Arthropod-Plant Interactions

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 87–92 | Cite as

Seasonality of herbivory and communication between individuals of sagebrush

  • Kaori Shiojiri
  • Richard KarbanEmail author
Original Paper


Seasonal changes in herbivore numbers and in plant defenses are well known to influence plant–herbivore interactions. Some plant defenses are induced in response to herbivore attack or cues correlated with risk of attack although seasonal variation in these defenses is relatively poorly known. We previously reported that sagebrush becomes more resistant to its herbivores when neighboring plants have been experimentally clipped with scissors. In this study we asked whether herbivory to leaves of sagebrush varied seasonally and whether there was seasonal variation in natural levels of damage when neighbors were clipped. We found that sagebrush accumulated most chewing damage early in the season, soon after the spring flush of new leaves. This damage was caused by generalist grasshoppers, deer, specialist caterpillars, beetles, gall makers, and other less common herbivores. Sagebrush showed no evidence of preferentially abscising leaves that had been experimentally clipped. Experimental clipping by Trirhabda pilosa beetle larvae caused neighbors to accumulate less herbivore damage later that season, similar to results in which clipping was done with scissors. Induced resistance caused by experimentally clipping a neighbor was affected by season; plants with neighbors clipped in May accumulated less damage throughout the season relative to plants with unclipped neighbors or neighbors clipped later in the summer. We found a correlation between seasonal herbivore pressure, damage accumulated by plants, and induced responses to experimentally clipping neighbors. The causal mechanisms responsible for this correlation are unknown although a strong seasonal effect was clear.


Plant behavior Plant defense Phenology Artificial damage Induced resistance 


  1. Ayres MP, MacLean SF (1987) Development of birch leaves and the growth energetics of Epirrita autumnata (Geometridae). Ecology 68:558–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball ED, Tinkham ER, Flock R, Vorhies CT (1942) The grasshoppers and other Orthoptera of Arizona. University of Arizona Agricultural Experiment Station, Technical Bulletin 93:255–373Google Scholar
  3. Bertness MD, Leonard GH (1997) The role of positive interactions in communities: lessons from intertidal habitats. Ecology 78:1976–1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boege K, Marquis RJ (2005) Facing herbivory as you grow up: the ontogeny of resistance in plants. Trends Ecol Evol 20:441–448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Callaway RM, et al (2002) Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress. Nature 417:844–848PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coley PD (1983) Herbivory and defensive characteristics of tree species in a lowland tropical forest. Ecol Monogr 53:209–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Faeth SH, Connor EF, Simberloff D (1981) Early leaf abscission: a neglected source of mortality for folivores. Am Nat 117:409–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feeny P (1970) Seasonal changes in oak leaf tannins and nutrients as a cause of spring feeding by winter moth caterpillars. Ecology 51:565–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fronk WD, Beetle AA, Fullerton DG (1975) Dipterous galls on the Artemisia tridentata complex and insects associated with them. Ann Entomol Soc Am 57:575–577Google Scholar
  10. Gates DH (1964) Sagebrush infested by leaf defoliating moth. J Range Manage 17:209–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gols R, Raaijmakers CE, van Dam NM, Dicke M, Bukovinszky T, Harvey JA (2007) Temporal changes affect plant chemistry and tritrophic interactions. Basic Appl Ecol 8:421–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hall RC (1965) Sagebrush defoliator outbreak in northern California. US Forest Service Research Notes, PSW-75, 12 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. Hewitt GB, Barr WF (1967) The banded-wing grasshoppers of Idaho (Orthoptera:Oedipodinae). University of Idaho Agricultural Experiment Station Research Bulletin 72:1–64Google Scholar
  14. Hougen-Eitzman D, Karban R (1995) Mechanisms of interspecific competition that result in successful control of Pacific mites following inoculations of Willamette mites on grapevines. Oecologia 103:157–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Karban R, Baldwin IT (1997) Induced responses to herbivory. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  16. Karban R, Baxter KJ (2001) Induced resistance in wild tobacco with clipped sagebrush neighbors: the role of herbivore behavior. J Insect Behav 14:147–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Karban R, Huntzinger M, McCall AC (2004) The specificity of eavesdropping on sagebrush by other plants. Ecology 85:1846–1852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Karban R, Shiojiri K, Huntzinger M, McCall AC (2006) Damage-induced resistance in sagebrush: volatiles are key to intra- and interplant communication. Ecology 87:922–930PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kucera TE (1992) Influences of sex and weather on migration of mule deer. Great Basin Nat 52:112–130Google Scholar
  20. McNaughton SJ (1985) Ecology of a grazing ecosystem: the Serengeti. Ecol Monogr 55:259–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Messina FJ (1981) Plant protection as a consequence of an ant-membracid mutualism: interactions on goldenrod (Solidago sp.). Ecology 62:1433–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pierce BM, Bleich VC, Wehausen JD, Bowyer T (1999) Migratory patterns of mountain lions: implication for social regulation and conservation. J Mammal 80:986–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pringle WL (1960) The effect of a leaf feeding beetle on big sagebrush in British Columbia. J Range Manage 13:139–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Riipi M, Ossipov V, Lempa K, Haukioja E, Koricheva J, Ossipova S, Pihlaja K (2002) Seasonal changes in birch leaf chemistry: are there tradeoffs between leaf growth and accumulation of phenolics? Oecologia 130:380–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sampson AW, Jespersen BW (1963) California range brushlands and browse plants. University of California, Div. Ag. & Nat. Res., Oakland, CAGoogle Scholar
  26. Shiojiri K, Karban R (2006) Plant age, communication and resistance to herbivores: young sagebrush plants are better emitters and receivers. Oecologia 149:214–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Silvertown J, Gordon DM (1989) A framework for plant behavior. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:349–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Southwood TRE (1977) Habitat, the template for ecological strategies? J Anim Ecol 46:337–365Google Scholar
  29. Thompson JN (2005) The geographic mosaic of coevolution. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  30. Watts JG, Hewitt GB, Huddleston EW, Kinzer HG, Lavigne RJ, Ueckert DN (1989) Rangeland entomology 2nd ed. Society for Range Management, Denver, COGoogle Scholar
  31. Young JA, Evans RA, Major J (1988) Sagebrush steppe, pp 763–769. In: Barbour MG, Major J (eds), Terrestrial vegetation of California 2nd ed. California Native Plant Society Special Publication 9Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EntomologyUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations