Electrochemical characteristics of amophous carbon coated silicon electrodes
- 93 Downloads
- 3 Citations
Abstract
The properties of carbon films deposited by the radio frequency plasma sputtering of a fullerene C60 target were investigated to elucidate the dependence on the plasma power. A radio frequency argon plasma power ranging from 50 to 300W at a pressure of 1.3 Pa was applied for sputtering. This corresponds to a self-bias potential on the target ranging from −95 to −250 V and a maximum argon ion energy ranging from 240 to 575 eV. The analysis of the G and D peaks in the Raman spectra shows that the films are similar to tetragonal hydrogenated amorphous carbon annealed at 600–1,000 °C. The electron band structure of the carbon films deposited by the sputtering of C60 depends on the plasma power. The coating effect of these carbon films on the capacity performance of the silicon film electrode of lithium secondary batteries was significant in our experimental range. An electrochemical test revealed that such carbon thin film on the silicon electrode plays an important role in mitigating the capacity fading during the charge and discharge processes. The test revealed that the film formed at a plasma power of 300 W is the most effective.
Key words
Fullerene C60 Carbon Film r.f. Plasma Sputtering UV-Vis Spectra Raman Spectra Anode of Lithium Secondary BatteriesPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Y. Ohzawa, Y. Yamanaka, K. Naga and T. Nakajima, J. Power Sources, 146, 125 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.H.-T. Shim, D. Byun and J. K. Lee, Prepr. Pap.-Am. Chem. Soc. Div. Fuel Chem., 51, 195 (2006).Google Scholar
- 3.T. Zheng and J. R. Dahn, J. Power Sources, 68, 201 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.V. E. Pukha, A. N. Stetsenko, S. N. Dub and J. K. Lee, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 7, 1370 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.D. H. Lowndes, D. B. Geohegan, A. A. Puretzky, D. P. Norton and C. M. Rouleau, Science, 273, 898 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.V. A. Dudkin, V. E. Pukha, A. S. Vus, A. N. Stetsenko, B. A. Savitsky and O. M. Vovk, Vacuum, 68, 251 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.K. Miyauchi, T. Kitagawa, N. Toyoda, S. Matsui, K. Mochiji, T. Mitamura and I. Yamada, Nuclear Instru. Methods in Phys. Res. B, 206, 893 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.H. Huck, E. B. Halac, M. Reinoso, A. G. Dall’Asén, A. Somoza and W. Deng, Appl. Surf. Sci., 211, 379 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.E. B. Maiken and P. Taborek, J. Appl. Phys., 87, 423 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.D. L. Baptista and F. C. Zawislak, Diamond & Related Materials, 13, 1791 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.J.O. Song, H.-T. Shim, D. Byun and J. K. Lee, J. Solid State Phenomena, 124–126, 1063 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.I. P. Soshnikov, A.V. Lunev, M. E. Gaevski, L.G. Rotkina and V. T. Barchenko, Tech. Phys., 45, 766 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.J. C. Tauc. Optical properties of solids, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1972).Google Scholar
- 14.A. C. Ferrari, J. Robertson, Phys. Rev. B, 61, 14095 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.A. C. Ferrari, J. Robertson, Phys. Rev. B, 64, 75414 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar