Advertisement

Journal of Marine Science and Application

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 224–232 | Cite as

Structural Design and Performance Analysis of a Deep-Water Ball Joint Seal

  • Yongjun Hou
  • Qian Tang
  • Zhixing Wu
  • Xiaoming Liu
Research Article

Abstract

To overcome the current difficulties of high-precision machining and the high manufacturing and maintenance costs of spherical seals for deep-water drilling ball joints, a new spherical seal technique is proposed in this paper. The spherical seal is mainly composed of silicone rubber and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). Rational structural design makes the seal independent from the ball and other components, making it easy to replace if leakage occurs at its surface. PTFE can elastically deform over a certain deformation range, which guarantees that two sealing surfaces fit tightly together. O-Ring and PTFE elasticity makes up for any lack of accuracy during spherical machining and decreases the machining precision requirements for spherical surfaces. Using a finite element technique and nonlinear theory, the performance of the spherical seal under the influence of various factors is determined. The results show that the spherical seal designed in this paper exhibits excellent sealing performance under low-temperature and high-pressure conditions. The spherical seal, a combination of an O-ring and PTFE, has the advantages of cheap manufacturing and maintenance costs and excellent sealing performance.

Keywords

Deep-water drilling Ball joint Spherical seal Nonlinear theory Finite element technique Sealing performance 

References

  1. Akulichev AG, Alcock B, Echtermeyer AT (2017) Elastic recovery after compression in HNBR at low and moderate temperatures: experiment and modelling. Polym Test 61(2):46–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babuska TF, Pitenis AA, Jones MR, Nation BL, Sawyer WG, Argibay N (2016) Temperature-dependent friction and wear behavior of PTFE and MoS2. Tribol Lett 63(2):15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-016-0702-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Batra RC, Ching HK (2002) Energy release rates in a constrained epoxy disc with Hookean and Mooney–Rivlin materials. Theor Appl Fract Mech 38(2):165–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8442(02)00085-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernard AO, Hawong JS, Shin DC, Dong B (2015) Contact behavior analysis of elastomeric x-ring under uniform squeeze rate and internal pressure before and after forcing-out using the photoelastic experimental hybrid method. J Mech Sci Technol 29(5):2157–2168.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-0436-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borst RD, Crisfield MA, Remmers JJC, Verhoosel CV, 1993. Non-linear finite element analysis of solids and structures. Wiley,31–32,91–96. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118375938.ch2
  6. Cornelius DJ, Monroe CM (2010) The unique properties of silicone and fluorosilicone elastomers. Polym Eng Sci 25(8):467–473.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.760250807 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Feng YL, Zhang WM, Feng FZ (2006) Design and strength analysis of a spherical connector for lifting subsystem in deep sea mining system. China Ocean Eng 20(4):605–613.  https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0890-5487.2006.04.008 Google Scholar
  8. Flitney B (2005) Extending the application of fluorosilicone elastomers. Seal Technol 2005(2):6–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4789(05)00519-2 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fowler JR, Gardner TN (1980) Criterion for allowable lower ball joint angle in floating drilling. J Energy Resour Technol 102(4):242–250.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3227884 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. HANES JWE, 1969. Flexible connectors. United States Patent, 3433504. March 18, 1969Google Scholar
  11. Jahani K, Mahmoodzade H (2014) Predicting the dynamic material constants of Mooney-Rivlin model in broad frequency range for elastomeric components. Lat Am J Solids Struct 11(11):1983–1998.  https://doi.org/10.1590/s1679-78252014001100005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jaunich M, Stark W, Wolff D (2010) A new method to evaluate the low temperature function of rubber sealing materials. Polym Test 29(7):815–823.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Karimi A, Navidbakhsh M (2015) Mechanical properties of PVA material for tissue engineering applications. Mater Technol 29(2):90–100.  https://doi.org/10.1179/1753555713y.0000000115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kozik TJ, Lovell JE, Ertas A (1990) Upper ball joint force variations due to riser tensioner and vessel motions—part I: derivation of general equations. J Energy Resour Technol 112(3):200–207.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2905757 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moog O, 2003. Simple flexible joint for high pressure and high temperature. United States Patent Application Publication, US 2003/0016925 A1. Jan. 30, 2003Google Scholar
  16. Mooney MA (1940) Theory of large elastic deformation. J Appl Phys 11(9):582–592.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1712836 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Moses CJ, Hogan ME, Moses PS, Pottorff TM, Spicer CC, 2008. High temperature flexible pipe joint. United States Patent, US 7341283 B2. Mar. 11, 2008. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(10)60274-9
  18. Povloski Duy B, 2014. Freestanding hybrid riser system including a bottom configuration with a flexible pipe joint and a diverless pipe connector. International Application Published Under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), WO 2014/043126 A2. Mar. 20, 2014Google Scholar
  19. SHI SX, 2006. Universal spherical connector. China Patent, CN 2851787 Y, 2006-12-27. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  20. Song XG, Wang L, ChulPARK Y (2009) Analysis and optimization of nitrile butadiene rubber sealing mechanism of ball valve. Chin J Nonferrous Met 19(s1):220–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tan Q, Yuan JL, Deng JG (2013) Study on the variation of corner and load on bottom ball joint of deep-water drilling riser. Int Conf Machinery 318:547–550.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.318.547 Google Scholar
  22. WAN RN, 2014. Multi-direction spherical sealing rotary joint. China Patent, CN 103672244 A, 2014-03-26. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  23. Wang W, Deng T, Zhao SG, 2004. Determination of material constants in rubber Mooney-Rivlin model, Spec Rubber Products, 25(4):8–10. (in Chinese). DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-4030.2004.04.003
  24. Watkins BJ, Regan AM, Slota WP, 1976. Flexible supportive joint for sub-sea riser flotation means. United States Patent, 3952526. Apr. 27, 1976Google Scholar
  25. Zhang RQ, Zhan YB, 1990. Nonlinear finite element analysis. Chongqing, China, Chongqing University Press, 101–107;190–196. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  26. Zuthem EV, DeBoer M, Walton SA, 2000. Flexible pipe joint and method of installing underwater pipes. United States Patent, 6109662. Aug. 29, 2000Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Harbin Engineering University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yongjun Hou
    • 1
  • Qian Tang
    • 1
  • Zhixing Wu
    • 2
  • Xiaoming Liu
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Mechanical and Electrical EngineeringSouthwest Petroleum UniversityChengduChina
  2. 2.Offshore Oil Engineering Co., Ltd. Special Equipment CompanyTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations