Advertisement

Review of Condition-Based Maintenance Strategies for Offshore Wind Energy

  • Jichuan Kang
  • Jose Sobral
  • C. Guedes SoaresEmail author
Research Article
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

The existing maintenance strategies of offshore wind energy are reviewed including the specific aspects of condition-based maintenance, focusing on three primary phases, namely, condition monitoring, fault diagnosis and prognosis, and maintenance optimization. Relevant academic research and industrial applications are identified and summarized. The state of art, capabilities, and constraints of condition-based maintenance are analyzed. The presented research demonstrates that the intelligent-based approach has become a promising solution for condition recognition, and an integrated data platform for offshore wind farms is significant to optimize the maintenance activities.

Keywords

Condition-based maintenance Offshore wind energy Fault diagnosis Fault prognosis Maintenance optimization 

Notes

Funding Information

This study was performed within the project ARCWIND—adaptation and implementation of floating wind energy conversion technology for the Atlantic region—which is co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund through the Interreg Atlantic Area Program under contract EAPA 344/2016.

References

  1. Abdollahzadeh H, Atashgar K, Abbasi M (2016) Multi-objective opportunistic maintenance optimization of a wind farm considering limited number of maintenance groups. Renew Energy 88:247–261.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.11.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alaswad S, Xiang Y (2017) A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 157:54–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.08.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrawus JA, Watson J, Kishk M (2007a) Modelling system failures to optimise wind turbine maintenance. Wind Energy 31(6):503–522.  https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1851 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrawus JA, Watson J, Kishk M (2007b) Wind turbine maintenance optimisation: principles of quantitative maintenance optimisation. Wind Energy 31(2):101–110.  https://doi.org/10.1260/030952407781494467 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrawus JA, Watson J, Kishk M, Gordon H (2008) Optimisation of wind turbine inspection intervals. Wind Energy 32(5):477–490.  https://doi.org/10.1260/030952408786411921 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andrawus JA, Watson J, Kishk M, Adam A (2009) The selection of suitable maintenance strategy for wind turbines. Wind Energy 30(6):471–486.  https://doi.org/10.1260/030952406779994141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Azevedo HDM, Araújo AM, Bouchonneau N (2016) A review of wind turbine bearing condition monitoring: state of the art and challenges. Renew Sust Energ Rev 56:368–379.  https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1508 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baagøe-Engels V, Stentoft J (2016) Operations and maintenance issues in the offshore wind energy sector: an explorative study. Int J Energy Sect Manage 10(2):245–265.  https://doi.org/10.1108/ijesm-04-2015-0012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bagbanci H; Karmakar D, Guedes Soares C (2012) Review of offshore floating wind turbines concepts. In: Guedes Soares C, Garbatov Y, Sutulo S, Santos TA, (eds) Maritime engineering and technology. pp 553–562.  https://doi.org/10.1002/we.442
  10. Bangalore P, Patriksson M (2018) Analysis of SCADA data for early fault detection, with application to the maintenance management of wind turbines. Renew Energy 115:521–532.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.08.073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bennouna O, Héraud N, Camblong H, Rodriguez M, Kahyehl MA (2009) Diagnosis and fault signature analysis of a wind turbine at a variable speed. J Risk Reliab 223(1):41–50.  https://doi.org/10.1243/1748006xjrr199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Besnard F, Bertling L (2010) An approach for condition-based maintenance optimization applied to wind turbine blades. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 1(2):77–83.  https://doi.org/10.1109/tste.2010.2049452 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Besnard F, Fischer K, Tjernberg LB (2013) A model for the optimization of the maintenance support organization for offshore wind farms. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 4(2):443–450.  https://doi.org/10.1109/tste.2012.2225454 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Byon E, Ding Y (2010) Season-dependent condition-based maintenance for a wind turbine using a partially observed Markov decision process. IEEE Trans Power Syst 25(4):1823–1834.  https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2010.2043269 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Byon E, Pérez E, Ding Y, Ntaimo L (2011) Simulation of wind farm operations and maintenance using discrete event system specification. Simulation 87(12):1093–1117.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549711376841 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carroll J, McDonald A, McMillan D (2016) Failure rate, repair time and unscheduled O&M cost analysis of offshore wind turbines. Wind Energy 19(6):1107–1119.  https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1887 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chang PC, Flatau A, Lui SC (2003) Review paper: health monitoring of civil infrastructure. Struct Health Monit 341–358.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921703036169
  18. Ciang CC, Lee JR, Bang HJ (2008) Structural health monitoring for a wind turbine system: a review of damage detection methods. Meas Sci Technol 19:1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/19/12/122001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Costa AM, Fraguela F, Orosa JA, Perez JA (2015) A new procedure for wind energy systems maintenance design. J Renew Sustain Energy 7:043129.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4928872 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crabtree C, Zappala D, Tavner P (2014) Survey of commercially available condition monitoring systems for wind turbines [technical report]. Durham University School of Engineering and Computing Sciences and the SUPERGEN Wind Energy Technologies ConsortiumGoogle Scholar
  21. Dai L, Stålhane M, Utne I (2015) Routing and scheduling of maintenance fleet for offshore wind farms. Wind Energy 39(1):15–30.  https://doi.org/10.1260/0309-524x.39.1.15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dalgic Y, Lazakis I, Dinwoodie I, McMillan D, Revie M (2015) Advanced logistics planning for offshore wind farm operation and maintenance activities. Ocean Eng 101:211–226.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Deng MN, Yu YH, Chen L, Zhao HS (2012) Optimal maintenance interval for wind turbine gearbox. Appl Mech Mater 130–134.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.130-134.112
  24. Devriendt C, Magalhães F, Weijtjens W, De Sitter G, Cunha Á, Guillaume P (2014) Structural health monitoring of offshore wind turbines using automated operational modal analysis. Struct Health Monit 13(6):644–659.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921714556568 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ding F, Tian Z (2011) Opportunistic maintenance optimization for wind turbine systems considering imperfect maintenance actions. Int J Reliab Qual Saf Eng 18(5):463–482.  https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218539311004196 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ding F, Tian Z (2012) Opportunistic maintenance for wind farms considering multi-level imperfect maintenance thresholds. Renew Energy 45:175–182.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.02.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dinwoodie I, McMillan D, Revie M, Lazakis I, Dalgic Y (2013) Development of a combined operational and strategic decision support model for offshore wind. Energy Procedia 35:157–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.07.169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dinwoodie I, Endrerud OE, Hofmann M, Martin R, Sperstad I (2015) Reference cases for verification of operation and maintenance simulation models for offshore wind farms. Wind Eng 39(1):1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1260/0309-524x.39.1.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Djeziri MA, Benmoussa S, Sanchez R (2018) Hybrid method for remaining useful life prediction in wind turbine systems. Renew Energy 116:173–187.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.05.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Do P, Canh H, Barros A, Bérenguer C (2015) Maintenance grouping for multi-component systems with availability constraints and limited maintenance teams. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 142:56–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.04.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Erguido A, Marquez AC, Castellano E, Fernandez JFG (2017) A dynamic opportunistic maintenance model to maximize energy-based availability while reducing the life cycle cost of wind farms. Renew Energy 114:843–856.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.07.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fiber Optic Sensors (2018) Available from: http://www.scaime.com/en/117/products-services/fiber-optic-sensors.html. Accessed 14.05.18
  33. Florian M, Sørensen JD (2015) Planning of operation & maintenance using risk and reliability based methods. Energy Procedia 80:357–364.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.440 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fugate ML, Sohn H, Farrar CR (2001) Vibration-based damage detection using statistical process control. Mech Syst Signal Process 15:707–721.  https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.2000.1323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ghamlouch H, Fouladirad M, Grall A (2017) The use of real option in condition-based maintenance scheduling for wind turbines with production and deterioration uncertainties. Reliab Eng Syst Saf.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.10.001
  36. Gintautas T, Sørensen JD, Vatne SR (2016) Towards a risk-based decision support for offshore wind turbine installation and operation & maintenance. Energy Procedia 94:207–217.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.225 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC) (2015) Global wind report e annual market update 2014, MarchGoogle Scholar
  38. Guasp MR, Llinares JP, Alarcon VC, Santos FV, Sánchez MP, Daviu JA, Panadero RP, Cruz JP, Folch JR (2013) Diagnosis of induction machines under non-stationary conditions: concepts and tools. In: Proceedings of 2013 IEEE Workshop on Electrical Machines Design Control and Diagnosis (WEMDCD). pp 220–231.  https://doi.org/10.1109/wemdcd.2013.6525182
  39. Guedes Soares C, Bhattacharjee J, Karmakar D (2014) Overview and prospects for development of wave and offshore wind energy. Brodogradnja 65(2):87–109Google Scholar
  40. Haddad G, Sandborn PA, Pecht MG (2014) Using maintenance options to maximize the benefits of prognostics for wind farms. Wind Energy 17(5):775–791.  https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1610 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hagen B, Simonsen I, Hofmann M, Muskulus M (2013) A multivariate Markov weather model for O&M simulation of offshore wind parks. Energy Procedia 35:137–147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.07.167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Henao H, Capolino GA, Fernandez-Cabanas M, Filippetti F, Bruzzese C, Strangas E (2014) Trends in fault diagnosis for electrical machines: a review of diagnostic techniques. IEEE Ind Electron Mag 8(2):31–42.  https://doi.org/10.1109/mie.2013.2287651 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Herbert GMJ, Iniyan S, Goic R (2010) Performance, reliability and failure analysis of wind farm in a developing country. Renew Energy 35(12):2739–2751.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.04.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hoang A, Do P, Iung B (2016) Investigation on the use of energy efficiency for condition-based maintenance decision-making. IFAC-Papers Online 49-28:73–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.11.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hyers RW, Mcgowan JG, Sullivan KL, Manwell JF, Syrett BC (2006) Condition monitoring and prognosis of utility scale wind turbines. Mater Sci Eng Energy Syst 1:187–203.  https://doi.org/10.1179/174892406x163397 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Igba J, Alemzadeh K, Anyanwu-Ebo I, Gibbons P, Friis J (2013) A systems approach towards reliability-centred maintenance (RCM) of wind turbines. Procedia Comput Sci 16:814–823.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.01.085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Igba J, Alemzadeh K, Henningsen K, Durugbo C (2014) Effect of preventive maintenance intervals on reliability and maintenance costs of wind turbine gearboxes. Wind Energy 18:2013–2024.  https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1801 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jardine AKS, Lin D, Banjevic D (2006) A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mech Syst Signal Process 20:1483–1510.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.09.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jonge B, Teunter R, Tinga T (2017) The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 158:21–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Joshuva A, Sugumaran V (2017) A data driven approach for condition monitoring of wind turbine blade using vibration signals through best-first. ISA Trans 67:160–172.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2017.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kahrobaee S, Asgarpoor S (2013) A hybrid analytical-simulation approach for maintenance optimization of deteriorating equipment: case study of wind turbines. Electr Power Syst Res 104:80–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2013.06.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kaminski PC (1995) The approximate location of damage though the analysis of natural frequencies with artificial neural networks. J Process Mech Eng 209:117–125.  https://doi.org/10.1243/pime_proc_1995_209_238_02 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kang J, Sun L, Guedes Soares C (2016) Fault tree analysis of the failure of floating offshore wind turbines support structures and blade systems. In: Soares G (ed) Progress in renewable energies offshore. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 741–749.  https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315229256-87 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kang J, Li M, Sun L, Wang M (2017a) Preventative maintenance optimization for offshore wind turbine gearbox. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-seventh International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference. pp 626-630Google Scholar
  55. Kang J, Sun L, Sun H, Wu C (2017b) Risk assessment of floating offshore wind turbine based on correlation-FMEA. Ocean Eng 129:382–388.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.11.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Keizer MO, Flapper SD, Teunter R (2017) Condition-based maintenance policies for systems with multiple dependent components: a review. Eur J Oper Res 261:405–420.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.02.044 MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kirkegaard PH (1993) The use of neural networks for damage detection and location in a steel member. In: Third International Conference on the Application of Artificial Intelligence of Civil and Structural Engineering, Edingburgh, Scotland.  https://doi.org/10.4203/ccp.16.1.1
  58. Kragh KA, Hansen MH, Mikkelsen T (2011) Improving yaw alignment using spinner based lidar. In: 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Orlando, Florida.  https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-264
  59. Kühn M, Bierbooms WAAM, Van Bussel GJW, Cockerill TT, Harrison R, Ferguson MC (1999) Towards a mature offshore wind energy technology —guidelines from the opti-OWECS project. Wind Energy 2(1):25–58.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1824(199901/03)2:1<25::aid-we17>3.0.co;2-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kumar S, Goyal D, Dang R, Dhamib S, Pabla BS (2018) Condition based maintenance of bearings and gears for fault detection – a review. Mater Today: Proceed 5:6128–6137.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.12.219 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lau BCP, Ma EWM, Pecht M (2012) Review of offshore wind turbine failures and fault prognostic methods. In: IEEE Prognostics & System Health Management Conference. Beijing.  https://doi.org/10.1109/phm.2012.6228954
  62. Le B, Andrews J (2016) Modelling wind turbine degradation and maintenance. Wind Energy 19(4):571–591.  https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1851 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lee K, Aihara A, Puntsagdash G, Kawaguchi T, Sakamoto H, Okuma M (2017) Feasibility study on a strain based deflection monitoring system for wind turbine blades. Mech Syst Signal Process 82:117–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.05.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Leigh JM, Dunnett SJ (2016) Use of Petri nets to model the maintenance of wind turbines. Qual Reliab Eng Int 32(1):167–180.  https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1737 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Leite GNP, Araújo AM, Rosas PAC (2018) Prognostic techniques applied to maintenance of wind turbines: a concise and specific review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81(2):1917–1925.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Li H, Deloux E, Dieulle L (2016) A condition-based maintenance policy for multi-component systems with Lévy copulas dependence. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 149:44–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.12.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lindroth S, Leijon M (2011) Offshore wave power measurements – a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15(9):4274–4285.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Liu WY, Tang BP, Han JG, Lu XN, Hu NN, He ZZ (2015) The structure healthy condition monitoring and fault diagnosis methods in wind turbines: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 44:466–472.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Liu B, Liang Z, Parlikad AK, Xie M, Kuo W (2017a) Condition-based maintenance for systems with aging and cumulative damage based on proportional hazards model. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 168:200–209.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.04.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Liu B, Wu S, Xie M, Kuo W (2017b) A condition-based maintenance policy for degrading systems with age- and state-dependent operating cost. Eur J Oper Res 263:879–887.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.05.006 MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Liu K, Yan RJ, Guedes Soares C (2018a) An improved model updating technique based on modal data. Ocean Eng 154:277–287.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.02.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Liu K, Yan RJ, Guedes Soares C (2018b) Optimal sensor placement and assessment for modal identification. Ocean Eng 165:209–220.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.07.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Liu K, Yan RJ, Guedes Soares C (2018c) Damage identification in offshore jacket structures based on modal flexibility. Ocean Eng 170:171–185.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.10.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. López-Higuera JM, Cobo LR, Incera AQ, Cobo A (2011) Fiber optic sensors in structural health monitoring. J Lightwave Technol 29(4):587–608.  https://doi.org/10.1364/OFC.2010.OWL4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Lou J, Namburu M, Pattipati K (2003) Model-based prognostic techniques. In: Proceedings AUTOTESTCON. IEEE Systems Readiness Technology Conference. Anaheim.  https://doi.org/10.1109/autest.2003.1243596
  76. Lu Y, Sun L, Kang J, Sun H, Zhang X (2017) Opportunistic maintenance optimization for offshore wind turbine electrical and electronic system based on rolling horizon approach. J Renew Sustain Energy 9:033307.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4989640 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Lu Y, Sun L, Zhang X, Feng F, Kang J, Fu G (2018) Condition based maintenance optimization for offshore wind turbine considering opportunities based on neural network approach. Appl Ocean Res 74:69–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2018.02.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Mares C, Surace C (1996) An application of genetic algorithms to identify damage in elastic structures. J Sound Vib 195(2):195–215.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1996.0416 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Márquez FPG, Tobias AM, Pérez JMP, Mayorkinos P (2012) Condition monitoring of wind turbines: techniques and methods. Renew Energy 46:169–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Martinez-Luengo M, Kolios A, Wang L (2016) Structural health monitoring of offshore wind turbines: a review through the statistical pattern recognition paradigm. Renew Sust Energ Rev 64:91–105.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Martins D, Muraleedharan G, Guedes Soares C (2015) Weather window analysis of a site off Portugal. In: Soares G, Santos (eds) Maritime technology and engineering. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 1329–1337.  https://doi.org/10.1201/b17494-179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. May A, McMillan D, Thöns S (2014) Economic analysis of condition monitoring systems for offshore wind turbine sub-systems. IET Renew Power Gener 9(8):900–907.  https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2015.0019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Mérigaud A, Ringwood JV (2016) Condition-based maintenance methods for marine renewable energy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 66:53–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.07.071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Morthorst PE, Kitzing L (2016) Economics of building and operating offshore wind farms. Offshore Wind Farms - Technologies, Design and Operation, pp 9–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100779-2.00002-7
  85. Munoz CQG, Jimenez AA, Marquez FPG (2018) Wavelet transforms and pattern recognition on ultrasonic guides waves for frozen surface state diagnosis. Renew Energy 116:42–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Murata T (1989) Petri nets: properties, analysis and applications. Proceed IEEE 77(4):541–580.  https://doi.org/10.1109/5.24143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Nejad AR, Gao Z, Moan T (2014) Fatigue reliability-based inspection and maintenance planning of gearbox components in wind turbine drivetrains. Energy Procedia 53:248–257.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.234 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Netland O, Sperstad IB, Hofmann M, Skavhaug A (2014) Cost-benefit evaluation of remote inspection of offshore wind farms by simulating the operation and maintenance phase. Energy Procedia 53(C):239–247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.233 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Ng C, Ran L (2016) Introduction to offshore wind energy. Offshore Wind Farms - Technologies, Design and Operation, pp 3–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-100779-2.00001-5
  90. Nie M, Wang L (2013) Review of condition monitoring and fault diagnosis technologies for wind turbine gearbox. Proceed Procedia 11:87–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.07.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Nielsen JS, Sørensen JD (2014) Methods for risk-based planning of O&M of wind turbines. Energies 7(10):6645–6664.  https://doi.org/10.3390/en7106645 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Nielsen JS, Van de Pieterman RP, Sørensen JD (2014) Analysis of pitch system data for condition monitoring. Wind Energy 17:435–449.  https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1586 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. O’Connor M, Lewis T, Dalton G (2013) Weather window analysis of Irish west coast wave data with relevance to operations and maintenance of marine renewables. Renew Energy 52:57–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.10.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Ogidi OO, Barendse PS, Khan MA (2016) Fault diagnosis and condition monitoring of axial-flux permanent magnet wind generators. Electr Power Syst Res 136:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2016.01.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Ossai CI, Boswell B, Davies IJ (2016) A Markovian approach for modelling the effects of maintenance on downtime and failure risk of wind turbine components. Renew Energy 96:775–783.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.05.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Papasalouros D, Tsopelas N, Anastasopoulos A, Kourousis D, Lekou DJ, Mouzakis F (2013) Acoustic emission monitoring of composite blade of NM48/750 NEG-MICON wind turbine. J Acoust Emission 31(1):36–49Google Scholar
  97. Pattison D, Segovia Garcia M, Xie W, Quail F, Revie M, Whitfield R I, Irvine I (2016) Intelligent integrated maintenance for wind power generation. Wind Energy 19(3): 547–562.  https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1850
  98. Pérez E, Ntaimo L, Ding Y (2015) Multi-component wind turbine modeling and simulation for wind farm operations and maintenance. Simulation 91(4):360–382.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549715572490 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Ramírez JGR, Sørensen JD (2012) Risk-based inspection planning optimisation of offshore wind turbines. Struct Infrastruct Eng 8(5):473–481.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2010.539064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Rasmekomen N, Parlikad AK (2016) Condition-based maintenance of multi-component systems with degradation state-rate interactions. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 148:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Réthoré PE, Fuglsang P, Larsen GC, Buhl T, Larsen TJ, Madsen HA (2014) TopFarm: multi-fidelity optimization of offshore wind farm. Wind Energy 17:1797–1816.  https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1667 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Rumsey MA, Paquette J, White JR, Werlink RJ, Beattie AG, Pitchford CW (2008) Experimental results of structural health monitoring of wind turbine blades. In: 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston, Virginia.  https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2008-1348
  103. Salameh JP, Cauet S, Etien E, Sakout A, Rambault L (2018) Gearbox condition monitoring in wind turbines: a review. Mech Syst Signal Process 11:251–264.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.03.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Salvação N, Guedes Soares C (2018) Wind resource assessment offshore the Atlantic Iberian coast with the WRF model. Energy 145:276–287.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Santos FV, Guasp MR, Henao H, Sánchez MP, Panadero RP (2014a) Diagnosis of rotor and stator asymmetries in wound-rotor induction machines under nonstationary operation through the instantaneous frequency. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 61(9):4947–4959.  https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2013.2288192 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Santos FP, Teixeira A P, Guedes Soares C (2014b) Influence of logistic strategies on the availability and maintenance costs of an offshore wind turbine. In: Safety, Reliability and Risk Analysis: Beyond the Horizon. pp 791–799.  https://doi.org/10.1201/b15938-120
  107. Santos FP, Teixeira AP, Guedes Soares C (2015a) An age-based preventive maintenance for offshore wind turbines. In: Safety and Reliability: Methodology and Applications. Nowakowski et al. (eds). pp 1147–1155.  https://doi.org/10.1201/b17399-161
  108. Santos FP, Teixeira AP, Guedes Soares C (2015b) Modelling and simulation of the operation and maintenance of offshore wind turbines. J Risk Reliab 229(5):385–393.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X15589209 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Santos FP, Teixeira AP, Guedes Soares C (2015c) Review of wind turbine accident and failure data. In: Guedes Soares C (ed) Renewable energies offshore. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 953–959.  https://doi.org/10.1201/b18973-134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Santos FP, Teixeira AP, Guedes Soares C (2016) Operation and maintenance of floating offshore wind turbines. In: Castro-Santos, Diaz-Casas V (eds) Floating offshore wind farms-L. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 181–193.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27972-5_10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Santos FP, Teixeira AP, Guedes Soares C (2018a) Maintenance planning of an offshore wind turbine using stochastic petri nets with predicates. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng 140:021904–021901.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038934 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Santos FP, Teixeira AP, Guedes Soares C (2018b) Modelling, simulation and optimization of maintenance cost aspects on multi-unit systems by stochastic Petri nets with predicates. Simulation: Trans Soc Model Simul Int.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549718782655
  113. Sarker BR, Faiz TI (2016) Minimizing maintenance cost for offshore wind turbines following multi-level opportunistic preventive strategy. Renew Energy 85:104–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.06.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Scheu MN, Matha D, Hofmann M, Muskulus M (2012a) Maintenance strategies for large offshore wind farms. Energy Procedia 24:281–288.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2012.06.110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Scheu MN, Matha D, Muskulus M (2012b) Validation of a Markov-based weather model for simulation of O&M for offshore wind farms. In: The Twenty-second International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. RhodesGoogle Scholar
  116. Schlechtingen M, Santos IF, Achiche S (2013) Wind turbine condition monitoring based on SCADA data using normal behavior models. Part 1: system description. Appl Soft Comput 13(1):259–270.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2012.08.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Schroeder K, Ecke W, Apitz J, Lembke E, Lenschow G (2006) A fibre Bragg grating sensor system monitors operational load in a wind turbine rotor blade. Meas Sci Technol 17(5):1167–1172.  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.623990 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Schulz MJ, Sundaresan MJ (2006) Smart sensor system for structural condition monitoring of wind turbines. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Denver.  https://doi.org/10.2172/891105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Shafiee M (2015) Maintenance logistics organization for offshore wind energy: current progress and future perspectives. Renew Energy 77:182–193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.11.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Shafiee M, Finkelstein M (2015a) An optimal age-based group maintenance policy for multiunit degrading systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 134:230–238.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.09.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Shafiee M, Finkelstein M (2015b) A proactive group maintenance policy for continuously monitored deteriorating systems: application to offshore wind turbines. Proceed Instit Mech Eng, Part O: J Risk Reliab 229(5):373–384.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006x15598915 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Shafiee M, Sørensen JD (2017) Maintenance optimization and inspection planning of wind energy assets: models, methods and strategies. Reliab Eng Syst Saf.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.10.025
  123. Shafiee M, Finkelstein M, Bérenguer C (2015) An opportunistic condition-based maintenance policy for offshore wind turbine blades subjected to degradation and environmental shocks. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 142:463–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Sheng S (2015) Wind turbine gearbox reliability database, condition monitoring, and O&M research update. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), USAGoogle Scholar
  125. Sheu SH, Zhang ZG (2013) An optimal age replacement policy for multi-state systems. IEEE Trans Reliab 62(3):722–735.  https://doi.org/10.1109/tr.2013.2270427 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Shi F, Patton RJ (2014) A robust adaptive approach to wind turbine pitch actuator component fault estimation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 UKACC International Conference on Control. pp 468–473.  https://doi.org/10.1109/CONTROL.2014.6915185
  127. Sinha Y, Steel JA, Andrawus JA, Gibson K (2014) Significance of effective lubrication in mitigating system failures - a wind turbine gearbox case study. Wind Energy 38(4):441–450.  https://doi.org/10.1260/0309-524x.38.4.441 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Sobral J, Ferreira L (2010) Development of a new approach to establish inspection frequency in a RBI assessment. In: European Safety and Reliability Conference. RhodesGoogle Scholar
  129. Sørensen JD (2009) Framework for risk-based planning of operation and maintenance for offshore wind turbines. Wind Energy 12(5):493–506.  https://doi.org/10.1002/we.344 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Sparrevik P (2014) Monitoring offshore wind turbine foundations. Oceanology International, London, pp 1–26.  https://doi.org/10.4043/29041-ms CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Sun L, Lu Y, Zhang X (2016) A review on damage identification and structural health monitoring for offshore platform. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2016 35th International Conference on Ocean. Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Busan, Korea  https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2016-54561
  132. Sundaresan MJ, Schulz MJ, Ghoshal A (2002) Structural health monitoring static test of a wind turbine blade. Technical report, National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Available from: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy02osti/28719.pdf
  133. Tavner PJ, Xiang J, Spinato F (2007) Reliability analysis for wind turbines. Wind Energy 10(1):1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1002/we.204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Tchakoua P, Wamkeue R, Ouhrouche M, Slaoui-Hasnaoui F, Tameghe TA, Ekemb G (2014) Wind turbine condition monitoring: state-of-the-art review, new trends, and future challenges. Energies 7:2595–2630.  https://doi.org/10.3390/en7042595 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Teng W, Ding X, Zhang X, Liu Y, Ma Z (2016) Multi-fault detection and failure analysis of wind turbine gearbox using complex wavelet transform. Renew Energy 93:591–598.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Thons S, McMillan D (2014) Condition monitoring benefit for offshore wind turbines. Reliab Model Anal Smart Power Syst:169–182.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1798-5_11
  137. Tian Z, Jin T, Wu B, Ding F (2011) Condition based maintenance optimization for wind power generation systems under continuous monitoring. Renew Energy 36:1502–1509.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.10.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Uzunoglu E, Karmakar D, Guedes Soares C (2016) Floating offshore wind platforms. In: Castro-Santos L, Diaz-Casas V (eds) Green energy and technology. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 53–76.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27972-5_4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Verbert K, De Schutter B, Babuška R (2017) Timely condition-based maintenance planning for multi-component systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 159:310–321.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Wang KS, Sharma VS, Zhang ZY (2014) SCADA data based condition monitoring of wind turbines. Adv Manuf 2(1):61–69.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20463-5_16 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Welte TM, Wang K (2014) Models for lifetime estimation: an overview with focus on applications to wind turbines. Advances in Manufacturing 2:79–87.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-014-0064-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. WindEurope (2017) Wind in power-2016 European statistics. https://www.windeuropeorg/about-wind/statistics/european/wind-in-power-2016/. February 9
  143. Wu Y, Zhao H (2010) Optimization maintenance of wind turbines using Markov decision processes. In: International Conference on Power System Technology. Hangzhou, China.  https://doi.org/10.1109/powercon.2010.5666092
  144. Wu X, Li Y, Li F, Yang Z, Teng W (2012) Adaptive estimation-based leakage detection for a wind turbine hydraulic pitching system. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 17(5):907–914.  https://doi.org/10.1109/tmech.2011.2142400 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Wymore ML, Van Dam JE, Ceylan H, Qiao D (2015) A survey of health monitoring systems for wind turbines. Renew Sust Energ Rev 52:976–990.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Yang X, Li J, Liu W, Guo P (2011) Petri net model and reliability evaluation for wind turbine hydraulic variable pitch systems. Energies 4(6):978–997.  https://doi.org/10.3390/en4060978 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Yang W, Court R, Jiang J (2013) Wind turbine condition monitoring by the approach of SCADA data analysis. Renew Energy 53(C):365–376.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.11.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Yeter B, Garbatov Y, Guedes Soares C (2015) Fatigue damage assessment of fixed offshore wind turbine tripod support structures. Eng Struct 101:518–528.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.07.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Yeter B, Garbatov Y, Guedes Soares C (2016) Evaluation of fatigue damage model predictions for fixed offshore wind turbine support structures. Int J Fatigue 87:71–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Zhang ZY, Wang KS (2014) Wind turbine fault detection based on SCADA data analysis using ANN. Adv Manuf 2(1):70–78.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-014-0061-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Zhao R, Shen W, Knudsen T, Bak T (2012) Fatigue distribution optimization for offshore wind farms using intelligent agent control. Wind Energy 15(7):927–944.  https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1518 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Zhu Q, Peng H, Timmermans B, Van Houtum GJ (2017) A condition-based maintenance model for a single component in a system with scheduled and unscheduled downs. Int J Prod Econ 193:365–380.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.07.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Harbin Engineering University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Marine Technology and Ocean Engineering (CENTEC), Instituto Superior TécnicoUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentInstituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa (ISEL)LisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations