Arthropod-Plant Interactions

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 283–287

Ants impact sawfly oviposition on bracken fern in southern California

Original Paper


Although it has been speculated that ant visits to extrafloral nectaries of bracken fern may convey a fitness benefit for the plant, this has never been demonstrated with native herbivores and natural insect densities. We tested the hypothesis that ants attracted to extrafloral nectaries of bracken fern provide a mutualistic benefit by protecting fronds from herbivore damage in a field manipulation experiment in southern California. We examined densities of sawfly eggs and larvae on bracken fronds with and without ant exclusion. Because bracken fern in this region is also impacted by nitrogenous air pollution, we included an N addition treatment. We found that sawfly egg abundance was significantly higher for fern plants when ants were excluded, regardless of N treatment. Ants tended to have higher abundance on fertilized plants, but there was no interaction between N additions and ant exclusion. Bracken fern may derive a fitness benefit from attracting ants during the early phases of plant growth, through decreased herbivore oviposition, rather than through the deterrence of feeding larvae.


Ants Pteridiumaquilinum Extrafloral nectaries Sawfly San Bernardino Mountains 


  1. Becerra JXI, Venable DL (1989) Extrafloral nectaries: a defense against ant-Homptera mutualisms? Oikos 55:276–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Di Giusto B, Anstett MC, Dounias E, McKey DB (2001) Variation in the effectiveness of biotic defence: the case of an opportunistic ant-plant protection mutualism. Oecologia 129:367–375Google Scholar
  3. Douglas MM (1983) Defense of bracken fern by arthropods attracted to axillary nectaries. Psyche 90:313–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eatough Jones M, Paine TD (2006) Detecting changes in insect herbivore communities along a pollution gradient. Environ Pollut 143:377–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eatough Jones M, Fenn ME, Paine TD (2011) The effect of nitrogen additions on bracken fern and its insect herbivores at sites with high and low atmospheric pollution. Arthropod-Plant Interact 5:163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fenn ME, Poth MA, Johnson DW (1996) Evidence for nitrogen saturation in the San Bernardino Mountains in southern California. For Ecol Manage 82:211–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Freitas AVL, Oliveira PS (1996) Ants as selective agents on herbivore biology: effects on the behaviour of a non-myrmecophilous butterfly. J Anim Ecol 65:205–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heads PA (1986) Bracken, ants and extrafloral nectaries IV. Do wood ants (Formica lugubris) protect the plant against insect herbivores. J Anim Ecol 55:795–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heads PA, Lawton JH (1984) Bracken, ants and extrafloral nectaries II. The effect of ants on the insect herbivores of bracken. J Anim Ecol 53:1015–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heads PA, Lawton JH (1985) Bracken, ants and extrafloral nectaries III. How insect herbivores avoid ant predation? Ecol Entomol 10:29–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Koptur S, Rico-Gray V, Palacios-Rios M (1998) Ant protection of the nectaried fern Polypodium plebeium in central Mexico. Am J Bot 85:736–739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lawton JH, Heads PA (1984) Bracken, ants and extrafloral nectaries I. The components of the system. J Anim Ecol 53:995–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Miller PR (1992) Mixed conifer forests of the San Bernardino Mountains, California. In: Olson RK, Binkley D, Bohm M (eds) The response of western forests to air pollution, ecological studies vol 97. Springer, New York, pp 461–497Google Scholar
  14. Oldenkamp RE, Douglas MM (2011) Measuring the effects of “opportunistic defense” of the bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum) by patrolling ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) at Pierce Cedar Creek Institute in south central Michigan. Great Lakes Entomol 44:34–41Google Scholar
  15. Rashbrook VK, Compton SG, Lawton JH (1991) Bracken and ants: why is there no mutualism. In: Huxley CR, Cutler DF (eds) Ant-plant interactions. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 231–237Google Scholar
  16. Rashbrook VK, Compton SG, Lawton JH (1992) Ant-herbivore interactions—reasons for the absence of benefits to a fern with foliar nectaries. Ecology 73:2167–2174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. SAS Institute Inc (2008) SAS version 9.2. Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  18. Sendoya SF, Freitas AVL, Oliveira PS (2009) Egg-laying butterflies distinguish predaceous ants by sight. Am Nat 174:134–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tempel AS (1983) Bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum) and nectar-feeding ants—a nonmutualistic interaction. Ecology 64:1411–1422CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EntomologyUniversity of CaliforniaRiversideUSA

Personalised recommendations