Arthropod-Plant Interactions

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 71–80 | Cite as

Ovipositing Orius laevigatus increase tomato resistance against Frankliniella occidentalis feeding by inducing the wound response

  • Veronic De Puysseleyr
  • Monica Höfte
  • Patrick De Clercq
Original Paper


The anthocorid predator Orius laevigatus is widely used as biological control agent of thrips pests, including the western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis. In the current study, it was shown that O. laevigatus adults can increase plant resistance to feeding damage of F. occidentalis on tomato plants. The predator elicits a jasmonic acid (JA) mediated wound response during endophytic oviposition, resulting in reduced thrips feeding. A strong accumulation of H2O2, a molecule involved in different parts of the wound response, in leaf tissue surrounding the predator eggs or oviposition puncture sites was observed. Infestation of tomato plants with adult predators led to the upregulation of three JA regulated wound responsive genes: the precursor prosystemin, the jasmonic acid biosynthesis enzyme allene oxide synthase and the defence protein proteinase inhibitor I. Likewise, the presence of adults caused accumulation of proteinase inhibitor II, a principal marker for the wound response.


Indirect defence Induced resistance Wound response Jasmonic acid 


  1. Abe H, Ohnishi J, Narusaka M, Seo S, Narusaka Y, Tsuda S, Kobayashi M (2008) Function of jasmonate in response and tolerance of Arabidopsis to thrip feeding. Plant Cell Physiol 49:68–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Abe H, Shimoda T, Ohnishi J, Kugimiya S, Narusaka M, Seo S, Narusaka Y, Tsuda S, Kobayashi M (2009) Jasmonate-dependent plant defense restricts thrips performance and preference. BMC Plant Biol 9:97CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Agrawal AA, Kobayashi C, Thaler JS (1999) Influence of prey availability and induced host-plant resistance on omnivory by western flower thrips. Ecology 80:518–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alomar O, Goula M, Albajes R (2002) Colonisation of tomato fields by predatory mirid bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) in northern Spain. Agric Ecosyst Environ 89:105–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arimura G, Kost C, Boland W (2005) Herbivore-induced, indirect plant defences. Biochim Biophys Acta 1734:91–111PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Armer CA, Wiedenmann RN, Bush DR (1998) Plant feeding site selection on soybean by the facultatively phytophagous predator Orius insidiosus. Entomol Exp Appl 86:109–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bakr EM (2005) A new software for measuring leaf area, and area damaged by Tetranychus urticae Koch. J Appl Entomol 129:173–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Balbyshev NF, Lorenzen JH (1997) Hypersensitivity and egg drop: a novel mechanism of host plant resistance to Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J Econ Entomol 90:652–657Google Scholar
  9. Beckers GJM, Spoel SH (2006) Fine-tuning plant defence signalling: salicylate versus jasmonate. Plant Biol 8:1–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bennett RN, Wallsgrove RM (1994) Secondary metabolites in plant defense-mechanisms. New Phytol 127:617–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bergey DR, Orozco-Cardenas M, de Moura DS, Ryan CA (1999) A wound- and systemin-inducible polygalacturonase in tomato leaves. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:1756–1760CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen MS (2008) Inducible direct plant defense against insect herbivores: a review. Insect Sci 15:101–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clancy KM, Price PW (1987) Rapid herbivore growth enhances enemy attack—sublethal plant defenses remain a paradox. Ecology 68:733–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cocuzza GE, De Clercq P, Van de Veire M, De Cock A, Degheele D, Vacante V (1997) Reproduction of Orius laevigatus and Orius albidipennis on pollen and Ephestia kuehniella eggs. Entomol Exp Appl 82:101–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dicke M (2009) Behavioural and community ecology of plants that cry for help. Plant Cell Environ 32:654–665CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Farmer EE, Johnson RR, Ryan CA (1992) Regulation of expression of proteinase-inhibitor genes by methyl jasmonate and jasmonic acid. Plant Physiol 98:995–1002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Frescata C, Mexia A (1996) Biological control of thrips (Thysanoptera) by Orius laevigatus (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) in organically-grown strawberries. Biol Agric Hortic 13:141–148Google Scholar
  18. Gatehouse JA (2002) Plant resistance towards insect herbivores: a dynamic interaction. New Phytol 156:145–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Glazebrook J (2005) Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 43:205–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Graham JS, Pearce G, Merryweather J, Titani K, Ericsson L, Ryan CA (1985a) Wound-induced proteinase-inhibitors from tomato leaves. 1 The Cdna-deduced primary structure of pre-inhibitor-I and its post-translational processing. J Biol Chem 260:6555–6560PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Graham JS, Pearce G, Merryweather J, Titani K, Ericsson LH, Ryan CA (1985b) Wound-induced proteinase-inhibitors from tomato leaves. 2 The Cdna-deduced primary structure of pre-inhibitor-Ii. J Biol Chem 260:6561–6564PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hause B, Hause G, Kutter C, Miersch O, Wasternack C (2003) Enzymes of jasmonate biosynthesis occur in tomato sieve elements. Plant Cell Physiol 44:643–648CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Heil M (2008) Indirect defence via tritrophic interactions. New Phytol 178:41–61CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Howe GA, Jander G (2008) Plant immunity to insect herbivores. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:41–66CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Howe GA, Lightner J, Browse J, Ryan CA (1996) An octadecanoid pathway mutant (JL5) of tomato is compromised in signaling for defense against insect attack. Plant Cell 8:2067–2077CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kessler A, Baldwin IT (2002) Plant responses to insect herbivory: the emerging molecular analysis. Annu Rev Plant Biol 53:299–328CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Koiwa H, Bressan RA, Hasegawa PM (1997) Regulation of protease inhibitors and plant defense. Trends Plant Sci 2:379–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koornneef A, Pieterse CMJ (2008) Cross talk in defense signaling. Plant Physiol 146:839–844CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lattin JD (1999) Bionomics of the Anthocoridae. Annu Rev Entomol 44:207–231CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Li CY, Williams MM, Loh YT, Lee GI, Howe GA (2002) Resistance of cultivated tomato to cell content-feeding herbivores is regulated by the octadecanoid-signaling pathway. Plant Physiol 130:494–503CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Little D, Gouhier-Darimont C, Bruessow F, Reymond P (2007) Oviposition by pierid butterflies triggers defense responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 143:784–800CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lundgren JG, Fergen JK, Riedell WE (2008) The influence of plant anatomy on oviposition and reproductive success of the omnivorous bug Orius insidiosus. Anim Behav 75:1495–1502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maffei ME, Mithofer A, Boland W (2007) Before gene expression: early events in plant-insect interaction. Trends Plant Sci 12:310–316CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Narvaez-Vasquez J, Ryan CA (2004) The cellular localization of prosystemin: a functional role for phloem parenchyma in systemic wound signaling. Planta 218:360–369CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Nelson CE, Walkersimmons M, Ryan CA (1981) Regulation of proteinase-inhibitor synthesis in tomato leaves—invitro synthesis of inhibitor-I and inhibitor-ii with messenger-rna from excised leaves induced with piif (proteinase-inhibitor inducing factor). Plant Physiol 67:841–844CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Orozco-Cardenas M, Ryan CA (1999) Hydrogen peroxide is generated systemically in plant leaves by wounding and systemin via the octadecanoid pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:6553–6557CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Orozco-Cardenas M, Mcgurl B, Ryan CA (1993) Expression of an antisense prosystemin gene in tomato plants reduces resistance toward Manduca-sexta larvae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:8273–8276CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Orozco-Cardenas ML, Narvaez-Vasquez J, Ryan CA (2001) Hydrogen peroxide acts as a second messenger for the induction of defense genes in tomato plants in response to wounding, systemin, and methyl jasmonate. Plant Cell 13:179–191CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Penacortes H, Fisahn J, Willmitzer L (1995) Signals involved in wound-induced proteinase-inhibitor-Ii gene-expression in tomato and potato plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:4106–4113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Perdikis DC, Lykouressis DP (2004) Macrolophus pygmaeus (Hemiptera: Miridae) population parameters and biological characteristics when feeding on eggplant and tomato without prey. J Econ Entomol 97:1291–1298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Ryan CA (2000) The systemin signaling pathway: differential activation of plant defensive genes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1477:112–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Ryan CA, Pearce G (1998) Systemin: a polypeptide signal for plant defensive genes. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 14:1–17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Shapiro AM, Devay JE (1987) Hypersensitivity reaction of Brassica-nigra L (Cruciferae) kills eggs of pieris butterflies (Lepidoptera, Pieridae). Oecologia 71:631–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sivasankar S, Sheldrick B, Rothstein SJ (2000) Expression of allene oxide synthase determines defense gene activation in tomato. Plant Physiol 122:1335–1342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Souaze F, NtodouThome A, Tran CY, Rostene W, Forgez P (1996) Quantitative RT-PCR: limits and accuracy. BioTechniques 21:280–285PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Spence KO, Bicocca VT, Rosenheim JA (2007) Friend or foe?: a plant’s induced response to an omnivore. Environ Entomol 36:623–630CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Thaler JS (2002) Effect of jasmonate-induced plant responses on the natural enemies of herbivores. J Anim Ecol 71:141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thaler JS, Stout MJ, Karban R, Duffey SS (1996) Exogenous jasmonates simulate insect wounding in tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum) in the laboratory and field. J Chem Ecol 22:1767–1781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thordal-Christensen H, Zhang ZG, Wei YD, Collinge DB (1997) Subcellular localization of H2O2 in plants. H2O2 accumulation in papillae and hypersensitive response during the barley-powdery mildew interaction. Plant J 11:1187–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Van Driesche RG, Bellows TS (1996) Biological control. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. van Lenteren JC (2003) Quality control and production of biological control agents: theory and testing procedures. CABI publishing, WallingfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. van Oosten VR, Bodenhausen N, Reymond P, van Pelt JA, van Loon LC, Dicke M, Pieterse CMJ (2008) Differential effectiveness of microbially induced resistance against herbivorous insects in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 21:919–930CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Walling LL (2009) Adaptive defense responses to pathogens and insects. Plant Innate Immun 51:551–612Google Scholar
  54. Wasternack C (2007) Jasmonates: an update on biosynthesis, signal transduction and action in plant stress response, growth and development. Ann Bot 100:681–697CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Wasternack C, Stenzel I, Hause B, Hause G, Kutter C, Maucher H, Neumerkel J, Feussner I, Miersch O (2006) The wound response in tomato—role of jasmonic acid. J Plant Physiol 163:297–306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Zehnder GW, Murphy JF, Sikora EJ, Kloepper JW (2001) Application of rhizobacteria for induced resistance. Eur J Plant Pathol 107:39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhi JR, Margolies DC, Nechols JR, Boyer JE (2006) Host-plant-mediated interaction between populations of a true omnivore and its herbivorous prey. Entomol Exp Appl 121:59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Veronic De Puysseleyr
    • 1
  • Monica Höfte
    • 1
  • Patrick De Clercq
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Crop ProtectionGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations