Journal of Marine Science and Application

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 284–296 | Cite as

Wave and Current Effects on Floating Fish Farms

Keynote Contribution for the International Workshop on Wave Loads and Motions of Ships and Offshore Structures, Harbin, China, 5-7 November, 2017
  • Odd M. Faltinsen
  • Yugao ShenEmail author
Research Article


The paper is partly a review on hydrodynamic and structural aspects of fish farms. In addition, new numerical results are presented on the stochastic behavior of bending stresses in the floater of a realistic net cage in extreme wave conditions. The behavior of traditional-type fish farms with net cages and closed fish farms in waves and currents is discussed. Hydroelasticity can play a significant role for net cages and closed membrane-type fish farms. The many meshes in a net cage make CFD and complete structural modeling impracticable. As an example, a hydrodynamic screen model and structural truss elements are instead used to represent the hydrodynamic loading and the structural deformation of the net. In addition, the wake inside the net due to current plays an important role. The described simplified numerical method has been validated by comparing with model tests of mooring loads on a single net cage with two circular elastic floaters and bottom weight ring in waves and currents. It is discussed which parts of the complete system play the most important roles in accurately determining the mooring loads. Many realizations of a sea state are needed to obtain reliable estimates of extreme values in a stochastic sea. In reality, many net cages operate in close vicinity, which raises questions about spatial variations of the current and wave environment as well as hydrodynamic interaction between the net cages. Live fish touching the netting can have a non-negligible influence on the mooring loads. It is demonstrated by numerical calculations in waves and currents that a well boat at a net cage can have a significant influence on the mooring loads and the bending stresses in the floater. The latter results provide a rational way to obtain operational limits for a well boat at a fish farm. Sloshing has to be accounted for in describing the behavior of a closed fish farm when important wave frequencies are in the vicinity of natural sloshing frequencies. The structural flexibility has to be considered in determining the natural sloshing frequencies for a membrane-type closed fish farm. Free-surface non-linearities can matter for sloshing and can, for instance, result in swirling in a certain frequency domain for a closed cage with a vertical symmetry axis.


Wave Current Aquaculture Net cage Closed fish farm 


  1. Bardestani M, Faltinsen OM (2013) A two-dimensional approximation of a floating fish farm in waves and current with the effect of snap loads, Proc. 32nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, pp.V009T12A020-V009T12A020. Nantes, France.
  2. Dong GH, Xu TJ, Zhao YP, Li YC, Gui FK (2010) Numerical simulation of hydrodynamic behavior of gravity cage in irregular waves. Aquac Eng 42(2):90–101. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Faltinsen OM (1990) Sea loads on ships and offshore structures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 228–238Google Scholar
  4. Faltinsen OM, Timokha AN (2009) Sloshing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 135Google Scholar
  5. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2006) The state of world aquaculture. FAO fisheries technical paper 500, Rome 134 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Field CB, Behrenfeld MJ, Randerson JT, Falkowski P (1998) Primary production of the biosphere: integrating terrestrial and oceanic components. Science 281(5374):237–240. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. He Z, Faltinsen OM, Fredheim A, Kristiansen T (2017) The influence of fish on the mooring loads of a floating net cage. J Fluids Struct 76:384–395. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huang CC, Tang HJ, Liu JY (2006) Dynamical analysis of net cage structures for marine aquaculture: numerical simulation and model testing. Aquac Eng 35(3):258–270. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang CC, Tang HJ, Liu JY (2008) Effects of waves and currents on gravity-type cages in the open sea. Aquac Eng 38(2):105–116. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kristiansen T, Faltinsen OM (2012) Modeling of current loads on aquaculture net cages. J Fluids Struct 34:218–235. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kristiansen D, Faltinsen OM (2009) Nonlinear wave induced motions of cylindrical-shaped floaters of fish farms. P I Mech Eng M-J Eng 223(3):361–375.
  12. Kristiansen T, Faltinsen OM (2014) Experimental and numerical study of an aquaculture net cage with floater in waves and current. J Fluids Struct 54:1–26. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Le Bris F, Marichal D (1998) Numerical and experimental study of submerged supple nets applications to fish farms. J Mar Sci Technol 3:161–170. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li P, Faltinsen OM (2012) Wave-induced vertical response of an elastic circular collar of a floating fish farm, Proc. Tenth International Conference on Hydrodynamics (ICHD 2012), St. Petersburg, Russia. 2, 58–64Google Scholar
  15. Li P, Faltinsen OM, Greco M (2018) Wave-induced accelerations of a fish-farm elastic floater: experimental and numerical studies. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng 140(1):011201. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li P, Faltinsen OM, Lugni C (2016) Nonlinear vertical accelerations of a floating torus in regular waves. J Fluids Struct 66:589–608. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Løland G (1991) Current forces on and flow through fish farms. Dr. Ing. Thesis. Division of Marine Hydrodynamics. The Norwegian Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  18. Marichal D (2003) Cod-end numerical study. In: Third International Conference on Hydroelasticity in Marine Technology, Oxford, UK. 3, 11–18Google Scholar
  19. Naess A, Moan T (2012) Stochastic dynamics of marine structures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge University Press, New York, 176–179Google Scholar
  20. Rognebakke OF, Faltinsen OM (2003) Coupling of sloshing and ship motions. J Ship Res 47(3):208–221Google Scholar
  21. NAS (2009) NS 9415 Marine fish farms—requirements for site survey, risk analysis, design, dimensioning, production, installation and operation. ICS 65. 150;67.260. Standards Norway. Norway. (, 21–22
  22. Newman JN (1962) The exciting forces on fixed bodies in waves. J Ship Res 6(4):10–17Google Scholar
  23. Royon-Lebeaud A, Hopfinger WJ, Cartellier A (2007) Liquid sloshing and wave breaking in circular and square-base cylindrical containers. J Fluid Mech 577:467–494. MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Shainee M, Leira BJ, Ellingsen H, Fredheim A (2014) Investigation of a self-submersible SPM cage system in random waves. Aquac Eng 58:35–44. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shen YG, Greco M, Faltinsen OM (2016) Numerical study of a coupled well boat-fish farm system in waves and current during loading operations, 12 th International Conference on Hydrodynamics, ICHD2016, Egmond aan Zee, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  26. Shen YG, Greco M, Faltinsen OM, Nygaard I (2018) Numerical and experimental investigations on mooring loads of a marine fish farm in waves and current. J Fluids Struct 79:115–136. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Strand IM, Faltinsen OM (2017) Linear sloshing in a 2D rectangular tank with a flexible sidewall. J Fluids Struct 73:70–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Strand IM (2018) Sea loads on closed flexible fish cages. PhD thesis. Department of Mar Technol Norwegian University of Sci Technol, Trondheim, 37–40Google Scholar
  29. Xu TJ, Dong GH, Zhao YP, Li YC, Gui FK (2011) Analysis of hydrodynamic behaviors of gravity net cage in irregular waves. Ocean Eng 38(13):1545–1554. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Xu TJ, Zhao YP, Dong GH, Gui FK (2013a) Analysis of hydrodynamic behavior of a submersible net cage and mooring system in waves and current. Appl Ocean Res 42:155–167. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Xu TJ, Zhao YP, Dong GH, Li YC, Gui FK (2013b) Analysis of hydrodynamic behaviors of multiple net cages in combined wave-current flow. J Fluids Struct 39:222–236. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Harbin Engineering University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Marine TechnologyNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)TrondheimNorway
  2. 2.Center for Autonomous Marine Operations and Systems (AMOS)Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)TrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations