Arthropod-Plant Interactions

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 303–310 | Cite as

Cross-modal effect of natal habitat experience increases receptivity to non-natal habitat cues in generalist parasitic wasps

  • Hiroyuki TakemotoEmail author
Original Paper


Exposure to natal habitats induces preferences in individual organism for foraging cues that originate from their developmental habitat. However, the natal experience of habitat generalists may play a different role in their habitat selection, since they use a broad range of foraging cues in a non-natal habitat. In this study, the effects of natal habitat experiences on the responses of females of the generalist parasitoid Aphidius gifuensis Ashmead to cues from natal or non-natal habitats were investigated. The landing rates on plant-host complexes (PHCs) and undamaged plants (UDPs) of natal (wheat) and non-natal (broad bean) plant systems in a wind tunnel increased after encounters with host aphids on the wheat-PHCs when the wasps had previously been exposed to wheat-UDPs. However, without the previous exposure to wheat-UDPs, the landing rate on the broad bean-PHCs was not increased. Similar increase found in responses to green paper disc dummies suggested involvement of visual stimuli in the reinforcement. In olfactometer tests, preferences for broad bean-UDPs over broad bean-PHCs were found but wasps with previous exposure to wheat-UDPs and host encounter on wheat-PHCs did not show the preference. These results suggest that the early exposure to natal habitat plants modified later learning and response to visual cues from potential non-natal habitat plants, and olfactory learning might be involved in the modification. This cross-modal effect of early natal experience would compensate for the loss of host-searching efficiency due to uncertain information of potential non-natal habitats.


Habitat selection Natal experience Learning Host preference Olfaction Vision 



The author thanks Izumi Ohta for providing insect colonies, Mantaro Hironaka for his help in the measurement of relative reflectance of paper dummies, and the Research Institute of Green Science and Technology, Shizuoka University, for providing research facilities. This research was supported (in part) by The Japan Health Foundation and a Grant for Environmental Research Projects from The Sumitomo Foundation.


This study was funded by The Japan Health Foundation and The Sumitomo Foundation (Grant Number 143411).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author has no conflict of interest to declare.

Supplementary material

11829_2016_9433_MOESM1_ESM.tif (9 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (TIFF 8 kb)


  1. Blande JD, Pickett JA, Poppy GM (2007) A comparison of semiochemically mediated interactions involving specialist and generalist brassica-feeding aphids and the braconid parasitoid Diaeretiella rapae. J Chem Ecol 33:767–779. doi: 10.1007/s10886-007-9264-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Chittka L, Raine NE (2006) Recognition of flowers by pollinators. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9:428–435. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2006.05.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Davis JM, Stamps JA (2004) The effect of natal experience on habitat preferences. Trends Ecol Evol 19:411–416. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.04.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dobson HEM (1994) Floral volatiles and in insect biology. In: Bernays E (ed) Insect-plant interactions. CRC Press, London, pp 47–81Google Scholar
  5. Dötterl S, Vereecken NJ (2010) The chemical ecology and evolution of bee–flower interactions: a review and perspectives. Can J Zool 88:668–697. doi: 10.1139/Z10-031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Godfray HCJ (1993) Parasitoids: behavioral and evolutionary ecology. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  7. Nakahira K, Takada Y, Teramoto T, Kagoshima K, Takagi M (2012) Control of potato aphids by the addition of barley strips in potato fields: a successful example of vegetation management. Biocontrol Sci Technol 22:1155–1165. doi: 10.1080/09583157.2012.715627 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ohta I, Honda K (2010) Use of Sitobion akebiae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) as an alternative host aphid for a banker-plant system using an indigenous parasitoid, Aphidius gifuensis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Appl Entomol Zool 45:233–238. doi: 10.1303/aez.2010.233 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ohta I, Ohtaishi M (2004) Fertility, longevity and intrinsic rate of increase of Aphidius gifuensis Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Homoptera: Aphididae). Appl Entomol Zool 39:113–117. doi: 10.1303/aez.2004.113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ohta I, Ohtaishi M (2005) Effectiveness of Aphidius gifuensis Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on the population control of Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Homoptera: Aphididae) in small experimental greenhouses. Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 49:78–82. doi: 10.1303/jjaez.2005.78 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computingGoogle Scholar
  12. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (2012) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 4th edn. W. H. Freeman and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Stevens M (2013) Sensory ecology behaviour and evolution. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Storeck A, Poppy G, van Emden H, Powell W (2000) The role of plant chemical cues in determining host preference in the generalist aphid parasitoid Aphidius colemani. Entomol Exp Appl 97:41–46. doi: 10.1046/j.1570-7458.2000.00714.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Takada H (1992) Aphid parasitoids as biological control agents to vector aphids of papaya ring spot virus and banana bunchy top virus. FFTC Tech Bull 132:1–11Google Scholar
  16. Takada H (2002) Parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae, Aphidiinae; Aphelinidae) of four principal pest aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) on greenhouse vegetable crops in Japan. Appl Entomol Zool 37:237–249. doi: 10.1303/aez.2002.237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Takemoto H, Powell W, Pickett J, Kainoh Y, Takabayashi J (2012) Two-step learning involved in acquiring olfactory preferences for plant volatiles by parasitic wasps. Anim Behav 83:1491–1496. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.03.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Takemoto H, Uefune M, Ozawa R, Arimura G, Takabayashi J (2013) Previous infestation of pea aphids Acyrthosiphon pisum on broad bean plants resulted in the increased performance of conspecific nymphs on the plants. J Plant Interact 8:370–374. doi: 10.1080/17429145.2013.786792 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Turlings TCJ, Wäckers FL, Vet LEM, Lewis WJ, Tumlinson JH (1993) Learning of host-finding cues by Hymenopterous parasitoids. Insect Learn 51–78Google Scholar
  20. Uefune M, Kugimiya S, Shimoda T, Takabayashi J (2012) Starvation and herbivore-induced plant volatiles affect the color preferences of parasitic wasps. Biocontrol 58:187–193. doi: 10.1007/s10526-012-9483-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. van Emden H, Eletherianos I, Rose J, Douloumpaka S, Pettersson J (2002) Aphid parasitoid detects that an alien plant was present nearby during their development. Physiol Enthomology 27:199–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. van Emden HF, Storeck AP, Douloumpaka S, Eletherianos I, Poppy GM, Powell W (2008) Plant chemistry and aphid parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): Imprinting and memory. Eur J Entomol 105:477–483. doi: 10.14411/eje.2008.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vet LEM, Dicke M (1992) Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context. Annu Rev Entomol 37:141–172. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.001041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vet LEM, Lewis WJ, Cardé RT (1995) Parasitoid Foraging and Learning. Chemical ecology of insects 2. Springer, Boston, pp 65–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wei J, Li T, Kuang R, Wang Y, Yin T, Wu X, Zou L, Zhao W, Cao J, Deng J (2003) Mass rearing of Aphidius gifuensis (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae) for biological control of Myzus persicae (Homoptera: Aphididae). Biocontrol Sci Technol 13:87–97. doi: 10.1080/0958315021000054412 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yang S, Xu R, Yang S, Kuang R (2009a) Olfactory responses of Aphidius gifuensis to odors of host plants and aphid-plant complexes. Insect Sci. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7917.2009.01282.x Google Scholar
  27. Yang S, Yang SY, Zhang CP, Wei J-N, Kuanga RP (2009b) Population dynamics of Myzus persicae on tobacco in Yunnan Province, China, before and after augmentative releases of Aphidius gifuensis. Biocontrol Sci Technol 19:219–228. doi: 10.1080/09583150802696525 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yoshida M, Itoh Y, Ômura H, Arikawa K, Kinoshita M (2015) Plant scents modify innate colour preference in foraging swallowtail butterflies. Biol Lett 11:20150390. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0390 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Institute of Green Science and TechnologyShizuoka UniversityShizuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations