Direct synthesis of dimethyl carbonate from methanol and carbon dioxide over transition metal oxide/Ce0.6Zr0.4O2 catalysts: Effect of acidity and basicity of the catalysts
- 562 Downloads
- 16 Citations
Abstract
Ce X Zr1−X O2 catalysts with different cerium content (X) (X=0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0) were prepared by a sol-gel method. Among these catalysts, Ce0.6Zr0.4O2 showed the best catalytic performance in the direct synthesis of dimethyl carbonate from methanol and carbon dioxide. To see the effect of acidity and basicity of transition metal oxide/Ce0.6Zr0.4O2 catalysts on the catalytic performance in the direct synthesis of dimethyl carbonate, MO/Ce0.6Zr0.4O2 (MO=Ga2O3, La2O3, Ni2O3, Fe2O3, Y2O3, Co3O4, and Al2O3) catalysts were prepared by an incipient wetness impregnation method. NH3-TPD and CO2-TPD experiments were carried out to measure acidity and basicity of the supported catalysts, respectively. Experimental results revealed that both acidity and basicity of the catalysts played a key role in determining the catalytic performance in the direct synthesis of dimethyl carbonate from methanol and carbon dioxide. The amount of dimethyl carbonate produced over MO/Ce0.6Zr0.4O2 catalysts increased with increasing both acidity and basicity of the catalysts. Among the catalysts tested, Ga2O3/Ce0.6Zr0.4O2, which had the largest acidity and basicity, exhibited the best catalytic performance in the direct synthesis of dimethyl carbonate from methanol and carbon dioxide.
Key words
Dimethyl Carbonate Methanol Carbon Dioxide Acid-base Property Ceria-zirconia Supported Transition Metal OxidePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.N. Keller, G. Rebmann and V. Keller, J. Mol. Catal. A, 317, 1 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.D. Delledonne, F. Rivetti and U. Romano, Appl. Catal. A, 221, 241 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.H. Babad and A. G. Zeiler, Chem. Rev., 73, 75 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.S. T. King, Catal. Today, 33, 173 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.T. Matsuzaki and A. Nakamura, Catal. Surv. Jpn., 1, 77 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.H.-Y. Ju, M. D. Manju, K.-H. Kim, S.-W. Park and D.-W. Park, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24, 917 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.K.-H. Kim, D.-W. Kim, C.-W. Kim, J.-C. Koh and D.-W. Park, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 27, 1441 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.J. Zhang, F. Wang, W. Wei, F. Xiao and Y. Sun, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 27, 1744 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.K. Tomishige, Y. Ikeda, T. Sakaihiro and K. Fujimoto, J. Catal., 192, 355 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.J. Kizlink, Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun., 58, 1399 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.T. Sakakura, J.-C. Choi, Y. Saito and T. Sako, Polyhedron, 19, 573 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.J. Kizlink and I. Pastucha, Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun., 60, 687 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.S. Fang and K. Fujimoto, Appl. Catal. A, 142, L1 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.T. Zhao, Y. Han and Y. Sum, Fuel Process Technol., 62, 187 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.K. Tomishige, Y. Furusawa, Y. Ikeda, M. Asdullah and K. Fujimoto, Catal. Lett., 76, 71 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.K. Tomishige and K. Kunimori, Appl. Catal. A, 237, 103 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.C. Jiang, Y. Guo, C. Wang, C. Hu, Y. Wu and E. Wang, Appl. Catal. A, 256, 203 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.K.W. La, M. H. Youn, J. S. Chung, S.-H. Baeck and I. K. Song, Solid State Phenom., 119, 287 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.H. J. Lee, S. Park, J.C. Jung and I. K. Song, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 28, 1518 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.A. L. Petre, A. Auroux, M. Caldararu and N. I. Ionescu, Thernochim. Acta, 79, 117 (2001).Google Scholar
- 21.J. Halasz, Z. Konya, A. Fudala, A. Beres and I. Kiricsi, Catal. Today, 31, 293 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Y. Li, D. He, Y. Yuan, Z. Cheng and Q. Zhu, Fuel, 81, 1611 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.H. Sun, Y. Ding, J. Duan, Q. Zhang, Z. Wang, H. Lou and X. Zheng, Bioresour. Technol., 101, 953 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.J.G. Seo, M.H. Youn, K.M. Cho, S. Park, S.H. Lee, J. Lee and I.K. Song, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 25, 41 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.H. Lee, S. Park, I. K. Song and J. C. Jung, Catal. Lett., 141, 531 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.G.R. Rao and T. Rajkumar, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 324, 134 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.P. Pantu, K. Kim and G. R. Gavalas, Appl. Catal. A, 193, 203 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.S. R. Dhage, S. P. Gaikwad and P. Muthukumar, Mater. Lett., 58, 2704 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.G. Postole, B. Chowdhury, B. Karmakar, K. Pinki, J. Banerji and A. Auroux, J. Catal., 269, 110 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.K.-I. Shimizu, A. Satsuma and T. Hattori, Appl. Catal. B, 16, 377 (1998).Google Scholar
- 31.A. L. Petre, J. A. Perdigon-Melon, A. Gervasini and A. Auroux, Catal. Today, 78, 377 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.S.-J. Huang, A.B. Walters and M. A. Vannice, Appl. Catal. B, 26, 101 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.V. M. Bogatyrev, V. M. Gun’ko, M.V. Galaburda, M.V. Borysenko, V. A. Pokrovskiy, O. I. Oranska, E.V. Polshin, O. M. Korduban, R. Leboda and J. Skubiszewska-Zieba, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 338, 376 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Y. Ikeda, M. Asadullah, K. Fujimoto and K. Tonishige, J. Phys. Chem. B, 105, 10653 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.K. Almusaiteer, Catal. Commun., 10, 1127 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar