Arthropod-Plant Interactions

, Volume 9, Issue 6, pp 613–622 | Cite as

Florivory and nectar-robbing perforations in flowers of pointleaf manzanita Arctostaphylos pungens (Ericaceae) and their effects on plant reproductive success

  • Dorit EliyahuEmail author
  • Andrew C. McCall
  • Marina Lauck
  • Ana Trakhtenbrot
Original Paper


Damage to petals may have varying effects on the reproductive success of the plant. The variation may depend on the kind of damage to the corolla. Whether the damage is limited to the corolla, as is usually the case with nectar-robbing perforations, or extending to the reproductive parts of the flower, as in the case of florivory holes, might determine the extent of the effect on the plant’s reproduction. We examined the various perforations in the flowers of Arctostaphylos pungens and correlated their presence with fruiting success. We found that though florivory holes were highly associated with damage to reproductive parts, fruiting success did not differ significantly between flowers with the two kinds of damage. Although nectar-robbing perforations were not associated with reduced number of fruit produced, they were significantly correlated with reduced number of fruit that contained seemingly viable seeds. The implications of our findings are discussed in the context of pollination and antagonism.


Florivory Nectar robbing Reproductive success Floral damage Pollination Antagonism 



We would like to extend a special thank you to Nicole Rafferty and Emily McCall for their help with field work and data collection. We also appreciate valuable comments from Judith Bronstein and Carolyn McSherry on earlier versions of this manuscript. We thank Michele Lanan for providing the photograph for Figure 1a. Members and associates of the Bronstein laboratory provided helpful comments throughout the research. Funding was provided by Denison University to ACM and by the Center for Insect Science, at the University of Arizona, through NIH Training Grant #1 K12 GM000708 to DE.


  1. Akamatsu Y, Sugita N, Ueda K (2011) Nectar robbing from Hibiscus flowers by white-eyes on an oceanic island, Chichi-jima, Bonin Islands. Jpn J Ornithol 60:228–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armbruster WS, Guinn DA (1989) The solitary bee fauna (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) of interior and arctic Alaska: flower associations, habitat use, and phenology. J Kansas Entomol Soc 62:468–483Google Scholar
  3. Barrows EM (1980) Robbing of exotic plants by introduced carpenter and honey bees in Hawaii, with comparative notes. Biotropica 12:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Botto-Mahan C, Ramirez PA, Ossa CG, Medel R, Ojeda-Camacho M, Gonzalez AV (2011) Floral herbivory affects female reproductive success and pollinator visitation in the perennial herb Alstroemeria Ligtu (alstroemeriaceae). Int J Plant Sci 172:1130–1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brody AK (1992) Oviposition choices by a pre-dispersal seed predator (Hylemya sp.). Oecologia 91:56–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burkle LA, Irwin RE, Newman DA (2007) Predicting the effects of nectar robbing on plant reproduction: implications of pollen limitation and plant mating system. Am J Bot 94:1935–1943CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cardel YJ, Koptur S (2010) Effects of florivory on the pollination of flowers: an experimental field study with a perennial plant. Int J Plant Sci 171:283–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cascante-Marin A, Wolf JHD, Oostermeijer JGB (2009) Wasp florivory decreases reproductive success in an epiphytic bromeliad. Plant Ecol 203:149–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eliyahu D, McCall AC, Lauck M, Trakhtenbrot A, Bronstein JL (2015) Minute pollinators: the role of thrips (Thysanoptera) as pollinators of pointleaf manzanita Arctostaphylos pungens (Ericaceae). J Pollinat Ecol 16:64–71PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferreira CA, Torezan-Silingardi HM (2013) Implications of the floral herbivory on Malpighiacea plant fitness: visual aspect of the flower affects the attractiveness to pollinators. Sociobiology 60:323–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. García-Fayos P, Goldarazena A (2008) The role of thrips in pollination of Arctostaphyllos uva-ursi. Int J Plant Sci 169:776–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goodwillie C, Ritland C, Ritland K (2006) The genetic basis of floral traits associated with mating system evolution in Leptosiphon (Polemoniaceae): an analysis of quantitative trait loci. Evolution 60:491–504CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Irwin RE (2009) Realized tolerance to nectar robbing: compensation to floral enemies in Ipomopsis aggregata. Ann Bot 103:1425–1433PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Irwin RE, Adler LS, Brody AK (2004) The dual role of floral traits: pollinator attraction and plant defense. Ecology 85:1503–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Irwin RE, Bronstein JL, Manson JS, Richardson L (2010) Nectar robbing: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 4:271–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaczorowski RL, Koplovich A, Sporer F, Wink M, Markman S (2014) Immediate effects of nectar robbing by Palestine sunbirds (Nectarinia osea) on nectar alkaloid concentrations in tree tobacco (Nicotiana glauca). J Chem Ecol 40:325–330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kawagoe T, Kudoh H (2010) Escape from floral herbivory by early flowering in Arabidopsis halleri subsp. gemmifera. Oecologia 164:713–720CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kessler D, Diezel C, Clark DG, Colquhoun TA, Baldwin IT (2013) Petunia flowers solve the defence/apparency dilemma of pollinator attraction by deploying complex floral blends. Ecol Lett 16:299–306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Leonard AS, Brent J, Papaj DR, Dornhaus A (2013) Floral nectar guide patterns discourage nectar robbing by bumble bees. PLoS ONE 8:e55914PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Liao K, Gituru RW, Guo YH, Wang QF (2013) Effects of floral herbivory on foraging behaviour of bumblebees and female reproductive success in Pedicularis gruina (Orobanchaceae). Flora 208:562–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mayer C, Dehon C, Gauthier AL, Naveau O, Rigo C, Jacquemart AL (2014) Nectar robbing improves male reproductive success of the endangered Aconitum napellus ssp. lusitanicum. Evol Ecol 28:669–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McCall AC (2006) Natural and artificial floral damage induces resistance in Nemophila menziesii (Hydrophyllaceae) flowers. Oikos 112:660–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McCall AC, Barr CM (2012) Why do florivores prefer hermaphrodites over females in Nemophila menziesii (Boraginaceae)? Oecologia 170:147–157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. McCall AC, Irwin RE (2006) Florivory: the intersection of pollination and herbivory. Ecol Lett 9:1351–1365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Moisset B, Buchmann SL (2010) Bee basics: an introduction to our native bees. USDA, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  26. Navarro L (2001) Reproductive biology and effect of nectar robbing on fruit production in Macleania bullata (Ericaceae). Plant Ecol 152:59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna.
  28. Richardson L (1999) Mutualist and antagonist flower visitors: A pollination study of two species of manzanita (Arctostaphylos: Ericaceae). University of Arizona, ThesisGoogle Scholar
  29. Richardson L, Bronstein JL (2012) Reproductive biology of pointleaf manzanita (Arctostaphylos pungens) and the pollinator-nectar robber spectrum. J Pollinat Ecol 9:115–123Google Scholar
  30. Singh VK, Barman C, Tandon R (2014) Nectar robbing positively influences the reproductive success of Tecomella undulata (Bignoniaceae). PLoS ONE 9:e102607PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sober V, Moora M, Teder T (2010) Florivores decrease pollinator visitation in a self-incompatible plant. Basic Appl Ecol 11:669–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stanton ML, Preston RE (1988) Ecological consequences and phenotypic correlates of petal size variation in wild radish, Raphanus sativus (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 75:528–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Teixido AL, Mendez M, Valladares F (2011) Flower size and longevity influence florivory in the large-flowered shrub Cistus ladanifer. Acta Oecol 37:418–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tsuji K, Sota T (2010) Sexual differences in flower defense and correlated male-biased florivory in a plant-florivore system. Oikos 119:1848–1853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vega-Frutis R, Munguia-Rosas MA, Varga S, Kytoviita MM (2013) Sex-specific patterns of antagonistic and mutualistic biotic interactions in dioecious and gynodioecious plants. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 15:45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Willmer P (2011) Pollination and floral ecology. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wise MJ, Hebert JB (2010) Herbivores affect natural selection for floral-sex ratio in a field population of horsenettle, Solanum carolinense. Ecology 91:937–943CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Zangerl AR, Berenbaum MR (2009) Effects of florivory on floral volatile emissions and pollination success in the wild parsnip. Arthropod Plant Interact 3:181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dorit Eliyahu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andrew C. McCall
    • 2
  • Marina Lauck
    • 3
  • Ana Trakhtenbrot
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyDenison UniversityGranvilleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Biological ScienceFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  4. 4.Division of Open Areas and BiodiversityIsraeli Ministry of Environmental ProtectionJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations