Arthropod-Plant Interactions

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 463–466 | Cite as

The pollen of Caesalpinia pyramidalis Tul. is toxic to honeybees (Apis mellifera)

  • Igor Ricardo Batista Vieira de Melo
  • Mateus Cardoso da Costa Lages
  • Diego Passos dos Santos
  • Patrício Borges Maracajá
  • Rodrigo Alboim de Paiva Fernandes Rodrigues
  • Benito Soto-Blanco
Original Paper
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Caesalpinia pyramidalis Tul. (syn. Caesalpinia gardneriana Benth.) is an endemic tree from northeastern Brazil whose flowers are visited by a number of bee species, including the honeybee (Apis mellifera). The present study aimed to determine whether the pollen of C. pyramidalis is toxic to honeybees. Pollen samples were collected, dried, and added to food at doses of 0 (control), 2.5, 5.0, and 10 %. Each dose of food was fed to 60 honeybees, which were observed daily until the last one died. Statistical comparison of the survival curves was performed using the log-rank test. The mean survival times of the bees fed with C. pyramidalis pollen were 6.40 ± 0.28 days for the 2.5 % group, 5.70 ± 0.18 days for the 5.0 % group, 5.72 ± 0.23 days for the 10.0 % group, and 13.7 ± 0.61 days for the control group. All the pollen concentrations of C. pyramidalis significantly (P < 0.0001) reduced the survival of honeybees in comparison with control group. In conclusion, the results of our study show that the pollen produced by C. pyramidalis is toxic to A. mellifera under laboratory conditions.

Keywords

Toxic pollen Poisonous plants Hymenoptera Apidae 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adler LS (2000) The ecological significance of toxic nectar. Oikos 91:409–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguiar CML (2003) Utilização de recursos florais por abelhas (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) em uma área de Caatinga. Rev Bras Zool 20:457–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aguiar CML, Monteiro VM, Santos GMM, Resende JJ, França F, Melo E (2002) Plantas visitadas por Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera, Apidae) em uma área de Caatinga em Itatim, Bahia, Brasil. Sitientibus Série Ciências Biológicas 2:29–33Google Scholar
  4. Albuquerque UP, Medeiros PM, Almeida ALS, Monteiro JM, Lins Neto EMF, Melo JG, Santos JP (2007) Medicinal plants of the Caatinga (semi-arid) vegetation of NE Brazil: a quantitative approach. J Ethnopharmacol 114:325–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alon M, Elbaz M, Ben-Zvi MM, Feldmesser E, Vainstein A, Morin S (2012) Insights into the transcriptomics of polyphagy: Bemisia tabaci adaptability to phenylpropanoids involves coordinated expression of defense and metabolic genes. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 42:251–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Assis Junior EM, Fernandes IMS, Santos CS, Mesquita LX, Pereira RA, Maracajá PB, Soto-Blanco B (2011) Toxicity of castor bean (Ricinus communis) pollen to honeybees. Agric Ecosyst Environ 141:221–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bahia MV, Santos JB, David JP, David JM (2005) Biflavonoids and other phenolics from Caesalpinia pyramidalis (Fabaceae). Braz Chem Soc 16:1402–1405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bahia MV, David JP, David JM (2010) Occurrence of biflavones in leaves of Caesalpinia pyramidalis specimens. Quim Nova 33:1297–1300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boppre M, Colegate SM, Edgar JA (2005) Pyrrolizidine alkaloids of Echium vulgare honey found in pure pollen. J Agric Food Chem 53:594–600PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Braga R (2001) Plantas do Nordeste, especialmente do Ceará. Coleção Mossoroense Série C, vol 1204. Fundação Guimarães Duque, MossoróGoogle Scholar
  11. Brodschneider R, Crailsheim K (2010) Nutrition and health in honey bees. Apidologie 41:278–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cintra P, Malaspina O, Bueno OC (2003) Toxicity of barbatimão to Apis mellifera and Scaptotrigona postica, under laboratory conditions. J Apic Res 42:9–12Google Scholar
  13. Cintra P, Malaspina O, Bueno OC, Petacci F, Fernandes JB, Vieira PC, Silva MFGF (2005) Oral toxicity of chemical substances found in Dimorphandra mollis (Caesalpiniaceae) against honeybees (Apis mellifera) (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Sociobiology 45:141–149Google Scholar
  14. Cruz MCS, Santos PO, Barbosa AM Jr, Mélo DLFM, Alviano CS, Antoniolli AR, Alviano DS, Trindade RC (2007) Antifungal activity of Brazilian medicinal plants involved in popular treatment of mycoses. J Ethnopharmacol 111:409–412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hendriksma HP, Härtel S, Steffan-Dewenter I (2011) Testing pollen of single and stacked insect-resistant Bt-maize on in vitro reared honey bee larvae. PLoS One 6:e28174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kevan PG, Ebert T (2005) Can almond nectar & pollen poison honey bees? Am Bee J 145:507–509Google Scholar
  17. Leite AV, Machado IC (2009) Biologia reprodutiva da “catingueira” (Caesalpinia pyramidalis Tul., Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae), uma espécie endêmica da Caatinga. Rev Bras Bot 32:79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lima MRF, Luna JS, Santos AF, Andrade MCC, Sant’Ana AEG, Genet JP, Marquez B, Neuville L, Moreau N (2006) Anti-bacterial activity of some Brazilian medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol 105:137–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. London-Shafir I, Shafir S, Eisikowitch D (2003) Amygdalin in almond nectar and pollen—facts and possible roles. Plant Syst Evol 238:87–95Google Scholar
  20. Luna JS, Santos AF, Lima MRF, Omena MC, Mendonça FAC, Bieber LW, Sant’Ana AEG (2005) A study of the larvicidal and molluscicidal activities of some medicinal plants from northeast Brazil. J Ethnopharmacol 97:199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mendes CC, Bahia MV, David JM, David JP (2000) Constituents of Caesalpinia pyramidalis. Fitoterapia 71:205–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mesquita LX, Maracajá PB, Sakamoto SM, Soto-Blanco B (2010) Toxic evaluation in honey bees (Apis mellifera) of pollen from selected plants from the semi-arid region of Brazil. J Apic Res 49:265–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pimentel de Carvalho AC, Message D (2004) A scientific note on the toxic pollen of Stryphnodendron polyphyllum (Fabaceae, Mimosoideae) which causes sacbrood-like symptoms. Apidologie 35:89–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Praz CJ, Müller A, Dorn S (2008) Specialized bees fail to develop on non-host pollen: do plants chemically protect their pollen? Ecology 89:795–804PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Santos CA, Passos AMPR, Andrade FC, Camargo EA, Estevam CS, Santos MRV, Thomazzi SM (2011) Antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects of Caesalpinia pyramidalis in rodents. Braz J Pharmacogn 21:1077–1083Google Scholar
  26. Silva AF, Sousa JR, Sousa JS, Alves LS, Maracajá PB, Santos DP (2010) Diagnóstico da apicultura no município de Pombal-PB. Revista Brasileira de Gestão Ambiental 4:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Silva CHTP, Sobrinho TJSP, Castro VTNA, Lima DCA, Amorim ELC (2011) Antioxidant capacity and phenolic content of Caesalpinia pyramidalis Tul. and Sapium glandulosum (L.) Morong from Northeastern Brazil. Molecules 16:4728–4739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vale da Silva C, Mesquita LX, Maracajá PB, Soto-Blanco B (2010) Toxicity of Mimosa tenuiflora pollen to Africanized honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Acta Scientiae Veterinariae 38:161–163Google Scholar
  29. Westerkamp C (1996) Pollen in bee–flower relations. Some considerations on melittophily. Botanica Acta 109:325–332Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Igor Ricardo Batista Vieira de Melo
    • 1
  • Mateus Cardoso da Costa Lages
    • 1
  • Diego Passos dos Santos
    • 1
  • Patrício Borges Maracajá
    • 1
  • Rodrigo Alboim de Paiva Fernandes Rodrigues
    • 2
  • Benito Soto-Blanco
    • 3
  1. 1.Centro de Ciências e Tecnologia AgroalimentarUniversidade Federal de Campina GrandePombalBrazil
  2. 2.PIBICUniversidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)MossoróBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Veterinary Clinics and Surgery, Veterinary SchoolUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)Belo HorizonteBrazil

Personalised recommendations