Advertisement

Journal of Marine Science and Application

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 28–32 | Cite as

Ship resistance of quadramaran with various hull position configurations

  • Yanuar
  • Gunawan
  • A. Muhyi
  • A. Jamaluddin
Article

Abstract

Multihull ships are widely used for sea transportation, and those with four hulls are known as quadramarans. Hull position configurations of a quadramaran include the diamond, tetra, and slice. In general, multihull vessels traveling at high speeds have better hydrodynamic efficiency than monohull ships. This study aims to identify possible effects of various quadramaran hull position configurations on ship resistance for hull dimensions of 2 m length, 0.21 m breadth, and 0.045 m thickness. We conducted a towing test in which we varied the hull spacing and speed at Fr values between 0.08 and 0.62 and measured the total resistance using a load cell transducer. The experimental results reveal that the lowest total resistance was achieved with a diamond quadramaran configuration at Fr = 0.1-0.6 and an effective interference factor of up to 0.35 with S/L = 3/10 and R/L = 1/2 at Fr = 0.62.

Keywords

multihull quadramaran ship resistance interference factor hull position configurations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hafez K, El-Kot AR, 2011. Comparative analysis of the separation variation influence on the hydrodynamic performance of a high speed trimaran. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 10, 377–393. DOI: 10.1007/s11804-011-1083-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Insel M, Molland AF, 1992. An investigation into the resistance components of high speed displacement catamarans. Trans RINA, 134, 1–20.Google Scholar
  3. Lindstorm J, Sirvio J, Yli-Rntala A, 1995. Super slender monohull with side hulls.Google Scholar
  4. FAST 1995 Conf., Lubeck-Travemunde, Germany, 295–308.Google Scholar
  5. Smith RP, Jones JB, 2001. Design, construction and trials of the trident trimaran test craft. Jahrbuch Schiffbau Technische Gesellschaft, Berlin, 355–362.Google Scholar
  6. Molland AF, Wellicome JF, Couser PR, 1996. Resistance experiments on a systematic series of high speed catamaran form: Variation of length-displacement ratio and breadth-draught ratio. Trans RINA, 138, 55–71.Google Scholar
  7. Mynard T, Sahoo PK, Mikkelsen J, McGreer D, 2008. Numerical and experimental study of wave resistance for trimaran hull forms. The 6th International Conference on High-Performance Marine Vehicles, Naples, Italy, 117–127.Google Scholar
  8. Peng HX, 2001. Numerical computation of multi-hull ship resistance and motion. Dalhousie University, Canada.Google Scholar
  9. Recommended Procedure and Guidelines, 2002. Testing and extrapolation methods in resistance towing tank test, ITTC 7.5-02-02-02.Google Scholar
  10. Seif MS, Amini E, 2004. Performance comparison between planing monohull and trimaran at high froude numbers. Iranian Journal of Science & Technology, Transaction B, 28(B4), 435–441. DOI: 10.1.1.552.4761Google Scholar
  11. Tuck EO, Lazauskas L, 1998. Optimum spacing of a family of multihull. Ship Technology Research, 45, 180–195.Google Scholar
  12. Xu H, Zou Z, 2001. Numerical prediction of wave-making resistance of a trimaran. Proc. 2nd Int. Workshop on Ship Hydrodynamic (IWSH’01), Wuhan, China, 105–109.Google Scholar
  13. Yeung RW, 2005. interference resistance of multihull per thin ship theory. International Workshop on Water Waves & Floating Bodies, Longyearbyen, Spitsbergen, 1–4.Google Scholar
  14. Yanuar, Gunawan, Talahatu MA, Indrawati RT, Jamaluddin A, 2013. Resistance analysis of unsymmetrical trimaran model with outboard side-hulls configuration. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 12(3), 293–297. DOI: 10.1007/s11804-013-1193-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Yanuar, Gunawan, Kurniawan T, Waskito T, Jamaluddin A, 2015. Experimental study resistance of asymmetrical pentamaran model with separation and staggered hull variation of inner sidehulls. International Journal of Fluid Mechanics Research, 42(1), 82–94. DOI: 10.1615/InterJFluidMechRes.v42.i1.60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Harbin Engineering University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of IndonesiaJakartaIndonesia
  2. 2.Indonesian Hydrodynamic LaboratorySurabayaIndonesia

Personalised recommendations