Advertisement

Arthropod-Plant Interactions

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 149–161 | Cite as

Elevated temperature and periodic water stress alter growth and quality of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) and monarch (Danaus plexippus) larval performance

  • John J. Couture
  • Shawn P. Serbin
  • Philip A. Townsend
Original Paper

Abstract

In this study, we examined the independent and interactive effects of temperature and water availability on the growth and foliar traits of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) and performance of a specialist herbivore, larvae of the monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus). Milkweed from multiple population sources collected across a latitudinal gradient in Wisconsin, USA, were grown under all combinations of ambient or elevated temperature and the presence or absence of periodic water stress. Elevated temperature marginally increased, while water stress decreased plant growth. Milkweed from more northerly latitudes experienced larger growth responses to elevated temperature and were more resistant to water stress, especially under higher temperatures. Elevated temperature and water stress also altered milkweed composite foliar trait profiles. Elevated temperature generally increased leaf nitrogen and structural compounds, and decreased leaf mass per area. Water stress also elevated foliar nitrogen, but reduced defensive traits. Monarch larvae performed well on milkweed under elevated temperature and water stress, but gained the most mass on plants exposed to both treatments in combination. Our findings suggest that milkweed populations from more northerly latitudes in the upper Midwest may benefit more from rising temperatures than those in southerly locations, but that these beneficial effects depend on water availability. Monarch larvae grew larger on plants from all experimental treatments relative to ambient condition controls, indicating that future changes in milkweed presence on the landscape will likely influence monarch populations more than the effects of future changes in plant quality on larval performance.

Keywords

Asclepias Common milkweed Danaus plexippus Elevated temperature Monarch butterfly Water stress Plant–insect interactions 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Clayton Kingdon and Holly Hovanek for help with greenhouse collections. This work was supported by the University of Wisconsin Graduate School, McIntire-Stennis Formula Funds (Project WIS01531), and USDA NIFA AFRI Fellowship Grant 2012-67012-19900 to JJC.

Supplementary material

11829_2015_9367_MOESM1_ESM.docx (413 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 413 kb)

References

  1. Agrawal AA (2004) Resistance and susceptibility of milkweed: competition, root herbivory, and plant genetic variation. Ecology 85:2118–2133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal AA (2005) Natural selection on a common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) by a community of specialized insect herbivores. Evol Ecol Res 7:651–667Google Scholar
  3. Agrawal AA, Fishbein M (2006) Plant defense syndromes. Ecology 87:S132–S139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Agrawal AA, Petschenka G, Bingham RA, Weber MG, Rasmann S (2012) Toxic cardenolides: chemical ecology and coevolution of specialized plant–herbivore interactions. New Phytol 194:28–45CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26:32–46Google Scholar
  6. Asner GP, Martin RE (2008) Spectral and chemical analysis of tropical forests: scaling from leaf to canopy levels. Remote Sens Environ 112:3958–3970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Asner GP, Martin RE (2011) Canopy phylogenetic, chemical and spectral assembly in a lowland Amazonian forest. New Phytol 189:999–1012Google Scholar
  8. Awmack CS, Leather SR (2002) Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 47:817–844CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bale JS, Masters GJ, Hodkinson ID, Awmack C, Bezemer TM, Brown VK, Butterfield J, Buse A, Coulson JC, Farrar J, Good JEG, Harrington R, Hartlet S, Jones TH, Lindroth RL, Press MC, Symrnioudis I, Watt AD, Whittaker JB (2002) Herbivory in global climate change research: direct effects of rising temperature on insect herbivoes. Glob Change Biol 8:1–16Google Scholar
  10. Batalden RY, Oberhauser KS, Peterson AT (2007) Ecological niches in sequential generations of eastern North American monarch butterflies (Lepidoptera: Danaidae): the ecology of migration and likely climate change implications. Environ Entomol 36:1365–1373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bidart-Bouzat MG, Mithen R, Berenbaum MR (2005) Elevated CO2 influences herbivory-induced defense responses of Arabidopsis thaliana. Oecologia 145:415–424CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Brower LP, Taylor OR, Williams EH, Slayback DA, Zubieta RR, Isabel Ramirez M (2012) Decline of monarch butterflies overwintering in Mexico: is the migratory phenomenon at risk? Insect Conserv Divers 5:95–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS (2003) Understanding plant responses to drought—from genes to the whole plant. Funct Plant Biol 30:239–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clarke KR (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol 18:117–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clissold FJ, Sanson GD, Read J, Simpson SJ (2009) Gross versus net income: how plant toughness affects performance of an insect herbivore. Ecology 90:3393–3405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Coley PD (1983) Herbivory and defensive characteristics of tree species in a lowland tropical forest. Ecol Monogr 53:209–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cornelissen T (2011) Climate change and its effects on terrestrial insects and herbivory patterns. Neotrop Entomol 40:155–163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Couture JJ, Lindroth RL (2012) Atmospheric change alters performance of an invasive forest insect. Glob Change Biol 18:3543–3557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Couture JJ, Serbin SP, Townsend PA (2013) Spectroscopic sensitivity of real-time, rapidly induced phytochemical change in response to damage. New Phytol 198:311–319CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Foley WJ, McIlwee A, Lawler I, Aragones L, Wollnough AP, Berding N (1998) Ecological applications of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy - a tool for rapid, cost-effective prediction of the composition of plant and animal tissues and aspects of animal performance. Oecologia 116:293–305Google Scholar
  21. Gao B (1996) NDWI-a normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid from space. Remote Sens Environ 58:257–266Google Scholar
  22. Guiney MS, Oberhauser KS (2009) Insects as flagship conservation species. Terr Arthropod Rev 1:111–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gutbrodt B, Mody K, Dorn S (2011) Drought changes plant chemistry and causes contrasting responses in lepidopteran herbivores. Oikos 120:1732–1740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Honĕk A (1993) Intraspecific variation in body size and fecundity in insects: a general relationship. Oikos 66:483–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huberty AF, Denno RF (2004) Plant water stress and its consequences for herbivorous insects: a new synthesis. Ecology 85:1383–1398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hunter MD, Malcolm SB, Hartley SE (1996) Population-level variation in plant secondary chemistry, and the population biology of herbivores. Chemoecology 7:45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. IPCC (2013) IPCC 2013: summary for policymakers. In: Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Jamieson MA, Trowbridge AM, Raffa KF, Lindroth RL (2012) Consequences of climate warming and altered precipitation patterns for plant–insect and multitrophic interactions. Plant Physiol 160:1719–1727CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Jamieson MA, Quintero C, Blumenthal DM (2013) Interactive effects of simulated nitrogen deposition and altered precipitation patterns on plant allelochemical concentrations. J Chem Ecol 39:1204–1208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Julkunen-Tiitto R, Tahvanainen J, Silvola J (1993) Increased CO2 and nutrient status changes affect phytomass and the production of plant defense secondary chemicals in Salix myrsinfolia (Salisb.). Oecologia 95:495–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kucharik CJ, Serbin SP, Vavrus D, Hopkins EJ, Motew MM (2010) Patterns of climate change across Wisconsin from 1950 to 2006. Phys Geogr 31:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lavola A, Nybakken L, Rousi M, Pusenius J, Petrelius M, Kellomaki S, Julkunen-Tiitto R (2013) Combination treatment of elevated UVB radiation, CO2 and temperature has little effect on silver birch (Betula pendula) growth and phytochemistry. Physiol Plant 149:499–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lindroth RL, Roth S, Nordheim EV (2001) Genotypic variation in response of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) to atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Oecologia 126:371–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Malcolm SB (1992) Cardenolide-mediated interactions between plants and herbivores. In: Rosenthal GA, Berenbaum MR (eds) Herbivores: their interactions with secondary plant metabolites, vol I, 2nd edn., The Chemical ParticipantsAcademic Press, San Deigo, pp 251–296Google Scholar
  35. Malcolm SB (1995) Milkweeds, monarch butterflies and the ecological significance of cardenolides. Chemoecology 5(6):101–117Google Scholar
  36. Malcolm SB, Zalucki MP (1996) Milkweed latex and cardenolide induction may resolve the lethal plant defence paradox. Entomol Exp Appl 80:193–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Malcolm SB, Cockrell BJ, Brower LP (1987) Monarch butterfly voltinism—effects of temperature constraints at different latitudes. Oikos 49:77–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Malcolm SB, Cockrell BJ, Brower LP (1989) Cardenolide fingerprint of monarch butterflies reared on common milkweed, Asclepias syrica L. J Chem Ecol 15:819–853CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Mattson WJ (1980) Herbivory in review to plant nitrogen content. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:119–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mooney KA, Halitschke R, Kessler A, Agrawal AA (2010) Evolutionary trade-offs in plants mediate the strength of trophic cascades. Science 327:1642–1644Google Scholar
  41. Nybakken L, Hörkkä R, Julkunen-Tiitto R (2012) Combined enhancements of temperature and UVB influence grwoth and phenolics in clones of the sexually dimorphic Salix myrsinifolia. Physiol Plant 145:551–564Google Scholar
  42. Oberhauser KS, Peterson AT (2003) Modeling current and future potential wintering distributions of eastern North American monarch butterflies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:14063–14068CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:637–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pelini SL, Prior KM, Parker DJ, Dzurisin JDK, Lindroth RL, Hellman JJ (2009) Climate change and temporal and spatial mismatches in insect communities. In: Letcher TM (ed) Climate change: observed impacts on Planet Earth. Elsevier, The Netherlands, pp 215–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Peltonen PA, Vapaavuori E, Heinonen J, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Holopainen JK (2010) Do elevated atmospheric CO2 and O3 affect food quality and performance of folivorous insects on silver birch? Glob Change Biol 16:918–935Google Scholar
  46. Pleasants JM, Oberhauser KS (2013) Milkweed loss in agricultural fields because of herbicide use: effect on the monarch butterfly population. Insect Conserv Diver 6:135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Serbin SP (2012) Spectroscopic determination of leaf nutritional, morphological, and metabolic traits. PhD dissertation. UW-Madison, Madison, WI, USAGoogle Scholar
  48. Serbin SP, Dillaway DN, Kruger EL, Townsend PA (2012) Leaf optical properties reflect variation in photosynthetic metabolism and its sensitivity to temperature. J Exp Bot 63:489–502Google Scholar
  49. Serbin SP, Singh A, McNeil BM, Kingdon CC, Townsend PA (2014) Spectroscopic determination of leaf morphological and biochemical traits for northern temperate and boreal tree species. Ecol Appl. doi: 10.1890/13-2110.1 Google Scholar
  50. Serratore VR, Zalucki MP, Carter PA (2013) Thermoregulation in moulting and feeding Danaus plexippus L. (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) caterpillars. Aust J Entomol 52:8–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tao L, Hunter MD (2012) Does anthropogenic nitrogen deposition induce phosphorus limitation in herbivorous insects? Glob Change Biol 18:1843–1853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tingey DT, McKane RB, Olszyk DM, Johnsom MG, Rygiewics PT, Lee EH (2003) Elevated CO2 and temperature alter nitrogen allocation in Douglas-fir. Glob Change Biol 9:1038–1050Google Scholar
  53. U.S. Global Change Research Program (2009) In: Karl TR, Melillo JM, Peterson TC (eds) Global climate change impacts in the United States. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Vannette RL, Hunter MD (2011) Genetic variation in expression of defense phenotype may mediate evolutionary adaptation of Asclepias syriaca to elevated CO2. Glob Change Biol 17:1277–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Veteli TO, Kuokkanen K, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Roininen H, Tahvanainen J (2002) Effects of elevated CO2 and temperature on plant growth and herbivore defensive chemistry. Glob Change Biol 8:1240–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wason EL, Hunter MD (2014) Genetic variation in plant volatile emission does not result in differential attraction of natural enemies in the field. Oecologia 174:479–491CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Wason EL, Agrawal AA, Hunter MD (2013) A genetically-based latitudinal cline in the emission of herbivore-induced plant volatile organic compounds. J Chem Ecol 39:1101–1111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Wisconsin’s Changing Climate: Impacts and Adaptation (2011) Wisconsin Initiative on Climate Change Impacts (WICCI). Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
  59. Woods EC, Hastings AP, Turley NE, Heard SB, Agrawal AA (2012) Adaptive geographical clines in the growth and defense of a native plant. Ecol Monogr 82:149–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. York HA, Oberhauser KS (2002) Effects of duration and timing of heat stress on monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) development. J Kans Entomol Soc 75:290–298Google Scholar
  61. Zalucki MP (1982) Temperature and rate of development in Danaus plexippus L. and D. chrysippius L. (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). J Aust Entomol Soc 21:241–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zalucki MP, Lammers JH (2010) Dispersal and egg shortfall in Monarch butterflies: what happens when the matrix is cleaned up? Ecol Entomol 35:84–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zalucki MP, Rochester WA (2004) Spatial and temporal population dynamics of monarchs Down-Under: Lessons for North America. In: Oberhauser K, Solensky M (eds) The monarch butterfly: biology and conservation. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  64. Zalucki MP, Malcolm SB, Paine TD, Hanlon CC, Brower LP, Clarke AR (2001) It’s the first bites that count: survival of first-instar monarchs on milkweeds. Aust J Ecol 26:547–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zalucki MP, Malcolm SB, Hanlon CC, Paine TD (2012) First-instar monarch larval growth and survival on milkweeds in southern California: effects of latex, leaf hairs and cardenolides. Chemoecology 22:75–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zipkin EF, Ries L, Reeves R, Regetz J, Oberhauser KS (2012) Tracking climate impacts on the migratory monarch butterfly. Glob Change Biol 18:3039–3049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zvereva EL, Kozlov MV (2006) Consequences of simultaneous elevation of carbon dioxide and temperature for plant–herbivore interactions: a metaanalysis. Glob Change Biol 12:27–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • John J. Couture
    • 1
  • Shawn P. Serbin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Philip A. Townsend
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forest and Wildlife EcologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Environmental Sciences DepartmentBrookhaven National LaboratoryUptonUSA

Personalised recommendations