chem 112:676–684

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waterhouse AL (2002) Determination of total phenolics. In: Wrolstad RE, Acree TE, Decker EA et al. (eds) Current protocols in food analytical chemistry. Wiley, New York, pp. I1.1.1–I1.1.8

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead SR, Turcotte MM, Poveda K (2016) Domestication impacts on plant-herbivore interactions: a meta-analysis. Phil Trans R Soc 372:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Wink M (1988) Plant breeding: importance of plant secondary metabolites for protection against pathogens and herbivores. Theor Appl Genet 75:225–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Matthew Strom, Gabrielle Pintauro, Mara Schiffhauer, Andrew Lux, and Sarah Ongaro for their assistance in the laboratory, greenhouse, and field, and the growers who provided field sites for this research. We thank Dr. Elvira de Lange and an anonymous reviewer for helpful editorial comments on an earlier draft. Funds for this study were partially provided by the New Jersey Blueberry/Cranberry Research Council and the hatch project NJ08192 to C.R-S.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cesar Rodriguez-Saona.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Gimme Walter.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 24 KB)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 24 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hernandez-Cumplido, J., Giusti, M.M., Zhou, Y. et al. Testing the ‘plant domestication-reduced defense’ hypothesis in blueberries: the role of herbivore identity. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 12, 483–493 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-018-9605-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-018-9605-1

Keywords

Navigation