Arthropod-Plant Interactions

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 561–569 | Cite as

Why ant pollination is rare: new evidence and implications of the antibiotic hypothesis

Original Paper

Abstract

The antibiotic hypothesis proposes that ant pollination is rare at least in part because the cuticular antimicrobial secretions of ants are toxic to pollen grains. We tested this hypothesis by comparing the effects of ants and bees on pollen in two regions: a tropical rainforest in Amazonian Peru and temperate forests and old fields in Canada. We found support for three predictions that follow from the antibiotic hypothesis. (1) For all 10 ant and 11 plant species in our study, contact with ants significantly reduced pollen germination, confirming the generality of this effect. (2) Contact with two bee species did not have similar effects; pollen exposed to bees germinated as well as control pollen. (3) Consistent with the presumed greater abundance of entomopathogens in the tropics, which may have selected for stronger antibiotic secretions in tropical ants, tropical ants had more negative effects on pollen than temperate ants. We speculate that the antibiotic hypothesis contributes not only to the rarity but also to the biogeography of ant pollination, and we discuss whether the negative effects of ants on pollen have resulted in selection for floral defenses against ants.

Keywords

Ant–plant interactions Cuticular antimicrobial secretions Disease resistance Insect immunity Hymenoptera Tropical rainforests 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Lina Arcila Hernández, Adam Cembrowski, Antonio Coral, Eddie Ho, Gabriel Miller, and Jon Sanders for field/laboratory assistance; Frank Azorsa Salazar, Laurence Packer, and Claus Rasmussen for identifying our Peruvian ants and bee; Takashi Makino, Alison Parker, and James Thomson for their comments and for supplying the B. impatiens; the residents of Port Whitby for allowing us to collect flowers; the directors and staff at CICRA/the Amazon Conservation Association and the Koffler Scientific Reserve at Jokers Hill for logistics and permission to work at these sites; and the Peruvian Ministry of Agriculture for issuing a research permit (No. 299-2011-AG-DGFFS-DGEFFS). We are also grateful to the AE and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier draft. A Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant to MEF funded this research; EMD was also supported by an NSERC Undergraduate Student Research Award.

References

  1. Adler L (2000) The ecological significance of toxic nectar. Oikos 91:409–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beattie AJ, Turnbull C, Knox RB, Williams EG (1984) Ant inhibition of pollen function: a possible reason why ant pollination is rare. Am J Bot 71:421–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beattie AJ, Turnbull CT, Hough T, Jobson S, Knox RB (1985) The vulnerability of pollen and fungal spores to ant secretions: evidence and some evolutionary implications. Am J Bot 72:606–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhatkar A, Whitcomb WH (1970) Artificial diet for rearing various species of ants. Fla Entomol 53:229–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bot ANM, Ortius-Lechner D, Finster K, Maile R, Boomsma JJ (2002) Variable sensitivity of fungi and bacteria to compounds produced by the metapleural glands of leaf-cutting ants. Insectes Soc 49:363–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brewbaker JL, Kwack BH (1963) The essential role of calcium ion in pollen germination and pollen tube growth. Am J Bot 50:859–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Vega C, Arista M, Ortiz PL, Herrera CM, Talavera S (2009) The ant-pollination system of Cytinus hypocistis (Cytinaceae), a Mediterranean root holoparasite. Ann Bot 103:1065–1075PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feinsinger P, Swarm LA (1978) How common are ant-repellent nectars? Biotropica 10:238–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fernández-Marín H, Zimmerman JK, Rehner SA, Wcislo WT (2006) Active use of the metapleural glands by ants in controlling fungal infection. Proc R Soc B 273:1689–1695PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Galen C, Butchart B (2003) Ants in your plants: effects of nectar-thieves on pollen fertility and seed-siring capacity in the alpine wildflower, Polemonium viscosum. Oikos 101:521–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garcia MB, Antor RJ, Espadaler X (1995) Ant pollination of the palaeoendemic dioecious Borderea pyrenaica (Dioscoreaceae). Plant Syst Evol 198:17–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghazoul J (2001) Can floral repellents pre-empt potential ant-plant conflicts? Ecol Lett 4:295–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gomez JM, Zamora R (1992) Pollination by ants: consequences of the quantitative effects on a mutualistic system. Oecologia 91:410–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Graystock P, Hughes WOH (2011) Disease resistance in a weaver ant, Polyrhachis dives, and the role of antibiotic-producing glands. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:2319–2327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guernier V, Hochberg ME, Guégan J-F (2004) Ecology drives the worldwide distribution of human diseases. PLoS Biol 2:0740–0746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guerrant EO, Fiedler PL (1981) Flower defenses against nectar-pilferage by ants. Biotropica 13:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haber WA, Frankie GW, Baker HG, Baker I, Koptur S (1981) Ants like floral nectar. Biotropica 13:211–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harris FLC, Beattie AJ (1991) Viability of pollen carried by Apis mellifera L., Trigona carbonaria Smith and Vespula germanica (F.) (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Vespidae). J Aust Entomol Soc 30:45–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Herrera CM (1987) Components of pollinator ‘quality’: comparative analysis of a diverse insect assemblage. Oikos 50:79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hickman JC (1974) Pollination by ants: a low-energy system. Science 184:1290–1292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoffman AA, Clancy DJ, Merton E (1994) Cytoplasmic incompatibility in Australian populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 136:993–999Google Scholar
  22. Hoggard SJ, Wilson PD, Beattie AJ, Stow AJ (2011) Social complexity and nesting habits are factors in the evolution of antimicrobial defences in wasps. PLoS ONE 6:e21763PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hölldobler B, Engel-Siegel H (1984) On the metapleural gland of ants. Psyche 91:201–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. Hull DA, Beattie AJ (1988) Adverse effects on pollen exposed to Atta texana and other North American ants: implications for ant pollination. Oecologia 75:153–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Janzen DH (1977) Why don’t ants visit flowers? Biotropica 9:252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Junker RR, Blüthgen N (2008) Floral scents repel potentially nectar-thieving ants. Evol Ecol Res 10:295–308Google Scholar
  28. Junker RR, Daehler CC, Dötterl S, Keller A, Blüthgen N (2011) Hawaiian ant-flower networks: nectar-thieving ants prefer undefended native over introduced plants with floral defenses. Ecol Monogr 81:295–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lach L (2005) Interference and exploitation competition of three nectar-thieving ant species. Insectes Soc 52:257–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ness JH, Morin DF, Giladi I (2009) Uncommon specialization in a mutualism between a temperate herbaceous plant guild and an ant: are Aphaenogaster ants keystone mutualists? Oikos 118:1793–1804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nicklen EF, Wagner D (2006) Conflict resolution in an ant-plant interaction: Acacia constricta traits reduce ant costs to reproduction. Oecologia 148:81–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nunn CL, Altizer SM, Sechrest W, Cunningham AA (2005) Latitudinal gradients of parasite species richness in primates. Divers Distrib 11:249–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Peakall R, Beattie AJ (1989) Pollination of the orchid Microtis parviflora R. Br. by flightless worker ants. Funct Ecol 3:515–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peakall R, Angus CJ, Beattie AJ (1990) The significance of ant and plant traits for ant pollination in Leporella fimbriata. Oecologia 84:457–460Google Scholar
  35. Pitman NCA (2008) An overview of the Los Amigos watershed, Madre de Dios, southeastern Peru. http://cicra.acca.org.pe/espanol/paisaje_biodiversidad/los-amigos-overview9.pdf
  36. Poulsen M, Bot ANM, Nielsen MG, Boomsma JJ (2002) Experimental evidence for the costs and hygienic significance of the antibiotic metapleural gland secretion in leaf-cutting ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:151–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Proctor M, Yeo P (1972) The Pollination of Flowers. Taplinger Publishing Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Puterbaugh M (1998) The role of ants as flower visitors: experimental analysis in three alpine plant species. Oikos 83:36–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rader R, Edwards W, Westcott DA, Cunningham SA, Howlett BG (2011) Pollen transport differs among bees and flies in a human-modified landscape. Divers Distrib 17:519–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Raine NE, Willmer P, Stone GN (2002) Spatial structuring and floral avoidance behavior prevent ant-pollinator conflict in a Mexican ant-acacia. Ecology 83:3086–3098Google Scholar
  41. Ramsey M (1995) Ant pollination of the perennial herb Blandfordia grandiflora (Liliaceae). Oikos 74:265–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Richards JS, Stanley JN, Gregg PC (2005) Viability of cotton and canola pollen on the proboscis of Helicoverpa armigera: implications for spread of transgenes and pollination ecology. Ecol Entomol 30:327–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rico-Gray V, Oliveira PS (2007) The ecology and evolution of ant-plant interactions. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  44. Schemske DW, Mittelbach GG, Cornell HV, Sobel JM, Roy K (2009) Is there a latitudinal gradient in the importance of biotic interactions? Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:245–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stow AJ, Beattie A (2008) Chemical and genetic defenses against disease in insect societies. Brain Behav Immun 22:1009–1013PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stow A, Briscoe D, Gillings M, Holley M, Smith S, Leys R, Silberbauer T, Turnbull C, Beattie A (2007) Antimicrobial defences increase with sociality in bees. Biol Lett 3:422–424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stow A, Turnbull C, Gillings M, Smith S, Holley M, Silberbauer L, Wilson PD, Briscoe D, Beattie A (2010) Differential antimicrobial activity in response to the entomopathogenic fungus Cordyceps in six Australian bee species. Aust J Entomol 49:145–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thomson J (2003) When is it mutualism? Am Nat 162:S1–S9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thorp RW (2000) The collection of pollen by bees. Plant Syst Evol 222:211–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Turillazzi S, Mastrobuoni G, Dani FR, Moneti G, Pieraccini G, la Marca G (2006) Dominulin A and B: two new antibacterial peptides identified on the cuticle and in the venom of the social paper wasp Polistes dominulus using MALDI-TOF, MALDI-TOF/TOF, and ESI-Ion trap. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 17:376–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Veal DA, Trimble JE, Beattie AJ (1992) Antimicrobial properties of secretions from the metapleural glands of Myrmecia gulosa (the Australian bull ant). J Appl Bacteriol 72:188–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wagner D (2000) Pollen viability reduction as a potential cost of ant association for Acacia constricta (Fabaceae). Am J Bot 87:711–715PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Walker TN, Hughes WOH (2011) Arboreality and the evolution of disease resistance in ants. Ecol Entomol 36:588–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Weir TL, Newbold S, Vivanco JM, van Haren M, Fritchman C, Dossey AT, Bartram S, Boland W, Cosio EG, Kofer W (2011) Plant-inhabiting ant uses chemical cues for host discrimination. Biotropica. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2011.00786.x Google Scholar
  55. Willmer PG, Stone GN (1997) How aggressive ant-guards assist seed-set in Acacia flowers. Nature 388:165–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Willmer PG, Nuttman CV, Raine NE, Stone GN, Pattrick JG, Henson K, Stillman P, McIlroy L, Potts SG, Knudsen JT (2009) Floral volatiles controlling ant behaviour. Funct Ecol 23:888–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wilson P, Thomson JD (1991) Heterogeneity among floral visitors leads to discordance between removal and deposition of pollen. Ecology 72:1503–1507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yek SH, Mueller UG (2011) The metapleural gland of ants. Biol Rev 86:774–791PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations