Plant Biotechnology Reports

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 59–67 | Cite as

Expression of an Arabidopsis sodium/proton antiporter gene (AtNHX1) in peanut to improve salt tolerance

  • Manoj Banjara
  • Longfu Zhu
  • Guoxin Shen
  • Paxton Payton
  • Hong ZhangEmail author
Original Article


Salinity is a major environmental stress that affects agricultural productivity worldwide. One approach to improving salt tolerance in crops is through high expression of the Arabidopsis gene AtNHX1, which encodes a vacuolar sodium/proton antiporter that sequesters excess sodium ion into the large intracellular vacuole. Sequestering cytosolic sodium into the vacuoles of plant cells leads to a low level of sodium in cytosol, which minimizes the sodium toxicity and injury to important enzymes in cytosol. In the meantime, the accumulation of sodium in vacuoles restores the correct osmolarity to the intracellular milieu, which favors water uptake by plant root cells and improves water retention in tissues under soils that are high in salt. To improve the yield and quality of peanut under high salt conditions, AtNHX1 was introduced into peanut plants through Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. The AtNHX1-expressing peanut plants displayed increased tolerance of salt at levels up to 150 mM NaCl. When compared to wild-type plants, AtNHX1-expressing peanut plants suffered less damage, produced more biomass, contained more chlorophyll, and maintained higher photosynthetic rates under salt conditions. These data indicate that AtNHX1 can be used to enhance salt tolerance in peanut.


Salt tolerance Sodium/proton antiporter Photosynthesis Photosynthetic parameters 



We thank Natasja van Gestel for help with using the LI-COR instrument and Dr. Megha N. Parajulee for providing the chlorophyll meter. We thank Yinfeng Zhu, Sundaram Kappu, Rongbin Hu, Qiang Gu, Hua Qin, Jian Chen, and Xiaoyun Qiu for help and guidance with tissue culture, molecular analysis, and physiological and biochemical studies. This project was supported by grants from the Texas Peanut Producers Board and the National Peanut Board.


  1. Apse MP, Aharon GS, Snedden WA, Blumwald E (1999) Salt tolerance conferred by overexpression of a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiport in Arabidopsis. Science 285:1256–1258Google Scholar
  2. Blumwald E (2000) Salt transport and salt resistance in plants and other organisms. Curr Opin Cell Biol 12:431–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chinnusami V, Schumaker K, Zhu JK (2004) Molecular genetic perspectives on cross-talk and specificity in abiotic stress signaling in plants. J Exp Bot 55:225–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Duan XG, Song YJ, Yang AF, Zhang JR (2009) The transgenic pyramiding tobacco with betaine synthesis and heterologous expression of AtNHX1 is more tolerant to salt stress than either of the tobacco lines with betaine synthesis or AtNHX1. Physiol Plant 135:281–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Evans JR (1983) Nitrogen and photosynthesis in the flag leaf of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Physiol 72:297–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gaxiola RA, Li J, Undurraga S, Dang LM, Allen GJ, Alper SL, Fink GR (2001) Drought- and salt-tolerant plants result from overexpression of the AVP1 H+-pump. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:11444–11449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gaxiola RA, Fink GR, Hirschi KD (2002) Genetic manipulation of vacuolar proton pumps and transporters. Plant Physiol 129:967–973PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glenn EP, Brown JJ, Blumwald E (1999) Salt tolerance and crop potential of halophytes. Crit Rev Plant Sci 18:227–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. He C, Yan J, Shen G, Fu L, Holaday AS, Auld D, Blumwald E, Zhang H (2005) Expression of an Arabidopsis vacuolar sodium/proton antiportor gene in cotton improves photosynthetic performance under salt conditions and increases fiber yield in the field. Plant Cell Physiol 46:1848–1854Google Scholar
  10. He C, Shen G, Pasapula V, Venkataramani S, Qiu X, Kuppu S, Kornyeyev D, Holaday AS, Auld D, Blumwald E, Zhang H (2007) Ectopic expression of AtNHX1 in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) increases proline content and enhances photosynthesis under salt stress conditions. J Cotton Sci 11:266–274Google Scholar
  11. Leidi EO, Barragan V, Rubio L, El-Hamdaoui A, Ruiz MT, Cubero B, Fernandez JA, Bressan RA, Hasegawa PM, Quintero FJ, Pardo JM (2010) The AtNHX1 exchanger mediates potassium compartmentation in vacuoles of transgenic tomato. Plant J 61:495–506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li TX, Zhang Y, Liu H, Wu YT, Li WB, Zhang HX (2010) Stable expression of Arabidopsis vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter gene AtNHX1, and salt tolerance in transgenic soybean for over six generations. Chin Sci Bull 55:1127–1134Google Scholar
  13. Munns R, Tester M (2008) Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:645–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Parida AK, Das AB (2005) Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plant: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 60:324–349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pasapula V, Shen G, Kuppu S, Paez-Valencia J, Mendoza M, Hou P, Chen J, Qin X, Zhu L, Zhang X, Auld D, Blumwald E, Zhang H, Gaxiola R, Payton P (2011) Expression of an Arabidopsis vacuolar H+-pyrophosphatase gene (AVP1) in cotton improves drought- and salt tolerance and increases fiber yield in the field conditions. Plant Biotechnol J 9:88–99Google Scholar
  16. Rengasamy P (2002) Transient salinity and subsoil constraints to dry land farming on Australian sodic soils: an overview. Aust J Exp Agric 42:351–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rhoades JD, Loveday J (1990) Salinity in irrigated agriculture. In: Stewart BA, Nielsen DR (eds) Irrigation of agricultural crops (Agron Monogr 30). ASA/CSSA/SSSA, Madison, pp 1089–1142Google Scholar
  18. Rodríguez-Rosales MP, Gálvez FJ, Huertas R, Aranda MN, Baghour M, Cagnac O, Venema K (2009) Plant NHX cation/proton antiporters. Plant Signal Behav 4:265–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sharma KK, Anjaiah V (2000) An efficient method for the production of transgenic plants of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) through Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation. Plant Sci 159:7–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shi H, Quintero FJ, Pardo JM, Zhu JK (2002) The putative plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporters SOS1 controls long distance Na+ transporter in plants. Plant Cell 14:465–477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Szabolcs I (1989) Salt-affected soils. CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  22. Tian L, Huang C, Yu R, Liang R, Li Z, Zhang L, Wang Y, Zhang X, Wu Z (2006) Overexpression of AtNHX1 confers salt-tolerance of transgenic tall fescue. Afr J Biotechnol 5:1041–1044Google Scholar
  23. van Gestel NC, Nesbit AD, Gordon EP, Green C, Pare PW, Thompson L, Peffley EB, Tissue DT (2005) Continuous light may induce photosynthetic down-regulation in onion—consequences for growth and biomass partitioning. Physiol Plant 125:235–246Google Scholar
  24. Wang W, Vinocur B, Altman A (2003) Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta 218:1–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Xu K, Hong P, Luo L, Xia T (2009) Overexpression of AtNHX1, a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter from Arabidopsis thaliana, in Petunia hybrid enhances salt and drought tolerance. J Plant Biol 52:453–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhang HX, Blumwald E (2001) Transgenic salt-tolerant tomato plants accumulate salt in foliage but not in fruit. Nat Biotechnol 19:765–768PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang HX, Hodson JN, Williams JP, Blumwald E (2001) Engineering salt-tolerant Brassica plants: characterization of yield and seed oil quality in transgenic plants with increased vacuolar sodium accumulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:12832–12836Google Scholar
  28. Zhu JK (2003) Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6:441–445PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Plant Biotechnology and Springer 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manoj Banjara
    • 1
  • Longfu Zhu
    • 2
  • Guoxin Shen
    • 3
  • Paxton Payton
    • 4
  • Hong Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA
  2. 2.College of Plant Science and TechnologyHuazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanChina
  3. 3.Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural SciencesHangzhouChina
  4. 4.USDA-ARS Cropping Systems Research LaboratoryLubbockUSA

Personalised recommendations