Arthropod-Plant Interactions

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 107–114 | Cite as

Performance of the legume-feeding herbivore, Colias philodice (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) is not Affected by Elevated CO2



Presumably due to their association with nitrogen-fixing bacteria, the nutritional quality of legumes decreases less than that of non-legume C3 plants when grown under elevated atmospheric CO2. Therefore, it seems likely that legume-feeding herbivores will be less adversely affected than herbivores of non-legume C3 plants by anthropogenic increases in atmospheric CO2. When the legumes Medicago sativa (alfalfa), Trifolium repens (white clover), and Lotus corniculatus (birdsfoot trefoil) were grown under elevated (756 ppm) CO2, leaf nitrogen remained the same or increased, and C:N ratio did not change. Unlike most insects fed non-legume C3 plants, Colias philodice (sulfur butterfly) larvae fed elevated-grown M. sativa and T. repens did not exhibit reduced relative growth rate (RGR), and larvae fed elevated-grown L. corniculatus exhibited a nearly significant 37% increase in RGR. Pupal weight was unaffected by growth of host plants under elevated CO2. Relative nitrogen growth rate (RGRN) did not change for larvae fed elevated-grown M. sativa or T. repens, but increased by 34% for larvae fed elevated-grown L. corniculatus. These results suggest that legume-feeding herbivores will be relatively buffered against the adverse effects of elevated CO2 typically experienced by herbivores of non-legume C3 plants.


Elevated CO2 Legumes Plant-herbivore interactions Nutritional indices Colias philodice Global change 


  1. Agrell J, Anderson P, Oleszek W, Stochmal A, Agrell C (2004) Combined effects of elevated CO2 and herbivore damage on alfalfa and cotton. J Chem Ecol 30:2309–2324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrell J, Anderson P, Oleszek W, Stochmal A, Agrell C (2006) Elevated CO2 levels and herbivore damage alter host plant preferences. Oikos 112:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ainsworth E, Davey P, Bernacchi C, Dermody O, Heaton E, Moore D, Morgan P, Naidu S, Yoo Ra H, Zhu X, Curtis P, Long S (2002) A meta-analysis of elevated [CO2] effects on soybean (Glycine max) physiology, growth and yield. Glob Change Biol 8:695–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akey D, Kimball B (1989) Growth and development of the beet armyworm on cotton grown in an enriched carbon dioxide atmosphere. Southwest Entomol 14:255–260Google Scholar
  5. Asshoff R, Hättenschwiler S (2005) Growth and reproduction of the alpine grasshopper Miramella alpina feeding on CO2 enriched dwarf shrubs at treeline. Oecologia 142:191–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbehenn R, Karowe D, Spickard A (2004) Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on the nutritional ecology of C3 and C4 grass-feeding caterpillars. Oecologia 140:86–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowers M, Stamp N, Fajer E (1991) Factors affecting calculation of nutritional indices for foliage-fed insects: an experimental approach. Ent Exp et Appl 61:101–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen F, Wu G, Feng G, Parajulee M, Shrestha R (2005) Effects of elevated CO2 and transgenic Bt cotton on plant chemistry, performance, and feeding of an insect herbivore, the cotton bollworm. Ent Exp Appl 115:341–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cotrufo M, Ineson P, Scott A (1998) Elevated CO2 reduces the nitrogen concentration of plant tissues. Glob Change Biol 4:43–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coviella C, Trumble J (1999) Effects of elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide on insect-plant interactions. Cons Biol 13:700–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Graaff M-A, van Groenigen K-J, Six J, Hungate B, van Kessel C (2006) Interactions between plant growth and soil nutrient cycling under elevated CO2: a meta-analysis. Glob Change Biol 12:2077–2091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dermody O, O’Neill B, Zangerl A, Berenbaum M, DeLucia E (2008) Effects of elevated CO2 and O3 on leaf damage and insect abundance in a soybean agroecosystem. Arthropod-Plant Int 2:125–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edwards E, McCaffery S, Evans J (2006) Phosphorus availability and elevated CO2 affect biological nitrogen fixation and nutrient fluxes in a clover-dominated sward. New Phytol 169:157–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fajer E, Bowers M, Bazzaz F (1989) The effects of enriched carbon dioxide atmospheres on plant-herbivore interactions. Science 243:1198–1200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goverde M, Bazin A, Shykoff J, Erhardt A (1999) Influence of leaf chemistry of Lotus corniculatus (Fabaceae) on larval development of Polyommatus icarus (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae): effects of elevated CO2 and plant genotype. Funct Ecol 13:801–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goverde M, Erhardt A, Stöcklin J (2004) Genotype-specific response of a lycaenid herbivore to elevated carbon dioxide and phosphorus availability in calcareous grassland. Oecologia 139:383–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamilton J, Dermody O, Aldea M, Zangerl A, Rogers A, Berenbaum M, DeLucia E (2005) Anthropogenic changes in tropospheric composition increase susceptibility of soybean to insect herbivory. Environ Entomol 43:479–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hättenschwiler S, Schafellner C (1999) Opposing effects of elevated CO2 and N deposition on Lymantria monacha larvae feeding on spruce trees. Oecologia 118:210–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hättenschwiler S, Schafellner C (2004) Gypsy moth feeding in the canopy of a CO2-enriched mature forest. Glob Change Biol 10:1899–1908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hungate B, Dijkstra P, Johnson D, Hinkle C, Drake B (1999) Elevated CO2 increases nitrogen fixation and decreases soil nitrogen mineralization in Florida scrub oak. Glob Change Biol 5:781–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hungate B, Dukes J, Shaw M, Luo Y, Field C (2003) Nitrogen and climate change. Science 302:1512–1513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hunter M (2001) Effects of elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide on insect–plant interactions. Agric Forest Entomol 3:153–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Institute SAS (2000) The SAS system for Windows, Version 8e. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  24. Jablonski L, Wang X, Curtis P (2002) Plant reproduction under elevated CO2 conditions: A meta-analysis of reports on 79 crop and wild species. New Phytol 156:9–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johns C, Hughes L (2002) Interactive effects of elevated CO2 and temperature on the leaf-miner Dialectica scalariella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in Paterson’s Curse, Echium plantagineum (Boraginaceae). Glob Change Biol 8:142–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson R, Lincoln D (1991) Sagebrush carbon allocation patterns and grasshopper nutrition: the influence of CO2 enrichment and soil mineral nutrition. Oecologia 87:127–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Karowe D (1988) Ecological and evolutionary determinants of larval host plant range in the sulfur butterflies, Colias philodice and Colias interior. PhD thesis, University of Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  28. Karowe D (1989) Facultative monophagy as a consequence of feeding experience: behavioral and physiological specialization in Colias philodice larvae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Oecologia 78:106–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Karowe D (1990) Predicting host range evolution: colonization of Coronilla varia by Colias philodice (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Evolution 44:1637–1647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Karowe D (2007) Are legume-feeding herbivores buffered against direct effects of elevated CO2 on host plants? A test with the sulfur butterfly, Colias philodice. Glob Change Biol 13:2045–2051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Karowe D, Siemens D, Mitchell-Olds T (1997) Species-specific response of glucosinolate content to elevated atmospheric CO2. J Chem Ecol 23:2569–2582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Klots AB (1951) Butterflies of North America. Houghton Mifflin, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  33. Koike T, Tobita H, Shibata T, Matsuki H, Konno K, Kitao M, Yamashita N, Maruyama Y (2006) Defense characteristics of several deciduous broad-leaved tree seedlings grown under differing levels of CO2 and nitrogen. Pop Ecol 48:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Körner C (2006) Plant CO2 responses: an issue of definition, time and resource supply. New Phytol 172:393–411PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lincoln D, Sionit M, Strain B (1984) Growth and feeding response of Pseudoplusia includens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to host plants grown in controlled carbon dioxide atmospheres. Environ Entomol 13:1527–1530Google Scholar
  36. Lincoln D, Sionit M, Strain B (1986) Response of an insect herbivore to host plants grown in carbon dioxide enriched atmospheres. Oecologia 69:556–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lindroth R, Kinney K, Platz C (1993) Responses of deciduous trees to elevated atmospheric CO2: productivity, phytochemistry, and insect performance. Ecology 74:763–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Martin M, van’t Hof H (1988) The cause of reduced growth of Manduca sexta larvae on a low-water diet: Increased metabolic processing costs or nutrient limitation? J Insect Physiol 34:515–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Matthews H (2006) Emissions targets for CO2 stabilization as modified by carbon cycle feedbacks. Tellus B 58:591–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mattson W (1980) Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 11:119–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Meehl G, Stocker T, Collins W et al. (2007) Global climate projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Avery KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate changeGoogle Scholar
  42. Nowak R, Ellsworth D, Smith S (2004) Functional responses of plants to elevated atmospheric CO2- do photosynthetic and productivity data from FACE experiments support early predictions? New Phytol 162:253–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. O’Neill B, Zangerl A, DeLucia E, Berenbaum M (2008) Longevity and fecundity of Japanese Beetle (Popillia japonica) on foliage grown under elevated carbon dioxide. Environ Entomol 37:601–607PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Osbrink W, Trumble J, Wagner R (1987) Host suitability of Phaseolus lunata for Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in controlled carbon dioxide atmospheres. Environ Entomol 16:639–644Google Scholar
  45. Penuelas J, Estiarte M (1998) Can elevated CO2 affect secondary metabolism and ecosystem function? Trends Ecol Evol 13:20–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Percy K, Awmack C, Lindroth R, Kubiske M, Kopper B, Isebrands J, Pregitzer K, Hendrey G, Dickson R, Zak D, Oksanen E, Sober J, Harrington R, Karnosky D (2002) Altered performance of forest pests under atmospheres enriched by CO2 and O3. Nature 420:403–407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schädler M, Roeder M, Brandl R (2007) Interacting effects of elevated CO2, nutrient availability and plant species on a generalist invertebrate herbivore. Glob Change Biol 13:1005–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schmidt D, Reese J (1986) Sources of error in nutritional index studies of insects on artificial diets. J Insect Physiol 32:193–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Scott JA (1986) The Butterflies of North America. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  50. Scriber JM, Feeny P (1979) Growth of herbivorous caterpillars in relation to feeding specialization and to the growth form of their food plants. Ecology 60:829–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Scriber JM, Slansky F (1981) The nutritional ecology of immature insects. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 26:183–211Google Scholar
  52. Stiling P, Cornelissen T (2007) How does elevated carbon dioxide (CO2) affect plant-herbivore interactions? A field experiment and meta-analysis of CO2-mediated changes on plant chemistry and herbivore performance. Glob Change Biol 13:1823–1842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Valkama E, Koricheva J, Oksanen E (2007) Effects of elevated O3, alone and in combination with elevated CO2, on tree leaf chemistry and insect herbivore performance: a meta-analysis. Glob Chang Biol 13:184–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. van Groenigen K, Six J, Hungate B, de Graaff M, van Breemen N, van Kessel C (2006) Element interactions limit soil carbon storage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:6571–6574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Veteli T, Kuokkanen K, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Roininen H, Tahvanainen J (2002) Effects of elevated CO2 and temperature on plant growth and herbivore defensive chemistry. Glob Change Biol 8:1240–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Waldbauer G (1968) The consumption and utilization of food by insects. Adv Insect Physiol 5:229–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang X, Ji L, Wang G, Liu Y (2008) Potential effects of elevated carbon dioxide on leaf-feeding forest insects. Front Biol China 3:68–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Watt A, Whittaker M, Docherty M, Brooks G, Lindsay E, Salt D (1995) The impact of elevated atmospheric CO2 on insect herbivores. In: Harrington R, Stork ME (eds) Insects in changing environment. Academic Press, San Diego, California, pp 197–217Google Scholar
  59. West J, HilleRisLambers J, Lee T, Hobbie S, Reich P (2005) Legume species identity and soil nitrogen supply determine symbiotic nitrogen-fixation responses to elevated atmospheric [CO2]. New Phytol 167:523–530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wilkinson L (2000) SYSTAT: the system for statistics. SYSTAT Inc, EvanstonGoogle Scholar
  61. Williams R, Norby R, Lincoln D (2000) Effects of elevated CO2 and temperature-grown red and sugar maple on gypsy moth performance. Glob Change Biol 6:685–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wink M, Mohamed G (2003) Evolution of chemical defense traits in the Leguminosae: mapping of distribution patterns of secondary metabolites on a molecular phylogeny inferred from nucleotide sequences of the rbcL gene. Biochem Syst Ecol 31:897–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wink M, Waterman P (1999) Chemotaxonomy in relation to molecular phylogeny of plants. Annl Plant Rev 2:300–341Google Scholar
  64. Wu G, Chen F-J, Ge F (2006) Response of multiple generations of cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera Hübner, feeding on spring wheat, to elevated CO2. J Appl Entomol 130:2–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zeng N, Qian H, Munoz E, Iacono R (2004) How strong is carbon cycle-climate feedback under global warming? Geo Res Lett 31:L20203. doi:10.1029/2004GL020904 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zvereva E, Kozlov M (2006) Consequences of simultaneous elevation of carbon dioxide and temperature for plant–herbivore interactions: a metaanalysis. Glob Change Biol 12:27–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesWestern Michigan UniversityKalamazooUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations