CO2 absorption characteristics of a piperazine derivative with primary, secondary, and tertiary amino groups
- 158 Downloads
- 9 Citations
Abstract
Thermodynamic and kinetic data are important for designing a CO2 absorption process using aqueous amine solutions. A piperazine derivative, 1-(2-aminoethyl)piperazine (AEP), was blended with aqueous amine solutions due to its thermal degradation stability, high CO2 loading (mole of CO2-absorbed per mole of amine) and high solubility in water. In this study, the vapor liquid equilibrium (VLE), absorption rate, and species distribution of aqueous AEP solutions were studied to develop an optimum amine solution in a post-combustion capture process. The VLE and apparent absorption rate of the aqueous 30wt% AEP solution were measured using a batch-type reactor at 313.15, 333.15, and 353.15 K. The AEP exhibited approximately twice higher CO2 loading compared with monoethanolamine (MEA) at all temperatures. The apparent AEP absorption rate (k app =0.1 min−1) was similar to that of diethanolamine (DEA) at 333.15 K. Speciation of the CO2-absorbed AEP was analyzed using 13C NMR. Although AEP featured a primary amino group and secondary amino group, it did not form bicarbamate upon reaction with CO2 based on analysis results. AEP-1-carbamate was primarily formed by reactions between AEP and CO2 during the initial reaction. Bicarbonate species formed as the quantity of absorbed CO2 increased.
Keywords
Carbon Dioxide CO2 Absorption Piperazine Derivatives Vapor Liquid Equilibrium CO2 Apparent Absorption RatePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.A. Albo, P. Luis and A. Irabin, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 49, 11045 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.G. Marland, T. A. Boden and R. J. Andres, Global, regional, and national CO2 emissions, Trends: A compendium of data on global change, Statistical Review of World Energy (2010).Google Scholar
- 3.R. Allam and O. Bolland, IPCC special report: Carbon dioxide capture and storage, IPCC Working Group III (2005).Google Scholar
- 4.R. Thiruvenkatachari, S. Su, H. An and X. X. Yu, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 35, 438 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.A. J. Applehy and F. R. Foulkes, Fuel Cell Handbook, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1989).Google Scholar
- 6.C. Han, K. Graves, J. Neathery and K. Liu, Energy Environ. Res., 1, 67 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Y. E. Kim, J. H. Choi, S. C. Nam and Y. I. Yoon, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 50, 9306 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.J. Davison, Energy, 32, 1163 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.F. Closmann, T. Nguyen and G. T. Rochelle, Energy Procedia., 1, 1351 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.D. Singh, E. Croiset, P. L. Douglas and M. A. Douglas, Energy Convers. Manage., 44, 3073 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.R. Davy, Energy Procedia, 1, 885 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.M. H. Li and K. P. Shen, Fluid Phase Equilib., 85, 129 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.M. D. Cheng, A. R. Caparanga, A. N. Soriano and M. H. Li, J. Chem. Thermodyn., 742, 342 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.F. Y. Jou, A. E. Mather and F. D. Otto, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 73, 140 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.A. Veawab, P. Tontiwachwuthikul and A. Chakma, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 38, 3917 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.A. Veawab, P. Toniwachwuthikul and S. D. Bhole, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1, 36 (1997).Google Scholar
- 17.P. Singh, D. W. F. Brilman and M. J. Groeneveld, Energy Procedia, 1, 1257 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Y. Du, L. Li, O. Namjoshi, A. K. Voice, N. a. Fine and G. T. Rochelle, Energy Procedia., 37, 1621 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Y. Du and G. T. Rochelle, Energy Procedia, 63, 997 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.R. Zhang, E. P. Bonnin-Nartker, G. A. Farthing, L. Ji, M. G. Klidas, M. E. Nelson and L. M. Rimpf, Energy Procedia., 4, 1660 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Y. Zhang, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 50, 163 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.P. Jackson, K. J. Fisher and M. I. Attalla, Am. Soc. Mass. Spectrom., 22, 1420 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.M. S. Islam, R. Yusoff and B. S. Ali, Engineering e-Transaction., 2, 97 (2010).Google Scholar
- 24.M. Caplow, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 90, 6795 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.P. V. Danckwerts, Chem. Eng. Sci., 34, 443 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.H.-B. Xie, Y. Zhou, Y. Zhang and J. K. Johnson, J. Phys. Chem. A., 114, 11844 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.F. Barzagli, F. Mani and M. Peruzzini, Energy Environ. Sci., 2, 322 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.A. K. Chakraborty, K. B. Bischoff, G. Astarita and J. R. Damewood, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110, 6947 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.D. Prakash, E. Vaidya and Y. Kenig, Chem. Eng. Technol., 30, 1467 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.F. Barzagli, F. Mani and M. Peruzzini, Inter. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 5, 448 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.C. Perinu, B. Arstad and K.-J. Jens, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 20, 230 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.J. H. Choi, S. G. Oh, Y. E. Kim, Y. I. Yoon and S. C. Nam, Environ. Eng. Sci., 29, 328 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.I. H. Um, M. J. Kim, J. S. Min and D. S. Kwon, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 15, 523 (1997).Google Scholar
- 34.J. H. Choi, S. G. Oh, Y. I. Yoon, S. K. Jeong, K. R. Jang and S. C. Nam, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 18, 568 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.A. F. Ciftja, A. H. Hartono and H. F. Svendsen, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 16, 224 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar