Plant Biotechnology Reports

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 183–192 | Cite as

Identification of AtWRKY75 as a transcriptional regulator in the defense response to Pcc through the screening of Arabidopsis activation-tagged lines

  • Changhyun Choi
  • Young Ho Park
  • Soon Il Kwon
  • Chunghyo Yun
  • Ilpyung Ahn
  • Sang Ryeol Park
  • Duk-Ju Hwang
Original Article


The necrotrophic pathogen Pectobacterium carotovorum ssp. carotovorum (Pcc) causes soft rot in a broad range of plant hosts. Approximately 60,000 independent seeds from Arabidopsis activation tagging lines were inoculated with Pcc and screened for resistant mutants. An Rpe1 (resistance protein to Pectobacterium 1) mutant, which had more resistance to Pcc than wild-type (WT) plants, was selected for further study. The T-DNA inserting locus in Rpe1 was located on the middle of chromosome V by flanking sequence analysis. Through expression analysis with several genes adjacent to the T-DNA tagging region, AtWRKY75 gene was highly up-regulated in the Rpe1 mutant compared to the WT plant. The up-regulation of AtWRKY75 gene was shown to be correlated on the induction of the PDF1.2, VSP1 and PR1 genes compared to the WT plant. AtWRKY75 over-expression lines exhibited reduced Pcc bacterial growth compared to WT. Taken together, our data suggest that AtWRKY75 should be a positive regulator in the JA- or SA-mediated defense signaling responses to Pcc.


Arabidopsis Activation tagging line AtWRKY75 Soft rot 





Jasmonic acid


Pectobacterium carotovora ssp. carotovora


Salicylic acid


Type II secretion system


Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri



We thank Prof. Lee J.S at Seoul National University for providing activation-tagged Arabidopsis seeds and Sunyoung Lee from the Rural Development Administration (RDA) for technical assistance. This work was supported by two grants (PJ007850 and PJ006775) from the RDA to Dr. Duk-Ju Hwang.

Supplementary material

11816_2013_308_MOESM1_ESM.jpg (154 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (JPEG 153 kb)


  1. Ahn JH, Kim J, Yoo SJ, Yoo SY, Roh H, Choi JH, Choi MS, Chung KS, Han EJ, Hong SM et al (2007) Isolation of 151 mutants that have developmental defects from T-DNA tagging. Plant Cell Physiol 48:169–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asselbergh B, Achuo AE, Höfte M, Van Gijsegem AF (2008) Abscisic acid deficiency leads to rapid activation of tomato defence responses upon infection with Erwinia chrysanthemi. Mol Plant Pathol 9:11–24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Balzergue S, Dubreucq B, Chauvin S, Le-Clainche I, Le Boulaire F, de Rose R, Samson F, Biaudet V, Lecharny A, Cruaud C et al (2001) Biotechniques 30:496–504PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barras F Van, Gijsegem F, Chatterjee AK (1994) Extracellular enzymes and pathogenesis of soft-rot Erwinia. Annu Rev Phytopathol 32:201–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bouley J, Condemine G, Shevchik VE (2001) The PDZ domain of OutC and the N-terminal region of Out D determine the secretion specificity of the type II Out pathway of Erwinia chrysanthemi. J Mol Biol 308:205–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen A, Gu M, Sun S, Zhu L, Hong S, Xu S (2011) Identification of two conserved cis-acting elements, MYCS and P1BS, involved in the regulation of mycorrhiza-activated phosphate transporters in eudicot species. New Phytol 189:1157–1169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Choi C, Kim MG, Ahn IP, Park SR, Bae SC, Hwang DJ (2010) Selection of a susceptible line (susceptible to Pectobacterium 1, Atstp1) to soft-rot disease in T-DNA insertion mutants pool of Arabidopsis. Res Plant Dis 16:312–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Devaiah BN, Karthikeyan AS, Raghothama KG (2007) WRKY75 transcription factor is a modulator of phosphate acquisition and root development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 143:1789–1801PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dong J, Chen C, Chen Z (2003) Expression profiles of the Arabidopsis WRKY gene superfamily during plant defense response. Plant Mol Biol 51:21–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Douet V, Loiseau L, Barras F, Py B (2004) Systematic analysis, by the yeast two-hybrid, of protein interaction between components of the type II secretory machinery of Erwinia chrysanthemi. Res Microbiol 155:71–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Encinas-Villarejo S, Maldonado AM, Amil-Ruiz F, de los Santos B, Romero F, Pliego-Alfaro R, Muñoz-Blanco J, Caballero JL (2009) Evidence for a positive regulatory role of strawberry (fragaria × ananassa) FaWRKY1 and Arabidopsis AtWRKY75 proteins in resistance. J Exp Bot 60:3043–3065PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eulgem T, Somssich IE (2007) Networks of WRKY transcription factors in defense signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10:366–371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fagard M, Dellagi A, Roux C, Périno C, Rigault M, Boucher V, Shevchik VE, Expert D (2007) Arabidopsis thaliana expresses multiple lines of defense to counterattack Erwinia chrysanthemi. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 20:794–805PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gadjev I, Vanderauwera S, Gechev TS, Laloi C, Minkov IN, Shulaev V, Apel K, Inzé D, Mittler R, Breusegem FV (2006) Transcriptomic footprints disclose specificity of reactive oxygen species signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 141:436–445PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glazebrook J (2004) Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 43:205–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hwang SH, Yie SW, Hwang DJ (2011) Heterologous expression of OsWRKY6 gene in Arabidopsis activates the expression of defense related genes and enhances resistance to pathogens. Plant Sci 181:316–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jing HC, Hebeler R, Oeljeklaus S, Sitek B, Stühler K, Meyer HE, Sturre MJG, Hille J, Warscheid B, Dijkwel PP (2008) Early leaf senescence is associated with an altered cellular redox balance in Arabidopsis cpr5/old1 mutants. Plant Biol 10:85–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kalde M, Barth M, Somssich IE, Lippok B (2003) Members of the Arabidopsis WRKY group III transcription factors are part of different plant defense signaling pathways. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 16:295–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kariola T, Palomäki TA, Brader G, Palva ET (2003) Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora and Erwinia-derived elicitors HrpN and PehA trigger distinct but interacting defense responses and cell death in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 16:179–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim SY, Park BS, Kwon SJ, Kim JS, Lim MH, Park YD, Kim DY, Suh SC, Jin YM, Ahn JH et al (2007) Delayed flowering time in Arabidopsis and Brassica rapa by the overexpression of FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) homologs isolated from Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinesis). Plant Cell Rep 26:327–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kraepiel Y, Pédron J, Patrit O, Simond-Côte E, Hermand V (2011) Analysis of the plant bos1 mutant highlights necrosis as an efficient defence mechanism during D. dadantii/Arabidopsis thaliana interaction. PLoS ONE 6:e18991PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee JH, Hong JB, Hong SB, Choi MS, Jeong KY, Park HJ, Hwang DJ, Lee S, Ra D, Heu S (2008) Disease-resistant transgenic Arabidopsis carrying the expI gene from Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum SL940. Plant Pathol J 24:183–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li Z, Peng J, Wen X, Guo H (2012) Gene network analysis and functional studies of senescence-associated genes reveal novel regulators of Arabidopsis leaf senescence. J Integr Plant Biol 54:526–539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lyon GD (1989) The biochemical basis of resistance of potatoes to soft rot. Erwinia spp.-a review. Plant Pathol 38:313–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maleck K, Levine A, Eulgem T, Morgan A, Schmid J, Lawton KA, Dangl JL, Dietrich RA (2000) The transcriptome of Arabidopsis thaliana during systemic acquired resistance. Nat Genet 26:403–410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Misson J, Raghothama KG, Jain A, Jouhet J, Block MA, Bligny R, Ortet P, Creff A, Somerville S, Rolland N et al (2005) A genome-wide transcriptional analysis using Arabidopsis thaliana Affymetrix gene chips determined plant responses to phosphate deprivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:11934–11939PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Norman-Setterblad C, Vidal S, Palva ET (2000) Interacting signal pathways control defense gene expression in Arabidopsis in response to cell wall-degrading enzymes from Erwinia carotovora Cecilia. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 13:430–438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Park YH, Choi C, Park EM, Kim HS, Park HJ, Bae SC, Ahn I, Kim MG, Park SR, Hwang DJ (2012) Over-expression of rice leucine-rich repeat protein results in activation of defense response, thereby enhancing resistance to bacterial soft rot in Chinese cabbage. Plant Cell Rep 26:1845–1850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Perombelon MCM (2002) Potato diseases caused by soft rot Erwinias: an overview of pathogenesis. Plant Pathol 51:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vidal S, Ponce de León I, Denecke J, Palva ET (1997) Salicylic acid and the plant pathogen Erwinia carotovora induce defense genes via antagonistic pathways. Plant J 1:115–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vidal S, Eriksson ARB, Montesano M, Denecke J, Palva ET (1998) Cell-wall degrading enzymes from Erwinia carotovora cooperate in the salicylic acid independent induction of a plant defense response. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 11:23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang H, Zhu Y, Fujioka S, Asami T, Li J, Li J (2009) Regulation of Arabidopsis brassinosteroid signaling by atypical basic helix-loop-helix proteins. Plant Cell 21:3781–3791PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Weigel D, Ahn JH, Blázquez MA, Borevitz JO, Christensen SK, Fankhauser C, Ferrándiz C, Kardailsky I, Malancharuvil EJ, Neff MM et al (2000) Activation tagging in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 122:1003–1013PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Plant Biotechnology and Springer Japan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Changhyun Choi
    • 1
  • Young Ho Park
    • 1
  • Soon Il Kwon
    • 1
    • 2
  • Chunghyo Yun
    • 1
  • Ilpyung Ahn
    • 1
  • Sang Ryeol Park
    • 1
  • Duk-Ju Hwang
    • 1
  1. 1.National Academy of Agricultural ScienceRural Development AdministrationSuwonKorea
  2. 2.Convergence Research Center for Functional Plant ProductsAdvanced Institutes of Convergence Technology (AICT)SuwonKorea

Personalised recommendations