Arthropod-Plant Interactions

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 37–44 | Cite as

Visual search and the importance of time in complex decision making by bees

Review Paper

Abstract

Psychophysicists studying decision making in animals have overwhelmingly focused on choice accuracy, not speed. Results from human visual search, however, show that there might be a tight link between the two. Here we review both visual-sensory and cognitive mechanisms that affect decision speed in flower visiting bees. We show that decision times are affected by contrast of targets and background, by similarity between targets and distractors, numbers of distractors present in a scene, illuminating light intensity, presence or absence of punishment, and complexity of tasks. We explore between-individual and within-individual speed-accuracy tradeoffs, and show that bees resort to highly dynamic strategies when solving visual search tasks. Where possible, we attempt to link the observed search behaviour to the temporal and spatial properties of neuronal circuits underlying visual object detection. We demonstrate that natural foraging speed may not only be limited by factors such as food item density, flight energetics and scramble competition, as often implied. Our results show that understanding the behavioural ecology of foraging can substantially gain from knowledge about mechanisms of visual information processing.

Keywords

Apidae Foraging Information processing Psychophysics Visual search 

References

  1. Autrum HJ, Stoecker M (1950) Die Verschmelzungsfrequenzen des Bienenauges. Zeitschrift fuer Naturforschung 5:38–43Google Scholar
  2. Boisvert MJ, Sherry DF (2006) Interval timing by an invertebrate, the bumble bee Bombus impatiens. Curr Biol 16:1636–1640PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Briscoe AD, Chittka L (2001) The evolution of color vision in insects. Annu Rev Entomol 46:471–510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burns JG (2005) Impulsive bees forage better: the advantage of quick, sometimes inaccurate foraging decisions. Anim Behav 70:e1–e5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chittka L, Beier W, Hertel H, Steinmann E, Menzel R (1992) Opponent colour coding is a universal strategy to evaluate the photoreceptor inputs in hymenoptera. J Comp Physiol A 170:545–563PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chittka L, Brockmann A (2005) Perception space, the final frontier. PLoS Biol 3:545–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chittka L, Dyer AG, Bock F, Dornhaus A (2003) Bees trade off foraging speed for accuracy. Nature 424:388Google Scholar
  8. Chittka L, Shmida A, Troje N, Menzel R (1994) Ultraviolet as a component of flower reflections, and the colour perception of hymenoptera. Vision Res 34:1489–1508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chittka L, Thomson JD (1997) Sensori-motor learning and its relevance for task specialization in bumble bees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:385–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chittka L, Thomson JD, Waser NM (1999) Flower constancy, insect psychology, and plant evolution. Naturwissenschaften 86:361–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collett TS, Fry SN, Wehner R (1993) Sequence learning by honeybees. J Comp Physiol A 172:693–706Google Scholar
  12. Desimone R (1998) Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex. Philos Trans Royal Soc B 353:1245–1255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Downing CJ, Pinker S (1985) The spatial structure of visual attention. In: Posner MJ, Martin OSM (eds) Attention and performance, vol 11. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Hillsdale, pp 171–187Google Scholar
  14. Dyer AG, Chittka L (2004a) Bumblebee search time without ultraviolet light. J Exp Biol 207:1683–1688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dyer AG, Chittka L (2004b) Bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) sacrifice foraging speed to solve difficult colour discrimination tasks. J Comp Physiol A 190:759–763Google Scholar
  16. Dyer A, Neumeyer C, Chittka L (2005) Honeybee (Apis mellifera) vision can discriminate between and recognise images of human faces. J Exp Biol 208:4709–4714PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Giurfa M (2003) The amazing mini-brain: lessons from the honeybee. Bee World 84:5–18Google Scholar
  18. Giurfa M, Lehrer M (2001) Honeybee vision and floral displays: from detection to close-up recognition. In: Chittka L, Thomson JD (eds) Cognitive ecology of pollination. University Press, Cambridge, pp 61–82Google Scholar
  19. Gould JL (1985) How bees remember flower shapes. Science 227:1492–1494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Horridge A (2000) Seven experiments on pattern vision of the honeybee, with a model. Vision Res 40:2589–2603PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jander U, Jander R (2002) Allometry and resolution of bee eyes (Apoidea). Arthropod Struct Develop 30:179–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kemp DJ (2002) Visual mate-searching behaviour in the evening brown butterfly, Melanitis leda (L.) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Austr J Entomol 41:300–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kirschfeld K (1994) Tracking of small objects in front of a textured background by insects and vertebrates: Phenomena and neuronal basis. Biol Cybernet 70:407–415Google Scholar
  24. Land MF (1999) Compound eye structure: matching eye to environment. In: Archer SNEA (ed) Adaptive mechanisms in the ecology of vision. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 51–71Google Scholar
  25. Laughlin SB (1989) The role of sensory adaptation in the retina. J Exp Biol 146:39–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lotto RB, Chittka L (2005) Seeing the light: Illumination as a contextual cue to color choice behavior in bumblebees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:3852–3856Google Scholar
  27. McElree B, Carrasco M (1999) The temporal dynamics of visual search: Evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 25:1517–1539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Menzel R (2001) Behavioral and neural mechanisms of learning and memory as determinants of flower constancy. In: Chittka L, Thomson JD (eds) Cognitive ecology of pollination. University Press, Cambridge, pp 21–40Google Scholar
  29. Nakayama K, Silverman GH (1986) Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions. Nature 320:264–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Peitsch D, Fietz A, Hertel H, de Souza J, Ventura DF, Menzel R (1992) The spectral input systems of hymenopteran insects and their receptor-based colour vision. J Comp Physiol A 170:23–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Raine NE, Ings TC, Dornhaus A, Saleh N, Chittka L (2006) Adaptation, chance, and history in the evolution of bee foraging behavior. Adv Study Behav 36:305–354Google Scholar
  32. Saleh N, Ohashi K, Thomson JD, Chittka L (2006) Facultative use of repellent scent marking in foraging bumblebees: complex versus simple flowers. Anim Behav 71:847–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Skorupski P, Chittka L (2006) Animal cognition: an insect’s sense of time? Curr Biol 16:R851–R853PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Spaethe J, Chittka L (2003) Interindividual variation of eye optics and single object resolution in bumblebees. J Exp Biol 206:3447–3453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Spaethe J, Tautz J, Chittka L (2001) Visual constraints in foraging bumblebees: flower size and color affect search time and flight behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 3898–3903PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Spaethe J, Tautz J, Chittka L (2006) Do honeybees detect colour targets using serial or parallel visual search? J Exp Biol 209:987–993PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Srinivasan MV, Lehrer M (1984) Temporal acuity of honeybee vision: behavioural studies using moving stimuli. J Comp Physiol A 155:297–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Srinivasan MV, Zhang SW, Rolfe B (1993) Pattern vision in insects: “Cortical” Processing? Nature 362:539–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Treismann A, Gormican S (1988) Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. Psychol Rev 95:15–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vorobyev M, Brandt R, Peitsch D, Laughlin SB, Menzel R (2001) Colour thresholds and receptor noise: behaviour and physiology compared. Vision Res 41:639–653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Warrant EJ, McIntyre PD (1993) Arthropod eye design and the physical limits to spatial resolving power. Progr Neurobiol 40:413–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Williamson SJ, Cummins HZ (1983) Light and color in nature and art. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Wolfe JM (1999) How do you pay attention? Nature 400:813–815PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wolfe J (2000) Visual attention. In: DeValois KK (ed) Seeing. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  45. Zenger B, Fahle M (1997) Missed targets are more frequent than false alarms: a model for error rates in visual search. J Exp Psychol 23:1783–1791Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media BV 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Biological & Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary CollegeUniversity of LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations