Journal of Marine Science and Application

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 313–322 | Cite as

Experimental investigation on flow and scour characteristics around tandem piers in sandy channel with downward seepage

Article
  • 51 Downloads

Abstract

Experimental investigations have been carried out to study morpho-hydraulic characteristics such as scour geometry and turbulent flow properties around tandem piers in alluvial channels. Experiments were carried out in a plane sand bed with two circular piers of same diameter arranged in tandem manner under no seepage, 10% seepage and 20% seepage conditions. Downward seepage minimizes the scour depth around piers and restrains the development of scour depth with time. Strong reversal flow is found near the bed at upstream of piers and near free surface at downstream of piers where velocity and Reynolds shear stress are found to be negative which reduce in magnitude with downward seepage. The flow is more critical within the gap between two piers where velocity is lesser near free surface and gradually increasing towards bed. Quadrant analysis shows that contribution of each event to the total Reynolds shear stress increases with downward seepage. Sedimentation effect prevails within the scour hole whereas outside the scour hole erosive forces become more dominant. Reduced reversal flow at upstream of pier because of downward seepage results in decreasing higher order moments and turbulent kinetic energy. At downstream of piers, secondary currents are dominant due to wake vortices. Strouhal number decreases in case of seepage runs than no seepage condition.

Keywords

piers experimental investigation downward seepage moments scour Strouhal number tandem arrangement turbulent kinetic energy 

具有向下渗漏特性的沙质渠道中串列桥墩绕流及冲刷特性试验研究

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahmed F, Rajaratnam N, 1998. Flow around bridge piers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 124(3), 288–300. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1998)124:3(288)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ataie-Ashtiani B, Aslani-Kordkandi A, 2013. Flow field around single and tandem piers. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 90(3), 471–490. DOI: 10.1007/s10494-012-9427-7CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Ataie-Ashtiani B, Baratian-Ghorghi Z, Beheshti AA, 2010. Experimental investigation of clear-water local scour of compound piers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 136(6), 343–351. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2010)136:6(343)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ataie-Ashtiani B, Beheshti AA, 2006. Experimental investigation of clear-water local scour at pile groups. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 132(10), 1100–1104. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2006)132:10(1100)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beg M, 2010. Characteristics of developing scour holes around two piers placed in transverse arrangement. Scour and Erosion, ASCE, 76–85. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/41147(392)6#sthash.2PdT77GQ.dpufGoogle Scholar
  6. Chavan R, Sharma A, Kumar B, 2017. Effect of downward seepage on turbulent flow characteristics and bed morphology around bridge piers. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 16(1), 60–72. DOI: 10.1007/s11804-017-1394-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiew YM, Melville BW, 1987. Local scour around bridge piers. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 25(1), 15–26. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221688709499285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deshpande V, Kumar B, 2016. Turbulent flow structures in alluvial channels with curved cross-sections under conditions of downward seepage. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 41(8), 1073–1087. DOI: 10.1002/esp.3889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Devi TB, Kumar B, 2015. Turbulent flow statistics of vegetative channel with seepage. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 123, 267–276. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferraro D, Tafarojnoruz A, Gaudio R, Cardoso AH, 2013. Effects of pile cap thickness on the maximum scour depth at a complex pier. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 139(5), 482–491. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goring DG, Nikora VI, 2002. Despiking acoustic Doppler velocimeter data. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 128(1), 117–126. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2002)128:1(117)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Graf WH, Istiarto I, 2002. Flow pattern in the scour hole around a cylinder. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 40(1), 13–20. DOI: 10.1080/00221680209499869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Igarashi T, 1981. Characteristics of the flow around two circular cylinders arranged in tandem: 1st report. Bulletin of JSME, 24(188), 323–331. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1299/jsme1958.24.323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Izadinia E, Heidarpour M, Schleiss AJ, 2013. Investigation of turbulence flow and sediment entrainment around a bridge pier. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 27(6), 1303–1314. DOI 10.1007/s00477-012-0666-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kinzli KD, Martinez M, Oad R, Prior A, Gensler D, 2010. Using an ADCP to determine canal seepage loss in an irrigation district. Agricultural water management, 97(6), 801–810. DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.12.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lu SS, Willmarth WW, 1973. Measurements of the structure of the Reynolds stress in a turbulent boundary layer. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 60(3), 481–511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112073000315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maity H, Mazumder BS, 2012. Contributions of burst-sweep cycles to Reynolds shear stress over fluvial obstacle marks generated in a laboratory flume. International Journal of Sediment Research, 27(3), 378–387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6279(12)60042-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Martin CA, Gates TK, 2014. Uncertainty of canal seepage losses estimated using flowing water balance with acoustic Doppler devices. Journal of Hydrology, 517, 746–761. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nezu I, Nakagawa H, 1993. Turbulence in open-channel flows. Balkema: Rotterdam, The Netherlands.MATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Palau-Salvador G, Stoesser T, Rodi W, 2008. LES of the flow around two cylinders in tandem. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 24(8), 1304–1312. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2008.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Patel M, Deshpande V, Kumar B, 2015. Turbulent characteristics and evolution of sheet flow in an alluvial channel with downward seepage. Geomorphology, 248, 161–171. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.07.042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Qi M, Chiew YM, Hong JH, 2012. Suction effects on bridge pier scour under clear-water conditions. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 139(6), 621–629. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rao AR, Sreenivasulu G, Kumar B, 2011. Geometry of sand-bed channels with seepage. Geomorphology, 128(3), 171–177. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.01.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Raupach MR, 1981. Conditional statistics of Reynolds stress in rough-wall and smooth-wall turbulent boundary layers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 108, 363–382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112081002164CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Said NM, Mhiri H, Bournot H, Le Palec G, 2008. Experimental and numerical modelling of the three-dimensional incompressible flow behaviour in the near wake of circular cylinders. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 96(5), 471–502. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2007.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Salim M, Jones JS, 1998. Scour around exposed pile foundations. Compilation of Conference Scour Papers (1991-1998), ASCE.Google Scholar
  27. Simpson RL, Chew YT, Shivaprasad BG, 1981. The structure of a separating turbulent boundary layer. Part 2. Higher-order turbulence results. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 113, 53–73.Google Scholar
  28. Sumner D, Wong SST, Price SJ, Paidoussis MP, 1999. Fluid behaviour of side-by-side circular cylinders in steady cross-flow. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 13(3), 309–338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jfls.1999.0205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tafarojnoruz A, Gaudio R, Calomino F, 2012a. Bridge pier scour mitigation under steady and unsteady flow conditions. Acta Geophysica, 60(4), 1076–1097. DOI: 10.2478/S11600-012-0040-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tafarojnoruz A, Gaudio R, Calomino F, 2012b. Effects of a slotted bridge pier on the approach flow. Proc. XXXIII Convegno Nazionale Di Idraulica E Construzioni Idrauliche IDRA 2012, Brescia, Italy, 1–10.Google Scholar
  31. Tanji KK, Kielen NC, 2002. Agricultural drainage water management in arid and semi-arid areas. FAO.Google Scholar
  32. Zhao Y, Zong Z, Zou L, Wang TL, 2015. Turbulence model investigations on the boundary layer flow with adverse pressure gradients. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 14(2), 170–174. DOI: 10.1007/S11804-015-1303-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhuang Y, Liu ZY, 2007. Experimental study on the width of the turbulent area around bridge pier. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 6(1), 53–57. DOI: 10.1007/S11804-007-6048-YCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Harbin Engineering University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of TechnologyGuwahatiIndia

Personalised recommendations