Advertisement

CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome editing for crop improvement: current applications and future prospects

  • Geupil Jang
  • Young Hee Joung
Review
  • 55 Downloads

Abstract

Conventional breeding techniques for crop improvement are based on hybridization and selection. However, due to the long breeding cycles of crops and the potentially unpredictable effects of traditional breeding, these techniques are not sufficient to meet market demands for crops with a variety of traits or to address the emerging food crisis we could face in the near future. In the past decade, advanced technologies such as next-generation sequencing have been used to rapidly produce massive amounts of genome sequence information in many crop species. These techniques, together with targeted genome editing tools such as Zinc Finger Nuclease (ZFNs) and Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nucleases (TALENs), Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Sequences (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) have increased the possibilities for crop improvement via targeted genome editing. The use of these technologies in crop biology has opened up a new era of genome editing-mediated crop breeding. In this review, we summarize the current techniques used for site-directed genome editing in plants, focusing on the CRISPR/Cas system, and discuss their current and future applications for crop biology.

Keywords

CRISPR Cas Site-directed nuclease Genome editing Crop improvement 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out with the support of “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project no. PJ01389401 to Y.J.)” Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2016R1D1A1B03931167 to G.J.).

References

  1. Abdallah N, Prakash C, McHughen A (2015) Genome editing for crop improvement: Challenges and opportunities. GM Crops Food 6:183–205CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrangou R, Fremaux C, Deveau H, Richards M, Boyaval P, Moineau S, Romero DA, Horvath P (2007) CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science 315:1709–1712CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhaya D, Davison M, Barrangou R (2011) CRISPR-Cas systems in bacteria and archaea: versatile small RNAs for adaptive defense and regulation. Annu Rev Genet 45:273–297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boch J, Scholze H, Schornack S, Landgraf A, Hahn S, Kay S, Lahaye T, Nickstadt A, Bonas U (2009) Breaking the code of DNA binding specificity of TAL-type III effectors. Science 326:1509–1512CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cai CQ, Doyon Y, Ainley WM, Miller JC, DeKelver RC, Moehle EA, Rock JM, Lee Y-L, Garrison R, Schulenberg L (2009) Targeted transgene integration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases. Plant Mol Biol 69:699–709CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cai Y, Chen L, Liu X, Guo C, Sun S, Wu C, Jiang B, Han T, Hou W (2018) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis of GmFT2a delays flowering time in soya bean. Plant Biotechnol J 16:176–185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cermak T, Curtin SJ, Gil-Humanes J, Čegan R, Kono TJ, Konečná E, Belanto JJ, Starker CG, Mathre JW, Greenstein RL (2017) A multi-purpose toolkit to enable advanced genome engineering in plants. Plant Cell 29:1196–1217PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, Lin S, Barretto R, Habib N, Hsu PD, Wu X, Jiang W, Marraffini L (2013) Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339:819–823CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Endo A, Masafumi M, Kaya H, Toki S (2016) Efficient targeted mutagenesis of rice and tobacco genomes using Cpf1 from Francisella novicida. Sci Rep 6:38169CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Fauser F, Schiml S, Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPR/C as-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genome engineering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 79:348–359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fineran PC, Charpentier E (2012) Memory of viral infections by CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems: acquisition of new information. Virology 434:202–209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fonfara I, Richter H, Bratovič M, Le Rhun A, Charpentier E (2016) The CRISPR-associated DNA-cleaving enzyme Cpf1 also processes precursor CRISPR RNA. Nature 532:517–521CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gasiunas G, Barrangou R, Horvath P, Siksnys V (2012) Cas9–crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:E2579–E2586CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gaudelli NM, Komor AC, Rees HA, Packer MS, Badran AH, Bryson DI, Liu DR (2017) Programmable base editing of A· T to G· C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature 551:464–471CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Hilscher J, Bürstmayr H, Stoger E (2017) Targeted modification of plant genomes for precision crop breeding. Biotechnol J 12:1600173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hilton IB, D’ippolito AM, Vockley CM, Thakore PI, Crawford GE, Reddy TE, Gersbach CA (2015) Epigenome editing by a CRISPR-Cas9-based acetyltransferase activates genes from promoters and enhancers. Nat Biotechnol 33:510–517CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Hummel AW, Chauhan RD, Cermak T, Mutka AM, Vijayaraghavan A, Boyher A, Starker CG, Bart R, Voytas DF, Taylor NJ (2018) Allele exchange at the EPSPS locus confers glyphosate tolerance in cassava. Plant Biotechnol J 16:1275–1282CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Jaganathan D, Ramasamy K, Sellamuthu G, Jayabalan S, Venkataraman G (2018) CRISPR for crop improvement: an update review. Front Plant Sci 9:985CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Jiang WZ, Henry IM, Lynagh PG, Comai L, Cahoon EB, Weeks DP (2017) Significant enhancement of fatty acid composition in seeds of the allohexaploid, Camelina sativa, using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing. Plant Biotechnol J 15:648–657CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E (2012) A programmable dual-RNA–guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337:816–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Khandagale K, Nadaf A (2016) Genome editing for targeted improvement of plants. Plant Biotechnol Rep 10:327–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Komor AC, Kim YB, Packer MS, Zuris JA, Liu DR (2016) Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature 533:420–424CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Li T, Liu B, Spalding MH, Weeks DP, Yang B (2012) High-efficiency TALEN-based gene editing produces disease-resistant rice. Nat Biotechnol 30:390–392CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Li J, Meng X, Zong Y, Chen K, Zhang H, Liu J, Li J, Gao C (2016) Gene replacements and insertions in rice by intron targeting using CRISPR–Cas9. Nat Plant 2:16139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li J, Sun Y, Du J, Zhao Y, Xia L (2017) Generation of targeted point mutations in rice by a modified CRISPR/Cas9 system. Mol Plant 10:526–529CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Li C, Zong Y, Wang Y, Jin S, Zhang D, Song Q, Zhang R, Gao C (2018a) Expanded base editing in rice and wheat using a Cas9-adenosine deaminase fusion. Genome Biol 19:59CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Li J, Zhang X, Sun Y, Zhang J, Du W, Guo X, Li S, Zhao Y, Xia L (2018b) Efficient allelic replacement in rice by gene editing: A case study of the NRT1.1B gene. J Integr Plant Biol 60:536–540CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Li S, Li J, Zhang J, Du W, Fu J, Sutar S, Zhao Y, Xia L (2018c) Synthesis-dependent repair of Cpf1-induced double strand DNA breaks enables targeted gene replacement in rice. J Exp Bot 69:4715–4721CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Lowder LG, Paul JW, Baltes NJ, Voytas DF, Zhang Y, Zhang D, Tang X, Zheng X, Hsieh T-F, Qi Y (2015) A CRISPR/Cas9 toolbox for multiplexed plant genome editing and transcriptional regulation. Plant Physiol 169:971–985CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Lu Y, Zhu J-K (2017) Precise editing of a target base in the rice genome using a modified CRISPR/Cas9 system. Mol Plant 10:523–525CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lu K, Wu B, Wang J, Zhu W, Nie H, Qian J, Huang W, Fang Z (2018) Blocking amino acid transporter Os AAP 3 improves grain yield by promoting outgrowth buds and increasing tiller number in rice. Plant Biotechnol J 16:1710–1722CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Lusser M, Parisi C, Plan D, Rodríguez-Cerezo E (2012) Deployment of new biotechnologies in plant breeding. Nat Biotechnol 30:231–239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Macovei A, Sevilla NR, Cantos C, Jonson GB, Slamet-Loedin I, Čermák T, Voytas DF, Choi IR, Chadha-Mohanty P (2018) Novel alleles of rice eIF4G generated by CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis confer resistance to Rice tungro spherical virus. Plant Biotechnol J 16:1918–1927CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Alkhnbashi OS, Costa F, Shah SA, Saunders SJ, Barrangou R, Brouns SJ, Charpentier E, Haft DH (2015) An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR–Cas systems. Nat Rev Microbiol 13:722–736CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Maresca M, Lin VG, Guo N, Yang Y (2013) Obligate ligation-gated recombination (ObLiGaRe): custom-designed nuclease-mediated targeted integration through nonhomologous end joining. Genome Res 23:539–546CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Miki D, Zhang W, Zeng W, Feng Z, Zhu J-K (2018) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene targeting in Arabidopsis using sequential transformation. Nat Commun 9:1967CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Mishra R, Zhao K (2018) Genome editing technologies and their applications in crop Improvement. Plant Biotechnol Rep 12:57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mladenov E, Iliakis G (2011) Induction and repair of DNA double strand breaks: the increasing spectrum of non-homologous end joining pathways. Mutat Res 711:61–72CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Mojica FJ, Díez-Villaseñor C, García-Martínez J, Almendros C (2009) Short motif sequences determine the targets of the prokaryotic CRISPR defence system. Microbiology 155:733–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nakayasu M, Akiyama R, Lee HJ, Osakabe K, Osakabe Y, Watanabe B, Sugimoto Y, Umemoto N, Saito K, Muranaka T (2018) Generation of α-solanine-free hairy roots of potato by CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome editing of the St16DOX gene. Plant Physiol Biochem 131:70–77CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Organisms EPoGM (2012) Scientific opinion addressing the safety assessment of plants developed using Zinc Finger Nuclease 3 and other Site-Directed Nucleases with similar function. EFSA J 10:2943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ortigosa A, Gimenez-Ibanez S, Leonhardt N, Solano R (2018) Design of a bacterial speck resistant tomato by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing of SlJAZ2. Plant Biotechnol J 1–9Google Scholar
  43. Pabo CO, Peisach E, Grant RA (2001) Design and selection of novel Cys2His2 zinc finger proteins. Annu Rev Biochem 70:313–340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Peng A, Chen S, Lei T, Xu L, He Y, Wu L, Yao L, Zou X (2017) Engineering canker-resistant plants through CRISPR/Cas9-targeted editing of the susceptibility gene Cs LOB 1 promoter in citrus. Plant Biotechnol J 15:1509–1519CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Puchta H (2004) The repair of double-strand breaks in plants: mechanisms and consequences for genome evolution. J Exp Bot 56:1–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Ray DK, Mueller ND, West PC, Foley JA (2013) Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050. PLoS One 8:e66428CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Ricroch A, Clairand P, Harwood W (2017) Use of CRISPR systems in plant genome editing: toward new opportunities in agriculture. Emerg Top Life Sci 1:169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shah SA, Erdmann S, Mojica FJ, Garrett RA (2013) Protospacer recognition motifs: mixed identities and functional diversity. RNA Biol 10:891–899CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Shan Q, Wang Y, Chen K, Liang Z, Li J, Zhang Y, Zhang K, Liu J, Voytas DF, Zheng X (2013) Rapid and efficient gene modification in rice and Brachypodium using TALENs. Mol Plant 6:1365–1368CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Sharma S, Kaur R, Singh A (2017) Recent advances in CRISPR/Cas mediated genome editing for crop improvement. Plant Biotechnol Rep 11:193–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shimatani Z, Kashojiya S, Takayama M, Terada R, Arazoe T, Ishii H, Teramura H, Yamamoto T, Komatsu H, Miura K (2017) Targeted base editing in rice and tomato using a CRISPR-Cas9 cytidine deaminase fusion. Nat Biotechnol 35:441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Shimatani Z, Fujikura U, Ishii H, Matsui Y, Suzuki M, Ueke Y, Taoka K-i, Terada R, Nishida K, Kondo A (2018) Inheritance of co-edited genes by CRISPR-based targeted nucleotide substitutions in rice. Plant Physiol Biochem 131:78–83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Silva G, Poirot L, Smith J, Montoya G, Duchateau P, Pâques F (2011) Meganucleases and other tools for targeted genome engineering: perspectives and challenges for gene therapy. Curr Gene Ther 11:11–27CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Sprink T, Metje J, Hartung F (2015) Plant genome editing by novel tools: TALEN and other sequence specific nucleases. Curr Opin Biotechnol 32:47–53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Sternberg SH, Redding S, Jinek M, Greene EC, Doudna JA (2014) DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9. Nature 507:62CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Tang X, Zheng X, Qi Y, Zhang D, Cheng Y, Tang A, Voytas DF, Zhang Y (2016) A single transcript CRISPR-Cas9 system for efficient genome editing in plants. Mol Plant 9:1088–1091CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Tang X, Lowder LG, Zhang T, Malzahn AA, Zheng X, Voytas DF, Zhong Z, Chen Y, Ren Q, Li Q (2017) A CRISPR–Cpf1 system for efficient genome editing and transcriptional repression in plants. Nat Plants 3:17018CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, Befort BL (2011) Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:20260–20264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Van de Wiel C, Schaart J, Lotz L, Smulders M (2017) New traits in crops produced by genome editing techniques based on deletions. Plant Biotechnol Rep 11:1–8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Voytas DF (2013) Plant genome engineering with sequence-specific nucleases. Annu Rev Plant Biol 64:327–350CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Voytas DF, Joung JK (2009) DNA binding made easy. Science 326:1491–1492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Wang M, Mao Y, Lu Y, Tao X, Zhu J-k (2017) Multiplex gene editing in rice using the CRISPR-Cpf1 system. Mol Plant 10:1011–1013CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Waterworth WM, Drury GE, Bray CM, West CE (2011) Repairing breaks in the plant genome: the importance of keeping it together. New Phytol 192:805–822CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Wright DA, Townsend JA, Winfrey RJ Jr., Irwin PA, Rajagopal J, Lonosky PM, Hall BD, Jondle MD, Voytas DF (2005) High-frequency homologous recombination in plants mediated by zinc-finger nucleases. Plant J 44:693–705CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Xing H-L, Dong L, Wang Z-P, Zhang H-Y, Han C-Y, Liu B, Wang X-C, Chen Q-J (2014) A CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for multiplex genome editing in plants. BMC Plant Biol 14:327CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Xu R, Qin R, Li H, Li D, Li L, Wei P, Yang J (2017) Generation of targeted mutant rice using a CRISPR-Cpf1 system. Plant Biotechnol J 15:713–717CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Yu Q-h, Wang B, Li N, Tang Y, Yang S, Yang T, Xu J, Guo C, Yan P, Wang Q (2017) CRISPR/Cas9-induced targeted mutagenesis and gene replacement to generate long-shelf life tomato lines. Sci Rep 7:11874CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Zetsche B, Gootenberg JS, Abudayyeh OO, Slaymaker IM, Makarova KS, Essletzbichler P, Volz SE, Joung J, Van Der Oost J, Regev A (2015) Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell 163:759–771CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhang H, Zhang J, Lang Z, Botella JR, Zhu J-K (2017) Genome editing—principles and applications for functional genomics research and crop improvement. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 36:291–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zhao Y, Zhang C, Liu W, Gao W, Liu C, Song G, Li W-X, Mao L, Chen B, Xu Y (2016) An alternative strategy for targeted gene replacement in plants using a dual-sgRNA/Cas9 design. Sci Rep 6:23890CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Zong Y, Wang Y, Li C, Zhang R, Chen K, Ran Y, Qiu J-L, Wang D, Gao C (2017) Precise base editing in rice, wheat and maize with a Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusion. Nat Biotechnol 35:438–440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Zsögön A, Čermák T, Naves ER, Notini MM, Edel KH, Weinl S, Freschi L, Voytas DF, Kudla J, Peres LEP (2018) De novo domestication of wild tomato using genome editing. Nat Biotechnol.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4272 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Plant Biotechnology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Biological Sciences and TechnologyChonnam National UniversityGwangjuRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations