Advertisement

Plant Biotechnology Reports

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 501–510 | Cite as

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing of CsWRKY22 reduces susceptibility to Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri in Wanjincheng orange (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck)

  • Lijuan Wang
  • Shanchun Chen
  • Aihong Peng
  • Zhu Xie
  • Yongrui He
  • Xiuping ZouEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Key message

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing of CsWRKY22 repressed canker development in Wanjincheng orange.

Abstract

Citrus canker, a destructive disease of citrus, is threatening the citrus industry worldwide. Breeding resistant cultivars is the most economical and effective approach to control citrus canker. Recently, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing was demonstrated to be a powerful tool for the improvement of citrus resistance to the disease. In our previous works, we confirmed that CsWRKY22 is involved in the plant immunity response to citrus canker in Wanjincheng orange (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck). In this study, we targeted this gene to improve the resistance of Wanjincheng orange against citrus canker by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing. Sanger sequencing confirmed that CsWRKY22 in Wanjincheng orange contains CsWRKY22G and CsWRKY22C alleles, and the ratio of CsWRKY22G to CsWRKY22C is approximately 2:1. Four sgRNAs, which targeted the first exon of CsWRKY22, were selected for testing. In vitro cleavage activity analysis showed that two (W1 and W2) of the four sgRNAs displayed robust cleavage activities using PCR amplicons from the Wanjincheng orange genome as template. Subsequently, two constructs, pCas9/WRKY22sgRNA-W1 and pCas9/WRKY22sgRNA-W2, were used to modify the CsWRKY22. Three mutant plants were identified from seven independent transgenic plants. Based on Sanger sequencing, the W1-1, W2-2, and W2-3 mutant lines displayed 85.7%, 79.2%, and 68.2% mutation rates, respectively. Resistance evaluation indicated that the mutant plants showed decreased susceptibility to citrus canker. These results indicate that CRISPR/Cas9-targeted gene modification is an efficient approach for enhancing disease resistance in citrus.

Keywords

Citrus canker Susceptibility CsWRKY22 Genome editing CRISPR/Cas9 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFD0201500, to XZ), the Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-26, to SC), and the Natural Science Foundation Project of CQ (cstc2017jcyjBX0020 and cstc2016shms-ztzx80001, to XZ and YH, respectively). We thank Robert McKenzie, PhD, from Liwen Bianji, Edanz Group China (www.liwenbianji.cn/ac), for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript.

Author contribution

XZ designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. LW performed in vitro cleavage activity analysis and citrus transformation. AP performed mutation analysis. ZX performed vector construction. YH performed citrus canker resistance evaluation. SC revised the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11816_2019_556_MOESM1_ESM.xls (30 kb)
Supplementary file1 (XLS 30 kb)
11816_2019_556_MOESM2_ESM.docx (670 kb)
Supplementary file2 (DOCX 669 kb)

References

  1. Abbruscato P et al (2012) OsWRKY22, a monocot WRKY gene, plays a role in the resistance response to blast. Mol Plant Pathol 13:828–841.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00795.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakshi M, Oelmüller R (2014) WRKY transcription factors: Jack of many trades in plants. Plant Signal Behav 9:e27700.  https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.27700 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Brunings AM, Gabriel DW (2003) Xanthomonas citri: breaking the surface. Mol Plant Pathol 4:141–157.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00163.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cong L et al (2013) Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339:819–823.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1231143 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Doench JG et al (2016) Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9. Nat Biotechnol 34:184–191.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3437 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Donmez D, Simsek O, Izgu T, Kacar YA, Mendi YY (2013) Genetic transformation in citrus. Sci World J 2013:e491207.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/491207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dutt M, Barthe G, Irey M, Grosser J (2016) Transgenic citrus expressing an Arabidopsis NPR1 gene exhibit enhanced resistance against Huanglongbing (HLB; Citrus Greening). PLoS ONE 11:e0147657.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147657 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Fang DQ, Roose ML (1997) Identification of closely related citrus cultivars with inter-simple sequence repeat markers. Theor Appl Genet 95:408–417.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050577 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feng Z et al (2013) Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system. Cell Res 23:1229–1232.  https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2013.114 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Gong X, Liu J (2013) Genetic transformation and genes for resistance to abiotic and biotic stresses in Citrus and its related genera. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult 113:137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gottwald TR, Graham JH, Schubert TS (2002) Citrus canker: the pathogen and its impact. Online Plant Health Progress 3(1):15.  https://doi.org/10.1094/PHP-2002-0812-01-RV CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hartung F, Schiemann J (2014) Precise plant breeding using new genome editing techniques: opportunities, safety and regulation in the EU. Plant J Cell Mol Biol 78:742–752.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12413 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hsu FC, Chou MY, Chou SJ, Li YR, Peng HP, Shih MC (2013) Submergence confers immunity mediated by the WRKY22 transcription factor in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 25:2699–2713.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.113.114447 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Hu Y et al (2014) Lateral organ boundaries 1 is a disease susceptibility gene for citrus bacterial canker disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:E521–E529.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1313271111 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jia H, Wang N (2014) Targeted genome editing of sweet orange using Cas9/sgRNA. PLoS One 9:e93806.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093806 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Jia H, Orbovic V, Jones JB, Wang N (2016a) Modification of the PthA4 effector binding elements in Type I CsLOB1 promoter using Cas9/sgRNA to produce transgenic Duncan grapefruit alleviating XccDeltapthA4:dCsLOB1.3 infection. Plant Biotechnol J 14:1291–1301.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12495 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Jia H, Zhang Y, Orbovic V, Xu J, White F, Jones J, Wang N (2016b) Genome editing of the disease susceptibility gene CsLOB1 in citrus confers resistance to citrus canker. Plant Biotechnol J.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12677 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jia H, Xu J, Orbovic V, Zhang Y, Wang N (2017) Editing citrus genome via SaCas9/sgRNA System. Front Plant Sci 8:2135.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02135 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Jiang J, Ma S, Ye N, Jiang M, Cao J, Zhang J (2017) WRKY transcription factors in plant responses to stresses. J Integr Plant Biol 59:86–101.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.12513 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kloth KJ et al (2016) AtWRKY22 promotes susceptibility to aphids and modulates salicylic acid and jasmonic acid signalling. J Exp Bot 67:3383–3396.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw159 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Lei Y, Lu L, Liu HY, Li S, Xing F, Chen LL (2014) CRISPR-P: a web tool for synthetic single-guide RNA design of CRISPR-system in plants. Molecular plant 7:1494–1496.  https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssu044 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Li H, Durbin R (2009) Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 25:1754–1760.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li D, Shi W, Deng X (2002) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of embryogenic calluses of Ponkan mandarin and the regeneration of plants containing the chimeric ribonuclease gene. Plant Cell Rep 21:153–156.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-002-0492-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liang Z et al (2017) Efficient DNA-free genome editing of bread wheat using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Nat Commun 8:14261.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14261 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plantarum 15:473–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Omar AA, Dutt M, Gmitter FG, Grosser JW (2016) Somatic embryogenesis: still a relevant technique in citrus improvement. In: Germana MA, Lambardi M (eds) In vitro embryogenesis in higher plants. Springer, New York, pp 289–327.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3061-6_13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Peng A, Xu L, He Y, Lei T, Yao L, Chen S, Zou X (2015) Efficient production of marker-free transgenic ‘Tarocco’ blood orange (Citrus sinensis Osbeck) with enhanced resistance to citrus canker using a Cre/loxP site-recombination system. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 123:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-015-0799-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peña L, Pérez RM, Cervera M, Juárez JA, Navarro L (2004) Early events in Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of citrus explants. Ann Bot 94:67–74.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mch117 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Plüss M et al (2017) Need for speed in accurate whole-genome data analysis: GENALICE MAP challenges BWA/GATK more than PEMapper/PECaller and Isaac. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:E8320–E8322.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713830114 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rushton PJ, Somssich IE, Ringler P, Shen QJ (2010) WRKY transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci 15:247–258.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2010.02.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Shi Q, Febres VJ, Jones JB, Moore GA (2015) Responsiveness of different citrus genotypes to the Xanthomonas citri ssp. citri-derived pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) flg22 correlates with resistance to citrus canker. Mol Plant Pathol 16:507–520.  https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12206 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. So Young Y, Ken S, Jae Sun M, Seung-Goo L, Suk-Yoon K (2014) The activated SA and JA signaling pathways have an influence on flg22-triggered oxidative burst and callose deposition. PLoS One 9:e88951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stover E, Driggers R, Richardson ML, Hall DG, Duan YP, Lee RF (2014) Incidence and severity of Asiatic citrus canker on diverse citrus and citrus-related Germplasm in a Florida. Field Plant Hortsci 49:4–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Straubeta A, Lahaye T (2013) Zinc fingers, TAL effectors, or Cas9-based DNA binding proteins: what's best for targeting desired genome loci? Mol Plant 6:1384–1387.  https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/sst075 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ulker B, Somssich IE (2004) WRKY transcription factors: from DNA binding towards biological function. Curr Opin Plant Biol 7:491–498.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2004.07.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Xiang Z, Yanjuan J, Diqiu Y (2011) WRKY22 transcription factor mediates dark-induced leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. Mol Cells 31:303–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xie K, Zhang J, Yang Y (2014) Genome-wide prediction of highly specific guide RNA spacers for CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing in model plants and major crops. Mol Plant 7:923–926.  https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssu009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Xu Q et al (2013) The draft genome of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis). Nat Genet 45:59–66.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2472 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang XD, Francis MI, Dawson WO, Graham JH, Orbovic V, Triplett EW, Mou ZL (2010) Over-expression of the Arabidopsis NPR1 gene in citrus increases resistance to citrus canker. Eur J Plant Pathol 128:91–100.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-010-9633-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang D, Zhang H, Li T, Chen K, Qiu JL, Gao C (2017a) Perfectly matched 20-nucleotide guide RNA sequences enable robust genome editing using high-fidelity SpCas9 nucleases. Genome Biol 18:191.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1325-9 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang F, Leblanc C, Irish VF, Jacob Y (2017b) Rapid and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in Citrus using the YAO promoter. Plant Cell Rep 36:1883–1887.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-017-2202-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhou P et al (2017) Cloning and Expression Analysis of Four Citrus WRKY Genes Responding to Xanthomon asaxonopodis pv. citri. Acta Horticult Sin 44:452–462.  https://doi.org/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2016-0577 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhou J-M, Trifa Y, Silva H, Pontier D, Lam E, Shah J, Klessig DF (2000) NPR1 differentially interacts with members of the TGA/OBF family of transcription factors that bind an element of the PR-1 gene required for induction by Salicylic acid. Mol Plant Microb Interact 13:191–202.  https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.2.191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zou X et al (2014) Activation of three pathogen-inducible promoters in transgenic citrus (Citrus sinensis Osbeck) after Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri infection and wounding. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 117:85–98.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-013-0423-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zou X et al (2016) Transgenic citrus expressing synthesized cecropin B genes in the phloem exhibits decreased susceptibility to Huanglongbing. Plant Mol Biol 93:341–353.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-016-0565-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Zou X, Li D, Luo X, Luo K, Pei Y (2008) An improved procedure for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata L. Raf.) via indirect organogenesis. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 44:169–177.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-008-9106-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Plant Biotechnology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lijuan Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shanchun Chen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Aihong Peng
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zhu Xie
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yongrui He
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xiuping Zou
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Citrus Research InstituteSouthwest UniversityChongqingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Citrus Research InstituteChinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesChongqingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations